Effect of sertraline on complications and survival after hematopoietic stem-cell transplantation, a double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical study

Pharmacotherapy for the Prevention of Depression and Behavioral Side Effects in Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation Patients

Depression and decreased quality of life (QoL) develop in approximately 30% of nondepressed hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) recipients early after transplantation. To potentially prevent this complication, we conducted a prospective randomized trial to assess whether prophylaxis of nondepressed HSCT patients with the antidepressant sertraline (SER) in addition to supportive psychotherapy starting at admission for transplantation decreases the risk of depression and improves QoL. The primary objective of the study was to evaluate whether there was an added benefit of SER versus placebo along with routine supportive psychotherapy on the development of depression in patients receiving HSCT. A secondary objective was to analyze the impact on patient-reported QoL and survival. The study was conducted at a single-site academic medical center. We randomized 123 nondepressed HSCT recipients (1:1) in a phase III double-blind study to receive SER starting at a dose of 50 mg/day, with possible dose escalations to 200 mg per day, or placebo beginning on admission for HSCT and continuing for 12 weeks. Supportive psychotherapy was provided for both groups. Depression (Beck Depression Inventory II [BDI-II]) and QoL (Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Bone Marrow Transplantation [FACT-BMT]) were assessed prior to HSCT and then weekly to week 12 post-HSCT. A multivariable linear mixed-effects model was used to estimate the mean change in BDI-II scores as a function of elapsed time since baseline, treatment assignment, and their interaction. The same process was used to assess treatment effects on all QoL scores from the FACT-BMT assessment. A Kaplan-Meier curve was used to estimate the probability of survival for each group following initiation of treatment. A follow-up Cox proportional hazards model was used to estimate the mortality rate in the 2 groups. Our results do not indicate a benefit of SER in either a diminished risk of depression or improved QoL or survival outcomes. Based on our findings, we can only recommend early evaluation of HSCT recipients for depression, with antidepressant use reserved for patients with evidence of clinical depression, unless additional randomized trials can confirm the effects of early antidepressant therapy on mood and QoL in this vulnerable group. Future research in this area would be improved by systematic monitoring of medication adherence, identification of the optimal dose of SER (or other antidepressant), and inclusion of psychotherapy outcomes when relevant, the absence of which are limitations of this study.

Comorbidities in transplant recipients with acute myeloid leukemia receiving low-intensity conditioning regimens: an ALWP EBMT study

Older age and a high burden of comorbidities often drive the selection of low-intensity conditioning regimens in allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation recipients. However, the impact of comorbidities in the low-intensity conditioning setting is unclear. We sought to determine the contribution of individual comorbidities and their cumulative burden on the risk of nonrelapse mortality (NRM) among patients receiving low-intensity regimens. In a retrospective analysis of adults (≥18 years) who underwent transplantation for acute myeloid leukemia in the first complete remission between 2008 and 2018, we studied recipients of low-intensity regimens as defined by the transplantation conditioning intensity (TCI) scale. Multivariable Cox models were constructed to study associations of comorbidities with NRM. Comorbidities identified as putative risk factors in the low-TCI setting were included in combined multivariable regression models assessed for overall survival, NRM, and relapse. A total of 1663 patients with a median age of 61 years received low-TCI regimens. Cardiac comorbidity (including arrhythmia/valvular disease) and psychiatric disease were associated with increased NRM risk (hazard ratio [HR], 1.54; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.13-2.09 and HR, 1.69; 95% CI, 1.02-2.82, respectively). Moderate pulmonary dysfunction, though prevalent, was not associated with increased NRM. In a combined model, cardiac, psychiatric, renal, and inflammatory bowel diseases were independently associated with adverse transplantation outcomes. These findings may inform patient and regimen selection and reinforce the need for further investigation of cardioprotective transplantation approaches.

Antidepressants for the treatment of depression in people with cancer

BACKGROUND

Major depression and other depressive conditions are common in people with cancer. These conditions are not easily detectable in clinical practice, due to the overlap between medical and psychiatric symptoms, as described by diagnostic manuals such as the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM) and International Classification of Diseases (ICD). Moreover, it is particularly challenging to distinguish between pathological and normal reactions to such a severe illness. Depressive symptoms, even in subthreshold manifestations, have a negative impact in terms of quality of life, compliance with anticancer treatment, suicide risk and possibly the mortality rate for the cancer itself. Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) on the efficacy, tolerability and acceptability of antidepressants in this population are few and often report conflicting results.

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the efficacy, tolerability and acceptability of antidepressants for treating depressive symptoms in adults (aged 18 years or older) with cancer (any site and stage).

SEARCH METHODS

We used standard, extensive Cochrane search methods. The latest search date was November 2022.

SELECTION CRITERIA

We included RCTs comparing antidepressants versus placebo, or antidepressants versus other antidepressants, in adults (aged 18 years or above) with any primary diagnosis of cancer and depression (including major depressive disorder, adjustment disorder, dysthymic disorder or depressive symptoms in the absence of a formal diagnosis).

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

We used standard Cochrane methods. Our primary outcome was 1. efficacy as a continuous outcome. Our secondary outcomes were 2. efficacy as a dichotomous outcome, 3. Social adjustment, 4. health-related quality of life and 5. dropouts. We used GRADE to assess certainty of evidence for each outcome.

MAIN RESULTS

We identified 14 studies (1364 participants), 10 of which contributed to the meta-analysis for the primary outcome. Six of these compared antidepressants and placebo, three compared two antidepressants, and one three-armed study compared two antidepressants and placebo. In this update, we included four additional studies, three of which contributed data for the primary outcome. For acute-phase treatment response (six to 12 weeks), antidepressants may reduce depressive symptoms when compared with placebo, even though the evidence is very uncertain. This was true when depressive symptoms were measured as a continuous outcome (standardised mean difference (SMD) -0.52, 95% confidence interval (CI) -0.92 to -0.12; 7 studies, 511 participants; very low-certainty evidence) and when measured as a proportion of people who had depression at the end of the study (risk ratio (RR) 0.74, 95% CI 0.57 to 0.96; 5 studies, 662 participants; very low-certainty evidence). No studies reported data on follow-up response (more than 12 weeks). In head-to-head comparisons, we retrieved data for selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) versus tricyclic antidepressants (TCAs) and for mirtazapine versus TCAs. There was no difference between the various classes of antidepressants (continuous outcome: SSRI versus TCA: SMD -0.08, 95% CI -0.34 to 0.18; 3 studies, 237 participants; very low-certainty evidence; mirtazapine versus TCA: SMD -4.80, 95% CI -9.70 to 0.10; 1 study, 25 participants). There was a potential beneficial effect of antidepressants versus placebo for the secondary efficacy outcomes (continuous outcome, response at one to four weeks; very low-certainty evidence). There were no differences for these outcomes when comparing two different classes of antidepressants, even though the evidence was very uncertain. In terms of dropouts due to any cause, we found no difference between antidepressants compared with placebo (RR 0.85, 95% CI 0.52 to 1.38; 9 studies, 889 participants; very low-certainty evidence), and between SSRIs and TCAs (RR 0.83, 95% CI 0.53 to 1.22; 3 studies, 237 participants). We downgraded the certainty of the evidence because of the heterogeneous quality of the studies, imprecision arising from small sample sizes and wide CIs, and inconsistency due to statistical or clinical heterogeneity.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

Despite the impact of depression on people with cancer, the available studies were few and of low quality. This review found a potential beneficial effect of antidepressants against placebo in depressed participants with cancer. However, the certainty of evidence is very low and, on the basis of these results, it is difficult to draw clear implications for practice. The use of antidepressants in people with cancer should be considered on an individual basis and, considering the lack of head-to-head data, the choice of which drug to prescribe may be based on the data on antidepressant efficacy in the general population of people with major depression, also taking into account that data on people with other serious medical conditions suggest a positive safety profile for the SSRIs. Furthermore, this update shows that the usage of the newly US Food and Drug Administration-approved antidepressant esketamine in its intravenous formulation might represent a potential treatment for this specific population of people, since it can be used both as an anaesthetic and an antidepressant. However, data are too inconclusive and further studies are needed. We conclude that to better inform clinical practice, there is an urgent need for large, simple, randomised, pragmatic trials comparing commonly used antidepressants versus placebo in people with cancer who have depressive symptoms, with or without a formal diagnosis of a depressive disorder.

Association Between Depression Before Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation and Posttransplant Survival: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Depressive symptoms are often found in patients undergoing hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT). However, the impact of depression on overall survival and other outcomes after HSCT has not been systematically reviewed.

OBJECTIVE

The objective of this review was to determine if depression before HSCT is associated with poor posttransplant outcomes.

METHODS

We performed a systematic research, following Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISM) guidelines based on several databases (MEDLINE, EMBase, and PsycINFO) for cohort studies on adults undergoing HSCT, comparing overall survival or other outcomes (length of aplasia, infectious complications) between patients with depressive symptoms and controls. For studies reporting overall survival hazard ratios, we conducted a meta-analysis by calculating a 95% confidence interval hazard ratios, and we assessed heterogeneity with the I² statistic. Study quality was assessed using the Newcastle-Ottawa Quality Assessment scale for cohort studies.

RESULTS

A total of 18 studies were included in the systematic review (22,235 participants) and 8 in the meta-analysis. There were a variety of depression screening tools, the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) being the most reported questionnaire. A significant association between depression and overall survival was found in 9 studies, whereas 8 studies shown no association. Depression tended to have an impact on length of aplasia and infectious complications. In the meta-analysis, depression was found to impact significantly overall survival after HSCT with a hazard ratio = 1.07 (95% confidence interval 1.03-1.11). A publication bias was found in the meta-analysis.

CONCLUSION

Depression seems to have a significant impact on post-HSCT survival and on length of aplasia. A systematic screening of depression before HSCT should be considered, with validated tools such as HADS. Future research needs to be done to measure the impact of depression on HSCT response and understand its physiopathology.

Psychiatric Care in Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation

BACKGROUND

Patients with cancer frequently experience neuropsychiatric symptoms due to their medical illness or its treatment. In recent decades, psychiatrists have become increasingly involved in the care of patients with cancer. However, psychiatrists may be less familiar with hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT), a distinct cancer treatment modality associated with multiple neuropsychiatric sequelae.

OBJECTIVE

To provide an overview of HSCT, and describe the prevalence, impact, risk factors, and suggested management of psychiatric consequences of HSCT.

METHODS

We performed literature searches in PubMed and PsychInfo to identify articles describing neuropsychiatric symptoms, including depression, anxiety, distress, post-traumatic stress disorder, delirium and cognitive impairment, resulting from HSCT in adults. Those articles most relevant to this manuscript were included.

RESULTS

Psychiatrists may be involved in the treatment of patients before, during, or after inpatient hospitalization for HSCT. Each phase of treatment introduces unique stressors that may lead to or exacerbate psychiatric disorders. Appropriate management requires evaluation of HSCT-related medications, an understanding of the impact of complications from HSCT, and consideration of how the patient's underlying medical condition should influence psychiatric recommendations.

CONCLUSION

To optimize patient outcomes, consulting psychiatrists should be familiar with the basic principles of HSCT, and the neuropsychiatric sequelae that may result from treatment. Further research is needed to identify strategies to manage psychiatric complications in this unique population.

Psychosocial Assessment of Candidates for Transplantation scale (PACT) and survival after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation

Recent findings suggest that patient pre-transplant psychosocial risk factors predict survival after hematopoietic stem cell transplant (HSCT) and importance of comprehensive psychosocial assessment during pre-transplant period is increasingly acknowledged. Psychosocial screening process, however, has not been standardized across transplant centers and its predictive value has not yet been confirmed. An observational cohort study was conducted to explore the relationships between psychosocial variables, assessed with the Psychosocial Assessment of Candidates for Transplantation (PACT) scale, and post-transplant overall survival (OS) of patients with hematologic malignancies who received allogeneic HSCT as treatment. Overall, 119 patient medical records were reviewed to determine the PACT score. After controlling for clinical and demographic covariates, lower PACT scores in the domain of compliance with medications and medical advice were significantly associated with poorer OS (HR = 1.75, P = 0.03). Lower PACT ratings in the subscales of personality and psychopathology (HR = 1.35, P = 0.08), lifestyle factors (HR = 1.43, P = 0.08), and relevant disease knowledge and receptiveness to education (HR = 1.32, P = 0.08) tended to be associated with shorter OS. These findings suggested the association between pre-transplant psychosocial factors using PACT and post-transplant OS in patients receiving allogeneic HSCT.

Microencapsulated Schwann cell transplantation inhibits P2X3 receptor expression in dorsal root ganglia and neuropathic pain

Schwann cell transplantation is a promising method to promote neural repair, and can be used for peripheral nerve protection and myelination. Microcapsule technology largely mitigates immune rejection of transplanted cells. We previously showed that microencapsulated olfactory ensheathing cells can reduce neuropathic pain and we hypothesized that microencapsulated Schwann cells can also inhibit neuropathic pain. Rat Schwann cells were cultured by subculture and then microencapsulated and were tested using a rat chronic constriction injury (CCI) neuropathic pain model. CCI rats were treated with Schwann cells or microencapsulated Schwann cells and were compared with sham and CCI groups. Mechanical withdrawal threshold and thermal withdrawal latency were assessed preoperatively and at 1, 3, 5, 7, 9, 11 and 14 days postoperatively. The expression of P2X3 receptors in L4-5 dorsal root ganglia of the different groups was detected by double-label immunofluorescence on day 14 after surgery. Compared with the chronic constriction injury group, mechanical withdrawal threshold and thermal withdrawal latency were higher, but the expression of P2X3 receptors was remarkably decreased in rats treated with Schwann cells and microencapsulated Schwann cells, especially in the rats transplanted with microencapsulated Schwann cells. The above data show that microencapsulated Schwann cell transplantation inhibits P2X3 receptor expression in L4-5 dorsal root ganglia and neuropathic pain.