A monocentric retrospective study comparing pulse cyclophosphamide therapy versus low dose rituximab in the treatment of refractory autoimmune hemolytic anemia in adults

Efficacy of Whole-Blood Exchange Transfusion in Refractory Severe Autoimmune Haemolytic Anaemia Secondary to Systemic Lupus Erythematosus: A Real-World Observational Retrospective Study

Background

Severe autoimmune haemolytic anaemia (AIHA) in systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) patients could be life-threatening and formidable, especially in those nonresponsive to glucocorticoids (GCs) and immunosuppressants (ISAs). Whole-blood exchange transfusion (WBE), with plasma exchange and pathogenic cell removal as well as healthy red blood cell transfusion, could be beneficial. The objective of this study was to investigate the efficacy and safety of WBE in combination with GCs/ISAs.

Methods

In this retrospective study, the clinical data of 22 refractory severe SLE-AIHA inpatients between February 2016 and February 2021 were collected and analysed, among whom 14 patients had received WBE and were compared with those treated with typical second-line therapy of intravenous immunoglobulin and/or rituximab (IVIG/RTX).

Results

Among the 22 severe refractory SLE-AIHA patients, eight patients received IVIG and/or RTX without WBE (group 1, IVIG/RTX, n = 8), seven patients were given WBE without IVIG/RTX (group 2, WBE alone, n = 7), and seven patients who failed initial IVIG/RTX therapy were given sequential WBE therapy (group 3 IVIG/RTX→WBE, n = 7). Fourteen patients had accepted WBE treatment regardless of prior IVIG/RTX usage (group 2 + 3, WBE ± IVIG/RTX, n = 14). On days 1, 3, 5, and 7 after corresponding therapies, patients of groups 2, 3, and 2 + 3 showed significantly higher levels of haemoglobin (Hb) than patients of group 1. Compared with patients of group 1, patients of groups 2, 3, and 2 + 3 took less time to reach and maintain Hb ≥60 g/L from baseline. Groups 2 and 2 + 3 consumed a lower dose of GCs than group 1 to reach and maintain Hb ≥60 g/L from baseline. Group 1 experienced longer hospital stays than group 2, and group 3's cost of hospitalisation is more than groups 1 and 2. Hb_min <40 g/L may be a key indicative factor for initiating WBE remedy therapy as IVIG/RTX may not be effective enough in 48-72 h in those patients with refractory severe SLE-AIHA. No severe adverse effects were observed in the WBE group.

Conclusions

WBE could be a safe and beneficial alternative therapy for refractory severe SLE-AIHA.

A low-dose rituximab regimen for first-line treatment of acquired haemophilia A

A low-dose rituximab regimen for first-line treatment of acquired haemophilia A.

INTRODUCTION

Acquired haemophilia A (AHA) is a rare disease caused by the development of autoantibodies against FVIII. Diagnosis involves confirmation of FVIII deficiency and the presence of an inhibitor via the Bethesda assay. Severe bleeding is often managed with bypassing agents such as recombinant factor VII. This is then followed by eradication of the inhibitor with immunosuppression which typically includes a corticosteroid backbone.

AIM

Review the current management and outcomes of AHA in Queensland, Australia. Determine the incidence, demographics and clinical characteristics of AHA patients.

METHODS

Retrospective case series of AHA diagnosed between May 2014 and August 2018. Data were derived from the Australian Bleeding Disorders Registry and state-wide pathology database. Data collection proforma was completed by the treating haematologist and reviewed/compiled centrally.

RESULTS

24 patients were identified (incidence 1 in 1.27 million). The median age was 76.5 years. Median follow-up was 20 months. Index bleed was atraumatic and skin/soft tissue in the majority of patients. Recombinant FVIIa was the most commonly used haemostatic therapy and effective in 85% of patients. Immunosuppression and steroid usage were uniform. Upfront second agent was used in 75% of patients and was most commonly rituximab. 87.5% of patients achieved a complete remission in a median time of 48 days. Low-dose rituximab was frequently used and equally as efficacious as standard dose.

CONCLUSION

Immunosuppression with combination therapy, notably rituximab, appears to be non-inferior and has a favourable side effect profile.

Infection risk in autoimmune hematological disorders with low-dose rituximab treatment

Background

Rituximab has been widely used in many autoimmune diseases.

Aim

To evaluate the infection risk of rituximab in autoimmune hematological disorders.

Methods

Retrospectively studied and compared the clinical data of 89 patients in our hospital who used low‐dose rituximab (group R) or pulse cyclophosphamide (group C) for their refractory/relapsed autoimmune hematological diseases from January 2011 to January 2017. The kinds of their diseases included autoimmune hemolytic disease (AIHA), Evans syndrome, and idiopathic thrombocytopenic purpura (ITP). All patients chose either rituximab treatment or cyclophosphamide treatment on their own considerations.

Findings

The median follow‐up time was six months in group R and four months in group C. After treatments, the patients in group R showed higher white blood cell (WBC) count and neutrophil count than group C (P = .020, P = .037). CD20‐positive B cells in group R remained at a very low level after rituximab treatment and need about 15 months to return to normal level, which was longer than group C (six months). The incidence of infection in these two groups has no significant difference, which was 34.7% (17/30) in group R and 32.5% (13/28) in group C (P = .976). Tuberculosis infections after rituximab treatment were found in three patients for the first time.

Conclusion

The G‐CSF, nadir WBC count, and IgA level were protective factors of infection during rituximab treatment. Low‐dose rituximab therapy in autoimmune hematological diseases does not increase infection risk compared with cyclophosphamide.

Efficacy and safety of rituximab in autoimmune and microangiopathic hemolytic anemia: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Background

The efficacy and safety of rituximab (RTX) on hemolytic anemia (HA) is unknown. Therefore we retrospectively analyze the efficacy and safety of RTX in autoimmune hemolytic anemia (AIHA) and microangiopathic hemolytic anemia (MAHA) from the previous literature.

Methods

Data in clinical trials and observational studies were collected from PubMed, Cochrane, Embase, and Google Scholar until Oct 15, 2018. The efficacy and safety of RTX in patients with AIHA or MAHA were assessed and overall response rates (ORRs), complete response rates (CRRs), adverse events (AEs) and relapse rates (RRs) were extracted if available. A meta-analysis was performed with a random-effects model, estimating mean proportions in all studies, and relative rates in comparative studies.

Results

After quality assessment, a total of 37 investigations encompassing 1057 patients eligible for meta-analysis were included. Pooled mean proportion of ORR was 0.84 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.80–0.88), and that of CRR was 0.61 (95% CI 0.49–0.73). Mean AE rate was 0.14 (95% CI 0.10–0.17), and mean RR was 0.21 (95% CI 0.15–0.26). Relative ORR was 1.18 (95% CI 1.02–1.36), and relative CRR was 1.17 (95% CI 0.98–1.39) fold more than the respective non-RTX counter parts. Relative AE rate was 0.77 (95% CI 0.36–1.63), and relative RR was 0.93 (95% CI 0.56–1.55) fold less than the respective non-RTX counter parts.

Conclusion

RTX is more effective than the treatments without RTX for AIHA and MAHA and is well-tolerated.

[Outcomes of splenectomy in relapsed/refractory autoimmune hemolytic anemia]

Objective: To evaluate the outcomes of splenectomy in the treatment of relapsed/refractory autoimmune hemolytic anemia (AIHA). Methods: Retrospective analysis was performed in 30 cases with relapsed/refractory AIHA who were treated with splenectomy in our hospital. The pre- and post-operative blood routine indexes and responses were followed up. Results: Among the 30 relapsed/refractory AIHA patients, 20 were pure AIHA (including 13 patients with warm antibody AIHA, 2 with warm-cold double antibody AIHA and 5 with Coombs negative AIHA) and 10 were Evans syndrome. The short-term response was evaluated 10-14 days after operation, and the overall response rate (ORR) of short-term response was 90% [12 cases in complete response (CR), 6 cases in partial response (PR)] in 20 therapeutic evaluable cases. Among 13 patients with long-term follow-up data, except 3 patients with Evans syndrome died (2 cases were refractory to splenectomy, 1 case relapsed after surgery), the ORR of 10 patients with relapsed/refractory pure AIHA at 6 months and 12 months were 90% (9/10) and 70% (7/10), respectively, with a median follow-up of 14 (4-156) months. At the end of follow-up, 3 cases had maintained CR for more than 3 years. Conclusion: The short-term response of splenectomy as a second-line treatment for relapsed/refractory AIHA is satisfactory, and long-term outcome of splenectomy is up to 70% at 1 year. Approximately one-third of patients could maintain sustained remission.