Differential effects of nebivolol and atenolol on transmitral diastolic filling parameters in patients with essential hypertension

Effect of nebivolol monotherapy or combination therapy on blood pressure levels in patients with hypertension: an updated systematic review and multilevel meta-analysis of 91 randomized controlled trials

AIMS

To systematically appraise and summarize the available evidence from published randomized controlled trials considering the effect of nebivolol on blood pressure in patients with hypertension.

METHODS

Literature search was performed through Medline (via PubMed), Cochrane Library and Scopus until December 15, 2023. Double-independent study selection, data extraction and quality assessment were performed. Evidence was pooled with three-level mixed-effects meta-analysis.

RESULTS

In total, 7,737 participants with hypertension, who were treated with nebivolol, were analyzed across 91 RCTs. Nebivolol was associated with significantly greater reduction in office systolic and diastolic BP compared to placebo (MD = - 6.01 mmHg; 95% CI = [- 7.46, - 4.55] and MD = - 5.01 mmHg; 95% CI = [- 5.91, - 4.11], respectively). Moreover, resulted a similar reduction in systolic BP (MD = - 0.22 mmHg; 95% CI = [- 0.91, 0.46]) and a significantly greater reduction in diastolic BP compared to the active comparator (MD = - 0.71 mmHg; 95% CI = [- 1.27, - 0.16]). When considering the effect of nebivolol on 24-hour ambulatory BP, notable reductions were observed compared to placebo. In contrast, compared to the active comparators, there was no significant difference in systolic BP reduction, but a significant reduction in diastolic BP favoring nebivolol. Based on moderator analyses, the impact of nebivolol on the pooled estimates remained independent of the dose of nebivolol, age, male sex, trial duration, body mass index (BMI), baseline diabetes, heart failure, and baseline systolic and diastolic BP.

CONCLUSION

Nebivolol, compared to placebo, showed a significant BP reduction and was non-inferior to other active comparators in terms of BP reduction.

Emerging Role of Compartmentalized G Protein-Coupled Receptor Signaling in the Cardiovascular Field

G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) are cell surface receptors that for many years have been considered to function exclusively at the plasma membrane, where they bind to extracellular ligands and activate G protein signaling cascades. According to the conventional model, these signaling events are rapidly terminated by β-arrestin (β-arr) recruitment to the activated GPCR resulting in signal desensitization and receptor internalization. However, during the past decade, emerging evidence suggest that many GPCRs can continue to activate G proteins from intracellular compartments after they have been internalized. G protein signaling from intracellular compartments is in general more sustained compared to G protein signaling at the plasma membrane. Notably, the particular location closer to the nucleus is beneficial for selective cellular functions such as regulation of gene transcription. Here, we review key GPCRs that undergo compartmentalized G protein signaling and discuss molecular considerations and requirements for this signaling to occur. Our main focus will be on receptors involved in the regulation of important physiological and pathological cardiovascular functions. We also discuss how sustained G protein activation from intracellular compartments may be involved in cellular functions that are distinct from functions regulated by plasma membrane G protein signaling, and the corresponding significance in cardiovascular physiology.

Reversal of subclinical left ventricular dysfunction by antihypertensive treatment: a prospective trial of nebivolol against metoprolol

OBJECTIVES

To assess the effects of antihypertensive treatment on subclinical left ventricular dysfunction and to compare the effects of nebivolol with metoprolol.

METHODS

This is a prospective, randomized, parallel, active-controlled, PROBE design study (ClinicalTrials.org: NCT00942487) in 60 patients (53±9 years, 67% men) with arterial hypertension, left ventricular hypertrophy, normal ejection fraction, and no coronary heart disease, randomized to either a nebivolol-based or a metoprolol-based treatment, who had conventional and tissue Doppler echocardiography, at rest and during dobutamine stress, at baseline and after 6 months.

RESULTS

SBP and DBP, and resting heart rate decreased by 13, 13, and 12%, respectively, on nebivolol, and by 11, 13, and 7%, respectively, on metoprolol (all, P<0.01). Mean longitudinal early diastolic velocity increased by 16% (P<0.05) on nebivolol compared with 9% (P=not significant) on metoprolol (P=not significant for intergroup differences), whereas flow propagation velocity increased by 34% on nebivolol (P<0.05) and did not change on metoprolol (P<0.01 for intergroup differences). Mean longitudinal displacement increased by 10% on nebivolol (P<0.05) and did not change on metoprolol (P<0.05 for intergroup differences), whereas ejection time increased by 5% on nebivolol (P<0.05) and did not change on metoprolol. All the other parameters of left ventricular function were not different between the two treatment arms.

CONCLUSION

Patients with mild-to-moderate hypertension have a beneficial effect from 6-month antihypertensive treatment on diastolic longitudinal left ventricular function; effects are significant with nebivolol, but not with metoprolol.

Regional functions of the left ventricle in patients with coronary slow flow and the effects of nebivolol

Background: Microvascular and endothelial dysfunction have been implicated for coronary slow flow (CSF). Nebivolol, besides its beta-receptor blocking activity, causes an endothelium-dependent vasodilatation through increased nitric oxide release.

Methods: This study included 27 patients with CSF and 27 subjects with normal coronary arteries. Segmental functions of the left ventricle (LV) were assessed using myocardial tissue Doppler velocities before and 3 months after treatment with nebivolol 5 mg/day.

Results: Compared with the control group, mitral deceleration time (DT) was significantly longer, and E/A ratio, systolic velocity of lateral mitral annulus (Sm) and regional myocardial peak systolic and early diastolic velocities (V s, Vd) were significantly lower in patients with CSF. The reason for coronary angiography was typical angina in 21 (77.8%) and positive treadmill test in six (22.2%) CSF patients. There were significant correlations between presence of CSF in left anterior descending artery (LAD) with S m ( r =-0.404, p =0.002) and Vs in anterior ( r =-0.531, p < 0.001 ) and lateral ( r =-0.495, p < 0.001 ) segments and between presence of CSF in RCA and Vs in posterior segments ( r =-0.501, p < 0.001). Treatment with nebivolol significantly decreased blood pressures (128.5±12.5/82.5±8.8 to 119.8± 12.6/76.4± 7.4 mmHg, p < 0.001), DT (252.3±53.6 to 222.0±41.0 ms, p < 0.001 ) and IVRT (115.7±19.9 to 103.3±17.0 ms, p <0.001), and increased exercise capacity (8.7±1.3 to 10.4±0.9 METs, p < 0.001), E/A ratio (0.87±0.26 to 1.08±0.23, p <0.001) and myocardial velocities ( p < 0.001). All the patients were free of angina after treatment. Patients with CSF had impaired diastolic and regional LV functions.

Conclusions: Nebivolol may therefore be useful in improving angina, exercise capacity and LV functions in patients with CSF.