Evaluating the Optimal Timing of Revascularisation in Patients with Transient ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction: Rationale and Design of the TRANSIENT Trial

Plaque characteristics in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction and early spontaneous reperfusion

BACKGROUND

Early spontaneous reperfusion (ESR) is not an uncommon phenomenon in clinical settings.

AIMS

The aim of this study was to detect potential mechanisms of ESR in patients with STEMI.

METHODS

This prospective study enrolled a total of 241 consecutive patients with STEMI undergoing optical coherence tomography (OCT) from July 2016 to August 2019. Forty-five patients (18.7%) met angiographic ESR criteria (TIMI 3 flow on the initial angiogram). Among those without ESR (TIMI 0 flow on initial angiogram), 45 patients were assigned to the control group according to propensity score matching with the ESR group.

RESULTS

Although the baseline characteristics of the groups were comparable, non-ruptured plaque (62.2% vs 35.6%) predominated and plaque rupture (37.8% vs 64.4%) was less common in the ESR group (p=0.011). Red thrombus (44.4% vs 77.8%) was also less common in the ESR group (p=0.001). Lastly, compared to the control group, the ESR group underwent fewer emergent stent placements (68.9% vs 91.1%, p=0.008).

CONCLUSIONS

Relief of coronary occlusion induced by a non-ruptured plaque may contribute to ESR in patients with STEMI.

Transient ST-elevation myocardial infarction versus persistent ST-elevation myocardial infarction. An appraisal of patient characteristics and functional outcome

BACKGROUND

Up to 24% of patients presenting with ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) show resolution of ST-elevation and symptoms before revascularization. The mechanisms of spontaneous reperfusion are unclear. Given the more favorable outcome of transient STEMI, it is important to obtain further insights in differential aspects.

METHODS

We compared 251 patients who presented with transient STEMI (n = 141) or persistent STEMI (n = 110). Clinical angiographic and laboratory data were collected at admission and in subset of patients additional index hemostatic data and at steady-state follow-up. Cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (CMR) was performed at 2-8 days to assess myocardial injury.

RESULTS

Transient STEMI patients had more cardiovascular risk factors than STEMI patients, including more arterial disease and higher cholesterol values. Transient STEMI patients showed angiographically more often no intracoronary thrombus (41.1% vs. 2.7%, P < 0.001) and less often a high thrombus burden (9.2% vs. 40.0%, P < 0.001). CMR revealed microvascular obstruction less frequently (4.2% vs. 34.6%, P < 0.001) and smaller infarct size [1.4%; interquartile range (IQR), 0.0-3.7% vs. 8.8%; IQR, 3.9-17.1% of the left ventricle, P < 0.001] with a better preserved left ventricular ejection fraction (57.8 ± 6.7% vs. 52.5 ± 7.6%, P < 0.001). At steady state, fibrinolysis was higher in transient STEMI, as demonstrated with a reduced clot lysis time (89 ± 20% vs. 99 ± 25%, P = 0.03).

CONCLUSIONS

Transient STEMI is a syndrome with less angiographic thrombus burden and spontaneous infarct artery reperfusion, resulting in less myocardial injury than STEMI. The presence of a more effective fibrinolysis in transient STEMI patients may explain these differences and might provide clues for future treatment of STEMI.