Chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy in breast cancer patients treated with eribulin: interim data from a post-marketing observational study

Eribulin-Induced Peripheral Neuropathy in Locally Advanced or Metastatic Breast Cancer: Final Analysis of the Prospective Cohort IRENE Study

Eribulin is a preferred treatment for patients with advanced breast cancer (BC) following anthracyclines and taxanes. The final analysis of the IRENE study assessed the incidence and resolution of eribulin-induced peripheral neuropathy (EIPN), along with safety and quality of life (QoL), in patients with advanced/metastatic BC. IRENE was an observational, single-arm, prospective, multicenter cohort study. Patients aged ≥18 years with locally advanced/metastatic BC that progressed after 1-3 prior chemotherapeutic regimens received eribulin and were monitored for new-onset or worsening EIPN. Secondary endpoints included time to disease progression, safety, and health-related QoL. In total, 108 (32.2%) out of 335 patients experienced EIPN; 18 (5.4%) experienced grade ≥3 EIPN. Median time to EIPN resolution (EIPN ended or returned to baseline) was 78.7 weeks (95% CI 77.1-not estimable). Median time to disease progression was 4.5 months (95% CI 3.9-5.5). Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) occurred in 322 (96.1%) patients; serious TEAEs occurred in 185 (55.2%) patients. Incidence and resolution rates of EIPN were comparable with existing evidence from previous trials. TEAEs were consistent with the established eribulin safety profile, with no new safety signals. Eribulin treatment did not appear to affect QoL, as measured by EQ-5D-3L and EQ-VAS, or patient-reported neuropathy symptoms, as measured by the PNQ.

Incidence and Resolution of Eribulin-Induced Peripheral Neuropathy (IRENE) in Locally Advanced or Metastatic Breast Cancer: Prospective Cohort Study

BACKGROUND

Eribulin, a halichondrin-class microtubule dynamics inhibitor, is a preferred treatment option for patients with advanced breast cancer who have been pretreated with an anthracycline and a taxane. Peripheral neuropathy (PN) is a common side effect of chemotherapies for breast cancer and other tumors. The Incidence and Resolution of Eribulin-Induced Peripheral Neuropathy (IRENE) noninterventional postauthorization safety study assessed the incidence and severity of PN in patients with breast cancer treated with eribulin.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

IRENE is an ongoing observational, single-arm, prospective, multicenter, cohort study. Adult patients (≥18 years of age) with locally advanced or metastatic breast cancer and disease progression after 1-2 prior chemotherapeutic regimen(s) for advanced disease were treated with eribulin. Patients with eribulin-induced PN (new-onset PN or worsening of preexisting PN) were monitored until death or resolution of PN. Primary endpoints included the incidence, severity, and time to resolution of eribulin-induced PN. Secondary endpoints included time to disease progression and safety.

RESULTS

In this interim analysis (data cutoff date: July 1, 2019), 67 (32.4%) patients experienced any grade eribulin-induced PN, and 12 (5.8%) patients experienced grade ≥3 eribulin-induced PN. Median time to resolution of eribulin-induced PN was not reached. Median time to disease progression was 4.6 months (95% CI, 4.0-6.5). Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) occurred in 195 (93.8%) patients and serious TEAEs occurred in 107 (51.4%) patients.

CONCLUSION

The rates of any grade and grade ≥3 eribulin-induced PN observed in this real-world study were consistent with those observed in phase III randomized clinical trials. No new safety findings were observed.

A Randomized Controlled Phase 2 Study of Neoadjuvant Eribulin Versus Paclitaxel in Women with Operable Breast Cancer: The JONIE-3 Study

OBJECTIVE

Neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) is essential for surgical downstaging of early-stage breast cancer, but taxane administration is associated with neuropathy. We investigated whether eribulin induces less neuropathy than paclitaxel.

METHODS

In this multicentre, randomised study (UMIN000012817), patients diagnosed with invasive breast cancer between December 2013 and April 2016 were randomly assigned to group E (eribulin followed by fluorouracil, epirubicin, and cyclophosphamide; FEC) or group P (paclitaxel followed by FEC). The primary endpoint was incidence of grade 1 or higher peripheral neuropathy according to the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE). Secondary endpoints were pathological complete response (pCR), clinical response, breast-conserving surgery, adverse events, disease-free survival (DFS), and patient neurotoxicity questionnaire (PNQ) analysis.

RESULTS

One hundred and eighteen cases were analyzed for safety and 115 were evaluated for efficacy. Peripheral sensory neuropathy was significantly lower in group E after week 6, while peripheral motor neuropathy in group E was significantly lower at weeks 9, 12, and 15. pCR in groups E and P was 20.7% and 29.8% (P = .289), respectively, and clinical response was 55.2% and 77.2% (P = .017), respectively. Three-year DFS was 89.7% in group E and 86.0% in group P (P = .561). Neutropenia was more frequent and more severe in group E. PNQ was evaluated for 4 years, and item 1 (sensory) was consistently lower in group E.

CONCLUSION

Neuropathy was significantly less frequent and less severe in patients who received eribulin compared with paclitaxel. Thus, eribulin could be a good alternative to paclitaxel in patients suffering severe neuropathy.

Tolerability of Eribulin and correlation between polymorphisms and neuropathy in an unselected population of female patients with metastatic breast cancer: results of the multicenter, single arm, phase IV PAINTER study

BACKGROUND

Metastatic breast cancer (MBC) is an incurable disease and its treatment focuses on prolonging patients' (pts) overall survival (OS) and improving their quality of life. Eribulin is a microtubule inhibitor that increases OS in pre-treated MBC pts. The most common adverse events (AEs) are asthenia, neutropenia and peripheral neuropathy (PN).

METHODS

PAINTER is a single arm, phase IV study, aimed at evaluating the tolerability of eribulin in MBC pts. Secondary objectives were the description of treatment efficacy and safety, the assessment of the incidence and severity of PN and its association with genetic polymorphisms. Genomic DNA was isolated from blood samples and 15 Single Nucleotide Polymorphisms (SNPs) were genotyped by Taqman specific assays. The association between PN and SNPs were evaluated by Fisher exact test.

RESULTS

Starting from May 2014 until June 2018 180 pts were enrolled in this study by 20 Italian centers. 170 of these pts could be evaluated for efficacy and toxicity and 159 for polymorphisms analysis. The median age of pts was 60 years old and the biological subtypes were luminal type (64.7%), Her2 positive (18.3%) and triple negative (17%). Pts were pretreated with a median of 5 lines for MBC. The median follow up of this study was 15.4 months with a median number of 4.5 cycles administered (minimum-maximum 1-23). The median overall survival was 12 months. 48.8% of pts experienced a dose reduction, mainly for neutropenia (23.9%) and liver toxicity (12%). 65 pts (38.2%) reported at least one severe toxicity. Neutropenia and neurotoxicity were the most frequent severe AEs (15.3% and 14.7%, respectively); other reported toxicities were osteo-muscular, abdominal or tumor site pain (19.4%), liver toxicity (6.6%), pulmonary toxicity (6.5%) and dermatological toxicity (3.6%). Among the 15 evaluated SNPs, an association with PN was found for rs2233335 and rs7214723.

CONCLUSIONS

Eribulin is a well-tolerated treatment option in MBC. Schedule and dosage modifications were common, but toxicity rarely led to treatment discontinuation. SNPs rs2233335 (G/T and T/T) in the NDRG1 gene and rs7214723 (CC and CT) in the CAMKK1 gene were associated with PN. These findings, if validated, could allow a tailored treatment with eribulin in cancer patients.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov ID: NCT02864030.

Clinical and preclinical features of eribulin-related peripheral neuropathy

Different microtubule-targeting agents (MTAs) possess distinct modes of action and their clinical use in cancer treatment is often limited by chemotherapy-induced peripheral neurotoxicity (CIPN). Eribulin is a member of the halichondrin class of antineoplastic drugs, which is correlated with a high antimitotic activity against metastatic breast cancer and liposarcoma. Current clinical evidence suggests that eribulin treatment, unlike some of the other MTAs, is associated with a relatively low incidence of severe peripheral neuropathy. This suggests that different MTAs possess unique mechanisms of neuropathologic induction. Animal models reliably reproduced eribulin-related neuropathy providing newer insights in CIPN pathogenesis, and they are highly suitable for in vivo functional, symptomatic and morphological characterizations of eribulin-related CIPN. The purpose of this review is to discuss the most recent literature on eribulin with a focus on both clinical and preclinical data, to explain the molecular events responsible for its favorable neurotoxic profile.

Indices of peripheral leukocytes predict longer overall survival in breast cancer patients on eribulin in Japan

Background

It was reported that eribulin regulates the tumor microenvironment, including the immune system, by inducing vascular remodeling. Lymphocyte counts are a critical index of immune response in patients. The non-Asian, global EMBRACE study has suggested that baseline absolute lymphocyte count (ALC) may be a predictor of the survival benefit of eribulin in breast cancer patients. We examined whether the baseline ALC is a potential predictor of overall survival (OS) in Japanese patients with HER2-negative advanced breast cancer treated with eribulin.

Methods

This was a post hoc analysis of data from a post-marketing observational study of eribulin in Japan. The OS by baseline ALC was estimated using the Kaplan–Meier method, with the cut-off value of 1500/μL for ALC. The OS by baseline neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR), a general prognostic index in breast cancer patients, was also estimated, with the cut-off value of 3.

Results

The median OS was longer in patients with an ALC of ≥ 1500/μL than in those with an ALC of < 1500/μL (19.4 vs. 14.3 months; hazard ratio [HR]: 0.628; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.492, 0.801). Patients with an NLR of ≥ 3 showed shorter OS than those with an NLR of < 3 (13.2 vs. 18.8 months; HR: 1.552; 95% CI 1.254, 1.921), and NLR also separated OS in patients with an ALC of < 1500/μL.

Conclusions

Consistent with the findings of a previous study involving a non-Asian, Western population, our study suggested that baseline ALC may be a predictive factor for the survival benefit of eribulin in Japanese patients.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s12282-021-01232-1.

Effectiveness and safety of eribulin in Japanese patients with HER2-negative, advanced breast cancer: a 2-year post-marketing observational study in a real-world setting

Background Data on eribulin as the first- or second-line treatment in a clinical setting, especially the overall survival (OS) of patients, are scarce. Therefore, we assessed the effectiveness and safety of eribulin as the first-, second-, and third- or later-line treatments in patients with human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-negative advanced breast cancer in Japan. Methods This multicenter, prospective, post-marketing, observational study enrolled patients from September 2014 to February 2016 in Japan and followed them for 2 years. Patients were categorized by eribulin use into the first-, second-, and third- or later-line treatment groups. Results Of 651 registered patients, 637 patients were included in the safety and effectiveness analysis. In all, first-, second-, and third or later-line treatment groups, median OS (95% confidence interval) were 15.6 (13.8-17.6), 22.8 (17.3-31.0), 16.3 (12.4-19.9), and 12.6 (11.2-15.1) months and time to treatment failure (TTF) (95% confidence interval) were 4.2 (3.7-4.4), 5.2 (3.7-5.9), 4.2 (3.7-5.1), and 3.8 (3.5-4.2) months, respectively. Prolonged TTF was associated with complications of diabetes and the development of peripheral neuropathy after eribulin treatment, according to multivariate Cox regression analysis. Grade ≥ 3 adverse drug reactions (ADRs) were reported in 61.7% of the patients. Neutropenia (49.5%) was the most common grade ≥ 3 ADR in all groups. Conclusions The effectiveness and safety results of eribulin as the first- or second-line treatment were favorable. Thus, these suggest eribulin may be a first-line treatment candidate for patients with HER2-negative advanced breast cancer in Japan.

First-line bevacizumab and eribulin combination therapy for HER2-negative metastatic breast cancer: Efficacy and safety in the GINECO phase II ESMERALDA study

Purpose

Combining bevacizumab with paclitaxel significantly improves progression-free survival (PFS) versus paclitaxel alone in HER2-negative metastatic breast cancer (MBC). Eribulin is active and tolerable in pretreated MBC. To assess whether eribulin may offer a more tolerable yet effective combination partner for bevacizumab, we evaluated a bevacizumab/eribulin combination regimen as first-line therapy for MBC.

Methods

In this single-arm phase II study, patients with histologically confirmed HER2-negative MBC and no prior chemotherapy for MBC received eribulin 1.23 mg/m² on days 1 and 8 every 3 weeks for ≥6 cycles plus bevacizumab 15 mg/kg on day 1 every 3 weeks until disease progression. The primary endpoint was non-progression rate at 1 year. Secondary endpoints included objective response rate (ORR), PFS, and safety.

Results

The median age of the 61 treated female patients was 59 years, 16% had triple-negative MBC, 30% had ≥3 metastatic sites, and 71% had received prior (neo)adjuvant chemotherapy. Patients received a median of six eribulin and nine bevacizumab cycles. The non-progression rate at 1 year was 32% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 20–43%), ORR was 47% (95% CI: 34–60%), and median PFS was 8.3 months (95% CI: 7.0–9.6 months). The only grade ≥3 clinical adverse events in >5% of patients were hypertension (39%), neutropenia (26%), thrombosis (10%), and paresthesia/dysesthesia (7%).

Conclusion

First-line eribulin/bevacizumab combination therapy showed interesting activity in MBC with an acceptable safety profile, including a particularly low incidence of high-grade neuropathy.

•

A single-arm study evaluated first-line bevacizumab–eribulin for HER2-negative MBC.

•

The primary endpoint was non-progression rate at 1 year.

•

The 1-year non-progression rate was 32% (95% CI 20–43%); median PFS was 8.3 months.

•

Grade ≥3 clinical AEs in >10% comprised hypertension (39%) and neutropenia (26%).

•

Eribulin–bevacizumab showed interesting activity and acceptable safety in MBC.

Neurotoxicity of antineoplastic drugs: Mechanisms, susceptibility, and neuroprotective strategies

This review summarizes the adverse effects on the central and/or peripheral nervous systems that may occur in response to antineoplastic drugs. In particular, we describe the neurotoxic side effects of the most commonly used drugs, such as platinum compounds, doxorubicin, ifosfamide, 5-fluorouracil, vinca alkaloids, taxanes, methotrexate, bortezomib and thalidomide. Neurotoxicity may result from direct action of compounds on the nervous system or from metabolic alterations produced indirectly by these drugs, and either the central nervous system or the peripheral nervous system, or both, may be affected. The incidence and severity of neurotoxicity are principally related to the dose, to the duration of treatment, and to the dose intensity, though other factors, such as age, concurrent pathologies, and genetic predisposition may enhance the occurrence of side effects. To avoid or reduce the onset and severity of these neurotoxic effects, the use of neuroprotective compounds and/or strategies may be helpful, thereby enhancing the therapeutic effectiveness of antineoplastic drug.

Vinca alkaloids, thalidomide and eribulin-induced peripheral neurotoxicity: From pathogenesis to treatment

Vinca alkaloids, thalidomide, and eribulin are widely used to treat patients with childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL), adults affected by multiple myeloma and locally invasive or metastatic breast cancer, respectively. However, soon after their introduction into clinical practice, chemotherapy-induced peripheral neurotoxicity (CIPN) emerged as their main non-hematological and among dose-limiting adverse events. It is generally perceived that vinca alkaloids and the antiangiogenic agent thalidomide are more neurotoxic, compared to eribulin. The exposure to these chemotherapeutic agents is associated with an axonal, length-dependent, sensory polyneuropathy of mild to moderate severity, whereas it is considered that the peripheral nerve damage, unless severe, usually resolves soon after treatment discontinuation. Advanced age, high initial and prolonged dosing, coadministration of other neurotoxic chemotherapeutic agents and pre-existing neuropathy are the common risk factors. Pharmacogenetic biomarkers might be used to define patients at increased susceptibility of CIPN. Currently, there is no established therapy for CIPN prevention or treatment; symptomatic treatment for neuropathic pain and dose reduction or withdrawal in severe cases is considered, at the cost of reduced cancer therapeutic efficacy. This review critically examines the pathogenesis, epidemiology, risk factors (both clinical and pharmacogenetic), clinical phenotype and management of CIPN as a result of exposure to vinca alkaloids, thalidomide and its analogue lenalidomide as also eribulin.

The safety of eribulin for the treatment of metastatic breast cancer

Introduction: Eribulin mesylate is a highly potent anticancer agent approved for use in pretreated metastatic breast cancer (MBC). Clinical trials of eribulin in MBC have demonstrated activity against this tumor type, and a phase 3 study in patients with MBC previously treated with an anthracycline and a taxane showed a significant increase in overall survival (OS) with eribulin versus control regimens. Areas covered: This review presents overviews of the development of eribulin, its pharmacology, and its efficacy in MBC. A detailed review of its safety profile is presented, and the safety of eribulin is compared with other agents commonly used to treat MBC. Expert opinion: As eribulin is the only drug shown to improve OS in patients with pretreated MBC, it is an important treatment option for many patients. Eribulin is currently considered a second-line (Europe) or third-line (United States) therapy, and studies have been examining use in the first-line setting. The use of eribulin in combination with other therapies is beginning to be explored because its manageable safety profile makes it an ideal combination-treatment partner. Emerging eribulin combination-treatment data suggest a manageable toxicity profile, and eribulin is set to be a key drug for the treatment of MBC in the future.

Use of a Healthcare Claims Database for Post-Marketing Safety Assessments of Eribulin in Japan: A Comparative Assessment with a Prospective Post-Marketing Surveillance Study

BACKGROUND

To understand the extent to which a large-scale healthcare claims database (DB) captures the safety profile of eribulin mesylate (Halaven^®, Eisai Co., Ltd., Japan), we compared patient characteristics, drug use, and adverse events (AEs) between data for patients treated with eribulin retrieved from a DB and data for metastatic breast cancer patients from a conventional prospective post-marketing surveillance (PMS).

METHODS

We descriptively summarized patient characteristics and AEs of 551 and 951 patients retrieved from DB and PMS, respectively, during 2011‒2013. Using 2814 patient data from the DB during 2011‒2016, the drug use and AE incidence over time were assessed.

RESULTS

In both datasets, 99.8% were females, and the mean age was 57.8 ± 10.7 years. The mean number of eribulin administration was 11.1 ± 10.9 and 10.1 ± 7.8 in DB and PMS, respectively. Although, overall, the difference in AE incidence between the two datasets was moderate, gaps were larger for nausea (DB: 73.32% vs. PMS: 15.77%), neutropenia (20.87% vs. 66.67%), stomatitis (37.39% vs. 10.94%), and alopecia (0.36% vs. 12.09%). During 2011‒2016, the observed incidence of anemia or pyrexia significantly decreased (trend test, p = 0.0009 for both).

CONCLUSION

Generally, patient characteristics, drug use, and AE incidence between the DB and PMS were comparable; however, AEs such as neutropenia may require defining based on the laboratory data to achieve more comparable results in DBs. Besides the usefulness of healthcare claims DBs for long-term assessments, they may also serve as a good complementary to PMS in the pharmacovigilance of eribulin.