1
|
Abbasvandi F, Mahdavi R, Bayat M, Hajighasemi F, Jahanbakhshi F, Aghaei F, Sami N, Khoundabi B, Ataee H, Yousefpour N, Hoseinpour P, Mousavi Kiasary SMS, Omrani Hashemi M, Shojaeian F, Akbari A, Bagherhosseini N, Moradi A, Akbari ME, Abdolahad M. Electrical lymph node scanning (ELS) system for real-time intra-operative detection of involved axillary lymph nodes in adjuvant breast cancer patients. Sci Rep 2024; 14:12900. [PMID: 38839807 PMCID: PMC11153595 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-024-61600-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/18/2023] [Accepted: 05/07/2024] [Indexed: 06/07/2024] Open
Abstract
Lymph node (LN) status is an essential prognostic factor in breast cancer (BC) patients, with an important role in the surgical and therapeutic plan. Recently, we have been developed a novel system for real-time intra-operative electrical LN scanning in BC patients. The ELS scores were calibrated by pathological evaluation of the LNs. Herein, we evaluated the efficacy of ELS in a prospective study for non-chemo-treated breast cancer patients. This is a prospective study in which ELS scores are blind for pathologists who declare the clearance or involvement of LNs based on permanent pathology as the gold standard. ELS and frozen-section (FS) pathology results were achieved intra-operatively, and samples were sent for the permanent pathology. The score of ELS did not affect the surgeons' decision, and the treatment approach was carried out based on FS pathology and pre-surgical data, such as imaging and probable biopsies. Patients were recruited from October 2021 through November 2022, and 381 lymph nodes of 97 patients were included in the study. In this study we recruited 38 patients (39.2%) with sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) and 59 patients (60.8%) with ALND. Of the 381 LNs scored by ELS, 329 sentinel LNs underwent routine pathology, while others (n = 52) underwent both FS and permanent pathology. ELS showed a sensitivity of 91.4% for node-positive patients, decreasing to 84.8% when considering all LNs. Using ROC analysis, ELS diagnosis showed a significant AUC of 0.878 in relation to the permanent pathology gold standard. Comparison of ELS diagnosis for different tumor types and LN sizes demonstrated no significant differences, while increasing LN size correlated with enhanced ELS sensitivity. This study confirmed ELS's efficacy in real-time lymph node detection among non-chemo-treated breast cancer patients. The use of ELS's pathological scoring for intra-operative LN diagnosis, especially in the absence of FS pathology or for non-sentinel LN involvement, could improve prognosis and reduce complications by minimizing unnecessary dissection.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Fereshteh Abbasvandi
- ATMP Department, Breast Cancer Research Center, Motamed Cancer Institute, ACECR, P.O. Box 1517964311, Tehran, Iran
- Nano Bioelectronics Devices Lab, Cancer Electronics Research Group, School of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran
- Cancer Research Center, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
| | - Reihane Mahdavi
- Nano Bioelectronics Devices Lab, Cancer Electronics Research Group, School of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran
| | - Mahdis Bayat
- Nano Bioelectronics Devices Lab, Cancer Electronics Research Group, School of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran
| | - Farzane Hajighasemi
- Nano Bioelectronics Devices Lab, Cancer Electronics Research Group, School of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran
| | - Fahimeh Jahanbakhshi
- Nano Bioelectronics Devices Lab, Cancer Electronics Research Group, School of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran
| | - Faeze Aghaei
- Nano Bioelectronics Devices Lab, Cancer Electronics Research Group, School of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran
| | - Nafiseh Sami
- Nano Bioelectronics Devices Lab, Cancer Electronics Research Group, School of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran
- Student Research Committee, Faculty of Medicine, Tehran Medical Sciences, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran
| | - Batoul Khoundabi
- Iran-Helal Institute of Applied Science and Technology, Red Crescent Society of Iran, Tehran, Iran
- Research Center for Health Management in Mass Gathering, Red Crescent Society of the Islamic Republic of Iran, Tehran, Iran
| | - Hossein Ataee
- Nano Bioelectronics Devices Lab, Cancer Electronics Research Group, School of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran
| | - Narges Yousefpour
- Nano Bioelectronics Devices Lab, Cancer Electronics Research Group, School of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran
| | - Parisa Hoseinpour
- ATMP Department, Breast Cancer Research Center, Motamed Cancer Institute, ACECR, P.O. Box 1517964311, Tehran, Iran
- SEPAS Pathology Laboratory, Tehran, Iran
| | - Seyed Mohamad Sadegh Mousavi Kiasary
- Nano Bioelectronics Devices Lab, Cancer Electronics Research Group, School of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran
| | - Maryam Omrani Hashemi
- Cancer Research Center, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
| | - Fatemeh Shojaeian
- Nano Bioelectronics Devices Lab, Cancer Electronics Research Group, School of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran
| | - Atieh Akbari
- Cancer Research Center, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
| | - Najmeh Bagherhosseini
- Cancer Research Center, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
| | - Afshin Moradi
- Department of Pathology, Shohada Hospital, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
| | | | - Mohammad Abdolahad
- Nano Bioelectronics Devices Lab, Cancer Electronics Research Group, School of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran.
- Cancer Institute, Imam-Khomeini Hospital, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Wen Y, Zhao S, Holmqvist A, Hahn-Stromberg V, Adell G, Holmlund B, Pathak S, Peng Z, Sun XF. Predictive Role of Biopsy Based Biomarkers for Radiotherapy Treatment in Rectal Cancer. J Pers Med 2020; 10:jpm10040168. [PMID: 33066317 PMCID: PMC7712120 DOI: 10.3390/jpm10040168] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/28/2020] [Revised: 10/01/2020] [Accepted: 10/09/2020] [Indexed: 12/30/2022] Open
Abstract
Background and Purpose: Radiation therapy has long been contemplated as an important mode in the treatment of rectal cancer. However, there are few ideal tools available for clinicians to make a radiotherapy decision at the time of diagnosis for rectal cancer. The purpose of this study was to assess whether biomarkers expressed in the biopsy could help to choose the suitable therapy and provide predictive and/or prognostic information. Experimental Design: In total, 30 biomarkers were analyzed in 219 biopsy samples before treatment to discover the possibility of using them as an indicator for radiotherapy selection, diagnosis, survival and recurrence. Results: Twenty-two biomarkers (COX2-RT, COX2-NonRT, etc.; 36.67%) had diagnostic value. For survival, four biomarkers (NFKBP65, p130, PINCH and PPAR) were significant in regulating gene promoter activity and overall survival, while four had a trend (AEG1, LOX, SATB1 and SIRT6). Three biomarkers (COX2, PINCH and WRAP53) correlated with disease-free survival, while eight had a trend (AEG1, COX2, Ki67, LOX, NFKBP65, PPAR and SATB1). Four biomarkers (COX2-RT, NFKBP65cyto-RT, P130cyto-NonRT and PPARcyto-RT) were independent prognostic factors for recurrence. NFKBP65 and SIRT6 were significantly correlated with lymph node metastasis regardless of radiation. Patients with high AEG1, LOX, NFKBP65, PPAR and SATB1 had or showed a positive trend for better survival after radiotherapy, while those with positive PINCH and WRAP53 expression would not benefit from radiotherapy. Conclusions: AEG1, LOX, NFKBP65cyto, PPAR and SATB1 could be used as indicators for choosing radiotherapy. COX2-RT, COX2-NonRT and some other biomarkers may provide additional help for diagnosis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yugang Wen
- Department of General Surgery, Shanghai General Hospital, School of Medicine, Shanghai Jiaotong University, Shanghai 200080, China; (Y.W.); (S.Z.)
- Department of Oncology and Department of Biomedical and Clinical Sciences, Linköping University, SE-581 83 Linköping, Sweden; (A.H.); (G.A.); (B.H.)
| | - Senlin Zhao
- Department of General Surgery, Shanghai General Hospital, School of Medicine, Shanghai Jiaotong University, Shanghai 200080, China; (Y.W.); (S.Z.)
- Department of Oncology and Department of Biomedical and Clinical Sciences, Linköping University, SE-581 83 Linköping, Sweden; (A.H.); (G.A.); (B.H.)
| | - Annica Holmqvist
- Department of Oncology and Department of Biomedical and Clinical Sciences, Linköping University, SE-581 83 Linköping, Sweden; (A.H.); (G.A.); (B.H.)
| | | | - Gunnar Adell
- Department of Oncology and Department of Biomedical and Clinical Sciences, Linköping University, SE-581 83 Linköping, Sweden; (A.H.); (G.A.); (B.H.)
| | - Birgitta Holmlund
- Department of Oncology and Department of Biomedical and Clinical Sciences, Linköping University, SE-581 83 Linköping, Sweden; (A.H.); (G.A.); (B.H.)
| | - Surajit Pathak
- Faculty of Allied Health Sciences, Chettinad Academy of Research and Education, Kelambakkam, Chennai 603 103, India;
| | - Zhihai Peng
- Department of General Surgery, Shanghai General Hospital, School of Medicine, Shanghai Jiaotong University, Shanghai 200080, China; (Y.W.); (S.Z.)
- Correspondence: (Z.P.); (X.-F.S.); Tel.: +86-13761010066 (Z.P.); +46-10-1032066 (X.-F.S.)
| | - Xiao-Feng Sun
- Department of Oncology and Department of Biomedical and Clinical Sciences, Linköping University, SE-581 83 Linköping, Sweden; (A.H.); (G.A.); (B.H.)
- Correspondence: (Z.P.); (X.-F.S.); Tel.: +86-13761010066 (Z.P.); +46-10-1032066 (X.-F.S.)
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Ohashi R, Matsubara M, Watarai Y, Yanagihara K, Yamashita K, Tsuchiya SI, Takei H, Naito Z. Pleomorphic lobular carcinoma of the breast: a comparison of cytopathological features with other lobular carcinoma variants. Cytopathology 2016; 28:122-130. [PMID: 27489086 DOI: 10.1111/cyt.12362] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 05/14/2016] [Indexed: 11/27/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Pleomorphic lobular carcinoma (PLC) is a subtype of breast cancer with unique morphological features, but it remains controversial whether PLC should be considered an independent disease entity. The aim of this study was to illustrate cytopathological characteristics of PLC in comparison with other lobular carcinoma variants. METHODS We investigated clinicopathological features of PLC (n = 11) compared with those of other variants of invasive lobular carcinoma (ILC, non-PLC) (n = 32). Histological variants of the non-PLC group consisted of classic (n = 25), solid (n = 2), alveolar (n = 1) and a tubulolobular type (n = 4). A review of cytological reports and fine needle aspiration (FNA) smear samples was performed for the PLC (n = 9) and non-PLC (n = 27) groups. RESULTS Patients with PLC were older, and had a higher nuclear grade and a higher incidence of axillary lymph node metastasis and triple negative phenotype than non-PLC patients (P = 0.007, P < 0.001, P = 0.02 and P < 0.001, respectively). Cytological findings in PLC included medium- to large-sized nuclei, prominent nucleoli, a moderate-to-severe degree of pleomorphism, apocrine change and background necrosis, none of which were evident in the smears of the non-PLC group (P < 0.001, P = 0.002, P < 0.001, P < 0.001, and P = 0.03, respectively). Despite these differences, patients with PLC and non-PLC showed similar clinical outcomes in our follow-up period. CONCLUSIONS Based on our results, a cytological diagnosis of PLC should be proposed if there are moderate- to large-sized nuclei, prominent nucleoli, a moderate-to severe degree of nuclear pleomorphism, apocrine change and necrosis in the background in FNA biopsy samples.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- R Ohashi
- Department of Diagnostic Pathology, Nippon Medical School Hospital, Tokyo, Japan
| | - M Matsubara
- Department of Diagnostic Pathology, Nippon Medical School Hospital, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Y Watarai
- Department of Diagnostic Pathology, Nippon Medical School Hospital, Tokyo, Japan
| | - K Yanagihara
- Department of Breast Surgery, Nippon Medical School Hospital, Tokyo, Japan
| | - K Yamashita
- Department of Breast Surgery, Nippon Medical School Hospital, Tokyo, Japan
| | - S-I Tsuchiya
- Department of Diagnostic Pathology, Nippon Medical School Hospital, Tokyo, Japan.,Department of Diagnostic Pathology, Iida Hospital, Tokyo, Japan
| | - H Takei
- Department of Breast Surgery, Nippon Medical School Hospital, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Z Naito
- Department of Diagnostic Pathology, Nippon Medical School Hospital, Tokyo, Japan.,Department of Integrated Diagnostic Pathology, Nippon Medical School, Tokyo, Japan
| |
Collapse
|