1
|
Nicosia L, Mariano L, Pellegrino G, Ferrari F, Pesapane F, Bozzini AC, Frassoni S, Bagnardi V, Pupo D, Mazzarol G, De Camilli E, Sangalli C, Venturini M, Pizzamiglio M, Cassano E. Atypical Ductal Hyperplasia and Lobular In Situ Neoplasm: High-Risk Lesions Challenging Breast Cancer Prevention. Cancers (Basel) 2024; 16:837. [PMID: 38398228 PMCID: PMC10886664 DOI: 10.3390/cancers16040837] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/29/2023] [Revised: 02/07/2024] [Accepted: 02/15/2024] [Indexed: 02/25/2024] Open
Abstract
This retrospective study investigates the histopathological outcomes, upgrade rates, and disease-free survival (DFS) of high-risk breast lesions, including atypical ductal hyperplasia (ADH or DIN1b) and lobular in situ neoplasms (LIN), following Vacuum-Assisted Breast Biopsy (VABB) and surgical excision. The study addresses the challenge posed by these lesions due to their association with synchronous or adjacent Breast Cancer (BC) and increased future BC risk. The research, comprising 320 patients who underwent stereotactic VABB, focuses on 246 individuals with a diagnosis of ADH (120) or LIN (126) observed at follow-up. Pathological assessments, categorized by the UK B-coding system, were conducted, and biopsy samples were compared with corresponding excision specimens to determine upgrade rates for in situ or invasive carcinoma. Surgical excision was consistently performed for diagnosed ADH or LIN. Finally, patient follow-ups were assessed and compared between LIN and ADH groups to identify recurrence signs, defined as histologically confirmed breast lesions on either the same or opposite side. The results reveal that 176 (71.5%) patients showed no upgrade post-surgery, with ADH exhibiting a higher upgrade rate to in situ pathology than LIN1 (Atypical Lobular Hyperplasia, ALH)/LIN2 (Low-Grade Lobular in situ Carcinoma, LCIS) (38% vs. 20%, respectively, p-value = 0.002). Considering only patients without upgrade, DFS at 10 years was 77%, 64%, and 72% for ADH, LIN1, and LIN2 patients, respectively (p-value = 0.92). The study underscores the importance of a multidisciplinary approach, recognizing the evolving role of VABB. It emphasizes the need for careful follow-up, particularly for lobular lesions, offering valuable insights for clinicians navigating the complex landscape of high-risk breast lesions. The findings advocate for heightened awareness and vigilance in managing these lesions, contributing to the ongoing refinement of clinical strategies in BC care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Luca Nicosia
- Breast Imaging Division, Radiology Department, (IEO) European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, 20141 Milan, Italy; (L.M.); (F.F.); (F.P.); (A.C.B.); (D.P.); (M.P.); (E.C.)
| | - Luciano Mariano
- Breast Imaging Division, Radiology Department, (IEO) European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, 20141 Milan, Italy; (L.M.); (F.F.); (F.P.); (A.C.B.); (D.P.); (M.P.); (E.C.)
| | - Giuseppe Pellegrino
- Postgraduate School of Radiodiagnostics, University of Milan, 20122 Milan, Italy;
| | - Federica Ferrari
- Breast Imaging Division, Radiology Department, (IEO) European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, 20141 Milan, Italy; (L.M.); (F.F.); (F.P.); (A.C.B.); (D.P.); (M.P.); (E.C.)
| | - Filippo Pesapane
- Breast Imaging Division, Radiology Department, (IEO) European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, 20141 Milan, Italy; (L.M.); (F.F.); (F.P.); (A.C.B.); (D.P.); (M.P.); (E.C.)
| | - Anna Carla Bozzini
- Breast Imaging Division, Radiology Department, (IEO) European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, 20141 Milan, Italy; (L.M.); (F.F.); (F.P.); (A.C.B.); (D.P.); (M.P.); (E.C.)
| | - Samuele Frassoni
- Department of Statistics and Quantitative Methods, University of Milan-Bicocca, 20126 Milan, Italy; (S.F.); (V.B.)
| | - Vincenzo Bagnardi
- Department of Statistics and Quantitative Methods, University of Milan-Bicocca, 20126 Milan, Italy; (S.F.); (V.B.)
| | - Davide Pupo
- Breast Imaging Division, Radiology Department, (IEO) European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, 20141 Milan, Italy; (L.M.); (F.F.); (F.P.); (A.C.B.); (D.P.); (M.P.); (E.C.)
| | - Giovanni Mazzarol
- Division of Pathology, (IEO) European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, 20141 Milan, Italy; (G.M.); (E.D.C.)
| | - Elisa De Camilli
- Division of Pathology, (IEO) European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, 20141 Milan, Italy; (G.M.); (E.D.C.)
| | - Claudia Sangalli
- Data Management, (IEO) European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, 20141 Milan, Italy;
| | - Massimo Venturini
- Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology Unit, ASST Settelaghi, Insubria University, 21100 Varese, Italy;
| | - Maria Pizzamiglio
- Breast Imaging Division, Radiology Department, (IEO) European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, 20141 Milan, Italy; (L.M.); (F.F.); (F.P.); (A.C.B.); (D.P.); (M.P.); (E.C.)
| | - Enrico Cassano
- Breast Imaging Division, Radiology Department, (IEO) European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, 20141 Milan, Italy; (L.M.); (F.F.); (F.P.); (A.C.B.); (D.P.); (M.P.); (E.C.)
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Rubio IT, Wyld L, Marotti L, Athanasiou A, Regitnig P, Catanuto G, Schoones JW, Zambon M, Camps J, Santini D, Dietz J, Sardanelli F, Varga Z, Smidt M, Sharma N, Shaaban AM, Gilbert F. European guidelines for the diagnosis, treatment and follow-up of breast lesions with uncertain malignant potential (B3 lesions) developed jointly by EUSOMA, EUSOBI, ESP (BWG) and ESSO. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY 2024; 50:107292. [PMID: 38061151 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejso.2023.107292] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/14/2023] [Accepted: 11/17/2023] [Indexed: 01/16/2024]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Breast lesions of uncertain malignant potential (B3) include atypical ductal and lobular hyperplasias, lobular carcinoma in situ, flat epithelial atypia, papillary lesions, radial scars and fibroepithelial lesions as well as other rare miscellaneous lesions. They are challenging to categorise histologically, requiring specialist training and multidisciplinary input. They may coexist with in situ or invasive breast cancer (BC) and increase the risk of subsequent BC development. Management should focus on adequate classification and management whilst avoiding overtreatment. The aim of these guidelines is to provide updated information regarding the diagnosis and management of B3 lesions, according to updated literature review evidence. METHODS These guidelines provide practical recommendations which can be applied in clinical practice which include recommendation grade and level of evidence. All sections were written according to an updated literature review and discussed at a consensus meeting. Critical appraisal by the expert writing committee adhered to the 23 items in the international Appraisal of Guidelines, Research and Evaluation (AGREE) tool. RESULTS Recommendations for further management after core-needle biopsy (CNB) or vacuum-assisted biopsy (VAB) diagnosis of a B3 lesion reported in this guideline, vary depending on the presence of atypia, size of lesion, sampling size, and patient preferences. After CNB or VAB, the option of vacuum-assisted excision or surgical excision should be evaluated by a multidisciplinary team and shared decision-making with the patient is crucial for personalizing further treatment. De-escalation of surgical intervention for B3 breast lesions is ongoing, and the inclusion of vacuum-assisted excision (VAE) will decrease the need for surgical intervention in further approaches. Communication with patients may be different according to histological diagnosis, presence or absence of atypia, or risk of upgrade due to discordant imaging. Written information resources to help patients understand these issues alongside with verbal communication is recommended. Lifestyle interventions have a significant impact on BC incidence so lifestyle interventions need to be suggested to women at increased BC risk as a result of a diagnosis of a B3 lesion. CONCLUSIONS These guidelines provide a state-of-the-art overview of the diagnosis, management and prognosis of B3 lesions in modern multidisciplinary breast practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Isabel T Rubio
- Breast Surgical Oncology, Clinica Universidad de Navarra, Madrid, Spain; European Society of Breast Cancer Specialists (EUSOMA), Florence, Italy; European Society of Surgical Oncology (ESSO), Brussels, Belgium.
| | - Lynda Wyld
- Department of Oncology and Metabolism, University of Sheffield Medical School, Beech Hill Road, Sheffield, S10 2RX, UK; Doncaster and Bassetlaw Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Doncaster, UK
| | - Lorenza Marotti
- European Society of Breast Cancer Specialists (EUSOMA), Florence, Italy
| | | | - Peter Regitnig
- Diagnostic and Research Institute of Pathology, Medical University of Graz, Graz, Austria
| | - Giuseppe Catanuto
- Humanitas-Istituto Clinico Catanese Misterbianco, Italy; Fondazione G.Re.T.A., ETS, Napoli, Italy
| | - Jan W Schoones
- Research Policy & Graduate School Advisor, Leiden University Medical Center Leiden, the Netherlands
| | - Marzia Zambon
- Europa Donna - The European Breast Cancer Coalition, Milan, Italy
| | - Julia Camps
- Breast Health Units in Ribera Salud Hospitals.Valencia, Spain
| | - Donatella Santini
- Department of Pathology, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, Italy
| | - Jill Dietz
- The American Society of Breast Surgeons, Columbia, MD, USA
| | - Francesco Sardanelli
- Department of Biomedical Sciences for Health, Università Degli Studi di Milano, Milan, Italy; Unit of Radiology, IRCCS Policlinico San Donato, San Donato Milanese, Milan, Italy
| | - Zsuzsanna Varga
- Department of Pathology and Molecular Pathology, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Marjolein Smidt
- GROW-School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht University Medical Centre, Maastricht, the Netherlands; Department of Surgery, Maastricht University Medical Centre, Maastricht, the Netherlands
| | - Nisha Sharma
- Breast Unit, Level 1 Chancellor Wing, St James Hospital, Beckett Street Leeds, West Yorkshire, LS9 7TF, UK
| | - Abeer M Shaaban
- Cellular Pathology, Queen Elizabeth Hospital Birmingham, Birmingham, UK; Institute of Cancer and Genomic Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
| | - Fiona Gilbert
- Department of Radiology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge Biomedical Campus, UK.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Harper LK, Carnahan MB, Bhatt AA, Simmons CL, Patel BK, Downs E, Pockaj BA, Yancey K, Eversman SE, Sharpe RE. Imaging Characteristics of and Multidisciplinary Management Considerations for Atypical Ductal Hyperplasia and Flat Epithelial Atypia: Review of Current Literature. Radiographics 2023; 43:e230016. [PMID: 37768862 DOI: 10.1148/rg.230016] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 09/30/2023]
Abstract
High-risk lesions of the breast are frequently encountered in percutaneous biopsy specimens. While benign, these lesions have historically undergone surgical excision due to their potential to be upgraded to malignancy. However, there is emerging evidence that a tailored management approach should be considered to reduce overtreatment of these lesions. Flat epithelial atypia (FEA) and atypical ductal hyperplasia (ADH) are two of the most commonly encountered high-risk lesions. FEA has been shown to have a relatively low rate of progression to malignancy, and some guidelines are now recommending observation over routine excision in select cases. Selective observation may be reasonable in cases where the target lesion is small and completely removed at biopsy and when there are no underlying risk factors, such as a history of breast cancer or genetic mutation or concurrent ADH. ADH has the highest potential upgrade rate to malignancy of all the high-risk lesions. Most society guidelines continue to recommend surgical excision of this lesion. More recently, some literature suggests that ADH lesions that appear completely removed at biopsy, involve limited foci (less than two or three) with no necrosis or significant atypia, manifest as a small group of mammographic calcifications, or demonstrate no enhancement at MRI may be reasonable for observation. Ultimately, management of all high-risk lesions must be based on a multidisciplinary approach that considers all patient, radiologic, clinical, and histopathologic factors. ©RSNA, 2023 Quiz questions for this article are available in the supplemental material.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Laura K Harper
- From the Departments of Radiology (L.K.H., M.B.C., B.K.P., K.Y., S.E.E., R.E.S.), Pathology (E.D.), and Surgery (B.A.P.), Mayo Clinic, 5777 E Mayo Blvd, Phoenix, AZ 85054; Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minn (A.A.B.); and Department of Radiology, Phoenix Children's Hospital, Phoenix, Ariz (C.L.S.)
| | - Molly B Carnahan
- From the Departments of Radiology (L.K.H., M.B.C., B.K.P., K.Y., S.E.E., R.E.S.), Pathology (E.D.), and Surgery (B.A.P.), Mayo Clinic, 5777 E Mayo Blvd, Phoenix, AZ 85054; Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minn (A.A.B.); and Department of Radiology, Phoenix Children's Hospital, Phoenix, Ariz (C.L.S.)
| | - Asha A Bhatt
- From the Departments of Radiology (L.K.H., M.B.C., B.K.P., K.Y., S.E.E., R.E.S.), Pathology (E.D.), and Surgery (B.A.P.), Mayo Clinic, 5777 E Mayo Blvd, Phoenix, AZ 85054; Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minn (A.A.B.); and Department of Radiology, Phoenix Children's Hospital, Phoenix, Ariz (C.L.S.)
| | - Curtis L Simmons
- From the Departments of Radiology (L.K.H., M.B.C., B.K.P., K.Y., S.E.E., R.E.S.), Pathology (E.D.), and Surgery (B.A.P.), Mayo Clinic, 5777 E Mayo Blvd, Phoenix, AZ 85054; Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minn (A.A.B.); and Department of Radiology, Phoenix Children's Hospital, Phoenix, Ariz (C.L.S.)
| | - Bhavika K Patel
- From the Departments of Radiology (L.K.H., M.B.C., B.K.P., K.Y., S.E.E., R.E.S.), Pathology (E.D.), and Surgery (B.A.P.), Mayo Clinic, 5777 E Mayo Blvd, Phoenix, AZ 85054; Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minn (A.A.B.); and Department of Radiology, Phoenix Children's Hospital, Phoenix, Ariz (C.L.S.)
| | - Erinn Downs
- From the Departments of Radiology (L.K.H., M.B.C., B.K.P., K.Y., S.E.E., R.E.S.), Pathology (E.D.), and Surgery (B.A.P.), Mayo Clinic, 5777 E Mayo Blvd, Phoenix, AZ 85054; Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minn (A.A.B.); and Department of Radiology, Phoenix Children's Hospital, Phoenix, Ariz (C.L.S.)
| | - Barbara A Pockaj
- From the Departments of Radiology (L.K.H., M.B.C., B.K.P., K.Y., S.E.E., R.E.S.), Pathology (E.D.), and Surgery (B.A.P.), Mayo Clinic, 5777 E Mayo Blvd, Phoenix, AZ 85054; Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minn (A.A.B.); and Department of Radiology, Phoenix Children's Hospital, Phoenix, Ariz (C.L.S.)
| | - Kristina Yancey
- From the Departments of Radiology (L.K.H., M.B.C., B.K.P., K.Y., S.E.E., R.E.S.), Pathology (E.D.), and Surgery (B.A.P.), Mayo Clinic, 5777 E Mayo Blvd, Phoenix, AZ 85054; Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minn (A.A.B.); and Department of Radiology, Phoenix Children's Hospital, Phoenix, Ariz (C.L.S.)
| | - Sarah E Eversman
- From the Departments of Radiology (L.K.H., M.B.C., B.K.P., K.Y., S.E.E., R.E.S.), Pathology (E.D.), and Surgery (B.A.P.), Mayo Clinic, 5777 E Mayo Blvd, Phoenix, AZ 85054; Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minn (A.A.B.); and Department of Radiology, Phoenix Children's Hospital, Phoenix, Ariz (C.L.S.)
| | - Richard E Sharpe
- From the Departments of Radiology (L.K.H., M.B.C., B.K.P., K.Y., S.E.E., R.E.S.), Pathology (E.D.), and Surgery (B.A.P.), Mayo Clinic, 5777 E Mayo Blvd, Phoenix, AZ 85054; Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minn (A.A.B.); and Department of Radiology, Phoenix Children's Hospital, Phoenix, Ariz (C.L.S.)
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Al-Shami K, Awadi S, Khamees A, Alsheikh AM, Al-Sharif S, Ala’ Bereshy R, Al-Eitan SF, Banikhaled SH, Al-Qudimat AR, Al-Zoubi RM, Al Zoubi MS. Estrogens and the risk of breast cancer: A narrative review of literature. Heliyon 2023; 9:e20224. [PMID: 37809638 PMCID: PMC10559995 DOI: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e20224] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/11/2023] [Revised: 09/13/2023] [Accepted: 09/14/2023] [Indexed: 10/10/2023] Open
Abstract
In female mammals, the development and regulation of the reproductive system and non-reproductive system are significantly influenced by estrogens (oestrogens). In addition, lipid metabolism is another physiological role of estrogens. Estrogens act through different types of receptors to introduce signals to the target cell by affecting many estrogen response elements. Breast cancer is considered mostly a hormone-dependent disease. Approximately 70% of breast cancers express progesterone receptors and/or estrogen receptors, and they are a good marker for cancer prognosis. This review will discuss estrogen metabolism and the interaction of estrogen metabolites with breast cancer. The carcinogenic role of estrogen is discussed in light of both conventional and atypical cancers susceptible to hormones, such as prostate, endometrial, and lung cancer, as we examine how estrogen contributes to the formation and activation of breast cancer. In addition, this review will discuss other factors that can be associated with estrogen-driven breast cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Khayry Al-Shami
- Faculty of Medicine, Yarmouk University, P.O Box 566, 21163, Irbid, Jordan
| | - Sajeda Awadi
- Faculty of Medicine, Yarmouk University, P.O Box 566, 21163, Irbid, Jordan
| | - Almu'atasim Khamees
- Faculty of Medicine, Yarmouk University, P.O Box 566, 21163, Irbid, Jordan
- Department of General Surgery, King Hussein Cancer Center, Amman, 11941, Jordan
| | | | - Sumaiya Al-Sharif
- Faculty of Medicine, Yarmouk University, P.O Box 566, 21163, Irbid, Jordan
| | | | - Sharaf F. Al-Eitan
- Faculty of Medicine, Yarmouk University, P.O Box 566, 21163, Irbid, Jordan
| | | | - Ahmad R. Al-Qudimat
- Department of Public Health, College of Health Sciences, QU-Health, Qatar University, Doha, 2713, Qatar
- Surgical Research Section, Department of Surgery, Hamad Medical Corporation, Doha, Qatar
| | - Raed M. Al-Zoubi
- Surgical Research Section, Department of Surgery, Hamad Medical Corporation, Doha, Qatar
- Department of Biomedical Sciences, College of Health Sciences, QU-Health, Qatar University, Doha, 2713, Qatar
- Department of Chemistry, Jordan University of Science and Technology, P.O.Box 3030, Irbid, 22110, Jordan
| | | |
Collapse
|
5
|
Miceli R, Mercado CL, Hernandez O, Chhor C. Active Surveillance for Atypical Ductal Hyperplasia and Ductal Carcinoma In Situ. JOURNAL OF BREAST IMAGING 2023; 5:396-415. [PMID: 38416903 DOI: 10.1093/jbi/wbad026] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/17/2022] [Indexed: 03/01/2024]
Abstract
Atypical ductal hyperplasia (ADH) and ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) are relatively common breast lesions on the same spectrum of disease. Atypical ductal hyperblasia is a nonmalignant, high-risk lesion, and DCIS is a noninvasive malignancy. While a benefit of screening mammography is early cancer detection, it also leads to increased biopsy diagnosis of noninvasive lesions. Previously, treatment guidelines for both entities included surgical excision because of the risk of upgrade to invasive cancer after surgery and risk of progression to invasive cancer for DCIS. However, this universal management approach is not optimal for all patients because most lesions are not upgraded after surgery. Furthermore, some DCIS lesions do not progress to clinically significant invasive cancer. Overtreatment of high-risk lesions and DCIS is considered a burden on patients and clinicians and is a strain on the health care system. Extensive research has identified many potential histologic, clinical, and imaging factors that may predict ADH and DCIS upgrade and thereby help clinicians select which patients should undergo surgery and which may be appropriate for active surveillance (AS) with imaging. Additionally, multiple clinical trials are currently underway to evaluate whether AS for DCIS is feasible for a select group of patients. Recent advances in MRI, artificial intelligence, and molecular markers may also have an important role to play in stratifying patients and delineating best management guidelines. This review article discusses the available evidence regarding the feasibility and limitations of AS for ADH and DCIS, as well as recent advances in patient risk stratification.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rachel Miceli
- NYU Langone Health, Department of Radiology, New York, NY, USA
| | | | | | - Chloe Chhor
- NYU Langone Health, Department of Radiology, New York, NY, USA
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Elfgen C, Leo C, Kubik-Huch RA, Muenst S, Schmidt N, Quinn C, McNally S, van Diest PJ, Mann RM, Bago-Horvath Z, Bernathova M, Regitnig P, Fuchsjäger M, Schwegler-Guggemos D, Maranta M, Zehbe S, Tausch C, Güth U, Fallenberg EM, Schrading S, Kothari A, Sonnenschein M, Kampmann G, Kulka J, Tille JC, Körner M, Decker T, Lax SF, Daniaux M, Bjelic-Radisic V, Kacerovsky-Strobl S, Condorelli R, Gnant M, Varga Z. Third International Consensus Conference on lesions of uncertain malignant potential in the breast (B3 lesions). Virchows Arch 2023:10.1007/s00428-023-03566-x. [PMID: 37330436 DOI: 10.1007/s00428-023-03566-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 14.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/14/2023] [Revised: 05/01/2023] [Accepted: 05/17/2023] [Indexed: 06/19/2023]
Abstract
The heterogeneous group of B3 lesions in the breast harbors lesions with different malignant potential and progression risk. As several studies about B3 lesions have been published since the last Consensus in 2018, the 3rd International Consensus Conference discussed the six most relevant B3 lesions (atypical ductal hyperplasia (ADH), flat epithelial atypia (FEA), classical lobular neoplasia (LN), radial scar (RS), papillary lesions (PL) without atypia, and phyllodes tumors (PT)) and made recommendations for diagnostic and therapeutic approaches. Following a presentation of current data of each B3 lesion, the international and interdisciplinary panel of 33 specialists and key opinion leaders voted on the recommendations for further management after core-needle biopsy (CNB) and vacuum-assisted biopsy (VAB). In case of B3 lesion diagnosis on CNB, OE was recommended in ADH and PT, whereas in the other B3 lesions, vacuum-assisted excision was considered an equivalent alternative to OE. In ADH, most panelists (76%) recommended an open excision (OE) after diagnosis on VAB, whereas observation after a complete VAB-removal on imaging was accepted by 34%. In LN, the majority of the panel (90%) preferred observation following complete VAB-removal. Results were similar in RS (82%), PL (100%), and FEA (100%). In benign PT, a slim majority (55%) also recommended an observation after a complete VAB-removal. VAB with subsequent active surveillance can replace an open surgical intervention for most B3 lesions (RS, FEA, PL, PT, and LN). Compared to previous recommendations, there is an increasing trend to a de-escalating strategy in classical LN. Due to the higher risk of upgrade into malignancy, OE remains the preferred approach after the diagnosis of ADH.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Constanze Elfgen
- Breast-Center Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
- University of Witten-Herdecke, Witten, Germany.
| | - Cornelia Leo
- Breast Center, Kantonsspital Baden, Baden, Switzerland
| | | | - Simone Muenst
- Institute of Medical Genetics and Pathology, University Hospital Basel, Basel, Switzerland
| | - Noemi Schmidt
- Department of Radiology, University Hospital Basel, Basel, Switzerland
| | - Cecily Quinn
- Irish National Breast Screening Program & Department of Histopathology, St. Vincent's University Hospital Dublin and School of Medicine, University College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland
| | - Sorcha McNally
- Radiology Department, St. Vincent University Hospital, Dublin, Ireland
| | - Paul J van Diest
- Department of Pathology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Ritse M Mann
- Department of Radiology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
- Department of Radiology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | | | - Maria Bernathova
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Medical University Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Peter Regitnig
- Diagnostic and Research Institute of Pathology, Medical University Graz, Graz, Austria
| | - Michael Fuchsjäger
- Division of General Radiology, Department of Radiology, Medical University Graz, Graz, Austria
| | | | - Martina Maranta
- Department of Gynecology, County Hospital Chur, Chur, Switzerland
| | - Sabine Zehbe
- Radiology Section, Breast Center Stephanshorn, St. Gallen, Switzerland
| | | | - Uwe Güth
- Breast-Center Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Eva Maria Fallenberg
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, School of Medicine & Klinikum Rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich (TUM), Munich, Germany
| | - Simone Schrading
- Department of Radiology, County Hospital Lucerne, Lucerne, Switzerland
| | - Ashutosh Kothari
- Breast Surgery Unit, Guy's and St Thomas's NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | | | - Gert Kampmann
- Centro di Radiologia e Senologia Luganese, Lugano, Switzerland
| | - Janina Kulka
- Department of Pathology, Forensic and Insurance Medicine, Semmelweis University Budapest, Budapest, Hungary
| | | | | | - Thomas Decker
- Breast Pathology, Reference Centers Mammography Münster, University Hospital Münster, Münster, Germany
| | - Sigurd F Lax
- Department of Pathology, Hospital Graz II, Graz, and School of Medicine, Johannes Kepler University Linz, Linz, Austria
| | - Martin Daniaux
- BrustGesundheitZentrum Tirol, University Hospital Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria
| | - Vesna Bjelic-Radisic
- University of Witten-Herdecke, Witten, Germany
- Breast Unit, Helios University Hospital, University Witten/Herdecke, Witten, Germany
| | | | | | - Michael Gnant
- Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Zsuzsanna Varga
- Department of Pathology and Molecular Pathology, University Hospital Zürich, Zürich, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Varga Z, Sinn P, Lebeau A. [B3 lesions of the breast: histological, clinical, and epidemiological aspects : Update]. PATHOLOGIE (HEIDELBERG, GERMANY) 2023; 44:5-16. [PMID: 36635403 PMCID: PMC9877091 DOI: 10.1007/s00292-022-01180-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 12/22/2022] [Indexed: 01/14/2023]
Abstract
B3 lesions of the breast are a heterogeneous group of lesions with uncertain malignant potential encompassing a broad spectrum of histologically distinct alterations that often pose challenging decisions if diagnosed on the preoperative core or vacuum biopsies. B3 lesions are mostly detected due to mammographic calcifications or mass lesions and, in most cases, encompass a spectrum of atypical lesions such as atypical ductal hyperplasia, classic lobular neoplasia, flat epithelial atypia, papillomas, fibroepithelial tumors, and rarely other lesions such as mucocele-like lesions, atypical apocrine lesions, and rare stromal proliferations. The use of immunohistochemical stains (estrogen receptors, basal cytokeratin, myoepithelial markers, and stromal marker panel) is useful in the differentiation of these lesions and allowing proper classification. Regarding clinical management of B3 lesions, the radiological-pathological correlation of the given entity plays the most important key element for the proper next diagnostic and therapeutic step.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zsuzsanna Varga
- Institut für Pathologie und Molekularpathologie, Universitätsspital Zürich, Schmelzbergstr. 12, 8091 Zürich, Schweiz
| | - Peter Sinn
- Pathologisches Institut, Universitätsklinikum Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Deutschland
| | - Annette Lebeau
- Institut für Pathologie, Universitätsklinikum Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Deutschland ,Gemeinschaftspraxis für Pathologie, Lübeck, Deutschland
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Sanders ME, Podoll MB. Atypical Ductal Hyperplasia-Ductal Carcinoma In Situ Spectrum: Diagnostic Considerations and Treatment Impact in the Era of Deescalation. Surg Pathol Clin 2022; 15:95-103. [PMID: 35236636 DOI: 10.1016/j.path.2021.11.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/14/2023]
Abstract
As the first node in treatment algorithms for breast disease, pathologists have the potential to play a critical role in refining appropriate therapy for lesions in the atypical ducal hyperplasia-ductal carcinoma in situ (ADH-DCIS) spectrum by conservatively approaching diagnosis of lesions limited in size on core needle biopsy. Appropriate efforts to downgrade the diagnosis of lesions at the borderline of ADH and DCIS will certainly lead to more breast conservation and avoid the common morbidities of mastectomy, sentinel node biopsy, and radiation therapy. Whether results of clinical trials of active surveillance will successfully identify a subset of women who may successfully forgo even limited breast-conserving surgery is eagerly anticipated. Given the increasing concern that a significant number of women with DCIS are overtreated, identification of patients at very low risk for progression who may forgo surgery and radiation therapy safely is of significant interest.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Melinda E Sanders
- Vanderbilt University Medical Center, 1301 Medical Center Drive, 4918A TVC Blg, Nashville, TN 37215.
| | - Mirna B Podoll
- Vanderbilt University Medical Center, 1301 Medical Center Drive, 4918A TVC Blg, Nashville, TN 37215
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
El-Sheikh S, Rathbone M, Chaudhary K, Joshi A, Lee J, Muthukumar S, Mylona E, Roxanis I, Rees J. Rates and Outcomes of Breast Lesions of Uncertain Malignant Potential (B3) benchmarked against the National Breast Screening Pathology Audit; Improving Performance in a High Volume Screening Unit. Clin Breast Cancer 2022; 22:381-390. [DOI: 10.1016/j.clbc.2022.02.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/01/2021] [Revised: 02/01/2022] [Accepted: 02/02/2022] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
|
10
|
Park KW, Han BK, Rhee SJ, Cho SY, Ko EY, Ko ES, Choi JS. Atypical Ductal Hyperplasia: Risk Factors for Predicting Pathologic Upgrade on Excisional Biopsy. JOURNAL OF THE KOREAN SOCIETY OF RADIOLOGY 2022; 83:632-644. [PMID: 36238508 PMCID: PMC9514512 DOI: 10.3348/jksr.2021.0109] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/12/2021] [Revised: 07/28/2021] [Accepted: 08/16/2021] [Indexed: 11/20/2022]
Abstract
Purpose To determine the incidence of atypical ductal hyperplasia (ADH) in needle biopsy and the upgrade rate to carcinoma, and to evaluate difference in findings between the upgrade and non-upgrade groups. Materials and Methods Among 9660 needle biopsies performed over 48 months, we reviewed the radiologic and histopathologic findings of ADH and compared the differences in imaging findings (mammography and breast US) and biopsy methods between the upgrade and non-upgrade groups. Results The incidence of ADH was 1.7% (169/9660). Of 112 resected cases and 30 cases followed-up for over 2 years, 35 were upgraded to carcinoma (24.6%, 35/142). The upgrade rates were significantly different according to biopsy methods: US-guided core needle biopsy (US-CNB) (40.7%, 22/54) vs. stereotactic-vacuum-assisted biopsy (S-VAB) (16.0%, 12/75) vs. US-guided VAB (US-VAB) (7.7%, 1/13) (p = 0.002). Multivariable analysis showed that only US-CNB (odds ratio = 5.19, 95% confidence interval: 2.16–13.95, p < 0.001) was an independent predictor for pathologic upgrade. There was no upgrade when a sonographic mass was biopsied by US-VAB (n = 7) Conclusion The incidence of ADH was relatively low (1.7%) and the upgrade rate was 24.6%. Surgical excision should be considered because of the considerable upgrade rate, except in the case of US-VAB.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ko Woon Park
- Department of Radiology, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Boo-Kyung Han
- Department of Radiology, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Sun Jung Rhee
- Department of Radiology, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Soo Youn Cho
- Department of Pathology and Translational Genomics, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Eun Young Ko
- Department of Radiology, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Eun Sook Ko
- Department of Radiology, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Ji Soo Choi
- Department of Radiology, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
El Sanharawi I, Bataillon G, Journo G, Farkhondeh F, Sebbag-Sfez D, Malhaire C, Tardivon A, Mosseri V, Thibault FE. Clinical management of atypical ductal hyperplasia on vacuum-assisted biopsy of microcalcifications: External validation study of a decision tree selecting patients eligible for surveillance. Eur J Radiol 2021; 141:109826. [PMID: 34174485 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2021.109826] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/02/2021] [Revised: 05/31/2021] [Accepted: 06/14/2021] [Indexed: 10/21/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Atypical lesions found on percutaneous breast biopsy raise specific management issues. The aim of this study was to validate the previous performance of a decision tree defined by Forgeard et al to select a subset of patients at low-risk of surgical diagnostic upgrade that would be eligible for surveillance. METHODS A consecutive series of 211 patients diagnosed with ADH on vacuum-assisted biopsy (VAB) of clustered microcalcifications alone, then operated in our institution, was reviewed. Histological findings on percutaneous cores were compared with definitive diagnoses on surgical specimens. The rate of cancer underestimation on VAB was analyzed in the four arms and two management attitudes defined in the scheme, using size and quality of microcalcification removal and the number of ADH foci. RESULTS Ninety-eight women with ADH met the inclusion criteria. Overall, 20 cancers were diagnosed at surgery, showing a malignancy rate of 44% (17/39 patients) in the surgery group and of 5% (3/59 patients) in the surveillance group, which was not significantly different from the 2% rate in the monitored reference group (p > 0.64). The malignancy rate increased significantly with the size of clustered microcalcifications (0% when < 6mm, 17% when between 6mm and 21 mm, 48% when > 21 mm, p < 0001) and the number of ADH foci on VAB (14% when ≤ 2, 45% when > 2, p < 0.005). CONCLUSION Our results corroborate - within the limits of large confidence intervals - those obtained with the reference decision tree. Due to statistical uncertainty, however, they need to be prospectively validated in a broader series.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Imane El Sanharawi
- Département d'Imagerie Médicale, Institut Curie, 26 rue d'Ulm, F-75005, Paris, France
| | - Guillaume Bataillon
- Pôle de Médecine Diagnostique et Théranostique, Institut Curie, 26 rue d'Ulm, F-75005, Paris, France
| | - Gabrielle Journo
- Département d'Imagerie Médicale, Institut Curie, 35 rue Dailly, F-92210, Saint-Cloud, France
| | - Fereshteh Farkhondeh
- Pôle de Médecine Diagnostique et Théranostique, Institut Curie, 26 rue d'Ulm, F-75005, Paris, France
| | - Delphine Sebbag-Sfez
- Département d'Imagerie Médicale, Institut Curie, 26 rue d'Ulm, F-75005, Paris, France
| | - Caroline Malhaire
- Département d'Imagerie Médicale, Institut Curie, 26 rue d'Ulm, F-75005, Paris, France; Laboratoire d'Imagerie Translationnelle en Oncologie, INSERM, Institut Curie, 91401, Orsay, France
| | - Anne Tardivon
- Département d'Imagerie Médicale, Institut Curie, 26 rue d'Ulm, F-75005, Paris, France
| | - Véronique Mosseri
- PSL Research University, DRCI, Biométrie, 35 Rue Dailly, F-92210, Saint-Cloud, France
| | - Fabienne E Thibault
- Département d'Imagerie Médicale, Institut Curie, 26 rue d'Ulm, F-75005, Paris, France.
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Salviat F, Charles C, Uzan C. Shall patients' anxiety influence surgical decisions for atypical breast lesions? A substudy of the prospective NOMAT trial. Breast Cancer Res Treat 2021; 187:597-599. [PMID: 33710438 DOI: 10.1007/s10549-021-06165-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/05/2021] [Accepted: 02/24/2021] [Indexed: 11/24/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Flore Salviat
- Service de Biostatistique Et D'Epidémiologie, Gustave Roussy, 94805, Villejuif, France.,CESP INSERM U1018, Université Paris-Sud, Université Paris-Saclay, 94805, Villejuif, France
| | - Cécile Charles
- Psycho-Oncology Unit, Gustave Roussy, Paris-Saclay University, Villejuif, France
| | - Catherine Uzan
- AP-HP (Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris), Department of Gynecological and Breast Surgery and Oncology, Pitié-Salpêtrière University Hospital, Paris, France. .,Centre de Recherche Saint-Antoine (CRSA), Sorbonne University, INSERM, UMR_S_938 « Cancer Biology and Therapeutics », Paris, France. .,Institut Universitaire de Cancérologie (IUC), Paris, France.
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Uzan C, Mazouni C, Rossoni C, De Korvin B, de Lara CT, Cohen M, Chabbert N, Zilberman S, Boussion V, Vincent Salomon A, Espie M, Coutant C, Marchal F, Salviat F, Boulanger L, Doutriaux-Dumoulin I, Jouve E, Mathelin C, de Saint Hilaire P, Mollard J, Balleyguier C, Joyon N, Triki ML, Delaloge S, Michiels S. Prospective Multicenter Study Validate a Prediction Model for Surgery Uptake Among Women with Atypical Breast Lesions. Ann Surg Oncol 2020; 28:2138-2145. [PMID: 32920723 DOI: 10.1245/s10434-020-09107-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/28/2020] [Accepted: 08/18/2020] [Indexed: 12/20/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Diagnosis of atypical breast lesions (ABLs) leads to unnecessary surgery in 75-90% of women. We have previously developed a model including age, complete radiological target excision after biopsy, and focus size that predicts the probability of cancer at surgery. The present study aimed to validate this model in a prospective multicenter setting. - METHODS Women with a recently diagnosed ABL on image-guided biopsy were recruited in 18 centers, before wire-guided localized excisional lumpectomy. Primary outcome was the negative predictive value (NPV) of the model. RESULTS The NOMAT model could be used in 287 of the 300 patients included (195 with ADH). At surgery, 12 invasive (all grade 1), and 43 in situ carcinomas were identified (all ABL: 55/287, 19%; ADH only: 49/195, 25%). The area under the receiving operating characteristics curve of the model was 0.64 (95% CI 0.58-0.69) for all ABL, and 0.63 for ADH only (95% CI 0.56-0.70). For the pre-specified threshold of 20% predicted probability of cancer, NPV was 82% (77-87%) for all ABL, and 77% (95% CI 71-83%) for patients with ADH. At a 10% threshold, NPV was 89% (84-94%) for all ABL, and 85% (95% CI 78--92%) for the ADH. At this threshold, 58% of the whole ABL population (and 54% of ADH patients) could have avoided surgery with only 2 missed invasive cancers. CONCLUSION The NOMAT model could be useful to avoid unnecessary surgery among women with ABL, including for patients with ADH. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION NCT02523612.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Catherine Uzan
- AP-HP (Assistance Publique des Hôpitaux de Paris), Department of Gynecological and Breast Surgery and Oncology, Pitié-Salpêtrière University Hospital, Paris, France. .,Sorbonne University, INSERM UMR_S_938, "Cancer Biology and Therapeutics", Centre de Recherche Saint-Antoine (CRSA), Paris, France. .,Institut Universitaire de Cancérologie (IUC), Paris, France.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Anne Vincent Salomon
- Institut Curie, Université Paris-Sciences Lettres, INSERM U934, Département de Médecine Diagnostique et Théranostique, Paris, France
| | - Marc Espie
- University of Paris, Hôpital Saint Louis, APHP, Paris, France
| | | | - Frederic Marchal
- Institut de Cancérologie de Lorraine, Vandœuvre-lès-Nancy, France
| | - Flore Salviat
- Service de Biostatistique et d'Épidémiologie, Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France.,CESP INSERM U1018, Université Paris-Sud, Université Paris-Saclay, Villejuif, France
| | | | | | - Eva Jouve
- Institut Claudius Regaud-Oncopole, Toulouse, France
| | - Carole Mathelin
- Les Hôpitaux universitaires de Strasbourg, Strasbourg, France
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
14
|
McMahon MA, Haigh I, Chen Y, Millican-Slater RA, Sharma N. Role of vacuum assisted excision in minimising overtreatment of ductal atypias. Eur J Radiol 2020; 131:109258. [PMID: 32919262 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2020.109258] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/24/2020] [Revised: 08/23/2020] [Accepted: 08/25/2020] [Indexed: 10/23/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE B3 lesions are indeterminate lesions of uncertain malignant potential. They include lesions with and without epithelial atypia. Those with atypia include atypical intraductal epithelial proliferation (AIDEP)/atypical ductal hyperplasia (ADH) and flat epithelial atypia (FEA). They are traditionally managed with surgery. Vacuum assisted excision (VAE) allows larger samples to be obtained using a vacuum assisted biopsy (VAB) device, which equates to a surgical biopsy. We propose that VAE and mammographic surveillance is a safe alternative to surgery in managing the ductal atypias; (AIDEP/ADH and FEA). METHOD Retrospective analysis of prospectively collected data on B3 lesions (April 2009 - March 2016) from consecutive breast screening patients diagnosed with AIDEP/ADH or FEA on initial diagnostic core biopsy. Mammographic abnormality, breast density, size, management pathway and upgrade to cancer and types of cancer were also collected during the treatment pathway and 5 year surveillance period (April 2009 - April 2019). RESULTS 273 cases of ductal atypia were identified. 187/273 (68.5 %) cases were managed with VAE only as no upgrade to malignancy and then 5 year mammographic surveillance. 34/273 (12.5 %) cases had a VAE diagnosing malignancy. 24/273 (8.8 %) cases had a VAE and then a surgical biopsy due to radiological or pathological concern, 8/24 upgraded to malignancy. 22/273 (8%) cases had a surgical diagnostic biopsy, 9/22 (41 %) cases were upgraded to malignancy. In total 51/273 (19 %) cases were diagnosed with cancer on the new pathway (13 invasive (all ER positive and Her2 negative) and 38 non-invasive, (34 ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) and 4 cases of lobular carcinoma in situ (LCIS)). While 17/273 (6.2 %) cases developed malignancy (12 invasive (all HER2 negative) and 4 DCIS and 1 LCIS) during the 5 year surveillance period. CONCLUSIONS VAE is a safe alternative to surgery in managing ductal atypias. 187/273 (68.5 %) women avoided surgery. While 34/51 cancers (66.7 %) were diagnosed preoperatively using VAE, allowing the women to have a single therapeutic procedure.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- M A McMahon
- Department of Breast Radiology, Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, United Kingdom
| | - I Haigh
- Department of Breast Radiology, Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, United Kingdom
| | - Y Chen
- Division of Cancer and Stem Cell, School of Medicine at University of Nottingham, United Kingdom
| | | | - N Sharma
- Department of Breast Radiology, Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, United Kingdom.
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Lucioni M, Rossi C, Lomoro P, Ballati F, Fanizza M, Ferrari A, Garcia-Etienne CA, Boveri E, Meloni G, Sommaruga MG, Ferraris E, Lasagna A, Bonzano E, Paulli M, Sgarella A, Di Giulio G. Positive predictive value for malignancy of uncertain malignant potential (B3) breast lesions diagnosed on vacuum-assisted biopsy (VAB): is surgical excision still recommended? Eur Radiol 2020; 31:920-927. [PMID: 32816199 DOI: 10.1007/s00330-020-07161-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/14/2020] [Revised: 06/20/2020] [Accepted: 08/06/2020] [Indexed: 10/23/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE Breast lesions classified as of "uncertain malignant potential" represent a heterogeneous group of abnormalities with an increased risk of associated malignancy. Clinical management of B3 lesions diagnosed on vacuum-assisted breast biopsy (VABB) is still challenging: surgical excision is no longer the only available treatment and VABB may be sufficient for therapeutic excision. The aim of the present study is to evaluate the positive predictive value (PPV) for malignancy in B3 lesions that underwent surgical excision, identifying possible upgrading predictive factors and characterizing the malignant lesions eventually diagnosed. These results are compared with a subset of patients with B3 lesions who underwent follow-up. METHODS A total of 1250 VABBs were performed between January 2006 and December 2017 at our center. In total, 150 B3 cases were diagnosed and 68 of them underwent surgical excision. VABB findings were correlated with excision histology. A PPV for malignancy for each B3 subtype was derived. RESULTS The overall PPV rate was 28%, with the highest upgrade rate for atypical ductal hyperplasia (41%), followed by classical lobular neoplasia (29%) and flat epithelial atypia (11%). Only two cases of carcinoma were detected in the follow-up cohort, both associated with atypical ductal hyperplasia at VABB. CONCLUSION Open surgery is recommended in case of atypical ductal hyperplasia while, for other B3 lesions, excision with VABB only may be an acceptable alternative if radio-pathological correlation is assessed, if all microcalcifications have been removed by VABB, and if the lesion lacks high-risk cytological features. KEY POINTS • Surgical treatment is strongly recommended in case of ADH, while the upgrade rate in case of pure FEA, especially following complete microcalcification removal by VABB, may be sufficiently low to advice surveillance as a management strategy. • The use of 11-G- or 8-G-needle VABB, resulting in possible complete diagnostic excision of the lesion, can be an acceptable alternative in case of RS, considering open surgery only for selected high-risk patients. • LN management is more controversial: surgical excision may be recommended following classical LN diagnosis on breast biopsy if an additional B3 lesion is concurrently detected while in the presence of isolated LN with adequate radiological-pathological correlation follow-up alone could be an acceptable option.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marco Lucioni
- Anatomic Pathology Section, Department of Human Pathology, University of Pavia, Fondazione IRCCS Policlinico San Matteo, Pavia, Italy
| | - Chiara Rossi
- Anatomic Pathology Section, Department of Human Pathology, University of Pavia, Fondazione IRCCS Policlinico San Matteo, Pavia, Italy
| | - Pascal Lomoro
- Breast Imaging Department, Valduce Hospital, Via Dante Alighieri 11, 22100, Como, Italy.
| | - Francesco Ballati
- Breast Imaging Department, University of Pavia, Fondazione IRCCS Policlinico San Matteo, Pavia, Italy
| | - Marianna Fanizza
- Breast Imaging Department, University of Pavia, Fondazione IRCCS Policlinico San Matteo, Pavia, Italy
| | - Alberta Ferrari
- Breast Surgery Department, Fondazione IRCCS Policlinico San Matteo, Università degli Studi di Pavia, Pavia, Italy
| | - Carlos A Garcia-Etienne
- Breast Surgery Department, Fondazione IRCCS Policlinico San Matteo, Università degli Studi di Pavia, Pavia, Italy
| | - Emanuela Boveri
- Anatomic Pathology Section, Department of Human Pathology, University of Pavia, Fondazione IRCCS Policlinico San Matteo, Pavia, Italy
| | - Giulia Meloni
- Breast Imaging Department, University of Pavia, Fondazione IRCCS Policlinico San Matteo, Pavia, Italy
| | - Maria Grazia Sommaruga
- Breast Imaging Department, University of Pavia, Fondazione IRCCS Policlinico San Matteo, Pavia, Italy
| | - Elisa Ferraris
- Medical Oncology, Fondazione IRCCS Policlinico San Matteo and, Università degli Studi, Pavia, Italy
| | - Angioletta Lasagna
- Medical Oncology, Fondazione IRCCS Policlinico San Matteo and, Università degli Studi, Pavia, Italy
| | - Elisabetta Bonzano
- University of Pavia and Department of Radiation Oncology, Fondazione IRCCS Policlinico San Matteo, Pavia, Italy
| | - Marco Paulli
- Anatomic Pathology Section, Department of Human Pathology, University of Pavia, Fondazione IRCCS Policlinico San Matteo, Pavia, Italy
| | - Adele Sgarella
- Breast Surgery Department, Fondazione IRCCS Policlinico San Matteo, Università degli Studi di Pavia, Pavia, Italy
| | - Giuseppe Di Giulio
- Breast Imaging Department, University of Pavia, Fondazione IRCCS Policlinico San Matteo, Pavia, Italy
| |
Collapse
|