Efficacy of stem cell mobilization in patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma after a CTD (cyclophosphamide, thalidomide, and dexamethasone) regimen

Prolonged infusion time of cyclophosphamide plus granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) as a mobilization regimen may improve mobilization efficiency in newly diagnosed multiple myeloma patients: a single center experience

OBJECTIVES

This study aimed to clarify the effectiveness and safety of two different infusion durations of cyclophosphamide (CTX) plus granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) for peripheral blood stem cell mobilization in patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (NDMM).

METHODS

One hundred and fifty-six consecutive NDMM patients receiving CTX plus G-CSF mobilization and autologous stem cell transplantation during the period of September 2008 to May 2020 were selected for retrospective analysis. According to differences in prolonged infusion time of CTX, they were divided into a 24-h group (24-h continuous infusion) and a control group (4-6 h of infusion). Mobilization and safety of infusion were analyzed. Flow cytometry was used to detect the peripheral blood CD34+ cell count. Multivariate analysis was performed to determine the factors influencing the number of CD34+ cells.

RESULTS

The mean CD34+ cell counts collected in 24-h and control groups were 6.78 (interquartile range [IQR] 3.59-11.69) and 4.48 (IQR 2.39-6.30) ×106/kg, respectively (p < 0.001). Meanwhile, the target number of CD34+ cells/kg (defined as ≥4 × 106/kg) was collected from 51 (75%) of cases in 24-h group vs. 45 (51%) in the control group (p = 0.002). Multivariate analysis identified the independence of CTX infusion time as a factor influencing the target number of CD34+ cells/kg [odds ratio OR, 4.045; 95% CI: 1.630-10.038, p = 0.003]. The post-transplantation time to neutrophil engraftment was 10 (IQR 9-11) in 24-h group and 11 (IQR 10-12) in control group (p < 0.001). Finally, no statistical differences were identified between groups in terms of hematologic and non-hematologic toxicities.

CONCLUSIONS

For patients with NDMM, 24-h continuous infusion of CTX plus G-CSF contributes to improved mobilization efficiency and equivalent toxicity as a stem cell mobilization regimen.

Comparison of the efficiency, safety, and survival outcomes in two stem cell mobilization regimens with cyclophosphamide plus G-CSF or G-CSF alone in multiple myeloma: a meta-analysis

Autologous stem cell transplantation as a frontline treatment for patients with multiple myeloma (MM) requires an adequate peripheral blood stem cell (PBSC) collection before processing. Granulocyte-colony stimulating factor (G-CSF) with or without cyclophosphamide (CTX) is a common regimen for PBSC mobilization; their benefits and risks are controversial. To compare the efficiency, safety, and survival outcomes between the two regimens, we conducted a meta-analysis including 18 studies with 4 prospective and 14 retrospective studies; a total of 2770 patients with MM were analyzed. The CTX plus G-CSF regimen had higher yields of total CD34⁺ cells (SMD = 0.39, 95% CI (0.30, 0.49)), and higher mobilization rates of the target ⩾ 2 × 10⁶/kg (OR = 3.34, 95% CI (1.82, 6.11)) and 4 × 10⁶/kg (OR = 2.16, 95% CI (1.69, 2.76)) cells. A favorable event-free survival (EFS) (HR = 0.73, 95% CI (0.58, 0.93), p = 0.01) and better 3-year EFS rate (OR = 1.65, 95% CI (1.1, 2.47), p = 0.02) were also reached in the patients with CTX plus G-CSF mobilization, although the risks of admission (OR = 26.49, 95% CI (7.31, 95.97)) and fever (OR = 13.66, 95% CI (6.21, 30.03)) during mobilization were increased, the treatment-related mortality was consistent (p = 0.26). The CTX plus G-CSF regimen was superior to the G-CSF-alone regimen for PBSC mobilization in patients with MM.

Optimal chemo-mobilization for the collection of peripheral blood stem cells in patients with multiple myeloma

BACKGROUND

For successful autologous stem cell transplantation, the collection of a sufficient number of hematopoietic stem cells after induction therapy is essential for transplant candidates with multiple myeloma (MM).

METHODS

In this study, we compared the efficacy and safety of stem cell mobilization using cyclophosphamide (CY; 3.0 g/m² on day 1) or etoposide (VP-16; 375 mg/m² on days 1 and 2) in patients with MM. Granulocyte-colony stimulating factor (G-CSF, 10 μg/kg/day, subcutaneously) was administered from the onset of neutropenia to the final day of collection.

RESULTS

Sixty-five patients were mobilized with a combination of CY and G-CSF, and 63 were mobilized with a combination of VP-16 and G-CSF. All patients were mobilized within 7 months of beginning frontline treatment. The median number of CD34⁺ cells collected was significantly higher in the VP-16 mobilization group than in the CY mobilization group (27.6 ×  10⁶ CD34⁺/kg vs. 9.6 × 10⁶ CD34⁺/kg, P <  0.001). The rate of mobilization failure, defined as < 2.0 × 10⁶ CD34⁺/kg collected in three apheresis procedures, was lower in the VP-16 group than in the CY group (1.6% vs. 10.8%, P = 0.062). Severe infections during the mobilization period were more frequent in the CY group than in the VP-16 group (18.5% vs. 7.9%, P = 0.117).

CONCLUSION

In conclusion, an intermediate dose of VP-16 with G-CSF appears to be an effective and tolerable chemo-mobilization method compared to CY and G-CSF, particularly in cases where use plerixafor in MM is difficult.

Efficacy and toxicity of the combination chemotherapy of thalidomide, alkylating agent, and steroid for relapsed/refractory myeloma patients: a report from the Korean Multiple Myeloma Working Party (KMMWP) retrospective study

We analyzed the treatment responses, toxicities, and survival outcomes of patients with relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma who received daily thalidomide, cyclophosphamide, and dexamethasone (CTD) or daily thalidomide, melphalan, and prednisolone (MTP) at 17 medical centers in Korea. Three‐hundred and seventy‐six patients were enrolled. The combined chemotherapy of thalidomide, corticosteroid, and an alkylating agent (TAS) was second‐line chemotherapy in 142 (37.8%) patients, and third‐line chemotherapy in 135 (35.9%) patients. The response rate overall was 69.4%. Patients who were not treated with bortezomib and lenalidomide before TAS showed a higher response rate compared to those who were exposed to these agents. The estimated median progression‐free survival and overall survival times were 10.4 months and 28.0 months, respectively. The adverse events during TAS were generally tolerable, but 39 (10.4%) patients experienced severe infectious complications. There were no differences in terms of efficacy between CTD and MTP, but infectious complications were more common in CTD group. TAS is an effective treatment regimen which induces a high response rate in relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma patients. Due to the high incidence of grade 3 or 4 infection, proper management of infection is necessary during the TAS treatment, especially the CTD.

Hematopoietic stem and progenitor cell harvesting: technical advances and clinical utility

Hematopoietic stem and progenitor cell (HSPC) transplantations require prior harvesting of allogeneic or autologous HSPCs. HSPCs are usually present in bone marrow (BM) during the entire life, in cord blood (CB) at birth, or in peripheral blood (PB) under particular circumstances. HSPCs were first harvested in BM and later in CB and PB, as studies showed interesting features of such grafts. All harvesting methods were in use throughout the years, except BM harvesting for HSPC autologous transplantation, which was replaced by PB harvesting. BM, CB, and PB harvesting methods have been developed, and materials and devices technically improved to increase the number of HSPCs harvested. In parallel, knowing the features of the donors or patients associated with successful numbers of HSPCs allows the adaptation of appropriate harvesting methods. Moreover, it is important to ensure the safety of donors or patients while harvesting. This review describes the methods used for harvesting based on recent studies or developments around these methods, and more particularly, the means developed to increase the numbers of HSPCs harvested in each method. It also explains briefly the influence of technical improvements in HSPC harvesting on potential changes in HSPC graft composition.

Thalidomide, cyclophosphamide and dexamethasone induction therapy: feasibility for myeloma patients destined for autologous stem cell transplantation

This study explored the effect of thalidomide and cyclophosphamide on stem cell collection, in addition to assessing their efficacy as induction therapy for myeloma patients destined for autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT). We analyzed newly diagnosed myeloma patients who received TCD (thalidomide 100 mg/day for 28 days, oral cyclophosphamide 150 mg/m 2 /day and dexamethasone 40 mg/day on days 1–4) as induction therapy prior to ASCT. Peripheral stem cells were mobilized with granulocyte colony-stimulating factor and cyclophosphamide. Thirty-six patients (median age 54 years) received TCD chemotherapy (median 4 cycles). The overall response rate to TCD was 77.8% (28/36). The median number of CD34+ cells was 6.5 × 10 6 /kg, and 2 patients failed to achieve the optimal number of CD34+ cells, i.e. 4.0 × 10 6 /kg, although they were able to attain >2.0 × 10 6 /kg. The overall response rate increased up to 94.4% (34/36) after ASCT; this included 9 patients with a stringent complete response without transplantation-related mortality. Four patients died due to disease progression and 17 were found to have progressed after ASCT (the median progression-free survival after ASCT was 19.6 months). TCD chemotherapy can be an effective and feasible induction regimen prior to ASCT for myeloma patients.

Early response-based intensification of primary therapy in newly diagnosed multiple myeloma patients who are eligible for autologous stem cell transplantation: phase II study

This phase II study prospectively evaluated the efficacy and tolerability of an early change in induction therapy before autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) in multiple myeloma (MM) patients who failed to achieve more than a partial response (PR) after two cycles of a cyclophosphamide, thalidomide, and dexamethasone (CTD) regimen. Patients aged 18-65 years received two cycles of CTD therapy, and then the patients who achieved more than a PR received two additional cycles of CTD therapy, while those who failed to achieve more than a PR were given intensified therapy with four cycles of a Vel-CD regimen (bortezomib, cyclophosphamide, and dexamethasone). After completing primary chemotherapy, the patients underwent ASCT. This study initially enrolled 64 patients, although four were excluded. Of the patients, 60 were treated with CTD regimen and 8 patients also had the intensified Vel-CD regimen, of whom five showing improved responses. The overall response rate before ASCT in 59 patients was 94.9 %, including 27.1 % with a stringent complete response/complete response, 23.7 % with a very good partial response (VGPR), and 44.1 % with a PR. The median time to progression (TTP) was 33.2 months (95 % CI, 26.6-34.8). Patients who attained a VGPR or better after ASCT tended to have a longer TTP than the patients who did not (not reached vs. 24.2 months, P = 0.04). In conclusion, early response-adapted intensification with a Vel-CD regimen was a well-tolerated, effective strategy for improving the response before ASCT in patients with newly diagnosed MM.