Open-label, dose-titration and continuation study to assess efficacy, safety, and pharmacokinetics of anagrelide in treatment-naïve Japanese patients with essential thrombocythemia

Anagrelide-associated Cardiomyopathy and Heart Failure in a Patient with Essential Thrombocythemia: A Case Report and Literature Review

Anagrelide is used worldwide to treat essential thrombocythemia (ET) by reducing platelet counts. Cardiomyopathy and heart failure (HF) are rare but serious complications associated with anagrelide use, although no cases were reported during Japanese Phase I to III studies. A 46-year-old, otherwise healthy, Japanese ET patient developed HF with reduced ejection fraction after 18 months of treatment with 1.0-3.5 mg of anagrelide daily. HF was stabilized with anagrelide withdrawal and guideline-directed HF therapy. The cardiac function returned to normal after six months. This case suggests that anagrelide can cause cardiomyopathy and HF in ET patients, regardless of nationality, comorbid cardiovascular conditions, or therapy duration.

Structure of PDE3A-SLFN12 complex and structure-based design for a potent apoptosis inducer of tumor cells

Molecular glues are a class of small molecular drugs that mediate protein-protein interactions, that induce either the degradation or stabilization of target protein. A structurally diverse group of chemicals, including 17-β-estradiol (E2), anagrelide, nauclefine, and DNMDP, induces apoptosis by forming complexes with phosphodiesterase 3A (PDE3A) and Schlafen 12 protein (SLFN12). They do so by binding to the PDE3A enzymatic pocket that allows the compound-bound PDE3A to recruit and stabilize SLFN12, which in turn blocks protein translation, leading to apoptosis. In this work, we report the high-resolution cryo-electron microscopy structure of PDE3A-SLFN12 complexes isolated from cultured HeLa cells pre-treated with either anagrelide, or nauclefine, or DNMDP. The PDE3A-SLFN12 complexes exhibit a butterfly-like shape, forming a heterotetramer with these small molecules, which are packed in a shallow pocket in the catalytic domain of PDE3A. The resulting small molecule-modified interface binds to the short helix (E552-I558) of SLFN12 through hydrophobic interactions, thus "gluing" the two proteins together. Based on the complex structure, we designed and synthesized analogs of anagrelide, a known drug used for the treatment of thrombocytosis, to enhance their interactions with SLFN12, and achieved superior efficacy in inducing apoptosis in cultured cells as well as in tumor xenografts.

Comparison of starting doses of anagrelide as a first-line therapy in patients with cytoreductive therapy-naïve essential thrombocythemia: difference between starting at 0.5 and 1.0 mg/day

Anagrelide is widely used for cytoreductive therapy in patients with essential thrombocythemia who are at high risk for thrombosis. The recommended starting dose in the package insert of anagrelide varies by country. A high starting dose leads to an early onset of action, but causes a higher incidence of adverse events. This relationship indicates that both the onset of action and side effects of anagrelide are dose dependent. We retrospectively compared the efficacy and safety of anagrelide as a first-line drug between patients with essential thrombocythemia who started at 0.5 or 1.0 mg/day. Incidence of total adverse events and anagrelide-related palpitation, discontinuation rates, and the median daily dose of anagrelide were lower in the 0.5 mg/day group than in the 1.0 mg/day group; however, comparable platelet-lowering effects were achieved in both groups. These data suggest that a low starting dose of anagrelide followed by dose escalation may result in fewer adverse events and lower discontinuation rates, while providing desirable platelet-lowering effects. Initiating anagrelide at a lower dose may be a useful approach in actual clinical practice.

Efficacy and safety of anagrelide as a first-line drug in cytoreductive treatment-naïve essential thrombocythemia patients in a real-world setting

Objective

This study aimed to retrospectively assess the efficacy and safety of anagrelide in cytoreduction therapy‐naïve essential thrombocythemia (ET) patients in a real‐world setting.

Method

Data from 53 ET patients who received anagrelide as a first‐line therapy were reviewed for patient characteristics, antiplatelet status, cytoreduction status, therapeutic effects, adverse events, thrombohemorrhagic event development, progression to myelofibrosis or acute leukemia, and cause of death.

Results

The rate of achieving a platelet count of <600 × 10⁹/L during anagrelide monotherapy was 83.0%. Adverse events occurred in 32 of 53 patients, and tended to be slightly more severe in patients with cardiac failure; however, they were mostly tolerable. The therapeutic effect of anagrelide was consistent, regardless of genetic mutation profiles. The incidence of anemia as an adverse event was significantly higher in the CALR mutation‐positive group. Favorable platelet counts were also achieved in patients for whom hydroxyurea was introduced as a replacement for anagrelide or in addition to anagrelide because of unresponsiveness or intolerance to treatment.

Conclusion

In Japanese cytoreduction therapy‐naïve ET patients, anagrelide administration as a first‐line therapy demonstrated favorable effects in reducing platelet counts, and its safety profile that was generally consistent with those in previous reports.

A phase III randomized, multicentre, double blind, active controlled trial to compare the efficacy and safety of two different anagrelide formulations in patients with essential thrombocythaemia - the TEAM-ET 2·0 trial

Anagrelide is an established treatment option for essential thrombocythaemia (ET). A prolonged release formulation was developed with the aim of reducing dosing frequency and improving tolerability, without diminishing efficacy. This multicentre, randomized, double blind, active‐controlled, non‐inferiority trial investigated the efficacy, safety and tolerability of anagrelide prolonged release (A‐PR) over a reference product in high‐risk ET patients, either anagrelide‐naïve or ‐experienced. In a 6 to 12‐week titration period the individual dose for the consecutive 4‐week maintenance period was identified. The primary endpoint was the mean platelet count during the maintenance period (3 consecutive measurements, day 0, 14, 28). Of 112 included patients 106 were randomized. The mean screening platelet counts were 822 × 10⁹/l (95% confidence interval (CI) 707–936 × 10⁹/l) and 797 × 10⁹/l (95% CI 708–883 × 10⁹/l) for A‐PR and the reference product, respectively. Both treatments effectively reduced platelet counts, to mean 281 × 10⁹/l for A‐PR (95% CI 254–311) and 305 × 10⁹/l (95% CI 276–337) for the reference product (P < 0·0001, for non‐inferiority). Safety and tolerability were comparable between both drugs. The novel prolonged‐release formulation was equally effective and well tolerated compared to the reference product. A‐PR provides a more convenient dosing schedule and will offer an alternative to licensed immediate‐release anagrelide formulations.

Pharmacokinetics of a Novel Anagrelide Extended-Release Formulation in Healthy Subjects: Food Intake and Comparison With a Reference Product

Anagrelide is an established therapy for essential thrombocythemia. Common adverse effects have been linked to peak plasma concentrations of anagrelide and its 3OH metabolite. Our study was performed to investigate the pharmacokinetics (PK) of a novel anagrelide extended-release (AER) formulation and its active metabolites. Thirty healthy volunteers were randomized to receive either 2 mg AER (under fasting and fed conditions) or 2 mg commercially available reference product (CARP) in an open-label, 3-way crossover trial with washout periods of 6 days. Plasma concentrations of anagrelide and its active metabolites were assessed by tandem mass spectrometry. The PK differed significantly between all treatment periods. Bioavailability of AER was 55% of the CARP under fasting conditions and 60% under fed conditions. Cmax , AUCt, and AUC∞ were significantly higher and Tmax and T1/2 were significantly shorter after the CARP compared with AER. Food had a significant impact on the PK of AER, increasing the Cmax and AUCt while reducing the T1/2 , plateau, and mean residence time. Both formulations were well tolerated, with a trend toward more frequently occurring adverse events after the CARP. The PK of AER and the CARP differed significantly in all parameters. Food enhanced the bioavailability of AER.

Management of side effects of BCR/ABL-negative chronic myeloproliferative neoplasm therapies. Focus on anagrelide

Although hydroxyurea is considered the first-line cytoreductive therapy in high-risk patients with polycythemia vera or essential thrombocythemia, approximately 20-25% of patients develop resistance or intolerance and they need an alternative therapy. Anagrelide is the treatment of choice in patients with essential thrombocythemia intolerant or with resistance to hydroxyurea. Anagrelide is usually well tolerated. Although there is concern about the increased risk of cardiac side effects, in most cases these are mild, and easily manageable. In this paper, the available evidence about the management of patients with myeloproliferative neoplasms, with a special focus on the side effects of drug therapies is reviewed.

Impact of JAK2(V617F) mutation status on treatment response to anagrelide in essential thrombocythemia: an observational, hypothesis-generating study

A JAK2(V617F) mutation is found in approximately 55% of patients with essential thrombocythemia (ET), and represents a key World Health Organization diagnostic criterion. This hypothesis-generating study (NCT01352585) explored the impact of JAK2(V617F) mutation status on treatment response to anagrelide in patients with ET who were intolerant/refractory to their current cytoreductive therapy. The primary objective was to compare the proportion of JAK2-positive versus JAK2-negative patients who achieved at least a partial platelet response (≤600×10⁹/L) after anagrelide therapy. Of the 47 patients enrolled, 46 were included in the full analysis set (JAK2-positive, n=22; JAK2-negative, n=24). At 12 months, 35 patients (n=14 and n=21, respectively) had a suitable platelet sample; of these, 74.3% (n=26) achieved at least a partial response. The response rate was higher in JAK2-positive (85.7%, n=12) versus JAK2-negative patients (66.7%, n=14) (odds ratio [OR] 3.00; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.44, 33.97). By using the last observation carried forward approach in the sensitivity analysis, which considered the imbalance in patients with suitable samples between groups, the overall response rate was 71.7% (n=33/46), with 77.3% (n=17/22) of JAK2-positive and 66.7% (n=16/24) of JAK2-negative patients achieving at least a partial response (OR 1.70; 95% CI 0.39, 8.02). There was no significant change in median allele burden over 12 months in the 12 patients who achieved a response. In conclusion, the overall platelet response rate was high in both JAK2-positive and JAK2-negative patients; however, a larger study would be required to confirm the differences observed according to JAK2(V617F) mutation status.

Phase III, single-arm study investigating the efficacy, safety, and tolerability of anagrelide as a second-line treatment in high-risk Japanese patients with essential thrombocythemia

Essential thrombocythemia (ET) is usually managed by anti-platelet therapy. European guidelines recommend that patients with ET at high risk of developing thrombohemorrhagic events should be placed on cytoreductive therapy (CRT). In Japan, hydroxycarbamide (HC) is the most widely used CRT; however, treatment options for patients who become intolerant or refractory to initial treatment are limited. This study sought to determine the efficacy, safety, and tolerability of anagrelide in high-risk Japanese adults with ET who were intolerant or refractory to their first-line CRT. Fifty-three patients were enrolled in the study. Of those, 67.9 % had a platelet response (<60 × 10(4)/µL) and 45.3 % achieved normalization of platelet counts (≤40 × 10(4)/µL) on anagrelide therapy. The median time to platelet count response was 98.5 days and the median time to platelet count normalization was 274.0 days. The median daily dose administered was 1.9 mg/day. The most common adverse events observed during anagrelide treatment were anemia, headache, palpitations, and diarrhea. The majority of these were either mild or moderate in severity. Overall, the safety profile of anagrelide in high-risk Japanese patients with ET was consistent with the European Summary of Product Characteristics.