Post Transplant Lymphoproliferative Disorder

Posttransplant lymphoproliferative disorder in a heart transplant recipient: a case report

Malignancy in heart transplant recipients is a grave complication. Post-transplant lymphoproliferative disorder (PTLD) is the second most common tumour in adults and commonest in children. The incidence varies with the transplanted organ from 1 to 2% following kidney transplantation to as high as 10% following thoracic organ transplantation due to different immunosuppression intensity. PTLD include a wide spectrum of diseases ranging from benign proliferation of lymphoid tissue to frank malignancy with aggressive behaviour (lymphoma). Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) infection and prolonged immunosuppressant therapy are implicated in the pathogenesis of PTLD. The incidence of PTLD varies from 2.6% at 1 year to 28% at 10 years post-transplant. Seronegativity for EBV in recipients with seropositive donors increases the risk of PTLD in recipients. The majority of early-onset PTLDs (85%) are of B-cell origin and associated with EBV. Timely and accurate diagnosis with histological examination of lymphoid tissue is essential for early intervention. Reduction of immunosuppressive therapy (IST) and rituximab usually are effective in remission of PTLD. In resistant cases, chemotherapy is given with or without rituximab. Adoptive T-cell transfer represents a promising therapeutic approach. Early PTLD respond well to lowering immunosuppression and has a favourable prognosis compared to late PTLD. Five-year survival is 30% for high-grade lymphomas. The prognosis of EBV-negative lymphomas is worse. One out of 40 heart transplant recipients followed up in our centre developed PTLD. He was treated to remission and we describe this case here.

Idiopathic CD4+ T-lymphocytopaenia with FLT1 mutation complicated by progressive multifocal leucoencephalopathy and EBV+ polymorphic lymphoproliferative disorder

We describe a unique case of idiopathic CD4+T cell lymphocytopaenia complicated by viral-associated disorders in a patient with a heterozygous FLT1 mutation. A previously healthy woman presented with left-sided neurological deficits. Workup revealed a severe HIV-seronegative CD4+T cell deficiency and white matter brain lesions; brain biopsy confirmed progressive multifocal leucoencephalopathy (PML). Six years later, she represented with a tender mandibular lesion, with pathology diagnostic for EBV+polymorphic post-transplant-like lymphoproliferative disorder. A heterozygous FLT1 P1127L mutation was detected on peripheral blood and mandibular lesion next-generation sequencing. Concern for PML reactivation with rituximab-based therapy and the presence of localised disease led us to offer radiotherapy, resulting in significant symptom relief and marked therapeutic response on repeat imaging.

EBV-encoded miRNAs BHRF1-1 and BART2-5p aggravate post- transplant lymphoproliferative disorder via LZTS2-PI3K-AKT axis

Post-transplant lymphoproliferative disorder (PTLD) is one of the most serious complications after transplantation. Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) is a key pathogenic driver of PTLD. About 80% of PTLD patients are EBV positive. However, the accuracy of preventing and diagnosing EBV-PTLD by monitoring EBV DNA load is limited. Therefore, new diagnostic molecular markers are urgently needed. EBV-encoded miRNAs can regulate a variety of EBV-associated tumors and are expected to be potential diagnostic markers and therapeutic targets. We found BHRF1-1 and BART2-5p were significantly elevated in EBV-PTLD patients, functionally promoting proliferation and inhibiting apoptosis in EBV-PTLD. Mechanistically, we first found that LZTS2 acts as a tumor suppressor gene in EBV-PTLD, and BHRF1-1 and BART2-5p can simultaneously inhibit LZTS2 and activate PI3K-AKT pathway. This study shows that BHRF1-1 and BART2-5p can simultaneously inhibit the expression of tumor suppressor LZTS2, and activate the PI3K-AKT pathway, leading to the occurrence and development of EBV-PTLD. Therefore, BHRF1-1 and BART2-5p are expected to be potential diagnostic markers and therapeutic targets for EBV-PTLD patients.

Short-term decreased post transplant lymphoproliferative disorder risk after kidney transplantation using two novel regimens

BACKGROUND

Belatacept is employed alongside calcineurin inhibitor (CNI) therapy to prevent graft rejection in kidney transplant patients who are Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) seropositive. Preliminary data suggested that rates of post-transplant lymphoproliferative disorder (PTLD) were higher in individuals treated with belatacept compared to CNI therapy alone.

METHODS

The records of 354 adults who underwent kidney only transplantation from January 2015 through September 2021 at one medical center were evaluated. Patients underwent treatment with either low-doses of mycophenolate, tacrolimus and sirolimus (B⁰, n = 235) or low-doses of mycophenolate, tacrolimus and belatacept (B¹, n = 119). All recipients underwent induction with antithymocyte globulin and a rapid glucocorticosteroid taper. Relevant donor and recipient information were analyzed and endpoints of PTLD were assessed.

RESULTS

There were no cases of PTLD in either cohort within the study period. Recipients in the belatacept cohort experienced lower estimated glomerular filtration rates at 12 months (B⁰: 67.48 vs. B¹: 59.10, p = 0.0014). Graft failure at 12 (B⁰: 1.28% vs. B¹: 0.84%, p = 1.0) and 24 months (B⁰:2.55% vs. B¹: 0.84%, p = 0.431) were similar. There was no difference in rejection rates at 12 (B⁰: 1.27% vs. B¹: 2.52%, p = 0.408) or 24 months (B⁰: 2.12% vs. B¹: 2.52%, p = 1.000). Both groups had similar rates of malignancy, mortality and CMV/BK viremia.

CONCLUSION

Non-belatacept (MMF, tacrolimus and sirolimus) and belatacept-based (MMF, tacrolimus and belatacept) regimens do not appear to pose any increased risk of early onset PTLD. Both cohorts benefited from low rates of rejection, malignancy, mortality and graft failure. Recipients will continue to be monitored as PTLD can manifest as a long-term complication.

Newly onset cytopenias not always indicate a relapsing AML after allogeneic HSCT, a case of non-destructive post transplant lymphoproliferative disorder

Allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT) remains an effective option for the treatment of intermediate and high-risk Acute myeloid leukemia (AML). Post-transplant lymphoproliferative disorder (PTLD) is related to the intensity of post-transplant immunosuppression. Although Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) seropositivity and reactivation can be a major risk factor for PTLD. A few PTLDs could be EBV negative. There are a very limited number of PTLD cases following HSCT in patients with AML. We present a differential diagnosis of cytopenias after allo-HSCT. This is the first report of an AML patient developing bone marrow EBV-negative PTLD relatively late in their post-transplant course.

Gastrointestinal manifestations, risk factors, and management in patients with post-transplant lymphoproliferative disorder: A systematic review

BACKGROUND

Patients with a history of solid organ transplantation (SOT) or hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) are at an increased risk of developing post-transplant lymphoproliferative disorder (PTLD). The gastrointestinal (GI) tract is commonly affected as it has an abundance of B and T cells.

AIM

To determine typical GI-manifestations, risk factors for developing PTLD, and management.

METHODS

Major databases were searched until November 2021.

RESULTS

Non-case report studies that described GI manifestations of PTLD, risk factors for developing PTLD, and management of PTLD were included. Nine articles written within the last 20 years were included in the review. All articles found that patients with a history of SOT, regardless of transplanted organ, have a propensity to develop GI-PTLD.

CONCLUSION

GI tract manifestations may be nonspecific; therefore, consideration of risk factors is crucial for identifying GI-PTLD. Like other lymphoma variants, PTLD is very aggressive making early diagnosis key to prognosis. Initial treatment is reduction of immunosuppression which is effective in more than 50% of cases; however, additional therapy including rituximab, chemotherapy, and surgery may also be required.

EBV-Driven Lymphoproliferative Disorders and Lymphomas of the Gastrointestinal Tract: A Spectrum of Entities with a Common Denominator (Part 3)

EBV is the first known oncogenic virus involved in the development of several tumors. The majority of the global population are infected with the virus early in life and the virus persists throughout life, in a latent stage, and usually within B lymphocytes. Despite the worldwide diffusion of EBV infection, EBV-associated diseases develop in only in a small subset of individuals often when conditions of immunosuppression disrupt the balance between the infection and host immune system. EBV-driven lymphoid proliferations are either of B-cell or T/NK-cell origin, and range from disorders with an indolent behavior to aggressive lymphomas. In this review, which is divided in three parts, we provide an update of EBV-associated lymphoid disorders developing in the gastrointestinal tract, often representing a challenging diagnostic and therapeutic issue. Our aim is to provide a practical diagnostic approach to clinicians and pathologists who face this complex spectrum of disorders in their daily practice. In this part of the review, the chronic active EBV infection of T-cell and NK-cell type, its systemic form; extranodal NK/T-cell lymphoma, nasal type and post-transplant lymphoproliferative disorders are discussed.

Epstein-Barr Virus-Negative Diffuse Large B-Cell Post-transplant Lymphoma in an Epstein-Barr Virus-Positive Recipient

Post-transplant lymphoproliferative disease (PTLD) can arise as a complication after solid organ transplantation. Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) infection is a known risk factor and is known to drive disease manifestation. PTLD can occur in EBV-negative recipients and with EBV-negative donor organs, however, EBV-negative PTLD pathogenesis is unknown. Here, we present PTLD presenting as intussusception in a patient with a historic simultaneous pancreas-kidney transplant (SPK). This case study presents the first documented case of EBV-negative post-transplant lymphoproliferative disease in an EBV-seropositive SPK recipient from an EBV-positive donor. Here we describe the diagnosis and management of this patient, discuss the differences between EBV positive and negative driven post-transplant lymphoproliferative disease, and highlight areas of research opportunity in the latter.

Epstein-Barr virus-associated post-transplant lymphoproliferative disorders: beyond chemotherapy treatment

Post-transplant lymphoproliferative disorder (PTLD) is a rare but life-threatening complication of both allogeneic solid organ (SOT) and hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT). The histology of PTLD ranges from benign polyclonal lymphoproliferation to a lesion indistinguishable from classic monoclonal lymphoma. Most commonly, PTLDs are Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) positive and result from loss of immune surveillance over EBV. Treatment for PTLD differs from the treatment for typical non-Hodgkin lymphoma because prognostic factors are different, resistance to treatment is unique, and there are specific concerns for organ toxicity. While recipients of HCT have a limited time during which they are at risk for this complication, recipients of SOT have a lifelong requirement for immunosuppression, so approaches that limit compromising or help restore immune surveillance are of high interest. Furthermore, while EBV-positive and EBV-negative PTLDs are not intrinsically resistant to chemotherapy, the poor tolerance of chemotherapy in the post-transplant setting makes it essential to minimize potential treatment-related toxicities and explore alternative treatment algorithms. Therefore, reduced-toxicity approaches such as single-agent CD20 monoclonal antibodies or bortezomib, reduced dosing of standard chemotherapeutic agents, and non-chemotherapy-based approaches such as cytotoxic T cells have all been explored. Here, we review the chemotherapy and non-chemotherapy treatment landscape for PTLD.