1
|
Mehta S, Xie J, Ionescu-Ittu R, Nie X, Kwong WJ. Real-World Treatment Patterns and Outcomes Following First-Line Pertuzumab and Trastuzumab Among Patients with HER2+ Metastatic Breast Cancer. Oncol Ther 2023; 11:481-493. [PMID: 37715853 PMCID: PMC10673796 DOI: 10.1007/s40487-023-00241-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/21/2023] [Accepted: 08/11/2023] [Indexed: 09/18/2023] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Many patients with human epidermal growth factor receptor-2-positive metastatic breast cancer (HER2+ mBC) require subsequent lines of therapy (LOTs) after being treated with pertuzumab and trastuzumab-based regimens in the first line (1L). Although the efficacy of the second-line (2L) therapies has been demonstrated in clinical trials, the real-world effectiveness of these treatments is understudied. This retrospective cohort study assessed the real-world treatment patterns and outcomes for patients with HER2+ mBC following 1L therapy with pertuzumab and trastuzumab-based regimens in the United States (US) during 2015-2019. METHODS Adults with HER2+ mBC in the US who initiated 1L pertuzumab and trastuzumab-based regimens between 01/01/2015 and 09/30/2019 and had ≥ 60 days of follow-up after 1L initiation were identified from the IQVIA Oncology Electronic Medical Records database. The regimens utilized in 2L following 1L pertuzumab and trastuzumab-based regimens were described. Median treatment duration and time to treatment failure were reported for 2L based on Kaplan-Meier analyses. RESULTS Of the 710 eligible patients who received pertuzumab and trastuzumab-based regimens in 1L (median age: 57.0 years [interquartile range: 48.0-65.0]; median follow-up: 20.3 months; median 1L duration: 15.3 months), 222 (31.3%) initiated 2L. The most common regimens in 2L were ado-trastuzumab emtansine (T-DM1)-based regimens (n = 159 [71.6%]), followed by lapatinib-based (n = 21 [9.5%]) and neratinib-based (n = 18 [8.1%]) regimens. The median treatment duration and time to treatment failure were 5.9 (95% CI: 5.0, 8.7) and 8.6 (7.3, 11.5) months, respectively, among patients initiating 2L, and 5.7 (4.7, 7.8) and 7.9 (6.5, 10.0) months among those receiving 2L T-DM1. CONCLUSIONS Most patients with HER2+ mBC requiring additional treatments after 1L pertuzumab and trastuzumab-based regimens utilized T-DM1 in 2L during 2015-2019. The short median treatment duration and time to treatment failure highlight an unmet need that can potentially be fulfilled by recently approved treatment options.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Jipan Xie
- Analysis Group, Inc., Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | | | - Xiaoyu Nie
- Analysis Group, Inc., Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
2
|
Wang J, Liu Y, Liang Y, Zhang Y, Dong H, Zheng T, Yu J, Du P, Jia S, King BL, Wang J, Liu X, Li H. Clinicopathologic features, genomic profiles and outcomes of younger vs. older Chinese hormone receptor-positive (HR+)/HER2-negative (HER2-) metastatic breast cancer patients. Front Oncol 2023; 13:1152575. [PMID: 37361577 PMCID: PMC10286822 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2023.1152575] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/27/2023] [Accepted: 05/23/2023] [Indexed: 06/28/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Poor outcomes have been widely reported for younger vs. older breast cancer patients, but whether this is due to age itself or the enrichment of aggressive clinical features remains controversial. We have evaluated the clinicopathologic characteristics and genomic profiles of real-world hormone receptor-positive (HR+)/HER2-negative (HER2-) metastatic breast cancer (MBC) patients to examine the determinants of outcome for younger vs. older patients in a single clinical subtype undergoing treatment in the same clinic. Patients and methods This study included patients presenting at the Peking University Cancer Hospital with primary stage IV or first-line metastatic HR+/HER2- breast cancer who consented to an additional blood draw for genomic profiling prior to treatment. Plasma samples were analyzed with a targeted 152-gene NGS panel to assess somatic circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) alterations. Genomic DNA (gDNA) extracted from peripheral blood mononuclear cells was analyzed for germline variants using a targeted 600-gene NGS panel. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis was performed to analyze disease free survival (DFS), progression free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) in association with clinicopathologic and genomic variables. Results Sixty-three patients presenting with HR+/HER2- MBC were enrolled in this study. Fourteen patients were < 40 years, 19 were 40-50 years, and 30 were > 50 years at the time of primary cancer diagnosis. No significant associations were observed between age and DFS, PFS or OS. Shorter OS was associated with de novo Stage IV disease (p = 0.002), Luminal B subtype (p = 0.006), high Ki67 index (p = 0.036), resistance to adjuvant endocrine therapy (p = 0.0001) and clinical stage (p = 0.015). Reduced OS was also observed in association with somatic alterations in FGFR1 (p = 0.008), CCND2 (p = 0.012), RB1 (p = 0.029) or TP53 (p = 0.029) genes, but not in association with germline variants. Conclusion In this group of real-world HR+/HER2- MBC breast cancer patients younger age was not associated with poor outcomes. While current guidelines recommend treatment decisions based on tumor biology rather than age, young HR+ breast cancer patients are more likely to receive chemotherapy. Our findings support the development of biomarker-driven treatment strategies for these patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jinhao Wang
- Huidu Shanghai Medical Sciences Ltd., Shanghai, China
| | - Yaxin Liu
- Key Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research, Department of Breast Oncology, Peking University Cancer Hospital & Institute, Beijing, China
| | - Yuehua Liang
- Key Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research, Department of Breast Oncology, Peking University Cancer Hospital & Institute, Beijing, China
| | - Yue Zhang
- Huidu Shanghai Medical Sciences Ltd., Shanghai, China
| | - Hang Dong
- Huidu Shanghai Medical Sciences Ltd., Shanghai, China
| | | | - Jianjun Yu
- Huidu Shanghai Medical Sciences Ltd., Shanghai, China
| | - Pan Du
- Predicine, Inc., Hayward, CA, United States
| | | | | | - Jing Wang
- Key Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research, Department of Breast Oncology, Peking University Cancer Hospital & Institute, Beijing, China
| | - Xiaoran Liu
- Key Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research, Department of Breast Oncology, Peking University Cancer Hospital & Institute, Beijing, China
| | - Huiping Li
- Key Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research, Department of Breast Oncology, Peking University Cancer Hospital & Institute, Beijing, China
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Heinig M, Heinze F, Schwarz S, Haug U. Initial and ten-year treatment patterns among 11,000 breast cancer patients undergoing breast surgery-an analysis of German claims data. BMC Cancer 2022; 22:130. [PMID: 35109813 PMCID: PMC8812022 DOI: 10.1186/s12885-022-09240-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/27/2021] [Accepted: 01/25/2022] [Indexed: 12/24/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND We aimed to explore the potential of German claims data for describing initial and long-term treatment patterns of breast cancer patients undergoing surgery. METHODS Using the German Pharmacoepidemiological Research Database (GePaRD, ~ 20% of the German population) we included patients with invasive breast cancer diagnosed in 2008 undergoing breast surgery and followed them until 2017. We described initial and long-term treatment patterns and deaths. Analyses were stratified by stage (as far as available in claims data), age at diagnosis, and mode of detection (screen-detected vs. interval vs. unscreened cases). RESULTS The cohort comprised 10,802 patients. The proportion with neoadjuvant therapy was highest in patients < 50 years (19% vs. ≤ 8% at older ages). The proportion initiating adjuvant chemotherapy within four months after diagnosis decreased with age (< 50 years: 63%, 50-69: 46%, 70-79: 27%, 80 + : 4%). Among women < 69 years, ~ 30% had two breast surgeries in year one (70-79: 21%, 80 + : 14%). Treatment intensity was lower for screen-detected compared to interval or unscreened cases, both in year one (e.g., proportion with mastectomy ~ 50% lower) and within 2-10 years after surgery (proportions with radiotherapy or chemotherapy about one third lower each). CONCLUSIONS This study illustrates the potential of routine data to describe breast cancer treatment and provided important insights into differences in initial and long-term treatment by mode of detection and age.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Miriam Heinig
- Department of Clinical Epidemiology, Leibniz Institute for Prevention Research and Epidemiology - BIPS, Achterstraße 30, 28359, Bremen, Germany.
| | - Franziska Heinze
- Department of Health, Long-Term Care and Pensions, SOCIUM Research Center On Inequality and Social Policy, University of Bremen, 28359, Bremen, Germany
| | - Sarina Schwarz
- Department of Clinical Epidemiology, Leibniz Institute for Prevention Research and Epidemiology - BIPS, Achterstraße 30, 28359, Bremen, Germany
| | - Ulrike Haug
- Department of Clinical Epidemiology, Leibniz Institute for Prevention Research and Epidemiology - BIPS, Achterstraße 30, 28359, Bremen, Germany.,Faculty of Human and Health Sciences, University of Bremen, Grazer Str. 2, 28359, Bremen, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Abemaciclib plus fulvestrant in hormone receptor-positive, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative advanced breast cancer in premenopausal women: subgroup analysis from the MONARCH 2 trial. Breast Cancer Res 2021; 23:87. [PMID: 34425869 PMCID: PMC8381581 DOI: 10.1186/s13058-021-01463-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/08/2021] [Accepted: 08/04/2021] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND In MONARCH 2, abemaciclib plus fulvestrant significantly improved median progression-free survival (PFS, 16.4 vs 9.3 months, hazard ratio [HR] 0.553) and overall survival (OS, 46.7 vs 37.3 months; HR 0.757) compared with placebo plus fulvestrant in hormone receptor-positive (HR-positive), human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative (HER2-negative) advanced breast cancer (ABC) patients who were endocrine therapy (ET) resistant, regardless of menopausal status. Here, we report findings in the premenopausal subgroup of the MONARCH 2 trial. METHODS The premenopausal subgroup included patients with natural menstrual bleeding who received a gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist at least 4 weeks prior to study treatment start date and for the entire study duration. Of the 669 patients enrolled in the MONARCH 2 trial, 114 were premenopausal (abemaciclib plus fulvestrant, n = 72; placebo plus fulvestrant, n = 42), and were included in this analysis. The primary objective was investigator-assessed PFS and secondary objectives were OS, objective response rate, and safety and tolerability. Exploratory analyses included time to second disease progression (PFS2), time to chemotherapy (TTC), and chemotherapy-free survival (CFS). RESULTS At the primary objective cutoff (February 14, 2017), median PFS was not reached for the abemaciclib plus fulvestrant arm versus 10.52 months for the placebo plus fulvestrant arm (HR 0.415; 95% CI 0.246-0.698). At the pre-specified OS interim cutoff (20-June-2019), median PFS was 28.6 months in the abemaciclib plus fulvestrant arm compared with 10.26 months in the placebo plus fulvestrant arm (HR 0.477; 95% CI 0.302-0.755). A numerical OS benefit was observed with abemaciclib plus fulvestrant compared to fulvestrant alone (HR 0.689; 95% CI 0.379-1.252, median, not reached vs 47.3 months). Improvements were also observed for the exploratory outcomes of PFS2 (HR 0.599), TTC (HR 0.674), and CFS (HR 0.642) with the addition of abemaciclib to fulvestrant. The safety profile was generally consistent with results disclosed previously. CONCLUSIONS Results of the premenopausal subgroup in the MONARCH 2 trial were consistent with the improved clinical outcomes observed in the intent-to-treat population. The analysis provides support for the use of abemaciclib plus fulvestrant (with ovarian suppression) as an effective treatment option for premenopausal patients with HR+, HER2- ABC who are ET-resistant. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION NCT02107703. Registered April 08, 2014- Retrospectively registered, https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT02107703 .
Collapse
|
5
|
Wu Y, Han Y, Yu P, Ouyang Q, Yan M, Wang X, Hu X, Jiang Z, Huang T, Tong Z, Wang S, Yin Y, Li H, Yang R, Yang H, Teng Y, Sun T, Cai L, Li H, Chen X, He J, Liu X, Yang S, Qiao Y, Fan J, Wang J, Xu B. Endocrine Therapy for Hormone Receptor-Positive Advanced Breast Cancer: A Nation-Wide Multicenter Epidemiological Study in China. Front Oncol 2021; 10:599604. [PMID: 33643905 PMCID: PMC7905089 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2020.599604] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/27/2020] [Accepted: 12/29/2020] [Indexed: 01/07/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Clinical guidelines generally recommend endocrine therapy (ET) as first-line treatment of hormone receptor-positive advanced breast cancer (HR+ ABC) whereas chemotherapy (CT) should be considered in the presence of life-threatening disease or limited clinical benefit after three sequential ET regimens. However, it is unclear if real-world clinical practice is in accordance with the current guidelines. This study was to present the real-world treatment patterns and ET regimens among HR+ ABC patients in China. Methods Using data from the Nation-wide Multicenter Retrospective Clinical Epidemiology Study of Female Advanced Breast Cancer in China (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT03047889), we investigated the clinicopathological characteristics, clinical profiles, and treatment patterns of HR+ ABC patients from January 2012 to December 2014. Results A total of 2,342 patients with HR+ ABC were included in this study. Our findings revealed that, in comparisons with those receiving initial CT (n = 1445), patients initiated ET (n =402) were significantly older, later recurrent after adjuvant treatment, with a lower rate of visceral involvement and a decreasing quantity of metastatic sites. A total of 1,308 patients received palliative ET while only 18.9% patients (n = 247) reached three lines of ET. Among patients completing more than one line of ET, the median treatment duration was 8 months for the first line, 6 months for the second line, and 3 months for the third line for patients receiving ET. In the advanced setting, the choices of palliative ET regimens were diverse, yet aromatase inhibitor (AI) monotherapy was still the overall mainstay of ET; in contrast, patients were less accessible to everolimus plus AI regimen in this population. Conclusions Less than one quarter of patients initiated palliative ET for HR+ ABC in routine clinical practice. Patients who received multi-lines of ET experienced successive shorter durations following each line of therapy. This real-life data provides a solid overview of ET for HR+ ABC from China, indicating unmet need for treatment options that improve the effectiveness of endocrine therapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yun Wu
- Department of Medical Oncology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| | - Yiqun Han
- Department of Medical Oncology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| | - Pei Yu
- Department of Cancer Epidemiology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| | - Quchang Ouyang
- Department of Breast Cancer Medical Oncology, Hunan Cancer Hospital, Changsha, China
| | - Min Yan
- Department of Breast Disease, Henan Breast Cancer Center, The Affiliated Cancer Hospital of Zhengzhou University & Henan Cancer Hospital, Zhengzhou, China
| | - Xiaojia Wang
- Department of Medical Oncology, Zhejiang Cancer Hospital, Hangzhou, China
| | - Xichun Hu
- Department of Medical Oncology, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, China
| | - Zefei Jiang
- Department of Breast Cancer, The Fifth Medical Centre of Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing, China
| | - Tao Huang
- Department of Breast and Thyroid Surgery, Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China
| | - Zhongsheng Tong
- Department of Breast Oncology, Key Laboratory of Breast Cancer Prevention and Therapy, National Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute and Hospital, Tianjin, China
| | - Shusen Wang
- Department of Medical Oncology, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China
| | - Yongmei Yin
- Department of Medical Oncology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China
| | - Hui Li
- Department of Breast Surgery, Sichuan Province Tumor Hospital, Chengdu, China
| | - Runxiang Yang
- Department of Medical Oncology, Yunnan Cancer Hospital, Kunming Medical University, Kunming, China
| | - Huawei Yang
- Department of Breast Surgery, The Affiliated Tumor Hospital of Guangxi Medical University, Guangxi, China
| | - Yuee Teng
- Department of Medical Oncology and Thoracic Surgery, The First Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang, China
| | - Tao Sun
- Department of Medical Oncology, Cancer Hospital of China Medical University, Liaoning Cancer Hospital and Institute, Key Laboratory of Liaoning Breast Cancer Research, Shenyang, China
| | - Li Cai
- The 4th Department of Internal Medical Oncology, Harbin Medical University Cancer Hospital, Harbin, China
| | - Hongyuan Li
- Department of the Endocrine and Breast Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, China
| | - Xi Chen
- Department of Medicine Oncology, 900 Hospital of the Joint Logistics Team, Fuzhou, China
| | - Jianjun He
- Department of Breast Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an, China
| | - Xinlan Liu
- Department of Oncology, General Hospital of Ningxia Medical University, Ningxia, China
| | - Shune Yang
- Department of Breast Cancer and Lymphoma, Affiliated Tumor Hospital of Xinjiang Medical University, Urumqi, China
| | - Youlin Qiao
- Department of Cancer Epidemiology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| | - Jinhu Fan
- Department of Cancer Epidemiology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| | - Jiayu Wang
- Department of Medical Oncology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| | - Binghe Xu
- Department of Medical Oncology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Burne R, Balu S, Guérin A, Bungay R, Sin R, Paul ML. Comparison of healthcare resource utilization and costs of patients with HR+/HER2- advanced breast cancer treated with ribociclib versus other CDK4/6 inhibitors. J Med Econ 2021; 24:806-815. [PMID: 34098827 DOI: 10.1080/13696998.2021.1939705] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/21/2022]
Abstract
AIMS To assess healthcare resource utilization (HRU) and healthcare costs among women with hormone receptor-positive and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative advanced breast cancer (HR+/HER2- aBC) treated with cyclin-dependent kinases 4 and 6 (CDK4/6) inhibitors. METHODS Women with HR+/HER2- aBC, initiating CDK4/6 inhibitor treatment were identified using IBM MarketScan Commercial and Medicare Supplemental databases (Q1/2000-Q3/2018). Based on the first CDK4/6 inhibitor patients received (index therapy), three cohorts were identified: abemaciclib, palbociclib, and ribociclib. The baseline period (six months preceding treatment initiation) was used to describe patient characteristics. All-cause HRU and direct total healthcare costs (medical and pharmacy) from treatment initiation until the earliest of the end of index therapy, continuous health plan enrollment, or data availability, were compared for the ribociclib cohort versus the abemaciclib and palbociclib cohorts, separately, using weighted regression analyses balanced on baseline covariates. RESULTS Average age at treatment initiation was ∼60 years and the majority of patients were postmenopausal (abemaciclib: 92%; palbociclib: 92%; ribociclib: 79%). Average follow-up duration was 3.9, 8.8, and 5.9 months for the abemaciclib, palbociclib, and ribociclib cohorts, respectively. After reweighting, HRU was not statistically different between the ribociclib and abemaciclib cohorts, however, the ribociclib cohort incurred significantly lower total healthcare costs (-$5,452; 95% CI: -$8,726; -$1,139, p = .01). Medical costs (driven by outpatient costs) and pharmacy costs (driven by CDK4/6 inhibitor costs) were significantly lower for the ribociclib cohort. Among the reweighted ribociclib and palbociclib cohorts, HRU and total healthcare costs were not statistically different, although the ribociclib cohort had lower outpatient costs per-patient-per-month (-$1,245, 95% CI: -$2,349; -$37, p = .04). LIMITATIONS Due to the retrospective, observational design, treatment cohorts were not randomly assigned. CONCLUSIONS During CDK4/6 inhibitor therapy, ribociclib patients tended to incur lower medical and pharmacy costs than abemaciclib patients. Among ribociclib and palbociclib patients, HRU and healthcare costs were similar.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Sanjeev Balu
- Health Economics and Outcomes Research, Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation, East Hanover, NJ, USA
| | | | | | - Roxana Sin
- Health Economics and Outcomes Research, Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation, East Hanover, NJ, USA
| | - Mary Lisha Paul
- Health Economics and Outcomes Research, Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation, East Hanover, NJ, USA
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Diéras V, Han HS, Kaufman B, Wildiers H, Friedlander M, Ayoub JP, Puhalla SL, Bondarenko I, Campone M, Jakobsen EH, Jalving M, Oprean C, Palácová M, Park YH, Shparyk Y, Yañez E, Khandelwal N, Kundu MG, Dudley M, Ratajczak CK, Maag D, Arun BK. Veliparib with carboplatin and paclitaxel in BRCA-mutated advanced breast cancer (BROCADE3): a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol 2020; 21:1269-1282. [PMID: 32861273 DOI: 10.1016/s1470-2045(20)30447-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 190] [Impact Index Per Article: 47.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/30/2020] [Revised: 06/17/2020] [Accepted: 06/19/2020] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND BRCA1 or BRCA2-mutated breast cancers are sensitive to poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) inhibitors and platinum agents owing to deficiency in homologous recombination repair of DNA damage. In this trial, we compared veliparib versus placebo in combination with carboplatin and paclitaxel, and continued as monotherapy if carboplatin and paclitaxel were discontinued before progression, in patients with HER2-negative advanced breast cancer and a germline BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutation. METHODS BROCADE3 was a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 3 trial done at 147 hospitals in 36 countries. Eligible patients (aged ≥18 years) had deleterious germline BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutation-associated, histologically or cytologically confirmed advanced HER2-negative breast cancer, an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0-2, and had received up to two previous lines of chemotherapy for metastatic disease. Patients were randomly assigned (2:1) by interactive response technology by means of permuted blocks within strata (block size of 3 or 6) to carboplatin (area under the concentration curve 6 mg/mL per min intravenously) on day 1 and paclitaxel (80 mg/m2 intravenously) on days 1, 8, and 15 of 21-day cycles combined with either veliparib (120 mg orally twice daily, on days -2 to 5) or matching placebo. If patients discontinued carboplatin and paclitaxel before progression, they could continue veliparib or placebo at an intensified dose (300 mg twice daily continuously, escalating to 400 mg twice daily if tolerated) until disease progression. Patients in the control group could receive open-label veliparib monotherapy after disease progression. Randomisation was stratified by previous platinum use, history of CNS metastases, and oestrogen and progesterone receptor status. The primary endpoint was investigator-assessed progression-free survival per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors version 1.1. Efficacy analyses were done by intention to treat, which included all randomly assigned patients with a centrally confirmed BRCA mutation, and safety analyses included all patients who received at least one dose of velilparib or placebo. This study is ongoing and is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02163694. FINDINGS Between July 30, 2014, and Jan 17, 2018, 2202 patients were screened, of whom 513 eligible patients were enrolled and randomly assigned. In the intention-to-treat population (n=509), 337 patients were assigned to receive veliparib plus carboplatin-paclitaxel (veliparib group) and 172 were assigned to receive placebo plus carboplatin-paclitaxel (control group). Median follow-up at data cutoff (April 5, 2019) was 35·7 months (IQR 24·9-43·6) in the veliparib group and 35·5 months (23·1-45·9) in the control group. Median progression-free survival was 14·5 months (95% CI 12·5-17·7) in the veliparib group versus 12·6 months (10·6-14·4) in the control group (hazard ratio 0·71 [95% CI 0·57-0·88], p=0·0016). The most common grade 3 or worse adverse events were neutropenia (272 [81%] of 336 patients in the veliparib group vs 143 [84%] of 171 patients in the control group), anaemia (142 [42%] vs 68 [40%]), and thrombocytopenia (134 [40%] vs 48 [28%]). Serious adverse events occurred in 115 (34%) patients in the veliparib group versus 49 (29%) patients in the control group. There were no study drug-related deaths. INTERPRETATION The addition of veliparib to a highly active platinum doublet, with continuation as monotherapy if the doublet were discontinued, resulted in significant and durable improvement in progression-free survival in patients with germline BRCA mutation-associated advanced breast cancer. These data indicate the utility of combining platinum and PARP inhibitors in this patient population. FUNDING AbbVie.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Véronique Diéras
- Institut Curie, Paris, France; Breast Oncology, Centre Eugène Marquis, Rennes, France.
| | - Hyo S Han
- Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL, USA
| | - Bella Kaufman
- Tel-Aviv University, Sheba Medical Center, Tel Hashomer, Ramat Gan, Israel
| | - Hans Wildiers
- Department of General Medical Oncology, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Michael Friedlander
- Prince of Wales Clinical School UNSW and Prince of Wales Hospital, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Jean-Pierre Ayoub
- Centre Hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal, Montreal, QC, Canada
| | | | - Igor Bondarenko
- Dnipropetrovsk Medical Academy, City Clinical Hospital Number 4, Dnipro, Ukraine
| | - Mario Campone
- Institut de Cancérologie de l'Ouest Saint-Herblain, France
| | | | - Mathilde Jalving
- University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, Netherlands
| | - Cristina Oprean
- University of Medicine and Pharmacy Timisoara and Oncomed SRL, Timisoara, Romania
| | | | | | - Yaroslav Shparyk
- Lviv State Regional Treatment and Diagnostic Oncology Center, Lviv, Ukraine
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Banu K Arun
- The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Shah AN, Metzger O, Bartlett CH, Liu Y, Huang X, Cristofanilli M. Hormone Receptor-Positive/Human Epidermal Growth Receptor 2-Negative Metastatic Breast Cancer in Young Women: Emerging Data in the Era of Molecularly Targeted Agents. Oncologist 2020; 25:e900-e908. [PMID: 32176406 PMCID: PMC7288640 DOI: 10.1634/theoncologist.2019-0729] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/21/2019] [Accepted: 01/29/2020] [Indexed: 12/16/2022] Open
Abstract
Breast cancer is the most common malignancy in young women worldwide, accounting for an estimated 30% of new cancer diagnoses and 25% of cancer deaths. Approximately two thirds of young women with breast cancer have hormone receptor-positive (HR+)/human epidermal growth receptor 2-negative (HER2-) tumors. Numerous studies, primarily in early-stage breast cancer, have demonstrated that young age is an independent risk factor for more aggressive disease and worse outcomes. Although more limited data are available regarding outcomes in young patients with advanced disease, these age-related disparities suggest that breast cancer in premenopausal women has distinct clinicopathologic and molecular features that can impact treatment outcomes. Until recently, limited data were available on the intrinsic molecular subtypes and genetics of young patients with HR+/HER2- metastatic breast cancer (mBC). In this review, we explore insights into the clinical and pathologic features of HR+/HER2- mBC in younger women derived from recent clinical trials of the cyclin-dependent kinase 4/6 inhibitors palbociclib (PALOMA-3), ribociclib (MONALEESA-7), and abemaciclib (MONARCH 2) and the implications of these findings for clinical practice, guideline development, and future research. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: This review provides clinicians with an overview of emerging data on the unique clinicopathologic and molecular features of hormone receptor-positive/human epidermal growth receptor 2-negative metastatic breast cancer (mBC) in premenopausal women, summarizes findings from the most recent clinical trials of endocrine-based treatment in this patient population, and explores the implications of these findings for clinical practice, guideline development, and future research. Improved understanding of the key factors influencing disease course and treatment response in premenopausal patients with mBC may lead to more timely incorporation of evidence-based treatment approaches, thereby improving patient care and outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ami N. Shah
- Robert H. Lurie Comprehensive Cancer Center, Northwestern University Feinberg School of MedicineChicagoIllinoisUSA
| | - Otto Metzger
- Dana‐Farber Cancer InstituteBostonMassachusettsUSA
| | | | - Yuan Liu
- Pfizer OncologySan DiegoCaliforniaUSA
| | - Xin Huang
- Pfizer OncologySan DiegoCaliforniaUSA
| | - Massimo Cristofanilli
- Robert H. Lurie Comprehensive Cancer Center, Northwestern University Feinberg School of MedicineChicagoIllinoisUSA
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Economic Burden of HR+/HER2- Metastatic Breast Cancer Among Adult Premenopausal Women. Adv Ther 2018; 35:503-514. [PMID: 29556908 DOI: 10.1007/s12325-018-0689-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/29/2018] [Indexed: 12/23/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Premenopausal women with hormone receptor-positive/human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative (HR+/HER2-) metastatic breast cancer (mBC) have complex treatment needs and may receive sequential combinations of endocrine therapy (ET) or chemotherapy. This study describes healthcare utilization (HRU) and costs among premenopausal women with HR+/HER2- mBC in real-world settings from a payer's perspective. METHODS In this retrospective cohort study, premenopausal women with HR+/HER2- mBC who received ET or chemotherapy were identified from the Truven Health Analytics MarketScan database (1 January 2006-31 December 2015). The main HRU outcomes per patient per 6 months (PPP6 M) were measured during each line of therapy and included number of days in inpatient (IP) and outpatient (OP) services. Healthcare costs per patient per month (PPPM) included medical and pharmacy costs. RESULTS A total of 3203 patients received first-line, 2194 received second-line, and 1242 received third-line therapy for mBC. Mean number of IP days PPP6 M were 1.6, 1.3, and 1.5 days in the first, second, and third lines, respectively. Mean number of days with OP services PPP6 M was 31.4, 30.9, and 23.3 in the first, second, and third lines, respectively. Among patients receiving ET, mean total healthcare costs were $6521, $4440, and $4555 PPPM in the first, second, and third line, respectively. Among patients receiving chemotherapy, mean total healthcare costs were $16,842, $12,868, and $16,129 PPPM in the first, second, and third line, respectively. These costs were mainly driven by treatment and OP costs. CONCLUSION Real-world HRU and costs among premenopausal women with HR+/HER2- mBC are extensive. Patients who received chemotherapy incurred approximately twice the costs of patients treated with ET. FUNDING Novartis Pharmaceutical Corp.
Collapse
|