Financial impact of radiological reports on medical-legal evaluation of compensation for meniscal lesions

Comparison of clinical, MRI and arthroscopic assessments of chronic ACL injuries, meniscal tears and cartilage defects

PURPOSE

The aim of this study was to compare the accuracy of clinical examination to that of MRI evaluated by two independent radiologists for the diagnosis of meniscal tears and chronic anterior cruciate ligament injuries and to assess the MRI accuracy in the diagnosis of cartilage defects.

METHODS

Seventy-six consecutive patients with suspected intra-articular knee pathology were prospectively evaluated by objective examination, 1.5 T MRI, re-examined by trained radiologist and arthroscopy. Accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value and negative predictive value were calculated. Agreement analysis with kappa (К) coefficient values was performed for meniscal and ACL tears.

RESULTS

No differences were found between diagnostic accuracy of clinical examination, the first and second MRI reports in diagnosis of medial meniscus (84 vs 96 vs 97 %) and anterior cruciate ligament injuries (93 vs 78 vs 89 %). For the lateral meniscal tears, the accuracy of the second radiologist was significantly higher than those of the first (96 vs 75 %; p < 0.01) and clinical examination (96 vs 86 %; p = 0.02). High diagnostic values were obtained for the diagnosis of full-thickness chondral defects with sensitivity of 100 %, specificity of 95 % and accuracy of 95 %.

CONCLUSION

Clinical and MRI evaluations have no differences in the diagnosis of medial meniscus and anterior cruciate ligament injuries. A trained radiologist obtained better sensitivity, specificity and accuracy in the diagnosis of lateral meniscus. 1.5 T MRI does not represent the technique of choice in the evaluation of chondral defect but demonstrated high diagnostic accuracy for detection of full-thickness chondral defects.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Diagnostic prospective study, Level II.

Imaging of adrenal incidentaloma: our experience

PURPOSE

To investigate clinical, biochemical and radiological features in 35 patients with adrenal incidentaloma found on CT and/or MRI and to define the management of patients with adrenal masses.

MATHERIAL AND METHODS

From January 2011 and May 2013, 35 patients (19F, 16M) with an adrenal mass incidentally discovered on CT and/or MRI were enrolled in a retrospective study. Thirthy-two patients underwent MDCT and eight 1.5 MRI.

RESULTS

Patients consisted in 16 males and 19 females, aged between 25 and 89 yo. Adrenal lesions were most commonly found in the sixth decade; in relation to the side of the mass, 20 were found on left side, 15 on the right. Of all the mass analyzed, 3 were <1 cm diameter, 29 between 1 and 4 cm, 3 > 4 cm. The most common finding on CT was adenoma-like appearance (19 cases in relation to size, 14 in relation to attenuation values). Hormonal analysis showed 32 cases of nonfunctional masses and 3 cases of hormone activity. Adrenalectomy was performed in ten patients having adenoma (5 cases), malignant lesions (2 cases), pheocromocitoma, cyst and myelolipoma (1 case).

CONCLUSION

Diagnostic approach to adrenal incidentaloma is focused on the definition of malignancy and hormonal activity; the characterization is needs hormonal and radiological (CT and/or MRI) evaluation, even if a fine needle aspiration is needed in selected cases. Benign and/or non-hypersecreting hormone lesion with <4 cm diameter could be sent to follow-up; active adrenal tumors or >4 cm diameter lesions with malignancy suspicious or growth during follow-up could be treated with surgical adrenalectomy.