Treatment of Rheumatoid Arthritis with Certolizumab Pegol: Results from PROACTIVE, a Non-Interventional Study in the UK and Ireland

Safety and effectiveness of certolizumab pegol in Japanese patients with rheumatoid arthritis: Up to 3-year results from a postmarketing surveillance study

OBJECTIVES

To report up to 3-year safety and effectiveness of certolizumab pegol (CZP) in Japanese patients with rheumatoid arthritis from a postmarketing surveillance study.

METHODS

Patients enrolled previously completed 24 weeks of CZP in the 24-week postmarketing surveillance study. Adverse drug reactions (ADRs) were recorded for patients who received ≥1 CZP dose. Effectiveness outcomes were 28-joint Disease Activity Score with erythrocyte sedimentation rate and European Alliance of Associations for Rheumatology response. Week 24-156 safety and Week 0-52 effectiveness data are reported here.

RESULTS

A total of 781 patients were enrolled, with 735 and 376 patients evaluated for safety and effectiveness, respectively. Within the safety set, 17.8% (131/735) of patients reported ADRs; 9.4% (69/735) reported serious ADRs. Among patients with history of respiratory, thoracic, and mediastinal disorders, 38.4% (28/73) reported ADRs. The most frequent ADRs were infections and infestations (11.8%; 87/735); skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders (1.9%; 14/735); respiratory, thoracic, and mediastinal disorders (1.6%; 12/735). Mean 28-joint Disease Activity Score with erythrocyte sedimentation rate reduced from 4.6 (Week 0) to 2.8 (Week 52). At Week 52, 51.8% (161/311) of patients achieved European Alliance of Associations for Rheumatology Good response.

CONCLUSIONS

The long-term safety and effectiveness of CZP in the real-world setting in Japan were consistent with previously reported data; no new safety signals were identified.

Safety and Effectiveness of Certolizumab Pegol in Japanese Patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis: Results from a 24-Week Post-Marketing Surveillance Study

OBJECTIVES

To report 24-week safety and effectiveness data of certolizumab pegol (CZP) in Japanese patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) from a post-marketing surveillance study.

METHODS

Enrolled patients were newly receiving CZP. All adverse events (AEs) and adverse drug reactions (ADRs) were recorded for patients who received ≥1 CZP dose. Effectiveness outcomes included: 28-joint Disease Activity Score with erythrocyte sedimentation rate (DAS28-ESR) and EULAR response. Missing data were imputed using last observation carried forward.

RESULTS

3,727 patients were enrolled; safety and effectiveness were evaluated in 3,586 and 1,794 patients, respectively. 24.9% of patients reported AEs (n=893/3,586) and 14.7% reported ADRs (528/3,586). Serious AEs and serious ADRs were reported in 8.3% (298/3,586) and 5.3% (190/3,586), respectively. Selected serious ADRs of interest included infections (n=110; 3.1%), tuberculosis (6; 0.2%), interstitial pneumonia (15; 0.4%), malignancy (8; 0.2%) and hepatic function disorder (7; 0.2%). No allergic reactions, autoimmune disease, cardiac failure, demyelinating diseases or pancytopenia were reported. Mean DAS28-ESR reduced from 4.8 (baseline) to 3.4 (final evaluation). At final evaluation, 34.7% of patients achieved EULAR good response.

CONCLUSIONS

These real-world safety and effectiveness results were consistent with previously reported data, with no new safety signals identified. Long-term, real-world CZP safety and effectiveness data are needed.

Effectiveness of Certolizumab-Pegol in Rheumatoid Arthritis, Spondyloarthritis, and Psoriatic Arthritis Based on the BIOPURE Registry: Can Early Response Predict Late Outcomes?

BACKGROUND

Identification of predictors of clinical response to certolizumab-pegol (certolizumab) may aid the decision-making process for treating patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA), spondyloarthritis (SpA), and psoriatic arthritis (PsA).

OBJECTIVE

The aim of our study was to evaluate the effectiveness of certolizumab and identify any predictors of favorable outcome in patients with RA, PsA, or SpA.

METHODS

We studied 355 RA, SpA, and PsA patients starting treatment with certolizumab. Endpoints of the study were drug survival and identification of predictors of clinical outcome. Drug retention was analyzed via the Kaplan-Meier method, and hazard ratios (HRs) were estimated using Cox regression models.

RESULTS

Of 355 certolizumab initiators, 178 had RA, 94 had PsA, and 83 had SpA. Biologic-naïve RA patients had significantly higher survival rates (73.3%) than switchers taking certolizumab as a second-line (49.0%) or third- or next-line biologic agent (51.2%; p = 0.0001). Instead, PsA and SpA patients showed similar drug retention rates regardless of the line of treatment. A significant clinical improvement from baseline was seen at 3 months for RA (28 joint-Disease Activity Score [DAS28]; p = 0.001), PsA (Disease Activity Index for PsA [DAPSA]; p = 0.001), and SpA (Bath Ankylosing Disease Index; p = 0.01). Biologic-naïve patients had the lowest HR (0.31; p = 0.001) of discontinuing certolizumab for RA, and the highest HR (7.94; p = 0.01) of achieving minimal disease activity (MDA) for PsA. For PsA, a predictor of late MDA was the achievement of low/remission DAPSA at 3 months, and 3-month low/remission DAS28 predicted late remission for RA.

CONCLUSIONS

Our study revealed that the best predictor of certolizumab effectiveness in unselected patients with RA, PsA, or SpA was a biologic-naïve status and achievement of an early response within 3 months.

Effectiveness and safety of certolizumab pegol in rheumatoid arthritis patients in Canadian practice: 2-year results from the observational FαsT-CAN study

Background:

The aim of this study was to assess the real-world effectiveness and safety of certolizumab pegol (CZP) in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients, and the impact on patients’ productivity, pain, and fatigue, in Canadian practice.

Methods:

FαsT-CAN, a 2-year prospective, observational study, evaluated CZP use in Canadian adults with moderate to severe, active RA. The primary objective was to assess the proportion of patients achieving 28-joint Disease Activity Scores (DAS28) <2.6 at Week 104. Secondary and additional endpoints assessed the improvements in Patients’ Assessment of Arthritis Pain (PtAAP), fatigue, Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index (HAQ-DI), and the proportion of patients achieving minimal clinically important differences (MCID) in HAQ-DI. Validated arthritis-specific Work Productivity Surveys (WPS-RA) assessed the RA-associated impact on productivity. Incidence of CZP-related treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) was reported for patients receiving ⩾1 dose of CZP (safety set).

Results:

The full analysis set (baseline DAS28 ⩾ 2.6, ⩾1 dose of CZP and ⩾1 valid post-baseline DAS28 measurement) included 451 of the 546 patients recruited into the study; a total of 229/451 (50.8%) patients completed Week 104. At Week 104, 90/451 (20.0%) patients achieved DAS28 < 2.6. Rapid improvements in disease activity, pain, and fatigue were observed. At Week 104, 66.2% of patients achieved HAQ-DI MCID. Patients employed at Week 104, reported reduced absenteeism, and improved productivity. CZP-related TEAEs were consistent with the known CZP safety profile.

Conclusions:

CZP was an effective RA treatment in Canadian practice, and no new CZP-related safety signals were identified. The improvements in household and workplace productivity are the first observations in a real-world Canadian setting.