Can High Titres of Anti Tissue Transglutaminase Antibodies Reduce the Need for Intestinal Biopsy for Diagnosis of Celiac Disease?

Non-biopsy Strategy for the Diagnosis of Celiac Disease in Adults: A Narrative Review

Celiac disease (CeD) diagnosis is a complicated process, requiring a multi-step procedure and a high level of clinical knowledge. Some scientific societies, mainly from Europe and North America, have proposed appropriate guidelines for the diagnosis and management of CeD. Since duodenal biopsy is particularly challenging for children, guidelines of the European Society for Pediatric Gastroenterology, Hepatology, and Nutrition, presented in 2012 and updated in 2020, have made it possible to avoid the biopsy in symptomatic pediatric patients with high levels of IgA anti-transglutaminase. Several parallel, similar studies in adults support the non-biopsy strategy. However, several pros and cons exist in applying such a strategy. The present narrative review reports the current evidence and the implication of omitting biopsy in the diagnosis of CeD in adults.

Do Serological Tests Eliminate the Need for Endoscopic Biopsy for the Diagnosis of Symptomatic Patients with Celiac Disease? A Retrospective Study with Review of Literature

Background: Celiac disease is one of the most common genetic allergies worldwide. The prevalence of celiac disease in Iran is similar to or even higher than the global prevalence. Celiac disease is a chronic inflammatory disease that affects the small intestine. Affected patients are allergic to gluten protein that exists in some grains, such as wheat and barley. Methods: Serological endomysial IgA antibody (EMA-AB) and tissue transglutaminase IgA antibody (TTG-IgA) tests were performed on 114 patients aged the ages of 0-18 years with histopathological findings of celiac disease. The results of these tests were compared to the results of the histopathological study of the duodenal biopsy. Results: Based on the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve and a calculation of the TTG-IgA test's sensitivity and specificity, the best diagnostic limit for the TTG-IgA test is 144, which has the best sensitivity and specificity. At this value (cut-off), the test's sensitivity was 62%, and the specificity was 93.7%. For the endomysial test, sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV) were 80%, 93%, 90%, and 75%, respectively. Conclusion: The diagnostic accuracy of the endomysial test is better than that of the TTG-IgA test in general for diagnosing patients with celiac disease. In the TTG-IgA test, false-positive cases are high due to a cut-off of 20, reducing the test's specificity. In these false-positive cases, the endomysial test helps in better diagnosis.

Relationship of citrulline and tissue transglutaminase antibody with duodenal histopathology among children with celiac disease

Objectives

Methods

Results

Conclusion

•

Celiac disease is an auto-immune disease that is characterized by chronic inflammation of the small intestine.

•

Non-invasive biomarkers, for the diagnosis of celiac disease, can reduce the need of biopsy.

•

Our findings indicate that citrulline and tTG antibody titer are significant biomarkers for the diagnosis of celiac disease.

No-biopsy pathway following the interim BSG guidance reliably diagnoses adult coeliac disease

Recent interim guidance from the British Society of Gastroenterology, aligned to historical paediatric practice, advises a no-biopsy protocol (NBP) for adults with high anti-tissue transglutaminase (tTG-IgA) titres and other clinical factors. A 7-year retrospective review identified 433 patients with positive tTG-IgA. Of these 433, 98 (23%) fulfilled the high titre criteria for an NBP which may have reduced endoscopic burden on the service. A high titre versus low titre translated in a 95% versus 75% histological confirmation of coeliac disease (p<0.01). The addition of anti-endomysial antibody analyses impacted minimally on these predictive rates. Our data support an NBP approach for selected patients. Of concern, however, was the finding that a third of patients with positive titres were not referred for a biopsy despite national guidance at the time advocating it. A clear message needs to be transmitted that the NBP is only for those with high titre, as opposed to any tTG-IgA positivity.