Pharmacokinetic drug interactions of azoles

Delayed clearance of the pro-carcinogen benzo[a]pyrene in PLHC-1 cells when co-exposed to the antifungal drug clotrimazole and effects on the CYP1A biomarker

Cytochrome P450 1 A (CYP1A) is a key enzyme in the metabolism of the polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon (PAH) benzo[a]pyrene (BaP) in animals, and a biomarker for environmental PAH exposure. The common antimycotic imidazole drug clotrimazole (CLO) has been detected in the aquatic environment and likely co-exists with BaP. Like BaP, CLO can bind to CYP1A enzymes and can act as a CYP1A inhibitor. Co-exposure of BaP with CLO significantly delayed BaP elimination in a fish liver cell line (PLHC-1). Intracellular BaP concentration was 2.4 times higher after 6 h in co-exposed cells, compared to cells exposed to BaP alone. Higher BaP concentrations in cells co-exposed to CLO positively correlated with CLO dose, indicating CLO-mediated delays in BaP clearance. After 24 h, BaP was undetectable irrespective of CLO co-exposure. In contrast, intracellular CLO concentrations remained constant over the 72 h experimental period. Co-exposure of BaP with CLO caused synergistic and time-dependent increases on the CYP1A biomarker both on CYP1A mRNA levels and on CYP1A enzyme activity, in accordance with an apparent delayed BaP elimination in the presence of CLO. These results indicate a toxicokinetic interaction between BaP and CLO on the CYP1A enzyme that delays metabolic clearance of BaP.

Effectiveness and Cost-Effectiveness of Prophylactic Voriconazole and Fluconazole Regarding Prevention of Post-hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation Invasive Fungal Infection and Its Related Death: A Single Center Experience

Purpose

Analyzing effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of voriconazole versus fluconazole prophylaxis in hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT).

Methods

The research included 70 patients; 34 undergoing allogeneic HSCT and 36 undergoing autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT), alternated to receive either voriconazole or fluconazole prophylaxis for 180 days on a 1:1 basis. Patients were monitored for occurrence of invasive fungal infections (IFI), IFI-related death (IRD) and total death events. Cost-effectiveness of both agents in both groups was also assessed.

Results

Antifungal prophylactic drug had no impact on incidence of IFI and IRD in both allogeneic HSCT and ASCT (P = .452 and P = 1.000; P = .457 and P = .146 respectively). An insignificant difference occurred among patients receiving voriconazole or fluconazole regarding overall survival (OS) and fungal infection-free survival (FFS) in both groups (P = .705 and P = .879; P = .713 and P = .681 respectively). Regarding cost-effectiveness, voriconazole dominated fluconazole regarding prevention of IFI and IRD but was less costly/less effective regarding prevention of total death events and gaining life years in the allogeneic HSCT setting. In the ASCT setting, voriconazole was not cost-effective regarding avoidance of IFI and IRD and was dominated by fluconazole regarding avoidance of total death events and gaining life years.

Conclusions

Voriconazole does not differ from fluconazole regarding its efficacy in prevention of IFI and IRD and does not improve OS and FFS in both allogeneic HSCT and ASCT settings. Voriconazole is cost-effective regarding protection from IFI and IRD in allogeneic HSCT but not cost-effective in ASCT.

Pharmacokinetic drug interactions of antimicrobial drugs: a systematic review on oxazolidinones, rifamycines, macrolides, fluoroquinolones, and Beta-lactams

Like any other drug, antimicrobial drugs are prone to pharmacokinetic drug interactions. These drug interactions are a major concern in clinical practice as they may have an effect on efficacy and toxicity. This article provides an overview of all published pharmacokinetic studies on drug interactions of the commonly prescribed antimicrobial drugs oxazolidinones, rifamycines, macrolides, fluoroquinolones, and beta-lactams, focusing on systematic research. We describe drug-food and drug-drug interaction studies in humans, affecting antimicrobial drugs as well as concomitantly administered drugs. Since knowledge about mechanisms is of paramount importance for adequate management of drug interactions, the most plausible underlying mechanism of the drug interaction is provided when available. This overview can be used in daily practice to support the management of pharmacokinetic drug interactions of antimicrobial drugs.

Distribution of voriconazole in seven body fluids of adult horses after repeated oral dosing

The purpose of this study was to assess safety and alterations in body fluid concentrations of voriconazole in normal horses on days 7 and 14 following once daily dose of 4 mg/kg of voriconazole orally for 14 days. Body fluid drug concentrations were determined by the use of high performance liquid chromatography (HPLC). On day 7, mean voriconazole concentrations of plasma, peritoneal, synovial and cerebrospinal fluids, aqueous humor, epithelial lining fluid (ELF), and urine were 1.47 +/- 0.63, 0.61 +/- 0.22, 0.70 +/- 0.20, 0.62 +/- 0.26, 0.55 +/- 0.32, 79.45 +/- 69.4, and 1.83 +/- 0.44 microg/mL respectively. Mean voriconazole concentrations in the plasma, peritoneal, synovial and cerebrospinal fluids, aqueous humor, ELF and urine on day 14 were 1.60 +/- 0.37, 1.02 +/- 0.27, 0.86 +/- 0.25, 0.64 +/- 0.21, 0.68 +/- 0.13, 47.76 +/- 45.4 and 3.34 +/- 2.17 respectively. Voriconazole concentrations in the bronchoalveolar cell pellet were below the limit of detection. There was no statistically significant difference between voriconazole concentrations of body fluids when comparing days 7 and 14. Results indicated that voriconazole distributes widely into body fluids.