Effects of Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation (t-DCS) of the Cerebellum on Pain Perception and Endogenous Pain Modulation: a Randomized, Monocentric, Double-Blind, Sham-Controlled Crossover Study

Assessing the influence of non-ischaemic A-fiber conduction blockade on offset analgesia: an experimental study

Offset analgesia (OA) is believed to reflect the efficiency of the endogenous pain modulatory system. However, the underlying mechanisms are still being debated. Previous research suggested both, central and peripheral mechanisms, with the latter involving the influence of specific A-delta-fibers. Therefore, this study aimed to investigate the influence of a non-ischaemic A-fiber conduction blockade on the OA response in healthy participants. A total of 52 participants were recruited for an A-fiber conduction blockade via compression of the superficial radial nerve. To monitor fiber-specific peripheral nerve conduction capacity, quantitative sensory testing was performed continuously. Before, during and after the A-fiber block, an individualized OA-paradigm was applied to the dorsum of both hands (blocked and control side were randomized). Pain intensity of each heat stimulus was evaluated by an electronic visual analogue scale. A successful A-fiber conduction blockade was achieved in thirty participants. Offset analgesia has been verified within time (before, during, after blockade), and condition (blocked and control side) (p < 0.01, d > 0.5). Repeated measurements ANOVA showed no significant interaction effects between OA within condition and time (p = 0.24, η²p = 0.05). Hence, no significant effect of A-fiber blockade was detected on OA during noxious heat stimulation. The results suggest that peripheral A-fiber afferents may play a minor role in OA compared to alternative central mechanisms or other fibers. However, further studies are needed to substantiate a central rather than peripheral influence on OA. PERSPECTIVE: This article presents the observation of offset analgesia before, during and after a successful A-fiber conduction blockade in healthy volunteers. A better understanding of the mechanisms of offset analgesia and endogenous pain modulation in general may help to explain the underlying aspects of pain disorders.

Re-examining the Mysterious Role of the Cerebellum in Pain

Pain is considered a multidimensional experience that embodies not merely sensation, but also emotion and perception. As is appropriate for this complexity, pain is represented and processed by an extensive matrix of cortical and subcortical structures. Of these structures, the cerebellum is gaining increasing attention. Although association between the cerebellum and both acute and chronic pain have been extensively detailed in electrophysiological and neuroimaging studies, a deep understanding of what functions are mediated by these associations is lacking. Nevertheless, the available evidence implies that lobules IV-VI and Crus I are especially pertinent to pain processing, and anatomical studies reveal that these regions connect with higher-order structures of sensorimotor, emotional, and cognitive function. Therefore, we speculate that the cerebellum exerts a modulatory role in pain via its communication with sites of sensorimotor, executive, reward, and limbic function. On this basis, in this review, we propose numerous ways in which the cerebellum might contribute to both acute and chronic pain, drawing particular attention to emotional and cognitive elements of pain. In addition, we emphasise the importance of advancing our knowledge about the relationship between the cerebellum and pain by discussing novel therapeutic opportunities that capitalize on this association.

"Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation (tDCS) in managing pain and recovery: A clinical case of radial capitellum fracture"

INTRODUCTION

The management of pain and functional recovery following a radial capitellum fracture poses a significant clinical challenge, especially in individuals whose professions, such as physiotherapy, demand optimal joint functionality. Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation (tDCS) emerges as a potential non-pharmacological intervention for pain management, necessitating exploration in the context of orthopedic injuries.

CASE PRESENTATION

A 41-year-old male physiotherapist presented with a MASON 2 radial capitellum fracture following a fall, experiencing notable pain (NPRS 6/7) and functional impairment (DASH 45/100, PRTEE 43/100). Conservative management, involving immobilization and potential surgical consideration, was employed, followed by tDCS for pain management. Post-tDCS, significant improvements were observed in pain and functional scores (NPRS to 0, DASH to 14.2, PRTEE to 7), alongside enhancements in range of motion and muscle strength.

CLINICAL DISCUSSION

The application of tDCS showcased notable efficacy in pain reduction and functional improvement, highlighting its potential in augmenting pain management strategies post-fracture. However, the variability in responses and lack of standardized application protocols necessitate further research to optimize its clinical utility. The balance between immobilization for fracture healing and mobilization for preventing stiffness and facilitating recovery was pivotal in managing the fracture and ensuring functional improvement.

CONCLUSIONS

This case underscores the potential of tDCS in managing pain and facilitating functional recovery in radial capitellum fractures, warranting further exploration and standardization of its application in clinical practice. The integrated, patient-centric approach, involving interdisciplinary collaboration and personalized care, was crucial in ensuring positive outcomes and provides a framework for managing similar orthopedic cases.

Abnormal brain activity in lumbar disc herniation patients with chronic pain is associated with their clinical symptoms

Introduction

Lumbar disc herniation, a chronic degenerative disease, is one of the major contributors to chronic low back pain and disability. Although many studies have been conducted in the past on brain function in chronic low back pain, most of these studies did not classify chronic low back pain (cLBP) patients according to their etiology. The lack of etiologic classification may lead to inconsistencies between findings, and the correlation between differences in brain activation and clinical symptoms in patients with cLBP was less studied in the past.

Methods

In this study, 36 lumbar disc herniation patients with chronic low back pain (LDHCP) and 36 healthy controls (HCs) were included to study brain activity abnormalities in LDHCP. Visual analogue scale (VAS), oswestry disability index (ODI), self-rating anxiety scale (SAS), self-rating depression scale (SDS) were used to assess clinical symptoms.

Results

The results showed that LDHCP patients exhibited abnormally increased and diminished activation of brain regions compared to HCs. Correlation analysis showed that the amplitude of low frequency fluctuations (ALFF) in the left middle frontal gyrus is negatively correlated with SAS and VAS, while the right superior temporal gyrus is positively correlated with SAS and VAS, the dorsolateral left superior frontal gyrus and the right middle frontal gyrus are negatively correlated with VAS and SAS, respectively.

Conclusion

LDHCP patients have brain regions with abnormally increased and abnormally decreased activation compared to healthy controls. Furthermore, some of the abnormally activated brain regions were correlated with clinical pain or emotional symptoms.