Comparison of reduced conditionings combining fludarabine with melphalan or 3-day busulfan in patients allografted for myeloid neoplasms

Prevalence of acute oral mucosal damage secondary to the use of systemic antineoplastics: A systematic review and meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to determine the prevalence of acute oral mucosal toxicities in non-irradiated patients treated with systemic antineoplastics agents. The secondary objective was to find out differences in its prevalence among the different types of systemic antineoplastics.

STUDY DESIGN

A systematic review and meta-analysis was performed. Articles from 2010 to July 2022 were retrieved and included if patients were adults undergoing oral assessment after administration of commercially available systemic antineoplastics. Data was extracted and pooled proportions were estimated using random-effect model method (Der Simonian and Lair).

RESULTS

Eighty-two articles were included in the study. The overall prevalence of acute oral mucosal damage across studies was 38.2% (95% CI: 33.1%-43.3%). The prevalence was 42.9% (95% CI: 32.8%-53%) in patients treated with chemotherapy alone, 38% (95% CI: 29.1%-47%) in patients treated with a combination of chemotherapy and targeted therapies, and 32.1% (95% CI: 26.8%-37.5%) in targeted therapies alone-treated patients. No statistically significant differences were found in the prevalence of oral mucosal toxicities between the different types of systemic antineoplastic treatments.

CONCLUSIONS

Oral mucosal toxicity is a major side effect in non-irradiated cancer patients undergoing systemic antineoplastics.

Retrospective comparison of hematopoietic stem cell transplantation following reduced-intensity conditioning with fludarabine/low-dose melphalan plus 4 Gy TBI versus fludarabine/ busulfan plus 4 Gy TBI

Fludarabine with intravenous busulfan (6.4 mg/kg; FB2) and fludarabine with intermediate-dose melphalan (140 mg/m²; FM140) are the most widely used reduced-intensity conditioning (RIC) regimens for allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. FM140 generally has a lower relapse rate and higher non-relapse mortality (NRM), resulting in overall survival (OS) comparable to that seen with FB2. To evaluate the effect of reducing the melphalan dose, we retrospectively compared transplant outcomes in 156 patients who received FB2 (n = 103) or FM80 (n = 53) at our center (median age: 63 years; range 27-72 years). All patients received 4-Gy total body irradiation. Three-year OS, the cumulative incidence of relapse, and NRM were comparable between groups (FB2 vs. FM80, 58% vs. 47%, p = 0.24; 30% vs. 36%, p = 0.57; 17% vs. 21%, p = 0.44, respectively). There was no significant difference in the cumulative incidence of graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) at day 100, chronic GVHD at 3 years, or the 3-year GVHD-free/relapse-free survival rate. In the high-risk disease group, patients receiving FM80 tended to have lower 3-year OS (FB2 vs. FM80, 48% vs. 17%, p = 0.06). In summary, transplant outcomes following FB2 or FM80 were comparable except in patients with high-risk disease.

Allogeneic Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation after Conditioning Regimens with Fludarabine/melphalan or Fludarabine/busulfan for Patients with Hematological Malignancies: A Single-center Analysis

Objective Fludarabine plus melphalan (FM) and fludarabine plus busulfan (FB) are two major conditioning regimens for allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT). Methods We retrospectively analyzed patients who underwent allo-HSCT after a conditioning regimen consisting of FM or FB with/without total body irradiation for hematological malignancies between 2005 and 2014. Results There were 41 patients who met the criteria. The median follow-up time for the survivors was 3 years. Thirty-two patients received allo-HSCT after the FM regimen and nine patients received allo-HSCT after the FB regimen. Patients who received FB were older than those who received FM (p=0.041). There was no significant difference in the 3-year overall survival between patients who had received FB and those who had received FM (29.6% vs. 56.5%, p=0.267). The 3-year cumulative incidence of relapse was significantly higher in patients who had received FB than that in patients who had received FM (66.7% vs. 17.8%, p=0.004), and FB was an independent prognostic factor for relapse by a multivariate analysis (hazard ratio, 9.8; 95% confidential interval, 2.5-39.3; p=0.001). When we restricted the evaluation to patients with acute myeloid leukemia and myelodysplastic syndrome, the 3-year cumulative incidence of relapse was also significantly higher in patients who had received FB than that in patients who had received FM (75.0% vs. 16.1%, p=0.004). Conclusion The results suggest that FM may provide better disease control than FB.

ATM gene single nucleotide polymorphisms predict regimen-related gastrointestinal toxicity in patients allografted after reduced conditioning

Polymorphisms of genes involved in innate and adaptive immunity have become an object of major interest in regard to hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) complications. Regimen-related gastrointestinal toxicity (RR-GIT) is the dominant complication during the pre-engraftment period and has been linked to increased risk of graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) development. According to our hypothesis, functional variants of genes participating in DNA damage response (DDR) may have an impact on the extent of tissue damage caused by the conditioning regimen. In our single-center study, we analyzed 62 patients who underwent HSCT from HLA-identical donors after reduced conditioning. The patients were genotyped for 5 single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs, rs4585 T/G, rs189037 A/G, rs227092 T/G, rs228590 C/T, and rs664677 T/C) of the ATM gene-the essential member of the DDR pathways, using allele-specific matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization, time-of-flight (MALDI-TOF) mass spectrometry assay. Because of almost absolute linkage disequilibrium observed among all 5 SNPs, association of 2 major ATM haplotypes (ATM1/ATM2) with RR-GIT and acute GVHD (aGVHD) was analyzed. Importantly, the univariate and multivariate analysis showed that patients homozygous for ATM2 haplotype (rs4585*T, rs189037*A, rs227092*T, rs228590*C, and rs664677*T) are more likely to suffer from high-grade RR-GIT than ATM1 homozygous patients. The association with aGVHD was not significant. To our knowledge, this is the first report showing the ATM gene variability in relation to RR-GIT in the allogeneic HSCT setting.