Minimally invasive valve surgery

Ambulatory Electrocardiography Monitoring for Early Discharge After Minimally Invasive Valve Surgery

INTRODUCTION

We sought to compare outcomes after early discharge in patients with and without predischarge diagnosis of arrhythmia following minimally invasive valve surgery (MIVS).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed ambulatory electrocardiography (AECG) datasheets and medical records of patients discharged with 14-d AECG monitoring from our facility between October 2019 and March 2022 ≤ 3 d after MIVS. Baseline and clinical characteristics, arrhythmias during AECG monitoring, and 30-d adverse outcomes were reported for the population and stratified by presence or absence of predischarge arrhythmia.

RESULTS

Of 41 patients discharged ≤3 d postoperatively of MIVS, 17 (41.5%) experienced predischarge arrhythmias and 24 (58.5%) did not. The population was predominantly male and White with a median age of 62 y [57, 70]. Baseline and clinical characteristics did not differ between subgroups. Most patients (92.7% [n = 38]) experienced one or more tachyarrhythmias during the AECG monitoring period. There were similar proportions of patients experiencing atrial fibrillation in both groups, but patients with predischarge arrhythmias had higher burden of atrial fibrillation on AECG monitoring (27.60% [6.57%, 100%] versus 1.65% [0.76%, 4.32%]; P = 0.004). The predischarge arrhythmia subgroup had higher proportions of patients experiencing nonsustained ventricular tachycardia but lower proportions experiencing supraventricular tachycardia. There were no mortalities within 30 d of surgery. Six (14.6%) patients were readmitted within 30 d with equal proportions of readmissions between subgroups (P = 0.662).

CONCLUSIONS

Early discharge timelines and noninvasive monitoring techniques can allow patients to return to their normal activities quicker in the comfort of their own home with no increased risk of morbidity or mortality.

The benefit of fibrosa layer stripping technique during minimally invasive aortic valve replacement for calcified aortic valve stenosis-A randomized controlled trial

BACKGROUND

Fibrosa layer stripping (FLS) technique is a new approach to remove the calcified aortic valve. In this study, we aimed to assess the effectiveness of the FLS technique by comparing it with the conventional technique in minimally invasive aortic valve replacement (MIAVR).

METHODS

A prospective, single-center, randomized controlled trial was conducted at Beijing Anzhen Hospital. Seventy patients diagnosed with severe calcific aortic stenosis were randomly assigned to undergo FLS (n = 35) or conventional (n = 35) technique to debride calcified aortic valve. Preoperative profile, procedural parameters, and postoperative outcomes were analyzed.

RESULTS

No significant difference was observed in the preoperative profile between the two groups. Compared with the conventional technique, the FLS technique had a significantly higher indexed effective orifice area and lower mean gradient. Moreover, the FLS technique was associated with significantly reduced aortic cross-clamp time (41 [38-44] vs. 56 [51-60] min, p < .001), cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) time (63 [56-69] vs. 81 [75-84] min, p < .001), and operative time (148 [141-156] vs. 173 [169-180] min, p < .001). Lastly, the length of intensive care unit stay (1.2 ± 0.4 vs. 1.5 ± 0.8 days, p = .041) and hospital stay (5.3 ± 0.6 vs. 6.0 ± 1.4 days, p = .020) was significantly reduced in the FLS group compared with those in the conventional group.

CONCLUSIONS

FLS technique is effective in removing calcified tissue during MIAVR and is associated with shorter cross-clamp time and CPB time, and better hemodynamic performance than the conventional technique.

Automated Fastener vs Hand-tied Knots in Heart Valve Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Although several studies revealed that the Cor-knot automated fastener (LSI Solutions, Victor, NY) reduces aortic cross-clamp and cardiopulmonary bypass times, the influence of the device on postoperative morbidity and mortality still needs to be evaluated. The aim of this study was to verify the hypothesis that the use of the Cor-knot device for heart valve surgery reduces aortic cross-clamp and cardiopulmonary bypass times, and this time saving translates into reduced morbidity and mortality.

METHODS

Retrospective cohort studies and randomized controlled trials reporting on the use of the automated fastener vs hand-tied knots were reviewed. The following end points were compared: aortic cross-clamp and cardiopulmonary bypass times, postoperative valvular regurgitation, postoperative ejection fraction, prolonged ventilator support, renal failure, and mortality.

RESULTS

Eight studies reporting data on 942 patients were included in the final analysis. The Cor-knot device was associated with shorter cardiopulmonary bypass (mean difference [MD], -11.74; 95% confidence interval [CI], -14.54 to -8.93; P < .00001) and aortic cross-clamp times (MD, -14.36; 95% CI, -19.63 to -9.09; P < .00001) in minimally invasive heart valve procedures. Overall, lower rates of postoperative valvular regurgitation (risk ratio [RR], 0.40; 95% CI, 0.26 to 0.62; P < .0001) and prolonged ventilator support (RR, 0.29; 95% CI, 0.13 to 0.65; P = .003) were observed. No difference was observed in postoperative atrial fibrillation, ejection fraction, renal failure, and mortality.

CONCLUSIONS

The use of the Cor-knot device in heart valve surgery reduced aortic cross-clamp and cardiopulmonary bypass times. Furthermore, as compared with hand-tie methods, the automated fastener may lead to decreased rates of prolonged ventilator support and valvular regurgitation while being noninferior in terms of other postoperative outcomes and mortality.

Initial Experience of Minimally Invasive Concomitant Aortic and Mitral Valve Replacement/Repair at a Tertiary Care Cardiac Centre of a Developing Country

Introduction

Minimally invasive double valve replacement (DVR) surgery through a small transverse anterior thoracotomy is an alternate technique to sternotomy for concomitant aortic and mitral valve (AVR, MVR) surgery. The aim of this study was to evaluate the in-hospital and early outcomes of direct vision minimal invasive double valve surgery (DVMI-DVR) at a tertiary care cardiac center of a developing country.

Methods

This study was conducted at the National Institute of Cardiovascular Diseases Karachi, Pakistan from January 2018 to September 2018. Nineteen consecutive patients undergoing DVMI-DVR for aortic and mitral disease without any prior cardiac surgery were included in this study. For all procedures, access was obtained through small transverse anterior thoracotomy incision with wedge resection (Chaudhry’s Wedge) of sternum opposite to the third and fourth costosternal joints. Patients were observed during their hospital stay and the following variables were observed the length of hospital stay (LOHS), ventilator support, intensive care unit (ICU) stay, pain score, and mortality. The pain score was assessed using the visual analog scale (VAS).

Results

The male/female ratio was 11:8 with a mean age of 35 ± 12 years with mean EuroSCORE of 6.6 ± 3.5%. The mean total bypass time was 129.8 ± 23.83 min (range: 98-181 minutes). The mean mechanical ventilation time was 3.16 ± 1.12 hours (range: 2-6 hours). The mean intensive care unit (ICU) stay was 41.84 ± 8.36 hours. The mean post-operative LOHS was 5.63 ± 1.12 days (range: 4-8 days). We had zero frequency of wound infection and surgical mortality. The mean pain score was 4.32 (on a predefined pain scale of one to nine with a high value indicating severe pain).

Conclusion

Minimally invasive DVR surgery is a safe and reproducible technique with comparable outcomes such as postoperative pain score (4.32 ± 2.05), ventilation time (3.16 ± 1.12 hours), ICU stay (41.84 ± 8.36 hours), and hospital stay (5.63 ± 1.12 days). In terms of mortality, operative times, ICU stay, and hospital stay, the minimally invasive DVR is at least comparable to those achieved with median sternotomy. Further prospective randomized studies are needed to validate our findings.

The effect of minimally invasive surgical aortic valve replacement on postoperative pulmonary and skeletal muscle function

NEW FINDINGS

What is the central question of this study? How does surgical aortic valve replacement affect cardiopulmonary and muscle function during exercise? What is the main finding and its importance? Early after the surgical replacement of the aortic valve a significant decline in pulmonary function was observed, which was followed by a decline in skeletal muscle function in the subsequent weeks of recovery. These date reiterate, despite restoration of aortic valve function, the need for a tailored rehabilitation programme for the respiratory and peripheral muscular system.

ABSTRACT

Suboptimal post-operative improvements in functional capacity are often observed after minimally invasive aortic valve replacement (mini-AVR). It remains to be studied how AVR affects the cardiopulmonary and skeletal muscle function during exercise to explain these clinical observations and to provide a basis for improved/tailored post-operative rehabilitation. Twenty-two patients with severe aortic stenosis (AS) (aortic valve area (AVA) <1.0 cm²) were pre-operatively compared to 22 healthy controls during submaximal constant-workload endurance-type exercise for oxygen uptake ( V ̇ O 2 ), carbon dioxide output ( V ̇ C O 2 ), respiratory gas exchange ratio, expiratory volume ( V ̇ E ), ventilatory equivalents for O₂ ( V ̇ E / V ̇ O 2 ) and CO₂ ( V ̇ E / V ̇ C O 2 ), respiratory rate (RR), tidal volume (V_t ), heart rate (HR), oxygen pulse ( V ̇ O 2 /HR), blood lactate, Borg ratings of perceived exertion (RPE) and exercise-onset V ̇ O 2 kinetics. These exercise tests were repeated at 5 and 21 days after AVR surgery (n = 14), along with echocardiographic examinations. Respiratory exchange ratio and ventilatory equivalents ( V ̇ E / V ̇ O 2 and V ̇ E / V ̇ C O 2 ) were significantly elevated, V ̇ O 2 and V ̇ O 2 /HR were significantly lowered, and exercise-onset V ̇ O 2 kinetics were significantly slower in AS patients vs. healthy controls (P < 0.05). Although the AVA was restored by mini-AVR in AS patients, V ̇ E / V ̇ O 2 and V ̇ E / V ̇ C O 2 further worsened significantly within 5 days after surgery, accompanied by elevations in Borg RPE, V ̇ E and RR, and lowered V_t . At 21 days after mini-AVR, exercise-onset V ̇ O 2 kinetics further slowed significantly (P < 0.05). A decline in pulmonary function was observed early after mini-AVR surgery, which was followed by a decline in skeletal muscle function in the subsequent weeks of recovery. Therefore, a tailored rehabilitation programme should include training modalities for the respiratory and peripheral muscular system.

Titanium Fastener Utilization During HeartMate 3 Left Ventricular Assist Device Implantation

OBJECTIVE

The objective of this study was to investigate the feasibility of using titanium fasteners for securement of the inflow sewing ring during HeartMate 3 implantation. The secondary objective was to compare cardiopulmonary bypass and total operative times between the titanium fastener and hand-tied knot groups.

METHODS

Clearance between the sewing ring and the HeartMate 3 device was assessed in vitro. Thirty-one patients undergoing HeartMate 3 implantation via median sternotomy at a single center from April 2017 to February 2018 were reviewed. The sewing ring was secured with hand-tied knots (n = 18) or titanium fasteners (n = 13). Cannulation strategy and implantation technique were otherwise identical between groups. Central arterial and venous cannulation was performed for cardiopulmonary bypass. The left ventricular apex was cored, and the sewing ring was attached with hand-tied knots or titanium fasteners.

RESULTS

There was adequate clearance for the titanium fastener to secure the inflow sewing ring and then connect to the HeartMate 3 in vitro. The inflow sewing ring was successfully secured during HeartMate 3 implantation in the titanium fastener group. Cardiopulmonary bypass time was 75 and 92 minutes for the titanium fastener and hand-tied groups, respectively (P < 0.03). Total operative time was 177 and 193 minutes for the titanium fastener and hand-tied groups, respectively (P = 0.513).

CONCLUSIONS

The inflow sewing ring of the HeartMate 3 was efficiently secured using titanium fasteners. Titanium fasteners resulted in shorter cardiopulmonary bypass times compared with the hand-tied group. There was no difference in total operative time.

Does full sternotomy have more significant impact than the cardiopulmonary bypass time in patients of mitral valve surgery?

Background

Over the past decade, minimally invasive mitral valve surgery (MIMVS) has grown in popularity. Less invasive approaches to mitral valve surgery are increasingly used for improved cosmesis. We sought to compare these minimally invasive approaches fairly with conventional full sternotomy approaches by using propensity-matching methods.

Methods

From January 2011 to January 2017, a total of 1120 isolated mitral valve operations were performed at our institution. Data were retrospectively collected on all patients, and a logistic regression model was created to predict selection to a minimally invasive versus conventional sternotomy approach. Propensity scores were then generated based on the regression model and matched pairs created using 1:1 nearest neighbor matching. There were 165 matched pairs in the analysis (sternotomy, n = 165;MIMVS, n = 165). Clinical outcomes included bypass and cross-clamp time, length of hospitalization, morbidity, and mortality. Patient details and follow-up outcomes were compared using multivariate, and Kaplan–Meier analyses.

Results

The minimally invasive approach led to slightly longer cardiopulmonary bypass time (99 ± 25 vs 88 ± 17 min, p <0.001), and cross-clamp time (65 ± 13 vs 49 ± 11 min, p<0.001). Overall, no significant differences existed among major in-hospital complications between groups. There were no differences between the matched groups in 30-day mortality (1.2% vs 0.6%, p >0.05). However, Chest tube drainage was lower at 6 and 24 h after a minimally invasive approach (30 ± 5 mL) and 120 ± 20 mL than after conventional sternotomy 175 ± 50 mL and 400 ± 150 mL at these times (p < 0.001). Transfusion was less frequent after minimally invasive surgery than after conventional surgery (15.7% vs 40.6%, p < 0.001). Patients undergoing minimally invasive surgery spent less time on ventilation support (6.2 ± 1.1 h vs 10.4 ± 2.7, p < 0.001). The multivariable regression analysis showed the full sternotomy was an independent risk factor for the propensity-adjusted likelihood of postoperative transfusion, re-exploration for bleeding, and postoperative ventilation support (p < 0.05). But the duration of cardiopulmonary bypass time was not an independent risk factor. The mean duration of survival follow-up was 4.4 ± 1.2 years. However, comparison of survival curves between the two groups revealed no significant difference (P = 0.203). With regard to freedom from valve-related morbidity, there was no significant difference between groups (P = 0 .574).

Conclusion

Within that portion of the spectrum of mitral valve surgery in which propensity matching was possible, minimally invasive mitral valve surgery has cosmetic, blood product use, and respiratory advantages over conventional surgery, and no apparent detriments. However, minimally invasive mitral valve surgery required a slightly longer cardiopulmonary bypass time and cross-clamp time. Minimally invasive mitral valve surgery represents a safe and effective surgical technique that we believe should be used more routinely in the surgical management of mitral valve disease. MIMVS provides equally durable midterm results as the standard sternotomy approach.

Comparison of Automated Titanium Fasteners to Hand-Tied Knots in Open Aortic Valve Replacement

Objective

Aortic cross-clamp and cardiopulmonary bypass times are independent predictors of postoperative morbidity and mortality. Reducing ischemic times with automated titanium fasteners may improve surgical outcomes. This study compared operative times and costs of titanium fasteners versus hand-tied knots for prosthesis securement in open aortic valve replacement.

Methods

A randomized control trial was conducted during a 16-month period at a single university medical center. Patients undergoing elective aortic valve replacement were randomized to the titanium fastener (n = 37) or hand-tied groups (n = 36). Knotting, aortic cross-clamp, cardiopulmonary bypass, and total operating room times were recorded. Hospital charges were also calculated for these procedures.

Results

Baseline characteristics, concomitant procedures, prosthetic valve size, and sutures were similar between groups. The titanium fastener group had significantly reduced knotting (7.4 vs. 13.0 minutes, P < 0.001), aortic cross-clamp (69 vs. 90 minutes, P < 0.05), cardiopulmonary bypass (86 vs. 114 minutes, P < 0.05), and total operating room times (234 vs. 266 minutes, P < 0.05). Intraoperative complications occurred more frequently in the hand-tied group compared with the titanium fastener group. Postoperative complications were similar between groups. Operating room costs were significantly higher in the titanium fastener group (US $10,428 vs. US $9671, P = 0.01). Hospitalization costs did not differ significantly between the titanium fastener and hand-tied group (US $23,987 vs. US $21,068, P = 0.12).

Conclusions

Titanium fastener use was associated with shorter knotting, aortic cross-clamp, cardiopulmonary bypass, and operating room times and fewer intraoperative complications in open aortic valve replacement, without significantly increasing hospitalization cost.

Aortic Valve Replacement: Treatment by Sternotomy versus Minimally Invasive Approach

Objective

To compare the results of aortic valve replacement with access by sternotomy or minimally invasive approach.

Methods

Retrospective analysis of medical records of 37 patients undergoing aortic valve replacement by sternotomy or minimally invasive approach, with emphasis on the comparison of time of cardiopulmonary bypass and aortic clamping, volume of surgical bleeding, time of mechanical ventilation, need for blood transfusion, incidence of atrial fibrillation, length of stay in intensive care unit, time of hospital discharge, short-term mortality and presence of surgical wound infection.

Results

Sternotomy was used in 22 patients and minimally invasive surgery in 15 patients. The minimally invasive approach had significantly higher time values of cardiopulmonary bypass (114.3±23.9 versus 86.7±19.8min.; P=0.003), aortic clamping (87.4±19.2 versus 61.4±12.9 min.; P<0.001) and mechanical ventilation (287.3±138.9 versus 153.9±118.6 min.; P=0.003). No difference was found in outcomes surgical bleeding volume, need for blood transfusion, incidence of atrial fibrillation, length of stay in intensive care unit and time of hospital discharge. No cases of short-term mortality or surgical wound infection were documented.

Conclusion

The less invasive approach presented with longer times of cardiopulmonary bypass, aortic clamping and mechanical ventilation than sternotomy, however without prejudice to the length of stay in intensive care unit, time of hospital discharge and morbidity.

The Cost of an Operating Room Minute for Heart Valve Procedures

Background: Heart valve disease is very common, with approximately 5 million people diagnosed with this disease annually in the United States. There has been substantial innovation in the technologies and techniques of surgical repair and replacement over the past decade. However, there is little information that allows the potential time savings associated with these technologies and techniques to be quantified from the hospital perspective. Objectives: The study objective was to estimate the variable cost per operating room (OR) minute in valvular procedures - aortic valve replacement (AVR), mitral valve replacement (MVR) and mitral valve repair (MVRepair) - and determine if there is a difference in OR cost per minute between traditional sternal versus less invasive right thoracotomy surgical techniques. Methods: The Premier database was queried from 2007 to 2011 for patients undergoing AVR, MVR, or MVRepair. Patients were identified using the International Classification of Diseases, 9th Revision (ICD-9) procedure codes. Propensity score matching created cohorts adjusted for patient differences and surgical approach -any sternal incision (Sternal) or right thoracotomy (RT). Regression analysis was performed to estimate the OR cost per minute based on heart valve procedure. Results: There were 2,656 heart valve procedures - 1,604 AVR, 434 MVR and 618 MVRepair - that met the inclusion criteria. The mean OR cost per minute for AVR procedures was $26.49 and $25.16 (p <0.01) for Sternal and RT, respectively. MVR procedures by surgical approach had a mean OR cost per minute of $25.66 and $25.00 and (p NS) for Sternal and RT, respectively. MVRepair procedures by surgical approach had a mean OR cost per minute of $25.17 and $24.40 and (p NS) for Sternal and RT, respectively. The overall estimate of the OR cost per minute for valvular procedures was $25.99. Conclusions: Quantifying the variable cost of an OR minute from a multi-institution database provides researchers with an important benchmark to use in economic evaluations of valvular procedures.