1
|
Shehata M, Al Hosani I, Ahmed I, Abu Alkas H, Khaddam O, Aljanahi AA, Al Ahmad M, Al Tiniji K, Singh Y, Malik T. Factors Associated With Short-Term Complications After Percutaneous Endoscopic Gastrostomy Tube Insertion: A Retrospective Cohort Study. Cureus 2024; 16:e55741. [PMID: 38463403 PMCID: PMC10920060 DOI: 10.7759/cureus.55741] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 03/07/2024] [Indexed: 03/12/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG) tube placement is generally safe but is associated with a range of complications. Minor complications include infections, granuloma formation, leakage, and blockages, while major complications encompass aspiration pneumonia, hemorrhage, and more serious conditions such as necrotizing fasciitis and colonic fistula. AIM This study aimed to assess the rate of short-term complications within one month of endoscopic PEG insertion, focusing on their correlation with patient characteristics. METHODOLOGY This retrospective cohort study analyzed data from patients who underwent PEG insertion between January 2020 and December 2022. It evaluated the incidence of complications in relation to variables such as the indication for the procedure, the patient's immune status, albumin and CRP levels, and the setting of the procedure (inpatient vs. outpatient). RESULTS The study included 121 patients, with a mean age of 69.73 years, comprising 71 males (58.7%) and 50 females (41.3%). Neurological indications accounted for 64.5% of the cases. Notably, 67.8% of the patients were immunocompromised. Within 30 days of PEG insertion, 16.5% experienced complications, including GI bleeding (4.1%), infection at the PEG site (11.6%), and peritonitis (0.8%). Complications were significantly higher in immunocompromised patients and those with non-neurological indications. Higher serum albumin and lower CRP levels were associated with fewer complications, though the association was not statistically significant. CONCLUSION The study highlights that gastrostomy site infection is the most common short-term complication following PEG insertion. Immune status and the reason for PEG insertion emerged as key factors influencing the likelihood of complications.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mostafa Shehata
- Gastroenterology, Sheikh Shakhbout Medical City (SSMC), Abu Dhabi, ARE
| | - Ibrahim Al Hosani
- Gastroenterology, Sheikh Shakhbout Medical City (SSMC), Abu Dhabi, ARE
| | - Ishtiaq Ahmed
- Gastroenterology, Sheikh Shakhbout Medical City (SSMC), Abu Dhabi, ARE
| | - Heba Abu Alkas
- Gastroenterology, Sheikh Shakhbout Medical City (SSMC), Abu Dhabi, ARE
| | - Omar Khaddam
- Internal Medicine, Sheikh Shakhbout Medical City (SSMC), Abu Dhabi, ARE
| | | | - Maryam Al Ahmad
- Gastroenterology, Sheikh Shakhbout Medical City (SSMC), Abu Dhabi, ARE
| | - Khalifa Al Tiniji
- Gastroenterology, Sheikh Shakhbout Medical City (SSMC), Abu Dhabi, ARE
| | | | - Talha Malik
- Gastroenterology, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, USA
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Boylan C, Barrett D, Li V, Merrick S, Steed H. Longitudinal complications associated with PEG: Rate and severity of 30-day and 1-year complications experienced by patients after primary PEG insertion. Clin Nutr ESPEN 2021; 43:514-521. [PMID: 34024564 DOI: 10.1016/j.clnesp.2021.02.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/24/2020] [Revised: 02/08/2021] [Accepted: 02/10/2021] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND AIMS Percutaneous Endoscopic Gastrostomy (PEG) feeding is utilised in patients with exceptionally poor oral intake but is associated with both short and long-term complications. This study reviews longitudinal PEG complications and compares key subgroups. METHODS Single-centre retrospective observational study of all patients receiving PEG insertion between January 2016 and December 2018. RESULTS 306 patients met the inclusion criteria. The mean age at insertion was 67 years. The majority were cared for in their own home (80.4%) by themselves or family (74.9%). 127 PEG tubes were inserted for dysphagia and 165 prophylactically prior to treatment for head and neck cancer. In the first 30 days 16.7% experienced a complication. The most frequently reported was peristomal pain (9.2%). In the first year, 35.6% experienced at least one complication, 12.4% two complications and 6.6% three complications and 6.5% required inpatient treatment for their complication. The most common was pain (14.4%) followed by site weeping, site infection and external overgranulation. Patients with dysphagia took longer to develop complications, had fewer complications and took longer to require management by members of the secondary care team than those with head and neck cancer. Discounting peristomal pain, there was no difference in total complications between patients caring for themselves when compared to those receiving professional input. CONCLUSION One third of patients will experience a complication related to their PEG tube over 1 year, but the majority are managed in an outpatient setting. This study has implications for planning support services and consenting and counselling patients pre-PEG-insertion.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Conor Boylan
- University of Birmingham, College of Medical and Dental Sciences, United Kingdom.
| | | | - Vincent Li
- Royal Wolverhampton NHS Trust, United Kingdom
| | | | - Helen Steed
- Royal Wolverhampton NHS Trust, University of Wolverhampton, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
A Comprehensive Examination of Percutaneous Endoscopic Gastrostomy and Its Association with Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis Patient Outcomes. Brain Sci 2019; 9:brainsci9090223. [PMID: 31487846 PMCID: PMC6770872 DOI: 10.3390/brainsci9090223] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/30/2019] [Revised: 08/27/2019] [Accepted: 08/31/2019] [Indexed: 12/11/2022] Open
Abstract
There is literature discord regarding the impact of percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG), or “feeding tube”, on amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) outcomes. We assess one of the largest retrospective ALS cohorts to date (278 PEG users, 679 non-users). Kruskal–Wallis and Kaplan–Meier analysis compared cohort medians and survival duration trends. A meta-analysis determined the aggregate associative effect of PEG on survival duration by combining primary results with 7 published studies. Primary results (p < 0.001) and meta-analysis (p < 0.05) showed PEG usage is associated with an overall significant increase in ALS survival duration, regardless of onset type. Percent predicted forced vital capacity (FVC %predict) ≥50 at PEG insertion significantly increases survival duration (p < 0.001); FVC %predict ≥60 has the largest associative benefit (+6.7 months, p < 0.05). Time elapsed from ALS onset until PEG placement is not predictive (p > 0.05). ALSFRS-R survey assessment illustrates PEG usage does not slow functional ALS pathology (p > 0.05), but does stabilize weight and/or body mass index (BMI) (p < 0.05). Observed clinical impression of mood (CIM), was not impacted by PEG usage (p > 0.05). Overall results support PEG as a palliative intervention for ALS patients with ≥50 FVC %predict at PEG insertion.
Collapse
|
4
|
Shangab MOM, Shaikh NA. Prediction of risk of adverse events related to percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy: a retrospective study. Ann Gastroenterol 2019; 32:469-475. [PMID: 31474793 PMCID: PMC6686100 DOI: 10.20524/aog.2019.0409] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/29/2019] [Accepted: 07/06/2019] [Indexed: 02/07/2023] Open
Abstract
Background: Percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG) is a popular method for long-term enteral feeding. Our aim was to determine potential risk factors for adverse events related to PEG, as well as consequent prolonged hospitalization. Methods: Data were retrospectively collected from the admission records of a tertiary center between July 2015 and June 2018. Possible predictors of the 3 following outcomes were evaluated: minor PEG-related adverse events, major PEG-related adverse events, and length of hospital stay. Data were tested for correlation using the Spearman coefficient and for association using Kruskal-Wallis tests for significance. Results: A total of 362 admissions involving 146 patients were included in the study. Of the admissions, 221 (61.0%) had only minor adverse events, 100 (27.6%) had only major adverse events, and 41 (11.3%) had both. Eighty (22.1%) had PEG-site infection and 128 (35%) had aspiration pneumonia. Serum albumin levels at presentation were negatively correlated with the length of hospitalization (P<0.001), which also differed between patients presenting with major and minor adverse events (P<0.001 and P=0.026). The Charlson comorbidity index was positively correlated with the duration of hospitalization (P<0.001). Higher index scores were found more among patients presenting with aspiration pneumonia (P=0.004) and lower scores were found among patients presenting with PEG site infection and inadvertent PEG removal compared with those presenting with a major complication (P<0.001). Conclusion: The patient’s general medical condition and nutritional status are the greatest risk predictors for developing adverse events related to their PEG feeding, as well as a consequent extended hospital stay.
Collapse
|
5
|
Sartori A, De Luca M, Lunardi C, Clemente N, Segato G, Rossi G, De Luca A, Minni M, Colaut F, Fortunato C, Nicolì F, Castiglioni C, Pellicanò N, Scaffidi G, De Marchi F. Laparoendoscopic Percutaneous Endoscopic Gastrostomy in Adults. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 2018; 28:1192-1195. [DOI: 10.1089/lap.2018.0119] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/12/2023] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Alberto Sartori
- Department of General Surgery, San Valentino Hospital, Montebelluna, Treviso, Italy
| | - Maurizio De Luca
- Department of General Surgery, San Valentino Hospital, Montebelluna, Treviso, Italy
| | - Cesare Lunardi
- Department of General Surgery, San Valentino Hospital, Montebelluna, Treviso, Italy
| | - Nicola Clemente
- Department of General Surgery, San Valentino Hospital, Montebelluna, Treviso, Italy
| | - Gianni Segato
- Department of Surgery, Regional Hospital of Vicenza, Vicenza, Italy
| | - GianMaria Rossi
- Department of Surgery, Regional Hospital of Vicenza, Vicenza, Italy
| | - Alberto De Luca
- Department of General Surgery, San Valentino Hospital, Montebelluna, Treviso, Italy
| | - Massimo Minni
- Department of General Surgery, San Valentino Hospital, Montebelluna, Treviso, Italy
| | - Flavio Colaut
- Department of General Surgery, San Valentino Hospital, Montebelluna, Treviso, Italy
| | - Costanzo Fortunato
- Department of General Surgery, San Valentino Hospital, Montebelluna, Treviso, Italy
| | - Francesco Nicolì
- Department of General Surgery, San Valentino Hospital, Montebelluna, Treviso, Italy
| | - Cristina Castiglioni
- Department of General Surgery, San Valentino Hospital, Montebelluna, Treviso, Italy
| | - Natale Pellicanò
- Department of General Surgery, San Valentino Hospital, Montebelluna, Treviso, Italy
| | - Guido Scaffidi
- Department of General Surgery, San Valentino Hospital, Montebelluna, Treviso, Italy
| | | |
Collapse
|
6
|
Bailey JA, Lavery RF, Adams JM, Livingston AS, DiFazio L, Livingston DH. Severe dysphagia requiring gastrostomy following cervical spine fracture fixation. Trauma Surg Acute Care Open 2016; 1:e000001. [PMID: 29766050 PMCID: PMC5891693 DOI: 10.1136/tsaco-2016-000001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/08/2016] [Revised: 05/06/2016] [Accepted: 05/11/2016] [Indexed: 11/28/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The incidence of severe dysphagia requiring gastrostomy tube (GT) placement following operative fixation of traumatic cervical spine fractures is unknown. Risk factors for severe dysphagia are not well identified and GT placement is often delayed due to the belief that it will resolve quickly. We hypothesized that patient and clinical factors could be used to predict severe dysphagia requiring GT placement in this population. METHODS A retrospective multicenter review of all adult patients requiring operative fixation of cervical spine fractures was performed. Data on demographics, injury severity score, presence of spinal cord injury, operative approach, presence of severe traumatic brain injury, and the need and timing of tracheostomy and GT were collected. The timing, number and results of formal speech, and language pathology examinations were also recorded. RESULTS 243 patients underwent cervical spine fixation for traumatic fractures, of which 72 (30%) required GT placement. Patients requiring gastrostomy were significantly older, 54 versus 45 years (p=0.002), and had higher injury severity scores at 24 versus 18 (p<0.0001). Tracheostomy was strongly associated with severe dysphagia; GT was required in 83% of patients who underwent tracheostomy versus 5% of those who did not require tracheostomy. 50% of patients underwent tracheostomy and GT on the same day after injury, with the remaining patients having an average of 9 days delay between procedures. The need for gastrostomy placement was also higher in patients undergoing combined operative approach versus anterior or posterior approach alone (p=0.02). There were no GT-related complications. CONCLUSIONS Severe dysphagia requiring GT placement occurs commonly (30%) in patients who undergo operative fixation of cervical spine fractures. Gastrostomy placement was delayed in 50%. Tracheostomy was strongly associated with the need for GT placement. Earlier GT placement, especially in patients requiring tracheostomy, would improve patient care and disposition.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Joanelle A Bailey
- Rutgers University—New Jersey Medical School, Newark, New Jersey, USA
| | - Robert F Lavery
- Rutgers University—New Jersey Medical School, Newark, New Jersey, USA
| | - John M Adams
- Divisions of Trauma and Surgical Critical Care, Department of Surgery at Morristown Memorial Hospital, Morristown, New Jersey, USA
| | | | - Lou DiFazio
- Divisions of Trauma and Surgical Critical Care, Department of Surgery at Morristown Memorial Hospital, Morristown, New Jersey, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
7
|
Tudor C, Branescu C, Savlovschi C, El-Khatib A, Pantu H, Nica A, Dascalu AM, Masoumeh B, Tudor AS, Oprescu SM, Serban D. Gastrostomy with peritoneal collar versus percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy. J Med Life 2016; 9:408-412. [PMID: 27928446 PMCID: PMC5141402] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/25/2022] Open
Abstract
Aim. The present study aimed to perform a medico-surgical comparative analysis of the 2 most widely used techniques: gastrostomy with peritoneal collar versus percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy, based on the vast clinical experience in an Upper Digestive Surgery Clinic. Materials and method. A retrospective study was carried out between January 2010 and January 2015 on the patients admitted for a surgical solution for feeding. The indications, preoperative preparation, surgical techniques, and postoperative outcomes were analyzed. Results. Out of the 94 cases admitted for a surgical solution for feeding, 67 underwent gastrostomy with peritoneal collar (GPC) and in 27 cases percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG) was performed. The indications for GPC were benign or malign causes of dysphagia, the most frequent being malign tumors of tongue, pharynx and larynx (47.76%), advanced inoperable esophageal or eso-cardiac cancers (26,86%), post-caustic esophageal stenosis (10.44%). PEG was performed in patients with functional difficulties of swallowing: sequelae of cerebral vascular accidents (44.44%), low Glasgow Coma Scale Score (29.62%) of different etiologies, Parkinson disease (18.51%) advanced dementia (7.4%), early nasopharyngeal cancer (2 cases). The intraoperatory and postoperatory complications were few and of minor importance in both techniques, but PEG allowed an immediate retake of alimentation (vs. at least 48 hours wait in GPC), with less gastric stasis, biliary reflux and aspiration related respiratory problems. Conclusions. Both techniques are easy and safe to perform, but an appropriate selection is required according to the cause of the swallowing difficulty. In cases with permeable digestive tube, PEG may be an excellent minimally invasive solution, but the costs and availability of the PEG kit and prehydrolyzed nutritive solution, as well as the co-existence of an upper digestive endoscopy service were limitations that had to be taken into account.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- C Tudor
- Upper Digestive Surgery Clinic, University Emergency Hospital, Bucharest, Romania
| | - C Branescu
- Upper Digestive Surgery Clinic, University Emergency Hospital, Bucharest, Romania
| | - C Savlovschi
- “Carol Davila” University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Bucharest, Romania
| | - A El-Khatib
- Upper Digestive Surgery Clinic, University Emergency Hospital, Bucharest, Romania
| | - H Pantu
- “Carol Davila” University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Bucharest, Romania
| | - A Nica
- “Carol Davila” University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Bucharest, Romania
| | - AM Dascalu
- “Carol Davila” University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Bucharest, Romania
| | - B Masoumeh
- SC El-Khatib Medica SRL, Bucharest, Romania
| | - AS Tudor
- Medlife Hyper Clinic, Bucharest, Romania
| | - SM Oprescu
- “Carol Davila” University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Bucharest, Romania
| | - D Serban
- “Carol Davila” University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Bucharest, Romania
| |
Collapse
|