A cohort study of the usefulness of primary prophylaxis in patients with severe haemophilia A

Congenital hemophilia A with low activity of factor XII: a case report and literature review

BACKGROUND

Congenital hemophilia A is a recessive inherited hemorrhagic disorder. According to the activity of functional coagulation factors, the severity of hemophilia A is divided into three levels: mild, moderate and severe. The first bleeding episode in severe and moderate congenital hemophilia A occurs mostly in early childhood and mainly involves soft tissue and joint bleeds. At present, there are limited reports on severe congenital hemophilia A with low factor XII (FXII) activity during the neonatal period.

CASE PRESENTATION

A 13-day-old neonate was admitted to the hospital with hematoma near the joints of both upper arms. Coagulation tests showed he had low activity of factor VIII (FVIII) and FXII. He was diagnosed with congenital hemophilia A and treated with human coagulation factor VIII (recombinant FVIII). Although the hematoma became smaller, FVIII activity was only increased to a certain extent and FXII activity decreased gradually. Unfortunately, the child responded poorly to recombinant human coagulation factor VIII and his guardian rejected prophylactic inhibitors and genetic testing and refused further treatment. Three months later, the child developed intracranial hemorrhage (ICH) due to low FVIII activity.

CONCLUSIONS

In hemophilia A, the presence of FVIII inhibitors, drug concentration and testing are three important aspects that must be considered when FVIII activity does not reach the desired level. Early positive disease treatment and prophylaxis can decrease the frequency of bleeding and improve quality of life. We recommend that pregnant women with a family history of hemophilia A undergo early prenatal and neonatal genetic testing.

[Efficacy of short-term full-dose prophylaxis in adult Chinese patients with severe hemophilia A]

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the efficacy of short-term full-dose prophylaxis in adult Chinese patients with severe hemophilia A.

METHODS

Thirteen adult Chinese patients with severe hemophilia A receiving on-demand or low-dose prophylaxis underwent ultrasound examination of the target joints and evaluation of Hemophilia Joint Health Score (HJHS). The data of annual bleeding episodes in the period of on-demand or low-dose prophylaxis were collected retrospectively from the patients, and the changes in bleeding and joint condition (ultrasound findings of the target joints and HJHS) were observed during short-term full-dose prophylaxis. The activity intensity of the patients was assessed using the IPAQ questionnaire, and the 72 h FⅧ trough activity was measured during full-dose prophylaxis.

RESULTS

The median age of the 13 patients was 26.0 (20.5-29.0) years. For full-dose prophylaxis, the patients received a median therapeutic dose of 31.0 (29.1-33.0) IU/kg, administered for 3 times per week; the median 72 h FⅧ trough activity of patients was 1.7% (1.3-3.4%). During the follow-up period for 3 months, the annual bleeding rates (ABR) and annual joint bleeding rates (AJBR) decreased significantly in all the patients (P=0.001 and 0.001, respectively), but zero bleeding was achieved in only 4 patients (30.8%) and zero joint bleeding in 7 patients (53.8%); 9 patients (69.2%) still experienced breakthrough bleeding. The damage severity of target joints assessed by ultrasound and HJHS in 6 patients (46.2%)was worse than before and no obvious progression of target joints damage was found in 7 patients (53.8%). Compared with the patients without progression, the patients with worsened joint damage had poorer baseline joint condition, higher bleeding frequencies before and during the follow-up, a higher intensity of physical activity, and a lower baseline FⅧ activity.

CONCLUSIONS

At present, although short-term full-dose prophylaxis can significantly reduce the bleeding and partially prevent the progression of joint damage, it is not yet possible to achieve the goal of zero bleeding for all adult patients with severe hemophilia A in China, nor can it completely prevent further joint damage. For adult patients with different clinical bleeding phenotypes, joint conditions and physical activity intensity, individualized therapy involving additional evaluation methods should be implemented, and physiotherapy and surgical intervention can be considered when necessary.

Long-term outcomes from prophylactic or episodic treatment of haemophilia A: A systematic review

INTRODUCTION

Evaluating treatment success in patients with haemophilia A (HA) remains a vigorous debate, especially concerning the interpretation of results from clinical and observational research. The benefits of short-term prophylaxis are well established, but long-term outcomes, particularly related to humanistic and economic burden, are not as well understood.

AIM

We conducted a systematic literature review to evaluate the association of episodic or prophylactic bleed control with long-term clinical, humanistic and economic outcomes.

METHODS

Studies published in English between 1 January 2006 and 15 December 2016 were included. Participants had HA (with or without inhibitors), received prophylactic or episodic treatment and had at least 4 years of treatment or follow-up. Results were analysed qualitatively with descriptive findings.

RESULTS

A total of 2091 records were screened, resulting in 19 studies from 20 publications for inclusion. Most studies included children (84%), were limited to patients with severe disease (74%) and were conducted in Europe or North America (89%). Ten studies (53%) included patients with inhibitors. Median study follow-up ranged from 5 to 19 years. Long-term bleeding and haemarthrosis outcomes were consistently better for patients receiving prophylaxis, who also required fewer hospitalizations or surgeries. Health-related quality of life, functionality and productivity were generally more favourable in patients receiving prophylaxis. Quantitative comparisons were not feasible due to the lack of consistency in endpoint collection and reporting among studies.

CONCLUSION

This systematic review confirmed that the benefits of prophylactic treatment on short-term outcomes translate to broader long-term clinical, humanistic and economic benefits. Better harmonization of data collection and outcome assessments across both registries and clinical studies is needed to allow for effective comparisons across studies and across data sources.