1
|
Ma L, Kong F, Sun K, Wang T, Guo T. From Classical Radiation to Modern Radiation: Past, Present, and Future of Radiation Mutation Breeding. Front Public Health 2022; 9:768071. [PMID: 34993169 PMCID: PMC8725632 DOI: 10.3389/fpubh.2021.768071] [Citation(s) in RCA: 32] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/31/2021] [Accepted: 11/15/2021] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
Radiation mutation breeding has been used for nearly 100 years and has successfully improved crops by increasing genetic variation. Global food production is facing a series of challenges, such as rapid population growth, environmental pollution and climate change. How to feed the world's enormous human population poses great challenges to breeders. Although advanced technologies, such as gene editing, have provided effective ways to breed varieties, by editing a single or multiple specific target genes, enhancing germplasm diversity through mutation is still indispensable in modern and classical radiation breeding because it is more likely to produce random mutations in the whole genome. In this short review, the current status of classical radiation, accelerated particle and space radiation mutation breeding is discussed, and the molecular mechanisms of radiation-induced mutation are demonstrated. This review also looks into the future development of radiation mutation breeding, hoping to deepen our understanding and provide new vitality for the further development of radiation mutation breeding.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Liqiu Ma
- Department of Nuclear Physics, China Institute of Atomic Energy, Beijing, China.,National Innovation Center of Radiation Application, Beijing, China
| | - Fuquan Kong
- Department of Nuclear Physics, China Institute of Atomic Energy, Beijing, China.,National Innovation Center of Radiation Application, Beijing, China
| | - Kai Sun
- National Engineering Research Center of Plant Space Breeding, South China Agricultural University, Guangdong, China
| | - Ting Wang
- Key Laboratory of High Magnetic Field and Ion Beam Physical Biology, Hefei Institutes of Physical Science, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Hefei, China
| | - Tao Guo
- National Engineering Research Center of Plant Space Breeding, South China Agricultural University, Guangdong, China
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Guo Z, Pei H, Nie J, Hu W, Zhang J, Ding J, Pan S, Li B, Hei TK, Chen W, Zhou G. Anti-cancer effects of CQBTO, a chloroquine, and benzo(e)triazine oxide conjugate. Chem Biol Drug Des 2019; 93:874-882. [PMID: 30637976 DOI: 10.1111/cbdd.13477] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/07/2018] [Revised: 12/11/2018] [Accepted: 12/16/2018] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
AIM Autophagy is a self-protective process, and it confers cancer cells resistance against radio-chemotherapeutics. To induce cancer cell death, a series of compounds of 3-((4-((7-chloroquinolin-4-yl)amino)butyl)amino)-7-substituted benzo[e][1,2,4]triazine 1-oxide or CQBTO containing two critical chemical groups were designed and synthesized. One compound, benzo[e][1,2,4]triazine 1-oxide, yielded free radicals to trigger autophagy, and the other one, chloroquine (CQ), was an inhibitor of autophagy. We hypothesized that the compounds could kill cancer cells effectively by inducing incomplete autophagy. METHODS In vitro cultured non-small cell lung carcinoma cells and primary lung tumors in mice in vivo were used to test the lethal effects of CQBTO on cancer cells and toxicity to normal tissues. Cell viability was examined using the CCK8 assay. Genomic instability was determined with the cytochalasin B-blocked micronucleus assay. Cell cycle distribution was analyzed by propidium iodide staining and flow cytometry. Western blotting and immunofluorescence were used to detect the induction and localization of LC3, a biomarker for autophagy. RESULTS Compared with CQ, three CQBTO compounds were lethal to lung cancer cells, and CQBTO-3 was the most effective. The LD50 for CQBTO-3 was 21 μΜ in A549 cells and 21.5 μΜ in Calu-1 cells, which was lower than that of CQBTO-2 or CQBTO-1. Induction of LC3 foci and an increase in the LC3II/LC3I ratio demonstrated the induction of autophagy by CQBTO-3 in A549 cells, whereas no obvious micronuclei or cell cycle arrest was observed. No detectable toxicity to normal mice was observed. CQBTO-3 improved the quality of mouse life, reduced the number and size of existing tumors, and suppressed tumor formation. CONCLUSION CQBTO-3 is a potential chemical compound for lung cancer treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ziyang Guo
- State Key Laboratory of Radiation Medicine and Protection, School of Radiation Medicine and Protection, Institute of Space Life Sciences, Collaborative Innovation Center of Radiological Medicine of Jiangsu Higher Education Institutions, Medical College of Soochow University, Suzhou, China
| | - Hailong Pei
- State Key Laboratory of Radiation Medicine and Protection, School of Radiation Medicine and Protection, Institute of Space Life Sciences, Collaborative Innovation Center of Radiological Medicine of Jiangsu Higher Education Institutions, Medical College of Soochow University, Suzhou, China
| | - Jing Nie
- State Key Laboratory of Radiation Medicine and Protection, School of Radiation Medicine and Protection, Institute of Space Life Sciences, Collaborative Innovation Center of Radiological Medicine of Jiangsu Higher Education Institutions, Medical College of Soochow University, Suzhou, China
| | - Wentao Hu
- State Key Laboratory of Radiation Medicine and Protection, School of Radiation Medicine and Protection, Institute of Space Life Sciences, Collaborative Innovation Center of Radiological Medicine of Jiangsu Higher Education Institutions, Medical College of Soochow University, Suzhou, China
| | - Jian Zhang
- State Key Laboratory of Radiation Medicine and Protection, School of Radiation Medicine and Protection, Institute of Space Life Sciences, Collaborative Innovation Center of Radiological Medicine of Jiangsu Higher Education Institutions, Medical College of Soochow University, Suzhou, China
| | - Jiahan Ding
- State Key Laboratory of Radiation Medicine and Protection, School of Radiation Medicine and Protection, Institute of Space Life Sciences, Collaborative Innovation Center of Radiological Medicine of Jiangsu Higher Education Institutions, Medical College of Soochow University, Suzhou, China
| | - Shuxian Pan
- State Key Laboratory of Radiation Medicine and Protection, School of Radiation Medicine and Protection, Institute of Space Life Sciences, Collaborative Innovation Center of Radiological Medicine of Jiangsu Higher Education Institutions, Medical College of Soochow University, Suzhou, China
| | - Bingyan Li
- State Key Laboratory of Radiation Medicine and Protection, School of Radiation Medicine and Protection, Institute of Space Life Sciences, Collaborative Innovation Center of Radiological Medicine of Jiangsu Higher Education Institutions, Medical College of Soochow University, Suzhou, China
| | - Tom K Hei
- Center for Radiological Research, College of Physician and Surgeons, Columbia University, New York, New York
| | - Weiqiang Chen
- Institute of Modern Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Lanzhou, China
| | - Guangming Zhou
- State Key Laboratory of Radiation Medicine and Protection, School of Radiation Medicine and Protection, Institute of Space Life Sciences, Collaborative Innovation Center of Radiological Medicine of Jiangsu Higher Education Institutions, Medical College of Soochow University, Suzhou, China
| |
Collapse
|