Overall Survival of Patients with Locally Advanced or Metastatic Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma Treated with Nimotuzumab in the Real World

Dose escalation in radical radio(chemo)therapy for cervical and upper thoracic esophageal cancer with 3DCRT/IMRT (ChC&UES): a multicenter retrospective study

BACKGROUND

Cervical and upper thoracic esophageal cancer (ESCA) presents treatment challenges due to limited clinical evidence. This multi-center study (ChC&UES) explores radical radio(chemo)therapy efficacy and safety, especially focusing on radiation dose.

METHOD

We retrospectively analyzed clinical data from 1,422 cases across 8 medical centers. According to the radiation dose for primary gross tumor, patients were divided into standard dose radiotherapy (SD, 50-55 Gy) or high dose (HD, > 55 Gy) radiotherapy. HD was further subdivided into conventional- high-dose group (HD-conventional, 55-63 Gy) and ultra-high-dose group (HD-ultra, ≥ 63 Gy). Primary outcome was Overall Survival (OS).

RESULTS

The median OS was 33.0 months (95% CI: 29.401-36.521) in the whole cohort. Compared with SD, HD shown significant improved survival in cervical ESCA in Kaplan-Meier (P = 0.029) and cox multivariate regression analysis (P = 0.024) while shown comparable survival in upper thoracic ESCA (P = 0.735). No significant difference existed between HD-conventional and HD-ultra in cervical (P = 0.976) and upper thoracic (P = 0.610) ESCA. Incidences of radiation esophagitis and pneumonia from HD were comparable to SD (P = 0.097, 0.240), while myosuppression risk was higher(P = 0.039). The Bonferroni method revealed that, for both cervical and upper thoracic ESCA, HD-ultra enhance the objective response rate (ORR) compared to SD (P < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

HD radiotherapy benefits cervical but not upper thoracic ESCA, while increasing bone marrow suppression risk. Further dose escalating (≥ 63 Gy) doesn't improve survival but enhances ORR.

Monoclonal antibodies for the treatment of squamous cell carcinoma: A literature review

BACKGROUND

Squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) is a relatively common and heterogenous malignancy of different organs, such as the skin, esophagus, and lungs. Although most cases experience good survival with surgical methods, management of advanced types of the disease remains challenging. Several modalities, including different chemotherapy regimens and immunotherapies, have been investigated in this matter, among which Monoclonal antibodies (Mabs) are one of the most promising ones. Since the development of Mabs, they have been widely used to treat different diseases. Mabs have shown significant efficacy with high specificity along with acceptable safety, which makes them a favorable option in cancer therapy. In this article, we aimed to review the different aspects of using Mabs in SCC therapy.

RECENT FINDINGS

We found that treating with different Mabs has shown excellent efficacy accompanied by acceptable safety in treating SCC of different organs. Therefore, Mabs are considered great options in the treatment of SCC, especially in advanced cases. Overall, two highly potent types of Mabs in SCC therapy are anti-EGFR Mabs and checkpoint inhibitors, especially Cetuximab, Nimotuzumab, and PD-1 inhibitors. Bevacizumab is also a promising option as adjuvant therapy to other modalities.

CONCLUSION

Although some Mabs have shown promising outcomes in SCC therapy, their application as a part of cancer treatment depends on further investigations regarding cost-effectiveness and predictors of response. FDA has approved several Mabs in SCC therapies, and Mabs may have a crucial role in this era in the near future, especially in treating head and neck and esophageal SCC and metastatic lung cancer.

Efficacy and Safety of Concurrent Chemoradiotherapy Combined with Nimotuzumab in Elderly Patients with Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma: A Prospective Real-world Pragmatic Study

BACKGROUND

Concurrent or definitive chemoradiotherapy is the standard treatment of locally advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC). Elderly patients could not tolerate the standard concurrent chemotherapy and were treated with radiotherapy because of weak physical status and multiple comorbidities.

OBJECTIVE

The efficacy and safety profile of concurrent (chemo) radiotherapy combined with nimotuzumab in elderly patients with ESCC were investigated.

METHODS

Eligible elderly (≥70 years) patients with locally advanced ESCC were enrolled in this prospective, real-world pragmatic study and received concurrent chemoradiotherapy or radiotherapy combined with nimotuzumab. The primary endpoint was overall survival (OS). Secondary endpoints were objective response rate, disease control rate, progression-free survival (PFS), and adverse drug reactions.

RESULTS

Fifty-three elderly patients were enrolled. Thirty-two (60.4%) were treated with radiotherapy combined with nimotuzumab (RT+N), and 21 (39.6%) with concurrent chemoradiotherapy combined with nimotuzumab (CRT+N). The median age was 75.8 years. Fourteen (56.0%) patients achieved a partial response, and 11 (44.0%) patients achieved stable disease at 3 months. The median follow-up duration was 24.4 (95%CI, 21.6-26.7) months. Median OS (mOS) was 27.0 (95%CI, 14.8-48.4) months. Median PFS (mPFS) was 22.6 (95%CI, 12.4-not reached) months. Higher mPFS (not reached vs. 12.0 months; p=0.022) and mOS (48.4 vs. 15.3 months; p=0.009) were observed in the CRT+N group compared with the RT+N group. Most adverse reactions were grade 1-2 (46, 86.8%).

CONCLUSIONS

Concurrent chemoradiotherapy or radiotherapy combined with nimotuzumab was safe and well-tolerated in elderly patients with locally advanced ESCC. ESCC patients treated with CRT+N could live longer.

Nimotuzumab in the Treatment of Inoperable Esophageal Tumors of Epithelial Origin

Background

Nimotuzumab is a humanized monoclonal antibody that targets the epidermal growth factor receptor. It was approved in Cuba for the indication of inoperable malignant tumors of the esophagus of epithelial origin. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the safety, overall and progression-free survival, clinical response, and quality of life, in adult patients with inoperable esophageal tumors of epithelial origin treated with nimotuzumab in a practical context. Material and Methods. The number of patients who developed adverse events was determined, and the frequency, seriousness, causality, and severity of these adverse events were determined. It also determined the median of survival and progression-free survival and rates at 12 and 24 months and the quality of life.

Results

A total of 111 patients were included. The proportion of serious and related AE with the use of nimotuzumab was 1.3%. Most of the related AEs were mild and moderate, and the most frequent AEs were diarrhea, chills, and tremors. New diagnosed patients who received nimotuzumab concurrent with chemotherapy and radiotherapy reached a median OS of 12.2 months (95% CI, 6.9-17.5) and 12- and 24-month survival rates of 51.0% and 17.0%, respectively. Median PFS was 7.8 months (95% CI, 6.2-9.5), and 12- and 24-month PFS rates were 39.3% and 11.2%, respectively. A favorable evolution of the general state of health (p=0.03) was obtained from the beginning of treatment until month 12, with a significant reduction in the appearance of nausea (p=0.009), insomnia (p=0.04), constipation (p=0.04), eating difficulties (p=0.0006), and choking when swallowing (p=0.0001), but increased in dysphagia (p=0.02).

Conclusions

The administration of nimotuzumab was safe in the real-world setting. New diagnosed patients that received nimotuzumab concurrent with chemotherapy and radiotherapy reached a higher overall and progression-free survival and better quality of life than the rest of the patients. Trial registration is RPCEC00000215 (Cuban Registry of Clinical Trials; https://registroclinico.sld.cu/en/home). It is registered prospectively on June 30, 2016.

Mechanisms of Pharmaceutical Therapy and Drug Resistance in Esophageal Cancer

Pharmaceutical therapies are essential for esophageal cancer (EC). For the advanced EC, the neoadjuvant therapy regimen, including chemotherapy plus radiotherapy and/or immunotherapy, is effective to achieve clinical benefit, even pathological complete response. For the unresectable, recurrent, and metastatic EC, the pharmaceutical therapy is the limited effective regimen to alleviate the disease and prolong the progression-free survival and overall survival. In this review, we focus on the pharmaceutical applications in EC treatment including cytotoxic agents, molecular targeted antibodies, and immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs). The chemotherapy regimen is based on cytotoxic agents such as platinum-based complexes, fluorinated pyrimidines and taxenes. Although the cytotoxic agents have been developed in past decades, the standard chemotherapy regimen is still the cisplatin and 5-FU or paclitaxel because the derived drugs have no significant advantages of overcoming the shortcomings of side effects and drug resistance. The targeted molecular therapy is an essential supplement for chemotherapy; however, there are only a few targeted therapies available in clinical practice. Trastuzumab and ramucirumab are the only two molecular therapy drugs which are approved by the US Food and Drug Administration to treat advanced and/or metastatic EC. Although the targeted therapy usually achieves effective benefits in the early stage therapy of EC, the patients will always develop drug resistance during treatment. ICIs have had a significant impact on routine clinical practice in cancer treatment. The anti-programmed cell death-1 monoclonal antibodies pembrolizumab and nivolumab, as the ICIs, are recommended for advanced EC by several clinical trials. However, the significant issues of pharmaceutical treatment are still the dose-limiting side effects and primary or secondary drug resistance. These defects of pharmaceutical therapy restrain the clinical application and diminish the effectiveness of treatment.

Slight advantages of nimotuzumab versus cetuximab plus concurrent chemoradiotherapy in locally advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma

This study aimed to compare the efficacy of nimotuzumab (Nimo) versus cetuximab (C225) plus concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) in locally advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (LA-ESCC). A total of 95 patients with LA-ESCC were retrospectively reviewed, including 65 in Nimo and 30 in C225. The results showed that the ORR in Nimo (61.0%; CR 22.0%, 13/59; PR 39.0% 23/59) was slightly higher than that in C225 (43.5%; CR 8.7%, 2/23; PR 34.8%, 8/23) but without significant difference (p = 0.81). The DCR was 79.7% vs. 73.9% in C225, favoring Nimo plus CCRT (p = 0.04). The median PFS in Nimo was significantly longer than that in C225 (19.6 months vs. 13.0 months, p = 0.02). The median OS of the whole cohort, the Nimo group and the C225 group were 21.3, 24.5, and 20.9 months, respectively. The rates of OS at 1-, 3-year in Nimo were 77.7% and 33.5%, compared to 73.3% and 20.0% in C225 (HR = 1.17, p = 0.23). Grade 3 or worse hematological toxicity and non-hematological toxicity (radiation esophagitis) in Nimo were similar with that in C225 (21.5% vs. 26.7%, p = 0.91; 26.1% vs. 26.7%, p = 0.56). No grade ≥3 radiation pneumonitis occurred neither Nimo group nor C225 group. Nimo plus CCRT improved DCR and PFS of patients with LA-ESCC and had a tendency of prolonged survival compared to C225 plus CCRT. Our results suggest that the combination of Nimo and CCRT may be a reasonable option in this population.

Nimotuzumab Plus Paclitaxel and Cisplatin as a 1st-Line Treatment for Esophageal Cancer: Long Term Follow-up of a Phase II Study

The effect of anti-epidermal growth factor receptor targeted treatment in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) is still unclear. We conducted a prospective phase II study of paclitaxel, cisplatin, and nimotuzumab (TPN) as a first-line treatment for unresectable or metastatic ESCC and the objective response rate was 51.8%. Here, we report the long-term follow-up results of the initial trial. Fifty-nine patients were enrolled from Mar 2011 to Apr 2013 and were treated with the TPN regimen. Palliative sequential radiotherapy was given if all tumor lesions were confined to 1-2 radiation fields. Fifty-six patients were eligible for evaluation. After a median follow-up of 32.2months, the median progression-free survival (PFS) and the overall survival (OS) time were 18.1±4.2 months (95% CI: 9.8-26.4) and 26.2±10.0 months (95% CI: 6.6-45.8), respectively, in 29 patients with unresectable local-regional disease, while they were 6.6±0.4 months (95% CI: 5.8-7.5) and 11.5±3.7 months (95% CI: 4.2-18.8), respectively, in 27 patients with metastatic disease. Patients who were male, those with multiple station lymph node metastases, those with visceral metastasis, those who did not response to TPN treatment, and those who did not receive radiotherapy, had a worse OS. In 6 patients with multiple station lymph node metastasis and in 3 patients with recurrent disease and oligo-metastasis (local lymph nodes), TPN with sequential radiation resulted in a mean OS of 17.67±9.50 months and a mean OS of over 40 months, respectively. In conclusion, TPN is effective as a first-line treatment for patients with unresectable and metastatic ESCC. In addition, TPN treatment with sequential radiation might improve survival in patients with limited or oligo lymph node metastases.