Commissioning of 6 MV medical linac for dynamic MLC-based IMRT on Monte Carlo code GEANT4

Monte Carlo methods for device simulations in radiation therapy

Monte Carlo (MC) simulations play an important role in radiotherapy, especially as a method to evaluate physical properties that are either impossible or difficult to measure. For example, MC simulations (MCSs) are used to aid in the design of radiotherapy devices or to understand their properties. The aim of this article is to review the MC method for device simulations in radiation therapy. After a brief history of the MC method and popular codes in medical physics, we review applications of the MC method to model treatment heads for neutral and charged particle radiation therapy as well as specific in-room devices for imaging and therapy purposes. We conclude by discussing the impact that MCSs had in this field and the role of MC in future device design.

Characterizing a Geant4 Monte Carlo model of a multileaf collimator for a TrueBeam™ linear accelerator

PURPOSE

The purpose of this work was to develop and validate a multileaf collimator (MLC) model for a TrueBeam™ linac using Geant4 Monte Carlo (MC) simulation kit.

METHODS

A Geant4 application was developed to accurately represent TrueBeam™ linac. Pre-computed phase-space file in a plane just above the jaws was used for radiation transport. A Varian 120 leaf Millennium™ MLC was modeled using geometry and material specifications provided by the manufacturer using Geant4 constructs. Leaf characteristics e.g. tongue-groove design, variable thickness, interleaf gap were simulated. The linac model was validated by comparing simulated dose profiles and depth-doses with experimental data using an ionization chamber in water. Dosimetric characteristics of the MLC such as inter- and intra-leaf leakage, penumbra effect, MLC leaf positioning, and dynamic characteristics were also investigated.

RESULTS

For the depth dose curves, 99% of the calculated data points agree within 1% of the experimental values for the 4 × 4 cm² and 10 × 10 cm² and within 2% of the experimental values for 20 × 20, 30 × 30 and 40 × 40 cm² jaw defined fields. The cross-plane dose profiles show agreement <2% for depths up to 10 cm and to within 4% beyond 10 cm. MLC dosimetric characterization with MC agree well with film measurements. The rounded leaf penumbra remained constant throughout the range of leaf motion.

CONCLUSIONS

The TrueBeam™ linac equipped with 120-leaf MLC was successfully modeled using Geant4. The accuracy of the model was verified by comparing the simulations with experiments. The model may be utilized for independent dose verification and QA of IMRT.

Dosimetric impact of an air passage on intraluminal brachytherapy for bronchus cancer

The brachytherapy dose calculations used in treatment planning systems (TPSs) have conventionally been performed assuming homogeneous water. Using measurements and a Monte Carlo simulation, we evaluated the dosimetric impact of an air passage on brachytherapy for bronchus cancer. To obtain the geometrical characteristics of an air passage, we analyzed the anatomical information from CT images of patients who underwent intraluminal brachytherapy using a high-dose-rate ¹⁹²Ir source (MicroSelectron V2r®, Nucletron). Using an ionization chamber, we developed a measurement system capable of measuring the peripheral dose with or without an air cavity surrounding the catheter. Air cavities of five different radii (0.3, 0.5, 0.75, 1.25 and 1.5 cm) were modeled by cylindrical tubes surrounding the catheter. A Monte Carlo code (GEANT4) was also used to evaluate the dosimetric impact of the air cavity. Compared with dose calculations in homogeneous water, the measurements and GEANT4 indicated a maximum overdose of 5-8% near the surface of the air cavity (with the maximum radius of 1.5 cm). Conversely, they indicated a minimum overdose of ~1% in the region 3-5 cm from the cavity surface for the smallest radius of 0.3 cm. The dosimetric impact depended on the size and the distance of the air passage, as well as the length of the treatment region. Based on dose calculations in water, the TPS for intraluminal brachytherapy for bronchus cancer had an unexpected overdose of 3-5% for a mean radius of 0.75 cm. This study indicates the need for improvement in dose calculation accuracy with respect to intraluminal brachytherapy for bronchus cancer.