Access to Chimeric Antigen Receptor T Cell Therapy for Diffuse Large B Cell Lymphoma

Chimeric Antigen Receptor T-Cell Access in Patients with Relapsed/Refractory Large B-Cell Lymphoma: Association of Access with Social Determinants of Health and Travel Time to Treatment Centers

Large B-cell lymphoma (LBCL) is the most common type of non-Hodgkin lymphoma. Chimeric antigen receptor T-cell (CAR T) therapy represents a novel treatment with curative potential for relapsed or refractory (R/R) LBCL, but there are access barriers to this innovative therapy that are not well-studied. Study objectives were: (1) Assess the impact of geographic factors and social determinants of health (SDOH) on access to treatment with CAR T in a sample of patients with R/R LBCL and ≥2 prior lines of therapy (LOT). (2) Compare and contrast patient characteristics, SDOH, and travel time between patients with R/R LBCL who received CAR T and those who did not. An observational, nested case-control study of patients with R/R LBCL, ≥2 prior LOT, not in a clinical trial, identified using 100% Medicare Fee-For-Service and national multi-payer claims databases. Patients were linked to near-neighborhood SDOH using 9-digit ZIP-code address. Driving distance and time between residence and nearest CAR T treatment center (TC) was calculated. Patients were stratified based on treatments received upon third LOT initiation (Index Date) or later: (1) received CAR T and (2) did not receive CAR T. Multivariable logistic regression was used to evaluate factors associated with CAR T. 5011 patients met inclusion criteria, with 628 (12.5%) in the CAR T group. Regression models found the likelihood of receiving CAR T decreased with patient age (odds ratio [OR] = .96, P < .001), and males were 29% more likely to receive CAR T (OR = 1.29, P = .02). Likelihood of CAR T increased with Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI; OR = 1.07, P < .001) indicating patients with more comorbidities were more likely to receive CAR T. Black patients were less than half as likely to receive CAR T than White patients (OR = .44, P = .01). Asian patients did not significantly differ from White patients (OR = 1.43, P = .24), and there was a trend for Hispanic patients to have a slightly lower likelihood of CAR T (OR = .50, P = .07). Higher household income was associated with receipt of CAR T, with the lowest income group more than 50% less likely to receive CAR T than the highest (OR = .44, P = .002), and the second lowest income group more than 30% less likely (OR = .68, P = .02). Finally, likelihood of CAR T therapy was reduced when the driving time to the nearest TC was 121 to 240 minutes (reference group: ≤30 minutes; OR = .64, P = .04). Travel times between 31 and 121 or greater than 240 minutes were not significantly different from ≤30 minutes. Payer type was collinear with age and could not be included in the regression analysis, but patients with commercial insurance were 1.5 to 3 times more likely to receive CAR T than other payers on an unadjusted basis. We identified significant disparities in access to CAR T related to demographics and SDOH. Patients who were older, female, low income, or Black were less likely to receive CAR T. The positive association of CCI with CAR T requires further research. Given the promising outcomes of CAR T, there is urgent need to address identified disparities and increase efforts to overcome access barriers.

Real-world patient characteristics, treatment patterns, and treatment outcomes of patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma by line of therapy

BACKGROUND

Although initial treatment of diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) with rituximab, cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisone (R-CHOP) can be effective, up to 50% of patients will develop refractory or relapsed (R/R) disease. This study aimed to provide contemporary data on characteristics, treatment patterns, and outcomes for R/R-DLBCL.

METHODS

Patients with incident (January 2016 to March 2021) DLBCL age ≥18 years who initiated first-line (1L) therapy were identified from the COTA real-world database. Baseline characteristics, treatment patterns, and real-world outcomes, including time to next treatment (rwTTNT) and overall survival (rwOS), were assessed for the study population and by line of therapy (LOT).

RESULTS

A total of 1347 eligible DLBCL patients were identified. Of these, 340 (25.2%) proceeded to receive 2L, of whom 141 (41.5%) proceeded to receive 3L, of whom 51 (36.2%) proceeded to receive 4L+. Most common treatments were R-CHOP in 1L (63.6%), stem cell transplant (SCT) in 2L (17.9%), polatuzumab vedotin, bendamustine, and rituximab (Pola-BR) in 3L (9.9%), and chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapy (CAR-T) in 4L (11.8%). Treatment patterns were more variable in later LOTs. One- and 3-year rwOS from 1L initiation were 88.5% and 78.4%, respectively. Patients who received later LOTs experienced numerically lower 1- and 3-year rwOS (from 2L initiation: 62.4% and 46.4%, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

In this real-world analysis, 25.2% of patients experienced R/R-DLBCL after 1L with poor outcomes. Given the findings of this study, there is a high unmet need for novel, safe, and effective treatment options for patients with R/R DLBCL.

CAR T-Cell Immunotherapy in Minority Patients with Lymphoma

BACKGROUND

Administration of anti-CD19 chimeric antigen receptor T-cell (CART19) immunotherapy for large B-cell lymphomas (LBCLs), a subset of non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL), involves high costs and access to specialized tertiary care centers. We investigated whether minority health populations (MHPs) have equal access to CART19 and whether their outcomes are similar to those of non-MHPs.

METHODS

We analyzed the prevalence and clinical outcomes of patients treated with commercial CART19 at two geographically and socioeconomically different institutions: the Abramson Cancer Center (ACC, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania) and the Knight Cancer Institute (KCI, Portland, Oregon).

RESULTS

In the ACC catchment area, 8956 patients were diagnosed with NHL between 2015 and 2019 (latest available data from the state registry), including 17.9% MHPs. In the ACC, between 2018 and 2022 (CART became available in 2018), 1492 patients with LBCL were treated, and 194 received CART19. The proportion of MHPs was 15.7% for the entire LBCL cohort but only 6.7% for the CART19 cohort. During the same time, in the KCI catchment area, 4568 patients were diagnosed with NHL, including 4.2% MHPs. In the KCI, 396 patients with LBCL were treated, and 47 received CART19. The proportion of MHPs was 6.6% for the entire LBCL cohort and 4.2% for the CART19 cohort. The 3-month response, survival, and toxicities after CART19 infusion showed similar results, although the number of patients who were treated was limited.

CONCLUSIONS

This study shows that the access of MHPs to tertiary centers for LBCL care was preserved but appeared reduced for commercial CART19 immunotherapy. Although clinical outcomes of MHPs seemed similar to those of non-MHPs, the small sample size precludes drawing firm conclusions. Further studies are needed. (Funded by the Laffey McHugh Foundation and others.).

Access to CAR T-cell therapy: Focus on diversity, equity and inclusion

Chimeric antigen receptor T-cell (CAR T-cell) therapy has revolutionized the treatment of hematologic malignancies in patients with relapsed or refractory disease without other treatment options. However, only a very small proportion of patients with an indication for CAR T-cell can access the treatment. The imbalance between supply and demand is magnified in minority and vulnerable populations. Limited access is multifactorial and in part a result of factors directly related to the cellular product such as cost, complex logistics and manufacturing limitations. On the other hand, the impact of diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) and their social and structural context are also key to understanding access barriers in cellular therapy and health care in general. CAR T-cell therapy provides us with a new opportunity to better understand and prioritize this gap, a key step towards proactively and strategically addressing access. The aim of this review is to provide an analysis of the current state of access to CAR T therapy with a focus on the influence of DEI. We will cover aspects related to the cellular product and the inseparable context of social and structural determinants. Identifying and addressing barriers is necessary to ensure equitable access to this and all future novel therapies.

Chimeric Antigen Receptor T-Cell and Bispecific Antibody Therapy in Multiple Myeloma: Moving Into the Future

Historically, the outcomes for individuals with triple-class refractory and penta-drug refractory multiple myeloma (MM) have been poor because of a dearth of effective treatment options. However, the advent of chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell and T-cell redirecting bispecific antibody (BsAb) therapies has led to unprecedented response rates and durations of response in heavily relapsed/refractory (R/R) populations. Currently, two B-cell maturation antigen (BCMA)-directed CAR T-cell therapies (idecabtagene vicleucel and ciltacabtagene autoleucel) as well as one BCMA/CD3 BsAb (teclistamab) have been approved for late-line (greater than four previous lines) R/R MM in the United States. The purpose of this review is to analyze the recent data for these approved therapies as well as provide an overview of other related CAR T-cell and BsAb therapies under development, including non-BCMA-targeting agents. We review efficacy and safety considerations, with particular focus on cytokine release syndrome, neurotoxicity, and infection risk. The relative merits and limitations of each class of therapy are discussed, as well as the areas of unmet need with respect to optimal sequencing and supportive care measures. We examine the factors that challenge equitable access to these novel therapies across minoritized racial, ethnic, and socioeconomic populations. Although it is evident that CAR T-cell and BsAb therapies will transform treatment paradigms in MM for years to come, significant work remains to identify the optimal utilization of these novel therapies and ensure equitable access.

Thinking "outside the germinal center": Re-educating T cells to combat follicular lymphoma

There have been significant advancements in the management of follicular lymphoma (FL), the most common indolent lymphoma. These include immunomodulatory agents such as lenalidomide, epigenetic modifiers (tazemetostat), and phosphoinotiside-3 kinase inhibitors (copanlisib). The focus of this review is T cell-engager therapies, namely chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy and bispecific antibodies, have recently transformed the treatment landscape of FL. Two CAR T cell products, axicabtagene ciloleucel (axi-cel) and tisagenlecleucel (tisa-cel), and one bispecific antibody, mosunetuzumab, recently received FDA approvals in FL. Several other new immune effector drugs are being evaluated and will expand the treatment armamentarium. This review focuses on CAR T-cell and bispecific antibody therapies, details their safety and efficacy and considers their evolving role in the current treatment landscape of FL.

Epidemiology and Predictors of 30-Day Readmission in CAR-T Cell Therapy Recipients

The novel cellular immunotherapy using chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T cells has transformed the management of several previously incurable hematologic malignancies. Since the first CAR-T cell product was approved by the Food and Drug Administration in 2017, five additional products have been approved for various hematologic malignancies. Although there is now more experience with outpatient administration, CAR-T therapy was initially delivered in an inpatient setting. The unique complications of cytokine release syndrome (CRS) and neurologic side effects (commonly known as immune effector cell-associated neurotoxicity syndrome [ICANS]), along with a higher risk for infection, increase the risk for hospital readmission. Given the recent approval of CAR-T therapy, large-scale epidemiologic data are lacking. The present study aimed to characterize the epidemiology of hospitalizations, readmissions, and factors associated with all-cause 30-day readmission post CAR-T therapy. This retrospective cohort study used the Nationwide Readmissions Database from 2017 to 2019 to identify hospitalizations for CAR-T therapy administration. A descriptive analysis was performed after categorizing these hospitalizations as non-Hodgkin lymphoma, multiple myeloma, or leukemia. The readmission rate was calculated, and etiologies of readmission were identified. A Cox proportional hazards model was used to elucidate factors associated with 30-day readmission. We also estimated the healthcare utilization related to readmissions, including total hospital charges and length of stay. The 2,964 CAR-T therapy-related admissions included 2,176 with a diagnosis of non-Hodgkin lymphoma, 344 with multiple myeloma, and 445 with leukemia. The median length of stay was 15 days. Most CAR-T therapy recipients were male (63.4%), admitted to a teaching hospital (99.2%); 49.3% had private insurance, and 33.2% belonged to the highest-income communities. CAR-T therapy was administered mostly in privately owned (89.5%) large-sized hospitals (74.4%) in large metropolitan regions (91.4%). Median total hospital charges were highest for non-Hodgkin lymphoma, followed by leukemia and multiple myeloma ($945,645 versus $265,034 versus $184,194; P < .001). All-cause mortality during index hospitalization was highest for leukemia at 8.6%, followed by 3.6% for non-Hodgkin lymphoma and 1.4% for multiple myeloma (P < .001). The 30-day all-cause readmission rate was 23.6%, and the median time to readmission was 7 days. The readmission rate was highest for leukemia, followed by non-Hodgkin lymphoma and multiple myeloma (34.2% versus 22.8% versus 15.7%; P < .001). Readmission incurred an additional median total hospital charge of $64,561. During readmission, median length of stay was 5 days, and in-hospital mortality was 4.9%. Top etiologies for readmission were cancer or treatment-related (22%), sepsis or infection (18%), neurologic events (15%), neutropenia or pancytopenia (11%), and fever, hypotension, or hypoxia (8%). On multivariable analysis, non-Hodgkin lymphoma and leukemia (compared with multiple myeloma), transfer to a facility at discharge, chronic renal disease, cerebrovascular disease, and noninvasive ventilation were associated with higher odds of readmission. In contrast, admission to a teaching hospital predicted lower odds of readmission. Almost a quarter of CAR-T therapy recipients are readmitted within the first 30 days resulting in additional economic burden and substantial healthcare utilization.

Treatment selection for patients with relapsed or refractory follicular lymphoma

Follicular lymphoma (FL) is the second most common lymphoma in the United States and is characterized by a variable clinical course, disease heterogeneity, and a relapse-and-remittance pattern historically accompanied by successive shortening of clinical response with every line of treatment. Factors such as progression of disease within 24 months of initial treatment are associated with poor survival outcomes. Although rituximab-based regimens are preferred for early lines of treatment, no clear standard of care exists for treatment of FL in the third-line setting or later as approved third-line treatments have not been compared in a prospective, randomized clinical trial. Rather, physicians may choose from several therapeutic classes with different safety profiles and dosing regimens, with consideration of patient and disease factors. Here we describe 2 hypothetical patients with relapsing or remitting FL, an elderly patient with comorbidities, and a younger patient whose FL progressed within 24 months. These cases are used to highlight key factors that clinicians should consider when selecting therapies for relapsed or refractory FL, such as patient frailty, age, comorbidities, as well as quality of life and patient-specific preferences for less intrusive treatment regimens or longer remission times.

Travel-Related Economic Burden of Chimeric Antigen Receptor T Cell Therapy Administration by Site of Care

Introduction

We previously examined how expanding access to chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T cell therapy administration sites impacted patient travel distances and time. In the current study, we estimated travel-related economic burden associated with site-of-care options among patients with relapsed/refractory diffuse large B cell lymphoma.

Methods

We used geographic information system methods to quantify travel-related economic burden across three site-of-care scenarios: academic hospitals; academic and community multispecialty hospitals; and academic and community multispecialty hospitals plus nonacademic specialty oncology network centers. Socioeconomic status, administration sites, and county of residence were derived from the US Census Bureau and publicly available sources. Travel costs were based on governmental guidelines, US census wage data, and Bureau of Transportation Statistics. Travel distance and time to the nearest CAR T cell therapy administration sites were estimated from previous research.

Results

Total national estimated costs associated with traveling for CAR T cell therapy were $21.1 million if CAR T cell therapy was offered exclusively in academic hospitals, and $14.7 million if expanded to include community hospitals plus nonacademic specialty oncology network centers, representing a $6.5-million reduction associated with expanding access to eligible patients. The largest cost-saving component was lodging/meals. Regional and demographic cost differences were statistically significant between academic hospitals and nonacademic hospitals/specialty oncology centers. In all scenarios, patients living below the federal poverty level (FPL) had higher weighted mean total costs versus patients living above the FPL. White and Native American patients were estimated to have the highest weighted mean total costs across race/ethnicity groups. For all subgroups, costs were reduced by expanding access beyond academic hospitals.

Conclusion

CAR T cell therapy is currently restricted to academic hospitals; total travel costs could be substantially decreased if access is expanded to nonacademic hospitals and specialty oncology centers. Patients in rural areas and those living below the FPL are particularly disadvantaged by restricted access.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s12325-021-01839-y.