Eosinophil, basophil, and mast cell infiltrates in the bone marrow: crossing the boundaries of diagnosis

Myelomastocytic leukemia: histopathological features, diagnostic criteria and differential diagnosis

Myelomastocytic leukemia (MML) is an extremely rare myeloid overlap-neoplasm that belongs to the group of tryptase-positive (T+) myeloid neoplasms. Main differential diagnoses include aggressive systemic mastocytosis (ASM), in particular ASM in transformation; mast cell leukemia; T+ acute myeloid leukemia (T+ AML); acute basophilic leukemia and chronic basophilic leukemia. MML exhibits both proliferative and dysplastic features and is characterized by prominent differentiation into the mast cell lineage in an advanced myeloid neoplasm, usually primary or secondary AML. While the histological key feature of MML is a diffuse increase in neoplastic cells expressing mast cell-related antigens like tryptase and CD117 (KIT), the most important cytomorphological finding in bone marrow (BM) and peripheral blood (PB) is the metachromatically granulated blast cell (= metachromatic blast). In contrast to systemic mastocytosis (SM), MML neither shows activating point mutations at codon 816 of KIT nor the aberrant expression of CD25 by mast cells is seen. MML can only be diagnosed when tryptase-staining is performed on BM biopsy specimens, PB and BM smears are investigated for presence of metachromatic blasts and other T+ leukemias have been excluded.

Mast cell leukemia: a review

SUMMARY 

Mast cell leukemia (MCL) is a rare subtype of systemic mastocytosis. In MCL the numbers of mast cells exceed 19% of nucleated cells in bone marrow and/or 10% of circulating leukocytes in peripheral blood. Primary MCL must be distinguished from secondary MCL evolving from another subvariant of systemic mastocytosis or from mast cell sarcoma. Acute MCL with a poor prognosis is distinguished from the more indolent chronic MCL. Serum tryptase is significantly elevated in almost all MCL patients and activating point mutations at codon 816 of KIT (usually KIT D816V) are encountered in about 70%. Regarding differential diagnosis, other ‘tryptase-positive’ or ‘metachromatic’ leukemias must be considered, including myelomastocytic leukemia and tryptase-positive acute myeloid leukemia but also acute and chronic basophilic leukemias.

[Mastocytosis and eosinophilic leukemia: diagnostics and classification]

Mastocytosis and myeloid eosinophilic neoplasms are rare diseases of the bone marrow and are often a diagnostic challenge for hematopathologists. In mastocytosis, compact mast cell infiltrates represent the main diagnostic criterion and for myeloid eosinophilic neoplasms, eosinophilic granulocytes dominate the histological picture. Both disease groups include phenotypically and prognostically very different entities which are each defined by WHO criteria. For systemic mastocytosis (SM), a differentiation between indolent and aggressive or even leukemic forms is of prognostic importance. In indolent variants of SM, a local and/or systemic, usually reactive increase in eosinophilic granulocytes (SM-eo) is often observed. In contrast, an increase in neoplastic eosinophils is often observed in advanced SM, predominantly in diseases designated SM with associated non-mastocytic hematological neoplasms (SM-AHNMD), e.g. in SM with chronic eosinophilic leukemia (SM-CEL). Apart from mastocytoses, immunophenotypically aberrant tissue mast cells are only observed in certain rare forms of myeloid neoplasms with eosinophilia, in particular in myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPN-eo) with cytogenic anomalies in the platelet-derived growth factor receptor (PDGFR). The World Health Organization (WHO) classification of eosinophilic leukemias, however, fulfils the morphological and clinical requirements in a limited way only and needs an update.

Pathogenesis and classification of eosinophil disorders: a review of recent developments in the field

Eosinophils and their products play an essential role in the pathogenesis of various reactive and neoplastic disorders. Depending on the underlying disease, molecular defect and involved cytokines, hypereosinophilia may develop and may lead to organ damage. In other patients, persistent eosinophilia is accompanied by typical clinical findings, but the causative role and impact of eosinophilia remain uncertain. For patients with eosinophil-mediated organ pathology, early therapeutic intervention with agents reducing eosinophil counts can be effective in limiting or preventing irreversible organ damage. Therefore, it is important to approach eosinophil disorders and related syndromes early by using established criteria, to perform all appropriate staging investigations, and to search for molecular targets of therapy. In this article, we review current concepts in the pathogenesis and evolution of eosinophilia and eosinophil-related organ damage in neoplastic and non-neoplastic conditions. In addition, we discuss classifications of eosinophil disorders and related syndromes as well as diagnostic algorithms and standard treatment for various eosinophil-related disorders.

Controversies and open questions in the definitions and classification of the hypereosinophilic syndromes and eosinophilic leukemias

Eosinophilia is frequently detectable in certain myeloid neoplasms and various reactive conditions, but it may also occur in the absence of an apparent underlying disease, or, rarely, as a paraneoplastic feature with solid tumors. In myeloid neoplasms, eosinophils are considered to belong to the malignant clone in most cases, whereas in all other conditions, eosinophilia is a reactive process triggered by eosinopoietic cytokines. Excessive accumulation of eosinophils, also termed hypereosinophilia (HE), is typically seen in eosinophilic leukemias, but it may also occur in other neoplasms and reactive disorders. HE-related end organ damage may develop in patients with reactive HE but also in those with hematologic malignancies. During the past few years, our knowledge about HE and HE-related organ damage in hematologic and nonhematologic disorders has improved considerably. Moreover, proposals for the definition and classification of eosinophil disorders have been generated by various expert groups and by the World Health Organization (WHO). However, several questions related to eosinophils and HE remain open, and many aspects of the definition and classification of eosinophil disorders and related pathologies remain controversial. In the current article, these open issues are discussed with special reference to the 2008 WHO classification of myeloid neoplasms and other classifications proposed by immunologists and various expert panels, as well as definitions and criteria recently proposed in a multidisciplinary consensus proposal.

Contemporary consensus proposal on criteria and classification of eosinophilic disorders and related syndromes

Eosinophilia is an important indicator of various neoplastic and nonneoplastic conditions. Depending on the underlying disease and mechanisms, eosinophil infiltration can lead to organ dysfunction, clinical symptoms, or both. During the past 2 decades, several different classifications of eosinophilic disorders and related syndromes have been proposed in various fields of medicine. Although criteria and definitions are, in part, overlapping, no global consensus has been presented to date. The Year 2011 Working Conference on Eosinophil Disorders and Syndromes was organized to update and refine the criteria and definitions for eosinophilic disorders and to merge prior classifications in a contemporary multidisciplinary schema. A panel of experts from the fields of immunology, allergy, hematology, and pathology contributed to this project. The expert group agreed on unifying terminologies and criteria and a classification that delineates various forms of hypereosinophilia, including primary and secondary variants based on specific hematologic and immunologic conditions, and various forms of the hypereosinophilic syndrome. For patients in whom no underlying disease or hypereosinophilic syndrome is found, the term hypereosinophilia of undetermined significance is introduced. The proposed novel criteria, definitions, and terminologies should assist in daily practice, as well as in the preparation and conduct of clinical trials.