Prospective comparison of 5- and 7-day administration of azacitidine for myelodysplastic syndromes: a JALSG MDS212 trial

Prognostic Value of Pretreatment Fetal Hemoglobin Levels in Patients with Myelodysplastic Syndromes and Acute Myeloid Leukemia Treated with Azacitidine: A Single-center Retrospective Study

Objective Azacitidine (AZA) has been the standard of care for elderly patients with high-risk myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS). However, reliable clinical predictors of outcome have yet to be identified. The prognostic value of fetal hemoglobin (HbF) levels has been reported for decitabine therapy. We evaluated pretreatment HbF levels in AZA monotherapy as a prognostic marker in MDS/acute myeloid leukemia (AML). Methods This study included chemotherapy-naïve patients who had received seven-day treatment schedules of AZA and whose HbF levels were measured at the onset of treatment between March 2011 and July 2020. Patients were grouped into HbF-normal (<1.0%) or HbF-elevated (≥1.0%) groups. Responses were classified according to the International Working Group 2006 criteria. Patients Twenty-nine patients were included and classified as having either MDS (n=21), chronic myelomonocytic leukemia (n=5), myelodysplastic/myeloproliferative neoplasm unclassifiable (n=1), or AML with <30% marrow blasts (n=2) based on the World Health Organization 2016 diagnostic criteria. According to the revised International Prognostic Scoring System classification, 20/29 patients were at intermediate, high, or very high risk. Pretreatment HbF levels were elevated in 13/29 patients. Results The median follow-up duration was 13.0 (range 1.5-93.5) months. The HbF-elevated group was associated with a significantly higher hematologic improvement rate (76.9% vs. 25%, p=0.009) and better overall survival (median, 21.0 vs. 13.0 months, p=0.048) than the HbF-normal group. Conclusion These results suggest that elevated pretreatment HbF levels can predict better outcomes in patients with MDS/AML treated with AZA.

Full-Dose Azacitidine in 5 Days Versus 7 Days With a Weekend Break in Myelodysplastic Syndromes: A Retrospective Cohort Study

INTRODUCTION

Apart from transplantation, only azacitidine demonstrated a survival benefit in a phase III study in higher-risk myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS). The approved regimen is 75 mg/m2/day for 7 consecutive days, imposing a logistic challenge for outpatient weekend administration. Schedules with 5 days and 7 days with a weekend break (5 + 2) have been used for convenience despite the lack of strong scientific support. Most studies of alternative schedules were performed in lower-risk MDS and with dose reduction in the 5-day schedules.

METHODS

We performed a single-center, retrospective cohort study to compare full-dose azacitidine (7 × 75 mg/m2) administration in 5-day and 5 + 2-day schedules in a higher-risk MDS cohort. We evaluated 100 patients for overall survival and a subsample (49 patients) for acute myeloid leukemia-free survival (AMLFS), probability of infections and transfusion burden. Kaplan-Meier analysis and Cox models were used for survival analyses. Linear and logistic regressions were applied for univariate and multivariate assessment.

RESULTS

After a median follow-up of 10.8 months, patients treated with a 5-day schedule had a median overall survival of 12.5 months versus 15.0 months in the 5+2 group: HR 0.95 (95% CI, 0.57-1.56); P= .83. AMLFS was also similar between groups: HR 1.70 (95% CI, 0.70-4.14); P = .24. Azacitidine schedules were not predictive of infections nor number of red blood cell or platelet transfusions in multivariate analyses.

CONCLUSIONS

In higher-risk MDS, full-dose azacitidine (7 × 75 mg/m2) can be administered both in 5 days and in 7 days with a weekend break with no significant difference in survival, infection or transfusional outcomes.

Female and preserved platelet count subgroups of myelodysplastic syndrome patients benefit from standard-dose azacitidine

BACKGROUND

Hypomethylating agents, including azacytidine (AZA), are standard therapeutics for patients with high-risk myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS), a group of myeloid neoplasms. However, treatment schedules are not unified in real-world practice; in addition to the standard 7-day (standard-dose) schedule, shortened (reduced-dose) schedules are also used.

AIMS

The aim of this study was to discover the patient group(s) which show differential efficacy between standard-and reduced-dose AZA to MDS.

METHODS AND RESULTS

The outcome of different AZA doses in a cohort of 151 MDS patients were retrospectively analyzed. Overall survival (OS) was not significantly different between standard- and reduced-dose AZA groups by multivariate analysis. However, an interaction was found between either the sex (female vs. male), the platelet counts (< 40 × 103 /μl vs. ≥ 40 × 103 /μl), or the karyotype risk (< poor vs. ≥ poor) and standard-dose AZA for longer OS. Subgroup analyses revealed better OS with standard- over reduced-dose AZA in female patients (HR, 0.27 [95% CI, 0.090-0.79]; p = 0.011), and those with platelet counts ≥ 40 × 103 /μl (HR, 0.51 [95% CI, 0.26-0.99]; p = 0.041). The union of female and preserved platelet count subgroups also benefited from standard-dose AZA. With this as a test cohort, we next analyzed patients registered in the JALSG MDS212 study, for whom 7-day and 5-day AZA treatment strategies were prospectively compared, as a validation cohort (N = 172). That cohort showed the same tendency as the retrospective results.

CONCLUSION

We identified the union of female and preserved platelet count subgroups which benefited from standard-dose AZA, imparting crucial information to physicians planning treatment regimens in MDS patients.

Postazacitidine clone size predicts long-term outcome of patients with myelodysplastic syndromes and related myeloid neoplasms

Azacitidine is a mainstay of therapy for myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS)-related diseases. The purpose of our study is to elucidate the effect of gene mutations on hematological response and overall survival (OS), particularly focusing on their posttreatment clone size. We enrolled a total of 449 patients with MDS or related myeloid neoplasms. They were analyzed for gene mutations in pretreatment (n = 449) and posttreatment (n = 289) bone marrow samples using targeted-capture sequencing to assess the impact of gene mutations and their posttreatment clone size on treatment outcomes. In Cox proportional hazard modeling, multihit TP53 mutation (hazard ratio [HR], 2.03; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.42-2.91; P < .001), EZH2 mutation (HR, 1.71; 95% CI, 1.14-2.54; P = .009), and DDX41 mutation (HR, 0.33; 95% CI, 0.17-0.62; P < .001), together with age, high-risk karyotypes, low platelets, and high blast counts, independently predicted OS. Posttreatment clone size accounting for all drivers significantly correlated with International Working Group (IWG) response (P < .001, using trend test), except for that of DDX41-mutated clones, which did not predict IWG response. Combined, IWG response and posttreatment clone size further improved the prediction of the original model and even that of a recently proposed molecular prediction model, the molecular International Prognostic Scoring System (IPSS-M; c-index, 0.653 vs 0.688; P < .001, using likelihood ratio test). In conclusion, evaluation of posttreatment clone size, together with the pretreatment mutational profile as well as the IWG response play a role in better prognostication of azacitidine-treated patients with myelodysplasia.

Advances in myelodysplastic syndromes: promising novel agents and combination strategies

INTRODUCTION

Myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS) are heterogeneous group of clonal hematopoietic stem cell neoplasms that have limited approved treatment options. Multiple novel agents are currently being tested in a clinical trial setting. From a therapeutic perspective, MDS is generally divided into lower-risk and higher-risk disease. In this review, we summarize some of the most prominent novel agents currently in development.

AREAS COVERED

This review focuses on select clinical trials in both lower- and higher-risk MDS, elucidating the mechanisms of action and rationale for drug combinations and summarizing early safety and efficacy data using novel agents in MDS.

EXPERT OPINION

Advances in understanding the innate immune system, telomere biology, as well as genomic drivers of the disease have led to the development of multiple novel agents that are currently in late stages of clinical development in MDS. Imetelstat is being tested in lower-risk disease and the phase III clinical trial recently completed accrual. Magrolimab, sabatolimab, and venetoclax in addition to novel oral hypomethylating agents (HMA) are being investigated in higher-risk MDS. These advances will hopefully bring better treatment options to patients and lead to a shift in the treatment paradigm. Post HMA therapy remains an area of dire unmet need.