Prognostic factors in patients aged 50 years or older undergoing allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation for hematologic malignancy

Cardiovascular events among recipients of hematopoietic stem cell transplantation-A systematic review and meta-analysis

Cardiovascular diseases are an emerging cause of mortality and morbidity in survivors of hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT); however, the incidence of cardiovascular events (CVEs) in this population is not well described. This systematic review summarizes the evidence on the incidence of CVEs in HSCT recipients. Medline and Embase were searched from inception to December 2020. Inclusion criteria were cohort studies and phase 3 randomized controlled trials that reported CVEs among adults who underwent HSCT for hematological malignancies. After reviewing 8386 citations, 57 studies were included. The incidence of CVEs at 100 days was 0.19 (95% CI: 0.17-0.21) per 100 person-days after autologous HSCT and 0.06 (95% CI: 0.05-0.07) per 100 person-days after allogeneic HSCT. This higher incidence after autologous HSCT was driven by reports of arrhythmia from one population-based study in patients with multiple myeloma. The incidence of long-term CVEs was 3.98 (95% CI; 3.44-4.63) per 1000 person-years in survivors of autologous HSCT and 3.06 (95% CI; 2.69-3.48) per 1000 person-years in survivors of allogeneic HSCT. CVEs remain an important but under-reported cause of morbidity and mortality in recipients of HSCT. Future studies are required to better understand the incidence and risk factors for CVEs in HSCT recipients.

Hematopoietic Cell Transplant (HCT) in the Elderly: Myths, Controversies and Unknowns

The incidence of most hematological malignancies increases with age. Despite the higher incidence of hematological malignancies in the elderly, the geriatric population is poorly represented in the early oncology clinical trials that established the current standards of care. Hematopoietic cell transplant (HCT), either upfront or at relapse, provides a potentially life-prolonging, often curative option for many patients with hematological malignancies and is considered the standard of care, at least for younger patients. Historically, the concern that older adults undergoing HCT may experience higher morbidity and transplant-related complications has limited the use of this potentially curative option to younger adults, particularly in allogeneic (allo-) HCT. There is growing evidence to support the feasibility, tolerability, and relatively similar effectiveness of both autologous and allo-HCT in the geriatric population. In the allo-HCT setting, nonmyeloablative/reduced-intensity conditioning (NMA/RIC) has expanded the spectrum of patients that can be considered for this approach. Overall survival is largely affected by disease stage, performance status, and comorbidities rather than by chronological age per se. Comprehensive geriatric assessment (CGA) is a promising tool that can uncover frequently undocumented vulnerabilities in an elderly transplant-eligible patient. Serial study of CGA throughout the peri-HCT period may help predict the short- and long-term impact of HCT on an older adult's functional status and quality of life. Further research is needed to evaluate whether early intervention to improve such vulnerabilities can improve survival and quality of life of these older patients.

Mitigating Fear and Loathing in Managing Acute Myeloid Leukemia

The contemporary care of patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) is made complex by potentially toxic treatments, continuously advancing science, aging patients, and individual treatment goals. By taking a survey of present-day approaches, we aim to dispel some of the trepidation surrounding that care of patients with AML. At the beginning is the initial presentation, and we will discuss whether or not AML should be considered a medical emergency. We will explore the complex realm of patient decision-making about initial therapy, including the intricate straits of patient-doctor communication, and available options for initial treatment. We will then address post-remission approaches and the controversies that lie therein, and survivorship issues. Finally, we will investigate the current role molecular assessments are playing in therapy recommendations.

Hematopoietic stem cell transplantation for hematologic malignancies in older adults: geriatric principles in the transplant clinic

Hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) provides a life-prolonging or potentially curative treatment option for patients with hematologic malignancies. Given the high transplant-related morbidity, these treatment strategies were initially restricted to younger patients, but are increasingly being used in older adults. The incidence of most hematologic malignancies increases with age; with the aging of the population, the number of potential older candidates for HCT increases. Autologous HCT (auto-HCT) in older patients may confer a slightly increased risk of specific toxicities (such as cardiac toxicities and mucositis) and have modestly lower effectiveness (in the case of lymphoma). However, auto-HCT remains a feasible, safe, and effective therapy for selected older adults with multiple myeloma and lymphoma. Similarly, allogeneic transplant (allo-HCT) is a potential therapeutic option for selected older adults, although fewer data exist on allo-HCT in older patients. Based on currently available data, age alone is not the best predictor of toxicity and outcomes; rather, the comorbidities and functional status of the older patient are likely better predictors of toxicity than chronologic age in both the autologous and allogeneic setting. A comprehensive geriatric assessment (CGA) in older adults being considered for either an auto-HCT or allo-HCT may identify additional problems or geriatric syndromes, which may not be detected during the standard pretransplant evaluation. Further research is needed to establish the utility of CGA in predicting toxicity and to evaluate the quality of survival in older adults undergoing HCT.

Comparison of reduced-intensity and myeloablative conditioning regimens for allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation in patients with acute myeloid leukemia and acute lymphoblastic leukemia: a meta-analysis

Currently, the indications to perform reduced-intensity conditioning allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplant (RIC-HCT) are based on data derived mainly from large registry and single-centre retrospective studies. Thus, at the present time, there is limited direct evidence supporting the current practice in selecting patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) and acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) for RIC versus myeloablative conditioning (MAC) transplants. To determine the relationship between dose intensity of conditioning regimen and survival outcomes after allografting in AML/ALL patients, we performed a meta-analysis of 23 clinical trials reported between 1990 and 2013 involving 15,258 adult patients that compare survival outcomes after RIC-HCT versus MAC-HCT. RIC-HCT resulted in comparable <2-year and 2-6 year overall survival (OS) rates post-transplantation even though the RIC-HCT recipients were older and had more active disease than MAC-HCT recipients. The 2-6 year progression-free survival (PFS), nonrelapse mortality, acute graft-versus-host disease (GvHD) and chronic GvHD rates were reduced after RIC-HCT, but relapse rate was increased. Similar outcomes were observed regardless of disease type and status at transplantation. Odds ratio for all outcomes remained comparable with or without performing separate analyses for the year of HCT and for retrospective versus prospective studies. Among RIC-HCT recipients, survival rates were superior if patients were in CR at transplantation. Significant inter-study heterogeneity for aGvHD data and publication bias for PFS data were observed. This meta-analysis showed no OS benefit of MAC-HCT over RIC-HCT across the entire cohort of patients suggesting that RIC-HCT could be an effective therapeutic option for AML/ALL patients who are ineligible for MAC-HCT and CR status is preferred before RIC-HCT.

Hematopoietic cell transplantation comorbidity index (HCT-CI) is predictive of adverse events and overall survival in older allogeneic transplant recipients

OBJECTIVES

Our goal was to evaluate the ability of the hematopoietic cell transplantation comorbidity index (HCT-CI) to predict outcomes after allogeneic stem cell transplant (SCT) within the context of an older patient population, where multiple comorbidities are common.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We performed a retrospective cohort study of SCT patients ≥50years of age at our institution, identifying 59 patients with complete HCT-CI data collected prospectively.

RESULTS

HCT-CI category distribution in our sample was disproportionate, with almost half of patients having scores ≥3. High HCT-CI score (≥3 vs <3) was associated with significantly inferior OS (median OS not reached for HCT-CI <3 vs 14months for HCT-CI ≥3; hazard ratio (HR) 2.2, p=0.02). HCT-CI score was a better predictor of OS than age, performance status or conditioning intensity. When adjusted for disease relapse risk, HCT-CI score conferred a worse prognosis in the low risk group (HR 1.43, p=0.03) but not in the intermediate/high risk group (HR 1.08, p=0.65). NRM was low in the total sample (6% at one year) and was not associated with HCT-CI score. Grade 3-4 non-hematologic adverse events within the first 100days after SCT were significantly more common in the higher HCT-CI groups (p=0.02).

CONCLUSIONS

In our older patient cohort with a high incidence of multiple comorbidities, HCT-CI score ≥3 was significantly associated with OS, particularly in the subset of patients with a low disease relapse risk.