Diagnostic Potential of Circulating Biomarkers in Adenosine Deaminase Diagnosed Pleural Tuberculosis Cases

Clinical significance of pleural fluid lactate dehydrogenase/adenosine deaminase ratio in the diagnosis of tuberculous pleural effusion

BACKGROUND

Pleural fluid is one of the common complications of thoracic diseases, and tuberculous pleural effusion (TPE) is the most common cause of pleural effusion in TB-endemic areas and the most common type of exudative pleural effusion in China. In clinical practice, distinguishing TPE from pleural effusion caused by other reasons remains a relatively challenging issue. The objective of present study was to explore the clinical significance of the pleural fluid lactate dehydrogenase/adenosine deaminase ratio (pfLDH/pfADA) in the diagnosis of TPE.

METHODS

The clinical data of 618 patients with pleural effusion were retrospectively collected, and the patients were divided into 3 groups: the TPE group (412 patients), the parapneumonic pleural effusion (PPE) group (106 patients), and the malignant pleural effusion (MPE) group (100 patients). The differences in the ratios of pleural effusion-related and serology-related indicators were compared among the three groups, and receiver operating characteristic curves were drawn to analyze the sensitivity and specificity of the parameter ratios of different indicators for the diagnosis of TPE.

RESULTS

The median serum ADA level was higher in the TPE group (13 U/L) than in the PPE group (10 U/L, P < 0.01) and MPE group (10 U/L, P < 0.001). The median pfADA level in the TPE group was 41 (32, 52) U/L; it was lowest in the MPE group at 9 (7, 12) U/L and highest in the PPE group at 43 (23, 145) U/L. The pfLDH level in the PPE group was 2542 (1109, 6219) U/L, which was significantly higher than that in the TPE group 449 (293, 664) U/L. In the differential diagnosis between TPE and non-TPE, the AUC of pfLDH/pfADA for diagnosing TPE was the highest at 0.946 (0.925, 0.966), with an optimal cutoff value of 23.20, sensitivity of 93.9%, specificity of 87.0%, and Youden index of 0.809. In the differential diagnosis of TPE and PPE, the AUC of pfLDH/pfADA was the highest at 0.964 (0.939, 0.989), with an optimal cutoff value of 24.32, sensitivity of 94.6%, and specificity of 94.4%; this indicated significantly better diagnostic efficacy than that of the single index of pfLDH. In the differential diagnosis between TPE and MPE, the AUC of pfLDH/pfADA was 0.926 (0.896, 0.956), with a sensitivity of 93.4% and specificity of 80.0%; this was not significantly different from the diagnostic efficacy of pfADA.

CONCLUSIONS

Compared with single biomarkers, pfLDH/pfADA has higher diagnostic value for TPE and can identify patients with TPE early, easily, and economically.

From simple to complex: Protein-based biomarker discovery in tuberculosis

Tuberculosis (TB) is a deadly infectious disease that affects millions of people globally. TB proteomics signature discovery has been a rapidly growing area of research that aims to identify protein biomarkers for the early detection, diagnosis, and treatment monitoring of TB. In this review, we have highlighted recent advances in this field and how it is moving from the study of single proteins to high-throughput profiling and from only using proteomics to include additional types of data in multi-omics studies. We have further covered the different sample types and experimental technologies used in TB proteomics signature discovery, focusing on studies of HIV-negative adults. The published signatures were defined as either coming from hypothesis-based protein targeting or from unbiased discovery approaches. The methodological approaches influenced the type of proteins identified and were associated with the circulating protein abundance. However, both approaches largely identified proteins involved in similar biological pathways, including acute-phase responses and T-helper type 1 and type 17 responses. By analysing the frequency of proteins in the different signatures, we could also highlight potential robust biomarker candidates. Finally, we discuss the potential value of integration of multi-omics data and the importance of control cohorts and signature validation.

Elevated neopterin in tuberculosis and co-infection with HIV and the effect of treatment: A systematic review, meta-analysis, and meta-regression

BACKGROUND

Neopterin (NEO) is a marker of immune stimulation. Increased NEO levels have been associated with autoimmune diseases, infections, and malignancies. Studies of NEO alterations in tuberculosis (TB) with or without HIV co-infection show inconsistent results. Moreover, challenges exist regarding TB diagnosis in people with HIV.

METHODS

We did a systematic review and meta-analysis of studies comparing urinary, pleural, and blood NEO levels between patients with TB or HIV-TB co-infection as the case group and subjects without TB and HIV or subjects with HIV without TB as the control group, respectively.

RESULTS

Blood NEO levels in patients with active TB were higher than healthy controls, with a large effect size of 1.99. Patients with TB had higher blood NEO levels before anti-tuberculosis therapy (ATT) than after ATT for months or when treatment ended with moderate effect sizes (1.13-1.46). meta-analysis of studies of patients with HIV-TB co-infection yielded similar results, with higher blood NEO levels in patients than controls that remained significant in subgroups of studies on pulmonary TB (PTB) patients and serum NEO and higher blood NEO levels in patients before than after ATT.

CONCLUSION

Meta-analyses reveal alteration in NEO levels in different specimens, e.g., blood, urine, and pleural fluid, in patients with TB with or HIV-TB co-infection compared to the control groups. Future studies need to investigate the utility of NEO as a diagnostic/prognostic biomarker for TB. Also, cellular and molecular mechanisms linking NEO and TB remain to be addressed.

Tuberculous pleural effusion

Tuberculous effusion is a common disease entity with a spectrum of presentations from a largely benign effusion, which resolves completely, to a complicated effusion with loculations, pleural thickening and even frank empyema, all of which may have a lasting effect on lung function. The pathogenesis is a combination of true pleural infection and an effusive hypersensitivity reaction, compartmentalized within the pleural space. Diagnostic thoracentesis with thorough pleural fluid analysis including biomarkers such as adenosine deaminase and gamma interferon achieves high accuracy in the correct clinical context. Definitive diagnosis may require invasive procedures to demonstrate histological evidence of caseating granulomas or microbiological evidence of the organism on smear or culture. Drug resistance is an emerging problem that requires vigilance and extra effort to acquire a complete drug sensitivity profile for each tuberculous effusion treated. Nucleic acid amplification tests such as Xpert MTB/RIF can be invaluable in this instance; however, the yield is low in pleural fluid. Treatment consists of standard anti-tuberculous therapy or a guideline-based individualized regimen in the case of drug resistance. There is low-quality evidence that suggests possible benefit from corticosteroids; however, they are not currently recommended due to concomitant increased risk of adverse effects. Small studies report some short- and long-term benefit from interventions such as therapeutic thoracentesis, intrapleural fibrinolytics and surgery but many questions remain to be answered.