Westphal P, Luo H, Shahmohammadi M, Heckman LIB, Kuiper M, Prinzen FW, Delhaas T, Cornelussen RN. Left Ventricular Pressure Estimation Using Machine Learning-Based Heart Sound Classification.
Front Cardiovasc Med 2022;
9:763048. [PMID:
35694657 PMCID:
PMC9174571 DOI:
10.3389/fcvm.2022.763048]
[Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/23/2021] [Accepted: 04/20/2022] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
Objective
A method to estimate absolute left ventricular (LV) pressure and its maximum rate of rise (LV dP/dtmax) from epicardial accelerometer data and machine learning is proposed.
Methods
Five acute experiments were performed on pigs. Custom-made accelerometers were sutured epicardially onto the right ventricle, LV, and right atrium. Different pacing configurations and contractility modulations, using isoflurane and dobutamine infusions, were performed to create a wide variety of hemodynamic conditions. Automated beat-by-beat analysis was performed on the acceleration signals to evaluate amplitude, time, and energy-based features. For each sensing location, bootstrap aggregated classification tree ensembles were trained to estimate absolute maximum LV pressure (LVPmax) and LV dP/dtmax using amplitude, time, and energy-based features. After extraction of acceleration and pressure-based features, location specific, bootstrap aggregated classification ensembles were trained to estimate absolute values of LVPmax and its maximum rate of rise (LV dP/dtmax) from acceleration data.
Results
With a dataset of over 6,000 beats, the algorithm narrowed the selection of 17 predefined features to the most suitable 3 for each sensor location. Validation tests showed the minimal estimation accuracies to be 93% and 86% for LVPmax at estimation intervals of 20 and 10 mmHg, respectively. Models estimating LV dP/dtmax achieved an accuracy of minimal 93 and 87% at estimation intervals of 100 and 200 mmHg/s, respectively. Accuracies were similar for all sensor locations used.
Conclusion
Under pre-clinical conditions, the developed estimation method, employing epicardial accelerometers in conjunction with machine learning, can reliably estimate absolute LV pressure and its first derivative.
Collapse