Analysis of the variable factors influencing tacrolimus blood concentration during the switch from continuous intravenous infusion to oral administration after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation

Factors Affecting Day-to-Day Variations in Tacrolimus Concentration among Children and Young Adults Undergoing Allogeneic Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation

Tacrolimus is widely used as prophylaxis for graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) in allogeneic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT). It has a narrow therapeutic index range; high tacrolimus concentrations are associated with toxicity, whereas low concentrations are associated with an increased risk of GVHD. Although dose adjustments based on therapeutic drug monitoring are performed, unexpected large variations in tacrolimus concentration are sometimes encountered. The available evidence suggests that the factors affecting tacrolimus concentration are not fully understood. This study was aimed primarily at investigating the factors affecting day-to-day variations in tacrolimus concentration in children and young adults who received continuous tacrolimus infusion after allo-HSCT. The secondary objective was to identify the factors causing large variations (>20%) in tacrolimus concentrations. This retrospective cohort study comprised 123 consecutive pediatric and young adult patients (age <25 years) who received continuous i.v. tacrolimus infusion after allo-HSCT at Shinshu University Hospital, Matsumoto, Japan, between January 2009 and December 2021. To compare day-to-day variations in tacrolimus concentration without consideration of the tacrolimus dose, 2 consecutive days when the tacrolimus dose was not changed were selected from between the first post-allo-HSCT day of a tacrolimus concentration >7 ng/mL and day 28 post-allo-HSCT. Subsequently, information for the subsequent 24 hours was collected along with the tacrolimus concentrations and hematocrit values. Tacrolimus concentration was determined using whole blood samples. Tacrolimus concentrations were significantly higher in patients who received red blood cell concentrate (RCC) transfusions (P < .0001) and methotrexate (P = .0162), patients with persistent fever (P = .0056), and patients with a decline in fever (P = .0003). In contrast, tacrolimus concentrations were significantly lower in patients who received platelet concentrate (PC) transfusions (P < .0001), who redeveloped fever (P = .0261), and who had a replaced tacrolimus administration route set (P = .0008). Variations in tacrolimus concentration were significantly correlated with variations in hematocrit (r = .556; P < .0001). Body weight (P < .0001), RCC transfusion (P < .0001), methotrexate use (P = .0333), persistent fever (P = .0150), and decline in fever (P = .0073) were associated with a sharp increase in tacrolimus concentration. In contrast, body weight (P < .0001), PC transfusion (P = .0025), and replacement of the tacrolimus administration route set (P = .0025) were associated with a sharp decrease in tacrolimus concentration. RCC and PC transfusions, fever, methotrexate administration, and replacement of the tacrolimus administration route set were independent factors affecting day-to-day variations in tacrolimus concentration. In addition to these factors, low body weight was a risk factor for both sharp increases and decreases in tacrolimus concentration. These findings suggest the need for better control of tacrolimus concentration using whole blood samples.

Tacrolimus Dose-Conversion Ratios Based on Switching of Formulations for Patients with Solid Organ Transplants

Background

Tacrolimus may be administered during hospitalization as an IV formulation or oral suspension. However, literature suggesting appropriate ratios for conversion from these formulations to capsules is limited.

Objective

To evaluate conversion ratios after a switch in formulation of tacrolimus for solid-organ transplant recipients.

Methods

This single-centre observational longitudinal study involved hospitalized patients who underwent a switch in formulation of tacrolimus according to 1 of 3 possible scenarios: IV to oral suspension, IV to capsule, or oral suspension to capsule. Data were collected from the earliest accessible electronic file (January 2009) to January 1, 2019. Conversion ratios were calculated for each of the 3 groups using data for blood concentrations and doses before and after the switch. The calculated ratios were then compared with recommended conversion ratios: 1:5 (i.e., 1 mg of IV tacrolimus is converted to 5 mg of oral tacrolimus, expressed as "5") for either of the switches involving an IV formulation and 1:1 (i.e., same amount, expressed as "1") for the switch from oral formulation to capsules.

Results

For the group who underwent switching from the IV formulation to oral suspension, the mean calculated conversion ratio was 3.04, which was significantly different from the recommended ratio of 5. For the group who underwent switching from the IV formulation to capsules, the calculated conversion ratio was 5.18, which was not significantly different from the recommended ratio of 5. For the group who underwent switching from oral suspension to capsules, the calculated conversion ratio was 1.17, which was not significantly different from the recommended ratio of 1.

Conclusion

In this small retrospective study of tacrolimus therapy, the calculated conversion ratio was significantly different from the recommended ratio for patients who were switched from IV administration to oral suspension, but not for those switched from IV administration or oral suspension to capsules. Therapeutic drug monitoring therefore appears indispensable, regardless of conversion ratios.

Influential Factors and Efficacy Analysis of Tacrolimus Concentration After Allogeneic Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation in Children with β-Thalassemia Major

Purpose

To analyze factors influencing tacrolimus (TAC) trough concentration (C₀) in β-thalassemia major (β-TM) pediatric patients after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (Allo-HSCT) and to investigate the effects of genotype polymorphism and drug-drug interactions on TAC trough concentration in children with β-TM. Furthermore, to analyze the correlation between TAC C₀ and efficacy and adverse reactions.

Patients and Methods

Prospectively collection of demographic information and details of combined treatment of patients with β-TM receiving HSCT, and genotypes of CYP3A4, CYP3A5, and ABCB1 (rs1045642, rs1128503, rs2032582) were obtained for each patient. Univariate analysis and multiple linear regression analysis were used to investigate influencing factors on TAC C₀. The impact of different genotypes and the co-administration of azole antifungal drugs on β-TM patients receiving TAC were evaluated, together with the correlation between acute graft-versus-host disease (aGVHD), infection, and liver injury of TAC C₀.

Results

A total of 46 patients with 587 concentration data were included. The multiple linear regression results showed that the patient's sex, weight, postoperative time, hemoglobin, platelet count, serum cystatin C, and combined voriconazole were independent influencing factors of the infusion trough concentration/daily dose, C₀/D_iv. Age, body surface area, postoperative time, co-administration of voriconazole, and CYP3A4*18B are independent influencing factors of C₀/D_po. Group comparisons showed that voriconazole can affect TAC C₀ administered intravenously (IV) and orally in β-TM pediatric patients, while patient genotype can affect TAC C₀ during oral administration. TAC C₀ does not correlate with aGVHD or liver injury, but infection may be associated with TAC C₀.

Conclusion

The concentration of TAC should be closely monitored when co-administered with voriconazole. It is worth considering that the influence of genotype on the trough concentration of oral TAC and individualized drug administration warrant investigation. Finally, this study indicated that C₀ is not suitable as an indicator of the efficacy of TAC.

Impact of Pharmacogenetics on Intravenous Tacrolimus Exposure and Conversions to Oral Therapy

CYP3A5 and CYP3A4 are the predominant enzymes responsible for tacrolimus metabolism; however only a proportion of the population expresses CYP3A5 secondary to genetic variation. CYP3A5 is expressed in both the intestine and the liver and has been shown to impact both the bioavailability and metabolism of orally administered tacrolimus. Increasing the initial tacrolimus dose by 50% to 100% is recommended in patients who are known CYP3A5 expressers; however, whether this dose adjustment is appropriate for i.v. tacrolimus administration is unclear. The objective of this study was to evaluate the impact of CYP3A5 genotype as well as other pharmacogenes on i.v. tacrolimus exposure to determine whether the current genotype-guided dosing recommendations are appropriate for this formulation. In addition, this study aimed to investigate dose conversion requirements among CYP3A5 genotypes when converting from i.v. to p.o. tacrolimus. This study is a retrospective chart review of all patients who underwent allogeneic stem cell transplantation at Michigan Medicine between June 1, 2014, and March 1, 2018, who received i.v. tacrolimus at the time of their transplantation. Secondary use samples were obtained for genotyping CYP3A5, CYP3A4, and ABCB1. Patient demographic information, tacrolimus dosing and trough levels, and concomitant medications received at the time of tacrolimus trough were collected retrospectively from the patients' medical records. The i.v. dose-controlled concentration (C/D) and the i.v.:p.o. exposure ratio was calculated for all tacrolimus doses and patients, respectively. The impact of CYP3A5, CYP3A4, and ABCB1 genotypes on the i.v. C/D were evaluated with linear mixed modeling. The impact of CYP3A5 genotype on the i.v.:p.o. ratio was evaluated while controlling for age and concomitant use of an azole inhibitor. CYP3A5 and CYP3A4 genotypes were significantly associated with the i.v. C/D, with CYP3A5 expressers and CYP3A4 rapid metabolizers having 20% lower tacrolimus exposure. Neither genotype remained significant in the multivariable model, although age, hematocrit, and concomitant use of strong azole inhibitors were associated with increased i.v. C/D. When controlling for patient age and sex, CYP3A5 expressers had significantly higher i.v.:p.o. ratios than CYP3A5 nonexpressers (3.42 versus 2.78; P = .04). Post hoc analysis showed that the i.v.:p.o. ratio may differ among different CYP3A5 genotypes and azole inhibitor combinations. This study demonstrates that the current genotype-guided tacrolimus dose adjustment recommendations are inappropriate for CYP3A5 expressers receiving i.v. tacrolimus. Although CYP3A5 genotype is likely a minor contributor to i.v. tacrolimus exposure, genotype, in addition to capturing concomitant CYP3A inhibitors, would likely improve i.v.:p.o. dose conversion selection. © 2021 American Society for Transplantation and Cellular Therapy. Published by Elsevier Inc.

Conversion ratio of tacrolimus switching from intravenous infusion to oral administration after lung transplantation

Background

To investigate the conversion ratio of tacrolimus switching from intravenous infusion to oral administration in patients after lung transplantation.

Methods

We retrospectively recruited patients received lung transplantation in the First Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical Hospital from January 2015 to June 2019. The blood concentration of tacrolimus administrated through intravenous infusion and oral administration were collected. The blood concentration, concentration/dose ratio (C/D), and (C/Dpo)/(C/Div) ratio were analyzed to explore the conversion ratio of tacrolimus switching from intravenous infusion to oral administration, as combined medication of tacrolimus and caspofungin were used.

Results

The concentration of intravenously administered tacrolimus was significantly higher than that of oral administration; the C/D ratio of intravenously administrated tacrolimus (C/Div) was significantly higher than that of the oral administration (C/Dpo). There was a significant correlation between C/Dpo and C/Div (R² =0.774, P<0.001). The conversion ratio of tacrolimus from intravenous administration to oral administration was 1:7.4, as combined medication of tacrolimus and caspofungin were used.

Conclusions

The conversion ratio of tacrolimus switching from intravenous to oral administration is 1:7.4 in the combination treatment of tacrolimus and caspofungin after lung transplantation.

Clinical Factors Affecting the Dose Conversion Ratio from Intravenous to Oral Tacrolimus Formulation among Pediatric Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation Recipients

BACKGROUND

Tacrolimus is converted from intravenous to oral formulation for the prophylaxis of graft-versus-host disease when patients can tolerate oral intake and graft-versus-host disease is under control. Oral tacrolimus formulation presents poor bioavailability with intraindividual and interindividual variations; however, some factors affecting its blood concentration among pediatric hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HCT) recipients are still unclear. This study aimed to identify the clinical factors affecting tacrolimus blood concentrations after switching its formulation.

METHODS

Changes in the blood concentration/dose ratio (C/D) of tacrolimus in pediatric HCT recipients were analyzed after the switching of tacrolimus from intravenous to oral formulation. Clinical records of 57 pediatric patients who underwent allogenic HCT from January 2006 to April 2019 in our institute were retrospectively reviewed. The C/D of tacrolimus before discontinuation of intravenous infusion (C/Div) was compared with the tacrolimus trough level within 10 days after the initiation of oral administration (C/Dpo). Multiple linear regression analysis was performed to identify factors affecting (C/Dpo)/(C/Div).

RESULTS

The constant coefficient of (C/Dpo)/(C/Div) was 0.1692 [95% confidence interval (CI), 0.137-0.2011]. The concomitant use of voriconazole or itraconazole and female sex were significant variables with a beta coefficient of 0.0974 (95% CI, 0.062-0.133) and -0.0373 (95% CI, -0.072 to -0.002), respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

After switching of tacrolimus formulation, pediatric HCT recipients might need oral tacrolimus dose that is 5-6 and 3.5-4.5 times the intravenous dose to maintain tacrolimus blood concentrations and area under the concentration-time curve, respectively. With the concomitant use of voriconazole or itraconazole, an oral tacrolimus dose of 4-5 times the intravenous dose seemed appropriate to maintain blood tacrolimus concentration.

Tacrolimus blood concentration increase depends on administration route when combined with voriconazole in pediatric stem cell transplant recipients

BACKGROUND

Understanding of TAC pharmacokinetics is required to avoid both overdosing and underdosing. VRCZ is known to increase the TAC blood concentration by inhibiting CYP3A4; however, detailed, practical information on pediatric cases is still scarce. Herein, we investigated the association between the TAC blood concentration and dosage focusing on the administration route and concomitant use of VRCZ in children.

METHODS

In total, 38 children who received TAC during stem cell transplantation at our hospital between January 2013 and April 2018 were included. The ratio of the TAC blood concentration (ng/mL) to dosage (mg/kg/day) (C/D) was calculated at the last continuous intravenous infusion (C/Div) and after switching to oral administration (C/Dpo).

RESULTS

Patients with VRCZ (n = 14) showed a higher C/D regardless of administration route (median C/Div: with VRCZ/without VRCZ = 832/643, median C/Dpo: with VRCZ/without VRCZ = 339/45). Additionally, the (C/Div)/(C/Dpo) was about one-fourth in cases with VRCZ; the median (C/Div)/(C/Dpo) was 3.3 for cases with VRCZ and 13.5 for cases without VRCZ. Interestingly, the increase in the TAC blood concentration due to VRCZ was higher when TAC was administered orally, especially in adolescent patients.

CONCLUSIONS

To obtain an optimal TAC blood concentration, dose adjustment based on multiple factors, such as administration route, concomitant use of VRCZ, and age, is required.

Impact of CYP3A5, POR, and CYP2C19 Polymorphisms on Trough Concentration to Dose Ratio of Tacrolimus in Allogeneic Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation

Single nucleotide polymorphisms in drug-metabolizing genes may affect tacrolimus pharmacokinetics. Here, we investigated the influence of genotypes of CYP3A5, CYP2C19, and POR on the concentration/dose (C/D) ratio of tacrolimus and episodes of acute graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) in Japanese recipients of allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT). Thirty-six patients receiving the first HSCT using tacrolimus-based GVHD prophylaxis were enrolled with written informed consent. During continuous intravenous infusion, HSCT recipients carrying the CYP3A5*1 allele, particularly those with at least one POR*28 allele, had a significantly lower tacrolimus C/D ratio throughout all three post-HSCT weeks compared to that in recipients with POR*1/*1 (p < 0.05). The CYP3A5*3/*3 genotype and the concomitant use of voriconazole were independent predictors of an increased tacrolimus C/D ratio during the switch from continuous intravenous infusion to oral administration (p < 0.05). In recipients receiving concomitant administration of voriconazole, our results suggest an impact of not only CYP3A5 and CYP2C19 genotypes, but also plasma voriconazole concentration. Although switching from intravenous to oral administration at a ratio of 1:5 was seemingly appropriate in recipients with CYP3A5*1, a lower conversion ratio (1:2-3) was appropriate in recipients with CYP3A5*3/*3. Our results suggest that CYP3A5, POR, and CYP2C19 polymorphisms are useful biomarkers for individualized dosage adjustment of tacrolimus in HSCT recipients.

Influence of azole antifungal drugs on blood tacrolimus levels after switching from intravenous tacrolimus to once-daily modified release tacrolimus in patients receiving allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation

WHAT IS KNOWN AND OBJECTIVE

Azole antifungal drugs are often co-administered with tacrolimus after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT). However, the influence of azole antifungal drugs on variation in tacrolimus pharmacokinetics when switching from intravenous tacrolimus (Tac-iv) to once-daily modified release tacrolimus (Tac-MR) remains to be elucidated. This study was performed to evaluate the effects of oral azole antifungal drugs on variation in tacrolimus pharmacokinetics after conversion to Tac-MR in HSCT patients.

METHODS

Patients concomitantly receiving fluconazole (FLCZ) or voriconazole (VRCZ) along with tacrolimus were evaluated retrospectively. Blood tacrolimus concentrations before and after changing to oral administration were compared between FLCZ and VRCZ groups.

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

A total of 52 patients (34 FLCZ and 18 VRCZ) were included in the analysis. There were no significant differences in the most recent daily dose (D_iv ) and blood level (C_iv ) of Tac-iv, C_iv /D_iv , and ratio of daily dose of tacrolimus on the first to second day after changing to Tac-MR (D_po1-2 ) to D_iv between FLCZ and VRCZ groups (P > 0.2). The trough levels of tacrolimus on the first to second day after switching to Tac-MR (C_po1-2 ) and on the third to fifth day after the switch (C_po3-5 ) were significantly higher in the VRCZ group than the FLCZ group (P < 0.05). The values of (C_iv /D_iv )/(C_po1-2 /D_po1-2 ) and (C_iv /D_iv )/(C_po3-5 /D_po3-5 ) in the VRCZ group were significantly lower compared with those in the FLCZ group (P < 0.05). Furthermore, individual values of (C_iv /D_iv )/(C_po3-5 /D_po3-5 ) in the FLCZ group varied widely.

WHAT IS NEW AND CONCLUSION

Voriconazole increased blood tacrolimus level more markedly than FLCZ after switching to Tac-MR, whereas FLCZ caused a large variation in tacrolimus blood level. These results suggest that therapeutic monitoring of tacrolimus after the switch may need to be performed carefully considering that orally co-administered VRCZ and FLCZ exhibit different change in blood tacrolimus level just after the switch.