Oncoplastic versus conventional breast-conserving surgery in breast cancer: a pooled analysis of 6941 female patients

Efficacy and safety of oncoplastic breast-conserving surgery versus conventional breast-conserving surgery: An updated meta-analysis

INTRODUCTION

Breast cancer is the most common cancer among women. The surgical treatment of breast cancer has transitioned progressively from radical mastectomy to breast-conserving surgery. In this meta-analysis, we are aiming to compare oncoplastic breast-conserving surgery (OS) with conventional breast-conserving surgery (BCS) in terms of efficacy and safety.

METHODS

We searched Medline, Web of Science, Embase, Cochrane databases, Clinicaltrial.gov, and CNKI until April 30, 2024. Data from cohort studies and randomized controlled trials (RCTs) were included. Outcomes included primary outcomes (re-excision, local recurrence, positive surgical margin, mastectomy), secondary outcomes and safety outcomes. The Cochrane Risk of Bias Assessment Tool and Newcastle-Ottawa Scale were used to evaluate the quality of outcomes.

RESULTS

Our study included 52 studies containing 46,835 patients. Primary outcomes comprise re-excision, local recurrence, positive surgical margin, and mastectomy, there were significant differences favoring OS over BCS (RR 0.68 [0.56, 0.82], RR 0.62 [0.47, 0.82], RR 0.76 [0.59, 0.98], RR 0.66 [0.44, 0.98] respectively), indicating superior efficacy of OS. Additionally, OS demonstrated significant aesthetic benefits (RR 1.17 [1.03, 1.33] and RR 1.34 [1.18, 1.52]). While total complications were significantly fewer in the OS group (RR 0.70 [0.53, 0.94]), the differences in specific complications were not significant. Furthermore, subgroup analyses were conducted based on nationality, sample size, quality, and type.

CONCLUSION

OS demonstrates either superior or at least comparable outcomes across various aspects when compared to BCS.

A bibliometric worldview of breast-conserving surgery for breast cancer from 2013 to 2023

Over the last decade, significant advancements have been made in breast-conserving surgery (BCS) for breast cancer. However, there is a lack of analytical and descriptive investigations on the trajectory, essential research directions, current research scenario, pivotal investigative focuses, and forthcoming perspectives. The objective of this research is to provide a thorough update on the progress made in BCS for breast cancer over the preceding decade. Retrieved from the Web of Science database, the data span from January 1, 2013, to November 30, 2023. Utilizing a set of advanced analytical instruments, we conducted comprehensive bibliometric and visual analyses. The findings underscore the predominant influence of the USA, representing 35.77% of the overall publications and playing a pivotal role in shaping research within this field. Notable productivity was evident at various institutions, including the Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, the University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, and the University of Toronto. Annals of Surgical Oncology contributed the most publications in this field. An examination of keywords indicated a change in the concentration of research attention, transitioning from molecular subtype, ultrasonography, and intraoperative aspects to SEER, male breast cancer, and adjuvant measures. By offering a comprehensive bibliometric assessment, this study enhances our understanding of BCS for breast cancer. Consequently, this benefits both experienced researchers and newcomers alike, providing prompt access to essential information and fostering the extraction of innovative concepts within this specific field.

Shoulder function following oncoplastic breast conserving surgery-a narrative review

Background and Objective

The high prevalence of breast cancer survivors makes it very relevant to investigate late morbidity following the treatment. Oncoplastic breast conserving surgery (OPS) has gained great popularity over the past years, and evidence-based knowledge suggest better prognosis for treatment with breast conserving surgery (BCS) compared to mastectomy. The aim was to investigate if OPS causes late effects on an acceptable level compared to what we know about breast surgery causing late effects.

Methods

Using the Medical Subject Headings (MeSH) terms "Breast Neoplasms", "shoulder", "oncoplast*", and "reconstruct*", the databases PubMed, Embase, and Scopus were searched on the 6th of June 2023. The literature search was managed in Covidence. We focused on studies describing late effects especially shoulder function including restrictions in mobility, reduced strength, as well as functional impairment.

Key Content and Findings

Nine studies fulfilled the inclusion criteria. Different kinds of oncoplastic procedures were described-most of them described volume replacement procedures. The knowledge of shoulder morbidity following OPS is limited. The heterogeneity in the selected studies was broad. Some of the studies were small and there was a considerable variation in follow-up time. They described shoulder function based on several different evaluation methods [range of motion (ROM), Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (DASH), Quick-DASH (Q-DASH), Shoulder Pain and Disability Index (SPADI), health-related quality of life (HRQoL), and non-validated subjective questionnaires]. All studies found acceptable levels of shoulder morbidity.

Conclusions

The requisite knowledge of late effects following OPS is still not available for unambiguous recommendations. This narrative review has elucidated the knowledge and has reached a conclusion based on review of the existing literature of this item. We found that the risk of decreased shoulder function caused by OPS-volume displacement as well as volume replacement-does not exceed the risk of shoulder problems seen after BCS and mastectomy with or without immediate reconstruction. Therefore, OPS can be considered if conventional BCS is not possible. But the knowledge of shoulder function after OPS is limited, and studies comparing shoulder function after OPS, BCS and mastectomy with or without immediate reconstruction are warranted.

Oncoplastic reduction mammoplasty: Systematic review and proportional meta-analysis of surgical outcomes

BACKGROUND

Breast-conserving surgery is the standard of care for early-stage breast cancer but can often result in unsatisfactory cosmetic outcomes. Oncoplastic surgery aims to address these issues by combining local excision with plastic surgery techniques to improve oncologic and esthetic outcomes. By incorporating breast reduction techniques into cancer surgery, wider margins of excision can be achieved, leading to enhanced oncological safety and reduced recurrence rates without causing significant asymmetry. This systematic review and meta-analysis aims to provide an updated understanding of the surgical outcomes associated with oncoplastic reduction mammoplasty.

METHODS

A systematic review of the literature was conducted according to PRISMA guidelines. Articles reporting post-operative outcomes following the oncoplastic reduction mammoplasty were included. A proportional meta-analysis of post-operative complications was performed to obtain their proportions and 95% Confidence Intervals (CIs).

RESULTS

Eighteen studies met the inclusion criteria, representing a total of 2711 oncoplastic reduction mammoplasty procedures in 2680 patients. The overall complication rate was 20% (95% CI: 15-25%). The positive margin rate following oncoplastic reduction mammoplasty was 11% (95% CI: 6-17%). The re-excision rate was 6% (95% CI: 3-12%). The completion mastectomy rate was 3% (95% CI: 2-6%).

CONCLUSIONS

Oncoplastic reduction mammoplasty is a safe and effective alternative to mastectomy and traditional breast-conserving surgery in the treatment of early-stage breast cancers.