The role of SPARC protein expression in the progress of gastric cancer. P. Pathol Oncol Res. 2012;18:697-702. [PMID: 22246794 DOI: 10.1007/s12253-012-9497-9]

SPARC: a potential target for functional nanomaterials and drugs

Secreted protein acidic and rich in cysteine (SPARC), also termed osteonectin or BM-40, is a matricellular protein which regulates cell adhesion, extracellular matrix production, growth factor activity, and cell cycle. Although SPARC does not perform a structural function, it, however, modulates interactions between cells and the surrounding extracellular matrix due to its anti-proliferative and anti-adhesion properties. The overexpression of SPARC at sites, including injury, regeneration, obesity, cancer, and inflammation, reveals its application as a prospective target and therapeutic indicator in the treatment and assessment of disease. This article comprehensively summarizes the mechanism of SPARC overexpression in inflammation and tumors as well as the latest research progress of functional nanomaterials in the therapy of rheumatoid arthritis and tumors by manipulating SPARC as a new target. This article provides ideas for using functional nanomaterials to treat inflammatory diseases through the SPARC target. The purpose of this article is to provide a reference for ongoing disease research based on SPARC-targeted therapy.

Bioinformatics and pathway enrichment analysis identified hub genes and potential biomarker for gastric cancer prognosis

Introduction

Gastric cancer is one of the most common cancers in the world. This study aimed to identify genes, biomarkers, and metabolic pathways affecting gastric cancer using bioinformatic analysis and meta-analysis.

Methods

Datasets containing gene expression profiles of tumor lesions and adjacent non-tumor mucosa samples were downloaded. Common differentially expressed genes between data sets were selected to identify hub genes and further analysis. Gene Expression Profiling and Interactive Analyses (GEPIA) and the Kaplan-Meier method were used to further validate the expression level of genes and plot the overall survivalcurve, respectively.

Results and disscussion

KEGG pathway analysis showed that the most important pathway was enriched in ECM-receptor interaction. Hub genes includingCOL1A2, FN1, BGN, THBS2, COL5A2, COL6A3, SPARC and COL12A1 wereidentified. The top interactive miRNAs including miR-29a-3p, miR-101-3p,miR-183-5p, and miR-15a-5p targeted the most hub genes. The survival chart showed an increase in mortality in patients with gastric cancer, which shows the importance of the role of these genes in the development of the disease and can be considered candidate genes in the prevention and early diagnosis of gastric cancer.

Clinicopathological and prognostic significance of SPARC expression in gastric cancer: A meta‑analysis and bioinformatics analysis

Secreted protein acidic and rich in cysteine (SPARC) is a member of the extracellular matrix glycoprotein family that binds to calcium ions. It may bind to a variety of proteins in the extracellular matrix and also compete with cell membrane surface receptors for growth. In the present study, the relationship between SPARC expression in gastric cancer tissues and the clinicopathological characteristics and prognosis of patients with gastric cancer were systematically evaluated. A meta-analysis and bioinformatics analysis were performed using the PubMed, Chinese National Knowledge Infrastructure, Kaplan-Meier (KM)-plotter, The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA), Gene Expression Profiling Interactive Analysis (GEPIA), University of ALabama at Birmingham CANcer (UALCAN), Human Protein Atlas (HPA) and Timer databases. SPARC was mainly expressed in tumor mesenchymal cells. The meta-analysis indicated that SPARC expression was higher in gastric cancer tissues than in normal tissues. SPARC was associated with the degree of differentiation and distant metastasis. K-M plotter results indicated that high SPARC expression was negatively associated with overall survival, post-progression survival and progression-free survival rates of patients. According to the Oncomine, GEPIA, UALCAN and HPA databases, SPARC mRNA and protein expression was upregulated in gastric cancer vs. normal tissues and was negatively associated with poor patient prognosis. In the TCGA database, univariate analysis indicated that lymph node metastasis and distant metastasis were associated with the prognosis of patients with gastric cancer. Cox multifactorial analysis suggested that high SPARC expression, age and distant metastasis were important factors affecting the survival time of patients with gastric cancer. Analysis with the Timer database indicated that SPARC was closely associated with the proportion of 7 immune-cell infiltrates in gastric cancer. These findings indicated that high expression of SPARC may be a potential marker of tumorigenesis and metastasis in patients with gastric cancer.

Identification of Potential Diagnostic and Prognostic Biomarkers for Gastric Cancer Based on Bioinformatic Analysis

Background: Gastric cancer (GC) is one of the most prevalent cancers all over the world. The molecular mechanisms of GC remain unclear and not well understood. GC cases are majorly diagnosed at the late stage, resulting in a poor prognosis. Advances in molecular biology techniques allow us to get a better understanding of precise molecular mechanisms and enable us to identify the key genes in the carcinogenesis and progression of GC.

Methods: The present study used datasets from the GEO database to screen differentially expressed genes (DEGs) between GC and normal gastric tissues. GO and KEGG enrichments were utilized to analyze the function of DEGs. The STRING database and Cytoscape software were applied to generate protein–protein network and find hub genes. The expression levels of hub genes were evaluated using data from the TCGA database. Survival analysis was conducted to evaluate the prognostic value of hub genes. The GEPIA database was involved to correlate key gene expressions with the pathological stage. Also, ROC curves were constructed to assess the diagnostic value of key genes.

Results: A total of 607 DEGs were identified using three GEO datasets. GO analysis showed that the DEGs were mainly enriched in extracellular structure and matrix organization, collagen fibril organization, extracellular matrix (ECM), and integrin binding. KEGG enrichment was mainly enriched in protein digestion and absorption, ECM-receptor interaction, and focal adhesion. Fifteen genes were identified as hub genes, one of which was excluded for no significant expression between tumor and normal tissues. COL1A1, COL5A2, P4HA3, and SPARC showed high values in prognosis and diagnosis of GC.

Conclusion: We suggest COL1A1, COL5A2, P4HA3, and SPARC as biomarkers for the diagnosis and prognosis of GC.

New Angiogenic Regulators Produced by TAMs: Perspective for Targeting Tumor Angiogenesis

Simple Summary

Since the targeting of a single pro-angiogenic factor fails to improve oncological disease outcome, significant efforts have been made to identify new pro-angiogenic factors that could compensate for the deficiency of current therapy or act independently as single drugs. Our review aims to present the state-of-the art for well-known and recently described factors produced by macrophages that induce and regulate angiogenesis. A number of positive and negative regulators of angiogenesis in the tumor microenvironment are produced by tumor-associated macrophages (TAMs). Accumulating evidence has indicated that, apart from the well-known angiogenic factors, there are plenty of novel angiogenesis-regulating proteins that belong to different classes. We summarize the data regarding the direct or indirect mechanisms of the interaction of these factors with endothelial cells during angiogenesis. We highlight the recent findings that explain the limitations in the efficiency of current anti-angiogenic therapy approaches.

Abstract

Angiogenesis is crucial to the supply of a growing tumor with nutrition and oxygen. Inhibition of angiogenesis is one of the main treatment strategies for colorectal, lung, breast, renal, and other solid cancers. However, currently applied drugs that target VEGF or receptor tyrosine kinases have limited efficiency, which raises a question concerning the mechanism of patient resistance to the already developed drugs. Tumor-associated macrophages (TAMs) were identified in the animal tumor models as a key inducer of the angiogenic switch. TAMs represent a potent source not only for VEGF, but also for a number of other pro-angiogenic factors. Our review provides information about the activity of secreted regulators of angiogenesis produced by TAMs. They include members of SEMA and S100A families, chitinase-like proteins, osteopontin, and SPARC. The COX-2, Tie2, and other factors that control the pro-angiogenic activity of TAMs are also discussed. We highlight how these recent findings explain the limitations in the efficiency of current anti-angiogenic therapy. Additionally, we describe genetic and posttranscriptional mechanisms that control the expression of factors regulating angiogenesis. Finally, we present prospects for the complex targeting of the pro-angiogenic activity of TAMs.

High expression of TREM2 promotes EMT via the PI3K/AKT pathway in gastric cancer: bioinformatics analysis and experimental verification

Background: To date, the pathogenesis of gastric cancer (GC) remains unclear. We combined public database resources and bioinformatics analysis methods, explored some novel genes and verified the experiments to further understand the pathogenesis of GC and to provide a promising target for anti-tumor therapy. Methods: We downloaded the chip data related to GC from the Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) database, extracted differentially expressed genes (DEGs), and then determined the key genes in the development of GC via PPI networks and model analysis. Functional annotation via GO and KEGG enrichment of DEGs was used to understand the latent roles of DEGs. The expression of the triggering receptor expressed on myeloid cells 2 (TREM2) gene in GC cell lines was verified via RT-PCR and western blotting. Moreover, the CCK-8, wound healing assay, and transwell migration and invasion assays were used to understand the changes in the proliferation, migration, and invasion abilities of GC cells after silencing TREM2. Western blotting verified the interaction between TREM2 and PI3K predict of the string website, as well as the effect of TREM2 on EMT. Finally, a lung metastasis model was used to explore the relationship between TREM2 and metastasis. Results: Our study identified 16 key genes, namely BGN, COL1A1, COL4A1, COL5A2, NOX4, SPARC, HEYL, SPP1, TIMP1, CTHRC1, TREM2, SFRP4, FBXO32, GPX3, KIF4A, and MMP9 genes associated with GC. The EMT-related pathway was the most significantly altered pathway. TREM2 expression was higher in GC cell lines and was remarkably associated with tumor invasion depth, TNM stage, histological grade, histological type, anatomic subdivision, and Helicobacter pylori state. Knockdown of TREM2 expression inhibited the proliferation, migration, and invasion of GC cells as well as the progression of EMT by PI3K/AKT signaling in vitro. In addition, lung metastasis were decreased in vivo. Conclusions: We identified some important genes associated with the progression of GC via public database analysis, explored and verified the effects of proto-oncogene TREM2 on EMT via the PI3K/AKT pathway. TREM2 may be a novel target in the GC therapy.

SPARC-p53: The double agents of cancer

Cancer is a complex disease with high incidence and mortality rates. The important role played by the tumor microenvironment in regulating oncogenesis, tumor growth, and metastasis is by now well accepted in the scientific community. SPARC is known to participate in tumor-stromal interactions and impact cancer growth in ambiguous ways, which either enhance or suppress cancer aggressiveness, in a context-dependent manner. p53 transcription factor, a well-established tumor suppressor, has been reported to promote tumor growth in certain situations, such as hypoxia, thus displaying a duality in its action. Although both proteins are being tested in clinical trials, the synergistic relation between them is yet to be explored in clinical practice. In this review, we address the controversial roles of SPARC and p53 as double agents in cancer, briefly summarizing the interaction found between these two molecules and its importance in cancer.

Expression of peritumoral SPARC during distal cholangiocarcinoma progression and correlation with outcome

Objectives: Distal cholangiocarcinoma (dCCA) is a malignancy with a dismal prognosis. One of the hallmarks is the presence of a rich desmoplastic stroma believed to contribute to tumor progression and treatment resistance. Secreted protein acidic and rich in cysteine (SPARC) is a matricellular glycoprotein implicated in tumor-stroma interaction with prognostic correlation across several malignancies. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the expression pattern and prognostic significance of SPARC in resected dCCA and paired lymph node metastasis.Materials and methods: SPARC expression was evaluated in 59 resected dCCA samples and 25 paired lymph node metastases as well as 10 benign bile duct samples using immunohistochemistry. Stromal SPARC expression was scored semi quantitatively. Survival was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method with associated log-rank test.Results: SPARC expression was absent in normal bile ducts. In dCCA, peritumoral stromal SPARC was detectable in 47/59 (80%) of samples with 40/59 (68%) classified as high stromal SPARC expression. There was a significantly lower proportion of SPARC positive stroma in paired lymph node metastasis 17/25 (68%) than the corresponding primary tumors 24/25 (96%) (p = .016). Stromal SPARC expression was associated with the presence of lymph node metastasis; high SPARC expression 31/40 (78%) versus low SPARC expression 9/19 (47%) (p = .013). In the present material there was no significant association between stromal SPARC expression and survival.Conclusions: Stromal SPARC expression occurs frequently in dCCA. Although significantly lower than in primary tumors stromal SPARC is frequently retained in paired lymph node metastasis suggesting a possible role in the metastatic process of dCCA.

Macrophage-derived SPARC Attenuates M2-mediated Pro-tumour Phenotypes

Since the theory of seed and soil was put forward, people have increasingly recognized that the tumour microenvironment is an important regulator of tumour progression and therapeutic response. Among them, M2-type macrophages (M2, as the major macrophage subtype in the tumour foci) have important promoting effects on various biological behaviours. Secreted protein acidic and rich in cysteine (SPARC) is an important anti-tumour component in the microenvironment of gastric cancer. This study shows that macrophages are an important source of the SPARC and that SPARC overexpression in M2 can reduce M2-mediated promoting proliferation, migration and anti-apoptotic effects in gastric cancer. Additionally, the AKT/mTOR signalling pathways may participate in the malignant process.

Accumulation of stabilin-1 positive macrophages in the early stage of gastric cancer is associated with short cumulative survival

The scavenger receptor stabilin-1 has been reported to be expressed by tumor-associated macrophages (TAMs) and to facilitate tumor growth and metastasis in mouse models of breast carcinoma and melanoma. However, to the best of our knowledge, its expression and association with prognosis in human gastric cancer has not been evaluated. The present study investigated the expression of stabilin-1 and its association with clinicopathological parameters in patients with gastric cancer. The expression of stabilin-1 was evaluated by immunohistochemical staining of gastric cancer tissue samples of 371 Chinese patients with primary gastric adenocarcinoma. Confocal laser scanning microscopy was used to determine the cellular source of stabilin-1 in the gastric cancer tissues using anti-CD68, anti-CD163, anti-stabilin-1 and anti-secreted protein acidic and rich in cysteine antibodies. A higher number of stabilin-1-positive cells were observed in the cancer tissues of primary gastric adenocarcinoma compared with adjacent non-cancerous tissues of primary gastric adenocarcinoma (P<0.001); the majority of stabilin-1-positve cells were CD68⁺/CD163⁺ macrophages. Poorly-differentiated gastric cancer tissue had fewer stabilin-1-positive cells compared with medium- and well-differentiated gastric cancer (P=0.030). A higher number of stabilin-1-positive cells were found in the early Tumor-Node-Metastasis (TNM) stage (TNM I stage) of primary gastric adenocarcinoma (P=0.038) compared with TNM stage IV. For patients with TNM stage I disease, a higher number of stabilin-1-positive TAMs was associated with shorter cumulative survival (P<0.05). Overall, stabilin-1 was found to be expressed by CD68⁺ TAMs in human gastric cancer. The high expression of stabilin-1 in TNM stage I disease was associated with poor patient survival, indicating the clinical significance of stabilin-1 in gastric cancer.

Prognostic value and association of Lauren classification with VEGF and VEGFR-2 expression in gastric cancer

Gastric cancer (GC) is one of the most common malignant tumors in the world. As anti-angiogenic therapy shows efficacy in the treatment of GC, but only works in certain patients, the identification of potential beneficiaries are urgently required in order to apply appropriate treatments. The Lauren classification demonstrates numerous differences in etiology, epidemiology and pathology; however, the association between Lauren classification and pro-angiogenic factors remains unclear. The present study aimed to investigate the clinicopathological factors associated with Lauren classification and the prognostic significance of Lauren classification and vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) and VEGF receptor-2 (VEGFR-2) expression in GC. Paraffin-embedded GC tissues and clinical information of 255 patients with GC were collected. The clinicopathological factors associated with Lauren classification were evaluated by Logistic regression analysis. Kaplan-Meier survival and Cox regression analyses were used to examine the prognostic significance of Lauren classification and of VEGF and VEGFR-2 expression in patients with GC. The results demonstrated that there was no association between Lauren classification and VEGF and VEGFR-2 expression. Furthermore, results from survival analysis demonstrated that Lauren classification (P=0.001) and Tumor-Node-Metastasis stage (stage II, P=0.002; stage III, P<0.001) were independent prognostic factors in GC. Following subgroup analysis based on Tumor-Node-Metastasis stage, Lauren classification was demonstrated to be an independent prognostic factor in patients with stage III GC (P=0.010) but not in patients with stage I or II GC. Furthermore, VEGFR-2 overexpression was an independent predictor of survival in intestinal-type GC (P=0.040) but not in diffuse-type GC. Taken together, these results indicate that Lauren classification may serve as an independent prognostic factor for patients with GC. In addition, although the expression of VEGF and VEGFR-2 was not associated with Lauren classification, VEGFR-2 overexpression may be considered as an independent prognostic factor in intestinal-type GC.

Low expression of SPARC in gastric cancer-associated fibroblasts leads to stemness transformation and 5-fluorouracil resistance in gastric cancer

Background

The aim of the present study was to clarify the correlations between SPARC expression in gastric cancer-associated fibroblasts (GCAFs) and the prognosis of patients with gastric cancer and to elucidate the role of GCAF-derived SPARC in stemness transformation and 5-fluorouracil resistance in gastric cancer.

Methods

One hundred ninety-two patients were enrolled in the present study. SPARC expression levels were evaluated by immunohistochemical staining. Primary GCAFs were obtained and cultured from cancer patients for in vitro study, and a lentivirus infection method was employed to knock down SPARC expression in GCAFs. The stemness phenotype and 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) response of gastric cancer cells were assessed via a 3D co-culture model. The apoptotic status and stemness alterations were monitored by flow cytometry and western blotting. Additionally, label-free quantification proteomics was used to identify the differentially expressed proteins and potential pathways in gastric cancer cells treated with GCAF-derived SPARC.

Results

Low expression of GCAF-derived SPARC was associated with decreased differentiation and reduced 5-year overall survival and was an independent predictive factor for prognosis in gastric cancer. The 3D tumour growth and 5-FU resistance abilities of gastric cancer cells were elevated after treatment with GCAFs with SPARC knockdown relative to these abilities in negative control cells. Additionally, suppressing SPARC expression in GCAFs facilitated the phenotypic alteration of gastric cancer cells towards CD44⁺/CD24⁻ cancer stem cell (CSC)-like cells. Quantification proteomics analysis revealed that the differentially expressed proteins in gastric cancer cells were mainly involved in the AKT/mTOR and MEK/ERK signalling pathways.

Conclusions

SPARC expression in GCAFs is a useful prognostic factor in patients with gastric cancer. Low expression of GCAF-derived SPARC can lead to CSC transformation and 5-FU resistance. Additionally, the AKT/mTOR and MEK/ERK signalling pathways may participate in the malignant process.

Electronic supplementary material

The online version of this article (10.1186/s12935-019-0844-8) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Clinical significance of secreted protein, acidic and cysteine-rich gene expression in patients with stage II/III gastric cancer following curative resection and adjuvant chemotherapy with S-1

The standard treatment for stage II/III gastric cancer is surgical resection followed by adjuvant chemotherapy with fluoropyrimidine anticancer agents, including S-1. The protein, secreted protein, acidic and cysteine-rich (SPARC), promotes angiogenesis, and the proliferation and migration of cancer cells. The present study evaluated the significance of expression of the SPARC gene in patients with stage II/III gastric cancer who had undergone surgical resection and adjuvant chemotherapy with S-1. In the present study, reverse transcription-quantitative polymerase chain reaction was performed in order to quantify mRNA expression levels of SPARC in cancer tissues and adjacent normal mucosa obtained from 134 patients with stage II/III gastric cancer who had undergone surgical resection followed by adjuvant chemotherapy with S-1. The mRNA expression level of SPARC was significantly higher in cancer tissues than in adjacent normal mucosa (P=0.0012). Additionally, the 5-year overall survival rate was significantly poorer in patients with high SPARC gene expression than in those with low expression (P<0.0001). Furthermore, multivariate analysis indicated that high SPARC mRNA expression was a significant predictor of poorer survival in patients with stage II/III gastric cancer who had undergone surgical resection and adjuvant chemotherapy with S-1 (HR, 5.347; P<0.0001). Therefore, high expression of the SPARC gene may be a useful predictor of outcomes in patients with stage II/III gastric cancer, who have received treatment involving surgical resection and adjuvant chemotherapy with S-1.

Which are the best Chinese herbal injections combined with XELOX regimen for gastric cancer?: A PRISMA-compliant network meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

The optimal Chinese herbal injections (CHIs) combined with XELOX regimen for patients with gastric cancer remains elusive. The aim of our network meta-analysis (NMA) is to explore the best options among different CHIs for gastric cancer.

METHODS

PubMed, Embase, the Cochrane Library, the China National Knowledge Infrastructure Database (CNKI), Wan-fang Database, Cqvip Database (VIP), China Biology Medicine disc (CBMdisc) were searched to identify RCTs which focused on CHIs against gastric cancer. The quality assessment of included randomized controlled trials (RCTs) was conducted by the Cochrane risk of bias tool. Standard pair-wise and Bayesian NMAs were performed to compare the efficacy and safety of different CHIs combined with the XELOX regimen via Stata 13.0 and WinBUGS1.4 software.

RESULTS

A total of 2316 records were searched, the network of evidence included 26 eligible RCTs involving 13 types of CHIs and 2154 patients. The results suggested that Shenqifuzheng+ XELOX, Huachansu+ XELOX, Kangai+ XELOX, Javanica oil emulsion+ XELOX, Aidi injection+ XELOX might be the optimal treatment for gastric cancer in improving the performance status than using XELOX regimen single, with odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) of 2.74 (1.24, 6.17), 8.27 (1.74, 42.43), 4.28 (1.80, 10.48), 5.14 (1.87, 16.28), 0.20 (0.090, 0.44). At the aspects of ADRs (adverse reactions), Compound Kushen+ XELOX, Lentinan+ XELOX, Xiaoaiping injection+ XELOX could obviously relieve leukopenia than only receiving XELOX regimen, and their ORs and 95% CIs were 5.62 (1.41, 36.24), 8.16 (2.25, 29.43), 5.69 (1.85, 15.77). Furthermore, Disodium cantharidinate and vitamin B6+ XELOX, Shenqifuzheng+ XELOX, Kangai+ XELOX, Lentinan+ XELOX could obviously relieve the nausea and vomiting than receiving the XELOX regimen alone, with ORs and 95% CIs of 5.29 (1.30, 23.96), 2.50 (1.16, 5.26), 2.42 (1.06, 5.63), 9.04 (3.24, 26.73). Nevertheless, CHIs combined with XELOX regimen did not confer higher better clinical effectiveness rate over receiving XELOX regimen alone, with nonstatistically significant between-group differences.

CONCLUSIONS

As the available evidence suggested that CHIs combined with XELOX regimen could provide treatment benefits for patients with gastric cancer. Among 13 types of CHIs, Javanica oil emulsion and Compound Kushen injection is the optimal treatment in improving the clinical effectiveness rate and performance status, and Lentinan injection was superior in relieving ADRs.

SPARC expression in gastric cancer predicts poor prognosis: Results from a clinical cohort, pooled analysis and GSEA assay

Background

The prognostic role of Secreted Protein Acidic and Rich in Cysteine (SPARC) in gastric cancer (GC) remains controversial. We investigated the clinical significance, the survival relevance, and potential function of SPARC in GC with resected samples, online gene set GSE62254, and cell line SGC7901.

Results

High immunostaining of SPARC significantly correlated with tumor differentiation (P = 0.004), and independently predicted shorter overall survival (OS) (HR = 1.446, P = 0.022), based on the current IHC evaluation. The accuracy of the results was further validated with 1000 times bootstrapping and the time-dependent receiver-operating characteristics (ROC) curves. The meta-analysis (pooled HR = 1.60, 95% CI: 1.01−2.53) confirmed SPARC as the predictor for reduced OS in GC. Moreover, the association between enhanced SPARC expression and Adriamycin (Adr) sensitivity was revealed by GSEA, and then confirmed by comparative cellular experiments, such as the protein level analysis of SGC7901and SGC7901/Adr cell line.

Materials and Methods

Immunohistochemistry (IHC) method was used to detect SPARC expression in 137 GC cases. Meta-analysis was performed based on 5 studies published in English on PubMed up to March 2016. GSEA was performed using online data set GSE62254 and GC-related functional gene sets derived from molecular signatures database (MSigDB). Western Blot was carried out to compare protein-level differences between gastric carcinoma SGC7901 cell line and Adr resistant SGC7901/Adr cell line. MTT assay was done to confirm the induction of SPARC on Adr sensitivity

Conclusions

Increased SPARC expression in GC led to a worse clinical outcome of patients and might induce Adr sensitivity of GC cells.

High secreted protein acidic and rich in cysteine expression in peritumoral fibroblasts predicts better prognosis in patients with resectable gastric cancer

Secreted protein acidic and rich in cysteine (SPARC) is an extracellular matrix glycoprotein that may serve an important role in epithelial-mesenchymal transition. Recent studies have demonstrated that SPARC status is a prognostic indicator in various cancer types; however, its value remains unclear in gastric cancer (GC). In the present study, the localization and prognostic impact of SPARC expression were evaluated in patients with GC. Immunohistochemical analysis of SPARC expression was performed in 117 surgically resected GC specimens, and the localization of SPARC positive cells, as well as the rassociation between SPARC expression and clinicopathological characteristics were evaluated. High SPARC expression was observed in 47 cases; the glycoprotein was localized in the peritumoral fibroblasts, but was rarely observed in the cytoplasm of cancer cells. Heterogeneity of SPARC expression was observed in 52 cases. High stromal SPARC expression was identified to be an independent predictor of more favorable prognosis (overall survival and recurrence free survival) in all patients (P<0.001). On subgroup analysis, this association remained significant in patients who received adjuvant chemotherapy, but not in patients who did not (P<0.001). Stromal SPARC expression predicts better prognosis in GC patients who underwent curative resection; this appears to be associated with improved response to chemotherapy.

The relationship between stromal cell derived SPARC in human gastric cancer tissue and its clinicopathologic significance

Background

We aimed to investigate the cellular source of secreted protein acidic and rich in cysteine (SPARC) in gastric cancer tissues and the relationship between SPARC expression and its prognostic significance.

Methods

The expression of SPARC in 365 primary advanced gastric adenocarcinomas and 39 non-cancerous tissues was evaluated by immunohistochemical staining. Double-immunofluorescence staining was used to reveal the cellular source of SPARC in tumor tissues. Western blotting and immunofluorescence staining were applied for verifying the endogenous expression of SPARC in human cell lines of gastric cancer and fibroblast.

Results

Higher positivity of SPARC was observed in gastric cancer tissues than non-cancerous gastric tissues (P=0.000). The positivity of SPARC was related to age (P=0.032), tumor location (P=0.018), depth of tumor invasion (P=0.011), nodal metastasis (P=0.023), TNM stage (P=0.034), the differentiation degree (P=0.006) and pathological type (P=0.002) of gastric cancer. SPARC in gastric cancer tissues was mainly expressed by cancer-associated fibroblasts. SPARC also appeared in neovascular endothelial cells and a few tumor-associated macrophages. The endogenous expression of SPARC in fibroblasts was suppressed by mucus-producing gastric adenocarcinoma cells(MKN-45). Increased SPARC expression in gastric cancer tissue was suggestive of a shorter cumulative survival in the patients with gastric adenocarcinoma, though this difference was not statistically significant(P>0.05).

Conclusion

SPARC in human gastric cancer tissue was derived from the stromal cells and was mainly produced by cancer-associated fibroblasts. Production of SPARC in fibroblasts was reduced by the mucus-producing gastric adenocarcinoma cells.

Impact of Secreted Protein Acidic and Rich in Cysteine (SPARC) Expression on Prognosis After Surgical Resection for Biliary Carcinoma

BACKGROUND

Secreted protein acidic and rich in cysteine (SPARC) is a matricellular protein that influences chemotherapy effectiveness and prognosis. The aim of this study was to investigate whether SPARC expression correlates with the postoperative survival of patients treated with surgical resection for biliary carcinoma.

METHODS

SPARC expression in resected biliary carcinoma specimens was investigated immunohistochemically in 175 patients. The relationship between SPARC expression and prognosis after surgery was evaluated using univariate and multivariate analyses.

RESULTS

High SPARC expression in peritumoral stroma was found in 61 (35%) patients. In all patients, stromal SPARC expression was significantly associated with overall survival (OS) (P = 0.006). Multivariate analysis revealed that high stromal SPARC expression was an independent risk factor for poor OS (HR 1.81, P = 0.006). Moreover, high stromal SPARC expression was independently associated with poor prognosis in a subset of 118 patients treated with gemcitabine-based adjuvant chemotherapy (HR 2.04, P = 0.010) but not in the 57 patients who did not receive adjuvant chemotherapy (P = 0.21).

CONCLUSIONS

Stromal SPARC expression correlated with the prognosis of patients with resectable biliary carcinoma, and its significance was enhanced in patients treated with adjuvant gemcitabine-based chemotherapy.

The relationship between SPARC expression in primary tumor and metastatic lymph node of resected pancreatic cancer patients and patients' survival

BACKGROUND

Previous researches in pancreatic cancer demonstrated a negative correlation between secreted protein acidic and rich in cysteine (SPARC) expression in primary tumor and survival, but not for SPARC expression in lymph node. In the present study, we aimed to evaluate the SPARC expression in various types of tissues and its impact on patients' prognosis.

METHODS

The expression of SPARC was examined by immunohistochemistry in resected pancreatic cancer specimens. Kaplan-Meier analyses and Cox proportional hazards regression were applied to assess the mortality risk.

RESULTS

A total of 222 tissue samples from 73 patients were collected to evaluate the SPARC expression, which included 73 paired primary tumor and adjacent normal tissues, 38 paired metastatic and normal lymph nodes. The proportion of positive SPARC expression in metastatic lymph node was high (32/38), whereas in normal lymph node it was negative (0/38). Positive SPARC expression in primary tumor cells was associated with a significantly decreased overall survival (P=0.007) and disease-free survival (P=0.003), whereas in other types of tissues it did not show a predictive role for prognosis. Univariate and multivariate analyses both confirmed this significance.

CONCLUSION

SPARC can serve a dual function role as both predictor for prognosis and potentially biomarker for lymph node metastasis in resected pancreatic cancer patients.

Change of SPARC expression after chemotherapy in gastric cancer

Objective

The expression of tumor biomarkers may change after chemotherapy. However, whether secreted protein acidic and rich in cysteine (SPARC) expression changes after chemotherapy in gastric cancer (GC) is unclear. This study investigated the influence of chemotherapy on SPARC expression in GC.

Methods

Immunohistochemistry was used to analyze SPARC expression in 132 GC cases (including 54 cases with preoperative chemotherapy and 78 cases without preoperative chemotherapy). SPARC expression of postoperative specimens with and without preoperative chemotherapy was assessed to analyze the influence of chemotherapy on SPARC expression.

Results

SPARC was highly expressed in GC compared with the desmoplastic stroma surrounding tumor cells and noncancerous tissues. High SPARC expression was correlated with invasion depth, lymph node, and TNM stage. After chemotherapy, a lower proportion of high SPARC expression was observed in patients with preoperative chemotherapy than in the controls. For 54 patients with preoperative chemotherapy, gross type, histology, depth of invasion, lymph node, TNM stage, and SPARC expression were related to overall survival. Further multivariate analysis showed that lymph node, histology, and SPARC expression after chemotherapy were independent prognostic factors.

Conclusion

SPARC expression may change after chemotherapy in GC. SPARC expression should be reassessed for patients with GC after chemotherapy.

Prognostic role of SPARC expression in gastric cancer: a meta-analysis

INTRODUCTION

Secreted protein acidic and rich in cysteine (SPARC) is involved in regulating cell adhesion, proliferation, migration, and tissue remodeling. We performed a meta-analysis to evaluate the association between SPARC expression and the clinicopathologic features and outcomes of gastric cancer patients.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Publications that assessed the clinical or prognostic significance of SPARC in gastric cancer up to October 2013 were identified. A meta-analysis was performed to clarify the association between SPARC expression and clinical outcomes.

RESULTS

Ten studies, including 1417 cases, met the inclusion criteria. The data were analyzed and the results show that SPARC is not significantly associated with the depth of gastric cancer invasion (odds ratio (OR) = 1.17, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.60-2.29, Z = 0.47, p = 0.64) or tumor differentiation (OR = 0.59, 95% CI: 0.22-1.58, Z = 1.06, p = 0.29). Moreover, SPARC was not significantly correlated with lymph node metastasis (OR = 0.72, 95% CI: 0.37-1.41, Z = 0.96, p = 0.34). However, SPARC overexpression was highly correlated with reduced overall survival (relative risk (RR) = 1.78, 95% CI: 1.52-2.09, Z = 7.10, p = 0.43).

CONCLUSIONS

The SPARC may play an important role in the progression of gastric cancer, and SPARC overexpression is closely correlated with poor patient survival. The SPARC is a potential clinical marker for the survival of gastric cancer patients; however, well-designed prospective studies are needed to confirm these findings.

Prognostic impact of tumoral and/or peri-tumoral stromal SPARC expressions after surgery in patients with biliary tract cancer

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

SPARC (secreted protein acidic and rich in cysteine) is a matricellular glycoprotein that modulates interactions between tumoral cells and the peri-tumoralstroma. SPARC induces proliferation and invasion in vitro, and is a poor prognostic factor in several gastrointestinal cancers. Herein, we evaluated the prognostic value of tumoral and stromal SPARC expression in patients with biliary tract cancer (BTC) after surgery.

METHODS

We examined immunohistochemical patterns of SPARC expression in 110 resected BTC specimens and evaluated the prognostic value using prospectively collected data.

RESULTS

SPARC was expressed in tumoral cells in 46 samples (42%) and inperi-tumoralstromain 65 samples (59%). Tumoral SPARC expression was not related to major patient characteristics. Stromal SPARC expression was related to lymph node metastasis, stage, margin status, and tumor location. Overall survival at 5 years after surgery was 34.2%. Stromal SPARC (P < 0.001) and tumoral SPARC (P = 0.048) were associated with poor prognosis. Multivariate analysis revealed invasion into lymphatic system, residual tumor, and stromal SPARC as independent prognostic factors. The hazard ratio for patients with positive stromal SPARC was 3.20 (P < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

SPARC expression inperi-tumoralstroma predicts a poor prognosis for patients with BTC after surgery.

SPARC expression is negatively correlated with clinicopathological factors of gastric cancer and inhibits malignancy of gastric cancer cells

Secreted protein acidic and rich in cysteine (SPARC) is a glycoprotein which plays multiple roles in different types of cancer. Our previous study showed that SPARC overexpression inhibited the growth and angiogenesis of tumors, and reduced expression of vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF). However, the relationship between SPARC expression and clinicopathological factors of gastric cancer (GC) is controversial, and the role of SPARC in GC remains unclear. We evaluated expression of SPARC in 65 human GC tissues using immunohistochemistry (IHC). The results indicated that SPARC expression was negatively correlated with clinicopathological factors of GC. In vitro assay showed that SPARC overexpression decreased proliferation and clonogenicity by suppressing CD44 expression. In addition, SPARC overexpression inhibited VEGF induced proliferation and arrested cell cycle of GC cells by reducing the activation of VEGFR2, ERK1/2 and AKT signaling pathways. SPARC suppressed the invasion and migration of GC by reducing MMP-7, MMP-9, N-cadherin, Sp1 and p-ERK1/2 expression. In the in vivo assay, cancer metastasis mouse models were established by tail vein injection. The results revealed that the lung metastases of SPARC-overexpressing GC cells in the mice were much fewer than those of control cells.

Clinical significance of SPARC gene expression in patients with gastric cancer

PURPOSE

Secreted protein acidic and rich in cysteine (SPARC) is one of the first known matricellular proteins that modulates interactions between cells and extracellular matrix. Recent studies investigated the clinical significance of SPARC gene expression in the development, progression, and metastasis of cancer. The present study examined the relations of the relative expression of the SPARC gene to clinicopathological factors and overall survival in patients with gastric cancer.

METHODS

We studied surgical specimens of cancer tissue and adjacent normal mucosa obtained from 227 patients with previously untreated gastric cancer. The relative expression levels of SPARC mRNA in cancer tissue and in adjacent normal mucosa were measured by quantitative real-time, reverse-transcription polymerase chain reaction.

RESULTS

The relative expression level of the SPARC gene was higher in cancer tissue than in adjacent normal mucosa. High expression levels of the SPARC gene were related to serosal invasion (P = 0.046). Overall survival at 5 years differed significantly between patients with high SPARC gene expression and those with low expression (P = 0.006).

CONCLUSIONS

Overexpression of the SPARC gene may be a useful independent predictor of outcomes in patients with gastric cancer.

A 4-gene panel as a marker at chromosome 8q in Asian gastric cancer patients

A widely held viewpoint is that the use of multiple markers, combined in some type of algorithm, will be necessary to provide high enough discrimination between diseased cases and non-diseased. We applied stepwise logistic regression analysis to identify the best combination of the 32 biomarkers at chromosome 8q on an independent public microarray test set of 80 paired gastric samples. A combination of SULF1, INTS8, ATP6V1C1, and GPR172A was identified with a prediction accuracy of 98.0% for discriminating carcinomas from adjacent noncancerous tissues in our previous 25 paired samples. Interestingly, the overexpression of SULF1 was associated with tumor invasion and metastasis. Function prediction analysis revealed that the 4-marker panel was mainly associated with acidification of intracellular compartments. Taken together, we found a 4-gene panel that accurately discriminated gastric carcinomas from adjacent noncancerous tissues and these results had potential clinical significance in the early diagnosis and targeted treatment of gastric cancer.

Clinical utility of measuring expression levels of KAP1, TIMP1 and STC2 in peripheral blood of patients with gastric cancer

Background

We examined preoperative kinesin II-associated protein (KAP1), TIMP metallopeptidase inhibitor 1 (TIMP1) and stanniocalcin 2 (STC2) expression levels in patients with gastric cancers to assess their clinical application for diagnosing and monitoring diseases.

Methods

Real-time reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction was used to detect the expression levels of KAP1, TIMP1, STC2, talin 2 (TLN2), sushi-repeat-containing protein, X-linked 2 (SRPX2) and secreted protein, acidic, cysteine-rich (SPARC) in the patients’ peripheral blood karyocytes. The data were analyzed with receiver operating characteristics (ROC) curves.

Results

A total of 112 patients with gastric cancer, 42 patients with recurrence and 107 healthy volunteers were recruited. There were significant correlations between KAP1, TIMP1 and STC2 levels, and TNM tumor stages and distant metastases. The area under the ROC curves (AUC) of KAP1 was 0.803 ± 0.040 (P = 0.0001), the AUC of TIMP1 was 0.767 ± 0.043 (P = 0.0001) and the AUC of STC2 was 0.769 ± 0.045 (P = 0.0001), thus differentiating preoperative gastric cancer patients from healthy volunteers by ROC curve analysis. The AUC of STC2 was 0.739 ± 0.070 (P = 0.004) and the AUC of KAP1 was 0.418 ± 0.088 (P = 0.319), thus differentiating recurrence of gastric cancer from healthy volunteers by ROC curve analysis. High TIMP1 and STC2 expression levels were suspected to be poor prognostic factors of disease recurrence in patients with gastric cancer.

Conclusions

KAP1, TIMP1 and STC2 expression levels may be potential biomarkers for the screening, diagnosis, prognosis and surveillance of gastric cancer.

Progress in understanding role of SPARC protein in gastric cancer

SPARC is a cysteine-rich secretory protein that is highly conservative and shares >70% amino acid sequence homology across all kinds of living organisms. The single-copy gene encoding the SPARC protein is located on human chromosome 5q31.3-q32, consists of 10 exons, and has a full length of 25 900 bp. SPARC protein is mainly expressed in tissue repair-related fibroblasts and endothelial cells, and high expression of SPARC protein has been noted in some aggressive malignant tumors. The incidence and mortality of gastric cancer are high in China, and the high mortality is closely related with tumor invasion and metastasis. SPARC protein is abnormally expressed in gastric carcinoma, and there is still controversy over the role of SPARC in gastric carcinoma. In this paper we review recent progress in understanding the role of SPARC protein in gastric cancer.

Secreted protein acidic and rich in cysteine (SPARC) suppresses angiogenesis by down-regulating the expression of VEGF and MMP-7 in gastric cancer

Background

Secreted protein acidic and rich in cysteine (SPARC) is a glycoprotein that functions to inhibit angiogenesis, proliferation, and invasion in different types of cancer. The ability of SPARC to modulate neovascularisation is believed to be mediated in part by its ability to modulate the expression of vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) and matrix metalloproteinases (MMPs). In this study, we aimed to determine the effect of SPARC expression in gastric cancer cells on proliferation and angiogenesis in vitro and in vivo.

Method

We evaluated expression of SPARC in seven human gastric cancer cell lines. Then we established a stably transfected SPARC overexpressed cell line (BGC-SP) and a stably transfected SPARC knock-down cell line (HGC-sh). The effect of SPARC overexpression and SPARC silencing was studied by examining capillary formation of HUVECs in vitro and a dorsal skin-fold chamber model in vivo. Quantitative real-time PCR and western blotting were performed to detect if the expressions of VEGF and MMP-7 were modulated by SPARC expression. To further determine the effect of SPARC expression on angiogenesis in vivo, xenograft models were established and microvessel density (MVD) of different clones were detected by immunohistochemistry.

Results

Endogenous SPARC overexpression inhibited the expression of VEGF and MMP-7, as well as the angiogenesis induced by BGC-SP cells. Correspondingly, SPARC silencing increased the expression of VEGF and MMP-7, as well as the angiogenesis induced by HGC-sh cells. Elevated angiogenesis induced by SPARC silencing in HGC-sh cells was decreased when VEGF was neutralised by antibodies, and MMP-7 was knocked down in vitro.

Conclusion

SPARC suppresses angiogenesis of gastric cancer by down-regulating the expression of VEGF and MMP-7.