A patient presenting nasal septum perforation during bevacizumab-containing chemotherapy for advanced breast cancer

Perforation of the Nasal Septum in a Colorectal Cancer Patient Treated With Aflibercept: A Case Report

Aflibercept is an antiangiogenic agent used in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer who have progressed to a first-line oxaliplatin-based regimen. The main adverse effects (AEs) of antiangiogenic agents are fatigue, asthenia, anorexia, hypertension, proteinuria, urinary tract infection, diarrhea, and neutropenia. Other AEs, such as hemorrhage, thromboembolic events, and gastrointestinal perforation, are much less frequent. Nasal septal perforation caused by antiangiogenic agents is even rarer. The published literature on this subject is scarce. Here, we report the case of a 54-year-old male with metastatic colorectal cancer undergoing treatment with leucovorin, fluorouracil (5-FU), irinotecan, and aflibercept who presented with epistaxis and nasal congestion. An otolaryngologist performed a rhinoscopy that revealed a perforation of the nasal septum. Aflibercept was withdrawn first, and local treatment was applied with lubricant and antibacterial lotions. It was considered a non-life-threatening side effect, and given the high risk of not continuing treatment in this patient with a recent recurrence, aflibercept was reintroduced in combination with leucovorin, 5-FU, and irinotecan. The patient continued local treatment and follow-up with medical oncology and otolaryngology with gradual improvement of symptoms. Follow-up was discontinued due to disease progression and death after 16 months of the event.

A case of nasal septal perforation caused by bevacizumab for advanced cervical cancer

Nasal septal perforation caused by bevacizumab is rarely reported in other cancers such as ovarian cancer and breast cancer, but it has not been reported in cervical cancer. A 48-year-old woman with a medical history of chronic allergic rhinitis was diagnosed stage 4B (T2bN1M0) cervical cancer and paclitaxel and carboplatin along with bevacizumab (triweekly) were administered. After eight courses of chemotherapy, nasal septal perforation was noted. The possibility of nasal septal perforation by bevacizumab was considered by excluding other causes. We report the first case of nasal septal perforation caused by bevacizumab for advanced cervical cancer.

Spontaneous nasal perforation in a bevacizumab-treated patient with metastatic breast cancer

Nasal septum perforation in patients with cancer receiving systemic therapy is rare, and its association with bevacizumab use has described recently in the literature. Here, we report the case of a 34-year-old woman with hormone-sensitive, HER-2/neu negative, metastatic breast cancer who develope a nasal septum perforation during the treatment with paclitaxel and bevacizumab.

An observational study of nasal cavity toxicity in cancer patients treated with bevacizumab

BACKGROUND

The nasal cavity is a vulnerable zone which may be damaged by vascular disorders. We systematically assessed the frequency and severity of nasal cavity alterations during bevacizumab treatment, to determine its clinical relevance and factors contributing to its onset.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We conducted a hospital-based cohort study in 47 consecutive patients with advanced cancers who were on treatment with chemotherapy and bevacizumab at different doses. All patients underwent otolaryngology (ENT) examination at the time of study initiation.

RESULTS

The mean number of cycles at first ENT examination was 16 (standard deviation = 14). A total of 45 patients (96%) showed nose mucosal lesions, of whom 30% had erosions and 62% had grade 1 - 2 epistaxis. One patient had septal perforation. Grades 1 - 4 sinus disorders were noted in 60%. There was a significant trend to a higher risk of grade ≥ 2 nasal events for bevacizumab doses > 7.5 mg/kg, concomitant taxane use and digital nasal self-manipulation.

CONCLUSIONS

We found a high incidence of nasal cavity lesions in patients receiving bevacizumab, with evidence for a dose-related effect. Most cases were low grade and manageable without drug interruption, but severe toxicity may rarely occur. Oncologists should be aware of this unusual event.