Grammont versus lateralizing reverse shoulder arthroplasty for proximal humerus fracture: functional and radiographic outcomes

Associations between radiographic parameters in the reverse shoulder arthroplasty and patient outcomes

Background

Various radiological parameters have been measured in the Reverse Shoulder Arthroplasty (RSA) and correlated to patient outcomes, to determine best baseplate position. Results remain unclear with respect to certain parameters such as inferior baseplate tilt. We have investigated our series of patients to clarify the relationship between radiological parameters and patient outcomes.

Methods

We conducted a UK based bi-centre retrospective review of 156 prostheses. Critical shoulder angle (CSA), RSA angle (RSAA), Overhang and Deltoid Lever Arm (DLA) were measured on preoperative and postoperative radiographs. Range of motion and Oxford Shoulder Score (OSS) (range 1-8 years) were obtained. We assessed for scapular notching at minimum 1 year follow up (n = 138).

Results

Decreased postoperative CSA and increased DLA were associated with higher OSSs (P = 0.001 and 0.019). Increased overhang and DLA were associated with increased flexion (P = 0.033 and 0.024 respectively). Multivariate analysis showed that CSA and DLA affected notching rate (P = 0.002 and 0.007).

Conclusions

Baseplate tilt in relation to the acromion (CSA) and DLA are the most predictive parameters for notching and OSS. We recommend considering a maximum CSA of 26 degrees to decrease notching rate and improve OSS. We recommend considering an Overhang of at least 6 mm to improve FF.

Improved outcomes of older patients with acute and displaced proximal humerus fractures treated with window bone ingrowth fracture-specific stem reverse shoulder arthroplasty

BACKGROUND

The optimal treatment of displaced proximal humerus fractures (PHFs) in the older people population remains controversial. Reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA) is a popular surgical treatment option that provides improved and reproducible results. However, the relevance of fracture-specific stem designs for RSA to improve tuberosity consolidation and shoulder function remains debatable.

METHODS

This study included all patients 70 years or older with acute and displaced PHFs primarily treated with RSA at a single institution in Portugal, between January 2010 and December 2019 who participated in a minimum follow-up of 2 years.

RESULTS

A total of 112 patients (15 men and 97 women) with a median clinical follow-up of 52 months were included. The mean age at the time of fracture was 78.6 years. All fractures were classified as Neer types 3 and 4 (n = 50 and n = 62, respectively). A window bone ingrowth fracture-specific stem was used for 86 patients, and a conventional humeral stem was used for 26 patients. Regarding the tuberosity fixation technique, 76 tuberosities were attached using technique A (according to Boileau's principles), 36 tuberosities were attached using technique B (not following Boileau's principles) and 11cases were classified as technique C (if fixation was not possible). The overall survival rate during the 2-year follow-up was 88.2%; however, this decreased to 79% at 5 years. Only three patients had complications (two infections and one dislocation) requiring revision surgery. In the multivariable analysis, the tuberosity fixation technique (P = 0.012) and tuberosity anatomical consolidation (P < 0.001) were associated with improved Constant scores (median Constant Score 62.67 (technique A), 55.32 (technique B), 49.70 (technique C). Fracture-specific humeral implants (P = 0.051), the tuberosity fixation technique (P = 0.041), tuberosity anatomical consolidation (P < 0.001), and dementia influenced the achievement of functional mobility (P = 0.014). Tuberosity anatomic consolidation was positively associated with bone ingrowth fracture-specific humeral implants (P < 0.01) and a strong tuberosity fixation technique (P < 0.01).

CONCLUSION

RSA is used for complex and displaced fractures of the proximal humerus in older patients. Dementia was negatively correlated with functional outcomes. A window bone ingrowth fracture-specific stem combined with strong tuberosity fixation can yield better clinical and radiological results.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level II; prospective comparative study; treatment study.

Factors affecting internal rotation following total shoulder arthroplasty

Background

Reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA) was developed in the late twentieth century to provide a stable arthroplasty option for patients with rotator cuff deficiency arthropathy. Since its inception, there have been changes in materials, design, and positioning. One of the persistent clinical issues has been difficulty with internal rotation (IR) and the associated difficulty with behind the back activities. Implant design, positioning, and the available soft tissues may influence IR after RSA. The purpose of this systematic review is to assess factors that impact IR following RSA.

Methods

The literature search, based on PRISMA guidelines, used 4 databases: Pubmed, Embase, Web of Science, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials. We included clinical trials that compared different implantation and design modifications and assessed IR.

Results

Of the 617 articles identified in the initial search, 46 satisfied the inclusion criteria. The articles explored multiple factors of RSA and their effects on IR, including humeral and glenoid components and muscle function and integrity. Among humeral factors affecting rotation, there was a broad consensus that: IR decreases as retroversion increases, humeral neck-shaft angle less than 155° improves IR, lateralized humeral offset does not improve IR, and shallow cups improve IR. Insert thickness was not associated with a reproducible effect. Of the studies evaluating the effect of glenoid components, there was majority agreement that glenosphere lateralization improved IR, and there were mixed results regarding the effects of glenosphere size and tilt. Others included one study in each: glenoid overhang, retroversion, and baseplate. One study found an association between teres minor insufficiency and improved IR, with mixed results in the presence of fatty infiltration in both teres minor and subscapularis. Most studies noted subscapularis repair had no effect on IR.

Conclusion

Prosthetic variables affecting IR are not widely studied. Based on the existing literature, evidence is conflicting. More research needs to be undertaken to gain a greater understanding regarding which factors can be modified to improve IR in RSA patients.

Which lateralization designed prosthesis of reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (glenoid-based lateralization vs humerus-based lateralization) would be better? Network Meta-analysis

PURPOSE

To demonstrate the differences between outcomes and complications after reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (rTSA), according to the types of lateralized prosthesis designs: glenoid-based lateralization (LG) and humerus-based lateralization (LH).

METHODS

PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Library databases were systematically searched for studies published before 1 April 2021, using the PRISMA guidelines. A network meta-analysis was applied for indirect comparison, incorporating studies including medialized or conventional Grammont prosthesis and each lateralized prosthesis (LG vs control and LH vs control). Out of 1,989 screened studies, 11 studies were included to compare functional scores, range of motion (ROM), radiologic outcomes, and revision rates. In addition, six articles from the included studies, which had repaired subscapularis after rTSA were analyzed to exclude the potential influence of subscapularis repair on the outcomes. The data were pooled using a random-effects model. The pooled estimates of the mean differences (MDs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated for continuous data, while dichotomous data were analyzed using the pooled relative risk (RR) and their 95% CIs.

RESULTS

The ROM, complications, and functional scores were similar between the two groups. In subgroup analysis of 6 studies involving concomitant subscapularis repair, the LH group showed higher American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) scores and Constant scores than the control group. Regarding the ROM, LH group showed better forward elevation than the LG group (LH vs LG: MD 10.07, 95% CI -9.05-29.19).

CONCLUSION

Overall, the outcomes and occurrence of complications were not significantly different between the two lateralized prosthesis groups. However, when the subscapularis was repaired, LH prosthesis seems to be more suitable to obtain a better ASES score and ROM.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III, network meta-analysis.

Artroplastia do ombro no tratamento das fraturas da extremidade proximal do úmero: Conceitos atuais

Complex proximal humeral fractures, especially in elderly patients, often require arthroplastic surgical treatment. Traditionally, shoulder hemiarthroplasty (HA) is the method of choice, resulting in long implant survival and a painless shoulder; however, shoulder HA has heterogeneous clinical outcomes related to the correct position of the implant, both in terms of height and version, and the anatomical consolidation of tuberosities. Today, reverse shoulder arthroplasties are increasingly used to treat such fractures. These techniques result in better functional outcomes compared to HAs, especially regarding anterior flexion, but implant longevity has not been established. The development of specific prosthetic humeral components for the treatment of fractures, which were recently introduced in the clinical practice, led to better clinical outcomes.

Complications and Intraoperative Fractures in Reverse Shoulder Arthroplasty: A Systematic Review

Introduction

The reverse shoulder arthroplasty is nowadays a treatment option for a variety of shoulder problems. As its incidence rose, also the number of complications increased, including intraoperative fractures.

Significance

We performed a systematic review and critical analysis of the current literature following the PRISMA guidelines. Our purpose was to: 1) determine incidence, causes, and characteristics of intraoperative fractures; 2) evaluate their current treatment options, possible related complications, reoperation rates, and the patients’ outcome; and 3) determine the overall incidence of each complication related to reverse shoulder arthroplasty. The articles were selected from PubMed medical database in April 2020 using a comprehensive search strategy. Rayyan software was used to support the selection process of the records. A descriptive and critical analysis of the results was performed.

Results

The study group included a total of 13,513 reverse shoulder arthroplasty procedures. The total number of complications was 1647 (rate 12.1%). The most common complication was dislocation (340 cases, rate 2.5%). Forty-six studies reported a total of 188 intraoperative fractures among the complications (rate 1.4%). The intraoperative fracture rate was 2.9% and 13.6% in primary and revision settings, respectively. There were 136 humeral fractures, 60% of them occurred in revision RSAs, during the removal of the previous implant, and involved the shaft in the majority of cases (39%). Glenoid fractures were 51 and occurred mostly during the reaming of the glenoid. We observed 7 further related complications (rate of 4%) and 3 reoperations (rate of 1.5%). The outcome was satisfactory in the majority of cases.

Conclusions

A comprehensive review on intraoperative fractures in reverse shoulder arthroplasties is presented. Results suggest favorable outcomes for all treatment methods, with a modest further complication rate. This investigation may aid in the treatment decision-making for these complications.

Reverse Shoulder Arthroplasty Humeral Lateralisation: A Systematic Review

Different studies on reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA) have proposed changes to the humeral design to lateralise the humeral centre of rotation (COR), with humeral inclination to 135 or 145 from 155 degrees or to switch to onlay humeral trays from inlay design; with both having also been used in combination. There have been many studies and systematic reviews to show the difference in outcomes and complications to the variations in glenoid design but to date, there have been no systematic studies to compare different humeral inclinations for RSA implants.

Searches using keywords were used in common medical search engines in a systematic fashion. The article was reviewed for the class of evidence and bias, summarised and compared in meta-analysis. Inclusion criteria included studies on adults with RSA that compared lateralised humeral implants to medialised.

The search produced 349 articles; of these, we identified nine studies that met the inclusion criteria. Our review identified a total of 562 patients who had been included in studies directly comparing lateralised humerus to a more medial design. Meta-analysis showed a significantly reduced risk of scapular notching in lateralised humerus compared to the standard medialised component. The external rotation range of motion in the lateralised group was statistically significant.

The improvement in scapular notching and gain in the range of motion without any apparent downside in the form of reduced patient-reported outcome measures or complications suggest a lateralised humeral component is superior to the more medialised design in RSA. A large RCT with a longer-term follow-up is needed to confirm whether there is clinically significant benefit from the lateralisation of the humerus.

Lateralized versus nonlateralized glenospheres in reverse shoulder arthroplasty: a systematic review with meta-analysis

HYPOTHESIS/BACKGROUND

Lateralization in reverse shoulder arthroplasty (L-RSA) was proposed to overcome some limitations of the original Grammont-style design (S-RSA). This systematic review aims to compare the clinical and functional outcomes and complications of S-RSA with L-RSA, and to assess the individual results of metallic and bony lateralization implants.

METHODS

A systematic search from January 1980 to December 2019 was performed. Studies were selected in 2 phases by 2 independent reviewers; disagreements were solved by discussion. Inclusion criteria were: (1) original studies; (2) written in English or French; (3) adult individuals submitted to RSA surgery; and (4) RSA with a lateralization device in at least one of the groups. Exclusion criteria were: (1) nonoriginal studies or case reports; (2) absence of clinical or radiographic outcomes; and (3) no comparison group using S-RSA. Data were extracted for outcomes of functional status (American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons, Constant, visual analog scale, Simple Shoulder Test, Subjective Shoulder Value, Activities of Daily Life that require External Rotation, and Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand), range of motion (ROM), complications, revisions, and notching. Meta-analyses were performed when possible. Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis guidelines were followed.

RESULTS

Fifteen articles/16 studies were included (865 participants: 440 L-RSA and 425 S-RSA). Most studies found no differences between the L-RSA and S-RSA groups in qualitative and meta-analysis for American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons, Constant, Simple Shoulder Test, Activities of Daily Life that require External Rotation, and Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand scores. Meta-analysis demonstrated significantly lower visual analog scale (1 point) and higher Subjective Shoulder Value (6 points) in L-RSA than in S-RSA. No significant differences were found in the qualitative analyses of most studies regarding ROM in forward elevation, abduction, and internal/external rotation, but meta-analysis reported a significantly higher external rotation in L-RSA groups and specifically in osseous lateralization. Complication rate was significantly lower in L-RSA (odds ratio = 0.38), but no significant differences were found for revision rates. Notching rate was significantly lower in the L-RSA group (odds ratio = 0.14), both for osseous and metallic lateralization.

DISCUSSION/CONCLUSION

This systematic review focused on studies comparing L-RSA and S-RSA and found significantly lower notching and complication rates in L-RSA groups. This review highlighted similar outcomes in clinical scores and a slight advantage for L-RSA in ROM, especially in external rotation. L-RSA was not associated with increased revision rates, while presenting lower complication and notching rates. Inclusion of studies with metallic and osseous lateralization has helped to provide further evidence on this subject, but heterogeneity and low evidence levels of the included studies may limit our conclusions.

Decreased complication profile and improved clinical outcomes of primary reverse total shoulder arthroplasty after 2010: A systematic review

The purpose of this review was to update the complication profile of reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (rTSA) post-2010, given greater procedural familiarity, improved learning curves, enhanced implant designs, and increased attention to the nuances of patient selection. Three electronic databases were searched and screened in duplicate from 1 January 2010 to 16 December 2018 based on predetermined criteria. Twenty-two studies examining 1455 patients (26% male; mean age: 73.4 ± 3.6; mean follow-up: 23.4 ± 14.3 months) were reviewed. Post-operative motion ranged a mean 122.4° ± 11.5° flexion, 109° ± 19.4° abduction, and 33° ± 11.2°/41° ± 5° external/internal rotation. Post-operative mean Constant score was 58.9 ± 10.1, American Shoulder Elbow Surgeon score was 73.4 ± 6.1, Simple Shoulder Test score was 63.5 ± 6.5, and a Visual Analog Scale pain score was 1.6 ± 0.9. The overall complication rate was 18.2% and major complication rate was 15.4%. Compared to pre-2010, the overall complication rate of 18.2% is lower than previous rates of 19%-68%, with the rate of "major" complications dropping three-fold from 15.4% to 4.6%. The data suggest that rTSA is a safe and efficacious alternative to aTSA and HA, and the "stale" nature of previous complication profiles are points fundamental to perioperative discussions surrounding rTSA.

Fracture-Specific and Conventional Stem Designs in Reverse Shoulder Arthroplasty for Acute Proximal Humerus Fractures-A Retrospective, Observational Study

Tuberosity healing and stem design can be outcome-dependent parameters in hemiarthroplasty for proximal humerus fractures (PHF). The relevance of fracture-specific stem design in reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA) is still a matter of debate. This retrospective study evaluates tuberosity healing and function for fracture specific stems (A) compared to conventional stems (B) in RSA for complex PHF in 26 patients (w = 21, mean age 73.5 years). Clinically, range of motion (ROM), Constant-Murley-Score (CS), Subjective Shoulder Value (SSV), and external rotation lag signs (ERLS) were evaluated. Healing of greater tuberosity (GT) and lesser tuberosity (LT), scapular notching, and loosening were examined radiologically. There were no statistical significant differences with regards to CS (A: 73 ± 11; B: 77 ± 9 points), SSV (A: 78% ± 11%; B: 84% ± 11%), external rotation (A: 18° ± 20°; B: 24° ± 19°), or internal rotation (A: 5.7 ± 2.2; B: 6.7 ± 2.8 CS-points) (p > 0.05). Mean forward flexion was superior for group A (p = 0.036). Consolidation of GT (82%) and LT (73%) was similar in both groups. Anatomical healing was slightly higher in group B (p > 0.05). Scapular notching was found in 27% (A) and 55% (B) (p > 0.05). RSA for PHF provides good to excellent clinical results. The quantitative and qualitative union rate for both cohorts was similar, indicating that fracture stems with open metaphyseal designs to allow for bone ingrowth do not improve tuberosity healing. ERLS correlates with a worse function in CS and ROM in all planes.

A systematic review of tuberosity healing and outcomes following reverse shoulder arthroplasty for fracture according to humeral inclination of the prosthesis

BACKGROUND

Proximal humerus fractures are common in the elderly population and are often treated with reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA). The purpose of this systematic review was to compare tuberosity healing and functional outcomes in patients undergoing RSA with humeral inclinations of 135°, 145°, and 155°.

METHODS

A systematic review was performed of RSA for proximal humerus fracture using Preferred Reporting Items for Systemic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. Radiographic and functional outcome data were extracted to evaluate tuberosity healing according to humeral inclination. Analysis was also performed of healed vs. nonhealed tuberosities.

RESULTS

A total of 873 patients in 21 studies were included in the analysis. The mean age was 77.5 years (range of 58-97) and the mean follow-up was 26.2 months. Tuberosity healing was 83% in the 135° group compared with 69% in the 145° group and 66% in the 155° group (P = .030). Postoperative abduction was highest in the 155° group (P < .001). No significant difference was found in forward flexion, external rotation, or postoperative Constant score between groups. Patients with tuberosity healing demonstrated 18° higher forward flexion (P = .008) and 16° greater external rotation (P < .001) than those with unhealed tuberosities.

CONCLUSION

RSA for fracture with 135° humeral inclination is associated with higher tuberosity healing rates compared with 145° or 155°. Postoperative abduction is highest with a 155° implant, but there is no difference in in postoperative forward flexion, external rotation, or Constant score according to humeral inclination. Patients with healed tuberosities have superior postoperative forward flexion and external rotation than those with unhealed tuberosities.