Post-remission measurable residual disease directs treatment choice and improves outcomes for patients with intermediate-risk acute myeloid leukemia in CR1

Understanding differential technologies for detection of MRD and how to incorporate into clinical practice

Patient- and leukemia-specific factors assessed at diagnosis classify patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) in risk categories that are prognostic for outcome. The induction phase with intensive chemotherapy in fit patients aims to reach a complete remission (CR) of less than 5% blasts in bone marrow by morphology. To deepen and sustain the response, induction is followed by consolidation treatment. This postremission treatment of patients with AML is graduated in intensity based on this favorable, intermediate, or adverse risk group classification as defined in the European Leukemia Network (ELN) 2022 recommendations. The increment of evidence that measurable residual disease (MRD) after induction can be superimposed on risk group at diagnosis is instrumental in tailoring further treatment accordingly. Several techniques are applied to detect MRD such as multiparameter flow cytometry (MFC), quantitative (digital) polymerase chain reaction (PCR), and next-generation sequencing. The clinical implementation of MRD and the technique used differ among institutes, leading to the accumulation of a wide range of data, and therefore harmonization is warranted. Currently, evidence for MRD guidance is limited to the time point after induction using MFC or quantitative PCR for NPM1 and core binding factor abnormalities in intermediate-risk patients. The role of MRD in targeted or nonintensive therapies needs to be clarified, although some data show improved survival in patients achieving CR-MRD negativity. Potential application of MRD for selection of conditioning before stem cell transplantation, monitoring after consolidation, and use as an intermediate end point in clinical trials need further evaluation.

Genetic mutation signature for relapse prediction in normal karyotype acute myeloid leukemia

Risk stratification for normal karyotype acute myeloid leukemia (NK-AML) remains unsatisfactory, which is reflected by the high incidence of leukemia relapse. This study aimed to evaluate the role of gene mutations and clinical characterization in predicting the relapse of patients with NK-AML. A prognostic system for NK-AML was constructed. A panel of gene mutations was explored using next-generation sequencing. A nomogram algorithm was used to build a genomic mutation signature (GMS) nomogram (GMSN) model that combines GMS, measurable residual disease, and clinical factors to predict relapse in 347 patients with NK-AML from four centers. Patients in the GMS-high group had a higher 5-year incidence of relapse than those in the GMS-low group (p < 0.001). The 5-year incidence of relapse was also higher in patients in the GMSN-high group than in those in the GMSN-intermediate and -low groups (p < 0.001). The 5-year disease-free survival and overall survival rates were lower in patients in the GMSN-high group than in those in the GMSN-intermediate and -low groups (p < 0.001) as confirmed by training and validation cohorts. This study illustrates the potential of GMSN as a predictor of NK-AML relapse.