What is it really? Anti-G or Anti-D plus Anti-C: Clinical Significance in Antenatal Mothers

Non-RhD alloimmunization in pregnancy: an updated review

RhD alloimmunization in pregnancy is still the main cause of hemolytic disease of the fetus and neonate (HDFN). Nevertheless, there are other antigens that may be associated with the occurrence of this phenomenon and that have been growing in proportion, given that current prevention strategies focus only on anti-RhD antibodies. Although not widespread, the screening and diagnostic management of the disease caused by these antibodies has recommendations in the literature. For this reason, the following review was carried out with the objective of listing the main red blood cell antigen groups described - such as Rh, ABO, Kell, MNS, Duffy, Kidd, among others - addressing the clinical importance of each one, prevalence in different countries, and recommended management when detecting such antibodies during pregnancy.

Anti-G with Concomitant Anti-D and Anti-C in a Pre-natal Patient, in India: Multi-disciplinary Approach to Diagnosis and Management

'G' antigen belongs to the Rh family and it was first described by Allen and Tippet in 1958. Various anti-D, anti-C, and anti-G antibody combinations can be found in patients. Ruling out the presence of anti-D is important for administering RhIg prophylaxis in RhD-negative pregnant women to prevent hemolytic disease of fetus and newborn (HDFN). RhIg prophylaxis is not indicated in the presence of an anti-D antibody. Time-to-time monitoring and follow-up of cases of RhD-negative pregnant women with a multi-disciplinary approach including an obstetrician, neonatologist, and transfusion medicine specialist helps diagnose, manage, and monitor HDFN in such cases. This case report emphasizes the need for proper antibody identification (anti-G) and managing HDFN (with intrauterine transfusions and exchange transfusion) during the perinatal period.

Red blood cell alloimmunization in pregnancy: A 10-year single-center study

Background/Aim. Pregnancy-induced red blood cell (RBC) alloimmunization is important not only because of the possible negative effects on subsequent pregnancy outcomes in case the fetus carries the antigen but also because of the optimal trans-fusion management in cases of obstetric hemorrhage. Timely detection of RBC antibodies is part of testing, prevention, and treatment strategy, aimed at achieving better outcomes for alloimmunized mothers with an affected fetus. The aim of the study was to determine the frequency and specificity of alloantibodies among pregnant women from the South Backa District, Serbia, with special attention to the incidence of anti-D alloantibodies. Methods. A retrospective study was conducted in the Blood Transfusion Institute of Vojvodina and covered the period from January 1, 2010, to December 31, 2019. Screening and antibody identification were performed by an indirect antiglobulin test in gel-microcards (ID-Card Liss/Coombs) with two test RBC (ID-DiaCell I-II screening cells, Bio-Rad, Cressier, Switzerland) on an automated system (IH-500, Bio-Rad). Results. Among 25,694 tested pregnant women, 1.38% were actively immunized, while 1.12% of women acquired antibodies in the current pregnancy. Among 3,622 (14.09%) RhD-negative women, 1.77% produced anti-D antibodies during the ongoing pregnancy. Distribution of anti-body specificity was: anti-D 23.34%, anti-M 11.85%, anti-E 9.41%, anti-K 9.41%, anti-C 5.92%, anti-Fyb 5.92%, anti-c 3.13%, anti-S 3.13%, anti-Lea 3.13%, anti-Leb 3.13%, anti-Cw 1.75%, anti-Jka 1.40%, anti-P 1.05%, anti-Lub 0.70%, anti-Fya 0.35%, autoantibody of undetermined specificity 0.70%, and irregular antibodies of undetermined specificity 15.68%. Conclusion. Immunoglobulin prophylaxis has led to a significant reduction in the frequency of D-alloimmunization among pregnant women in the South Backa District over the last ten years. However, the incidence of anti-D antibodies is still significantly higher than in published data for developed countries. We also identified the other, less commonly present, clinically significant antibodies. There is a need to introduce uniform recommendations for immunohematological testing in pregnancy on the territory of the Republic of Serbia in accordance with modern requirements.

A case of mild HDFN caused by anti-C, anti-D, and anti-G: Diagnostic strategy and clinical significance of distinguishing anti-G from anti-D and anti-C

Anti-G is commonly present with anti-D and anti-C and can confuse serological investigations. The differentiation of anti-G from anti-D and anti-C is particularly essential for the accurate diagnosis of hemolytic disease of the fetus and newborn (HDFN) and appropriate administration of anti-D immunoglobulin prophylaxis in Rhesus (Rh) negative women. We reported a rare case of anti-G together with anti-D and anti-C in a pregnant woman and her female neonate. The titers of IgG anti-D, anti-C, and anti-G in the woman were 256, 128, and 32, respectively. While the titers of IgG anti-D, anti-C, and anti-G in the neonate were 16, 8, and 4, respectively. The neonate experienced mild HDFN and only received phototherapy during hospitalization. This report discusses the diagnostic strategy and clinical significance of differentiating anti-G from anti-D and anti-C.