2
|
Pakshir P, Hinz B. The big five in fibrosis: Macrophages, myofibroblasts, matrix, mechanics, and miscommunication. Matrix Biol 2018; 68-69:81-93. [DOI: 10.1016/j.matbio.2018.01.019] [Citation(s) in RCA: 162] [Impact Index Per Article: 27.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/14/2018] [Revised: 01/25/2018] [Accepted: 01/28/2018] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
|
3
|
de la Zerda A, Kratochvil MJ, Suhar NA, Heilshorn SC. Review: Bioengineering strategies to probe T cell mechanobiology. APL Bioeng 2018; 2:021501. [PMID: 31069295 PMCID: PMC6324202 DOI: 10.1063/1.5006599] [Citation(s) in RCA: 43] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/26/2017] [Accepted: 01/29/2018] [Indexed: 01/08/2023] Open
Abstract
T cells play a major role in adaptive immune response, and T cell dysfunction can lead to the progression of several diseases that are often associated with changes in the mechanical properties of tissues. However, the concept that mechanical forces play a vital role in T cell activation and signaling is relatively new. The endogenous T cell microenvironment is highly complex and dynamic, involving multiple, simultaneous cell-cell and cell-matrix interactions. This native complexity has made it a challenge to isolate the effects of mechanical stimuli on T cell activation. In response, researchers have begun developing engineered platforms that recapitulate key aspects of the native microenvironment to dissect these complex interactions in order to gain a better understanding of T cell mechanotransduction. In this review, we first describe some of the unique characteristics of T cells and the mounting research that has shown they are mechanosensitive. We then detail the specific bioengineering strategies that have been used to date to measure and perturb the mechanical forces at play during T cell activation. In addition, we look at engineering strategies that have been used successfully in mechanotransduction studies for other cell types and describe adaptations that may make them suitable for use with T cells. These engineering strategies can be classified as 2D, so-called 2.5D, or 3D culture systems. In the future, findings from this emerging field will lead to an optimization of culture environments for T cell expansion and the development of new T cell immunotherapies for cancer and other immune diseases.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Adi de la Zerda
- Department of Materials Science and Engineering, Stanford University, Stanford, California 94305, USA
| | | | - Nicholas A Suhar
- Department of Materials Science and Engineering, Stanford University, Stanford, California 94305, USA
| | - Sarah C Heilshorn
- Department of Materials Science and Engineering, Stanford University, Stanford, California 94305, USA
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Biomaterials approaches to modeling macrophage-extracellular matrix interactions in the tumor microenvironment. Curr Opin Biotechnol 2016; 40:16-23. [PMID: 26921768 DOI: 10.1016/j.copbio.2016.02.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 22] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/16/2015] [Revised: 02/03/2016] [Accepted: 02/04/2016] [Indexed: 01/12/2023]
Abstract
Tumors are characterized by aberrant extracellular matrix (ECM) remodeling and chronic inflammation. While advances in biomaterials and tissue engineering strategies have led to important new insights regarding the role of ECM composition, structure, and mechanical properties in cancer in general, the functional link between these parameters and macrophage phenotype is poorly understood. Nevertheless, increasing experimental evidence suggests that macrophage behavior is similarly controlled by physicochemical properties of the ECM and consequential changes in mechanosignaling. Here, we will summarize the current knowledge of macrophage biology and ECM-mediated differences in mechanotransduction and discuss future opportunities of biomaterials and tissue engineering platforms to interrogate the functional relationship between these parameters and their relevance to cancer.
Collapse
|
5
|
Cazaux S, Sadoun A, Biarnes-Pelicot M, Martinez M, Obeid S, Bongrand P, Limozin L, Puech PH. Synchronizing atomic force microscopy force mode and fluorescence microscopy in real time for immune cell stimulation and activation studies. Ultramicroscopy 2015; 160:168-181. [PMID: 26521163 DOI: 10.1016/j.ultramic.2015.10.014] [Citation(s) in RCA: 26] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/03/2015] [Revised: 09/17/2015] [Accepted: 10/12/2015] [Indexed: 11/24/2022]
Abstract
A method is presented for combining atomic force microscopy (AFM) force mode and fluorescence microscopy in order to (a) mechanically stimulate immune cells while recording the subsequent activation under the form of calcium pulses, and (b) observe the mechanical response of a cell upon photoactivation of a small G protein, namely Rac. Using commercial set-ups and a robust signal coupling the fluorescence excitation light and the cantilever bending, the applied force and activation signals were very easily synchronized. This approach allows to control the entire mechanical history of a single cell up to its activation and response down to a few hundreds of milliseconds, and can be extended with very minimal adaptations to other cellular systems where mechanotransduction is studied, using either purely mechanical stimuli or via a surface bound specific ligand.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Séverine Cazaux
- Aix Marseille Université, LAI UM 61, Marseille F-13288, France; Inserm, UMR_S 1067, Marseille F-13288, France; CNRS, UMR 7333, Marseille F-13288, France
| | - Anaïs Sadoun
- Aix Marseille Université, LAI UM 61, Marseille F-13288, France; Inserm, UMR_S 1067, Marseille F-13288, France; CNRS, UMR 7333, Marseille F-13288, France
| | - Martine Biarnes-Pelicot
- Aix Marseille Université, LAI UM 61, Marseille F-13288, France; Inserm, UMR_S 1067, Marseille F-13288, France; CNRS, UMR 7333, Marseille F-13288, France
| | - Manuel Martinez
- Aix Marseille Université, LAI UM 61, Marseille F-13288, France; Inserm, UMR_S 1067, Marseille F-13288, France; CNRS, UMR 7333, Marseille F-13288, France
| | - Sameh Obeid
- Aix Marseille Université, LAI UM 61, Marseille F-13288, France; Inserm, UMR_S 1067, Marseille F-13288, France; CNRS, UMR 7333, Marseille F-13288, France
| | - Pierre Bongrand
- Aix Marseille Université, LAI UM 61, Marseille F-13288, France; Inserm, UMR_S 1067, Marseille F-13288, France; CNRS, UMR 7333, Marseille F-13288, France; APHM, Hôpital de la Conception, Laboratoire d'Immunologie, Marseille F-13385, France
| | - Laurent Limozin
- Aix Marseille Université, LAI UM 61, Marseille F-13288, France; Inserm, UMR_S 1067, Marseille F-13288, France; CNRS, UMR 7333, Marseille F-13288, France
| | - Pierre-Henri Puech
- Aix Marseille Université, LAI UM 61, Marseille F-13288, France; Inserm, UMR_S 1067, Marseille F-13288, France; CNRS, UMR 7333, Marseille F-13288, France.
| |
Collapse
|