Empfehlungen zur Organisation von Herzinfarktnetzwerken

[Certification in cardiology : Contra: The concept should be improved]

Increasing complexity and new highly differentiated therapeutic procedures in cardiology result in a need for additional training beyond cardiology board certification. The German Cardiac Society therefore developed a variety of certifications of educational curricula and definition of specialized centers. Standardization and structuring in education and patient treatment, as defined by certifications may be helpful; however, introduction of certification can have serious consequences for hospital structure, the side effects of which may impair quality of treatment for individual patients. The current article discusses these issues against the background of the following questions: how is quality defined? How do certifications interfere with patient care on a nationwide level, how do they influence responsibilities and teamwork? Are there conflicts of interests by designing certifications and how good are the organizational structures? Finally, suggestions are made on what has to be considered when designing certifications. Certifications should acknowledge all cardiologists, irrespective of their position in the level of care. There should be a coherent unified concept synchronizing all certifications and administration needs to be transparent and well structured.

[Emergency Medicine : What do we need?]

The timely medical treatment of the population in emergency situations is an enormous challenge for the healthcare system and is becoming increasingly more important. Due to this development clinical acute and emergency medicine has undergone enormous progress and is in the process of further professionalization. Various specialist societies and medical associations have published essential position papers in recent years and demanded fundamentally new healthcare structures and assignments. Additionally, emergency medical healthcare structures and centers have already been established on the initiative of individual emergency medical specialist disciplines. The future challenge is the nationwide establishment, grouping and integration of the structures and processes within definitive healthcare centers. The main objective of all involved must be the optimal care of emergency patients.

Lipidological competence centres and networks: Future perspectives to improve healthcare of patients with disorders of lipid metabolism

BACKGROUND

Numerous healthcare studies have shown that more than 90% of all patients with dyslipidaemia are not treated adequately.

OBJECTIVES

The "Deutsche Gesellschaft zur Bekämpfung von Fettstoffwechselstörungen und ihren Folgeerkrankungen (DGFF)" [German Society of Lipidology], a non-profit professional membership organization, has already made a series of efforts to improve the care of patients suffering from dyslipidaemia. A recent outcome is the nationwide implementation and certification of Lipidological Competence Centres and Networks (LCCNs).

METHODS AND RESULTS

By involving numerous external medical cooperation partners and combining the detailed work of different in-house medical specialists, the Medical Care Centre Kempten-Allgäu was able to improve both the diagnosis and treatment of patients exhibiting disorders of lipid metabolism (DLM). This local lipidological network is so successful, that it may serve as a nationwide standard model for outpatient lipidological care. Detailed organizational structures for improved lipidological care which are suitable to provide a template for future guidelines for the certification of LCCNs have been developed by the Medical Care Centre Kempten-Allgäu. Stringent requirements of implementation with respect to medical staff, content and structure, staff training, patient education and public relations as well as to documentation, quality assurance and quality improvement must be fulfilled both by the lipidological competence centre (LCC) and the cooperation partners within the lipidological network (LN). Finally, members of the health care system (e.g. health policy and health insurances) should be involved in this attempt and convinced of financial support.

CONCLUSION

The implementation and certification of national LCCNs supported by DGFF could contribute to a comprehensive improvement in the care of patients with dyslipidaemia, resulting in prevention of cardiovascular diseases and reduction of cardiovascular sequelae.