Advances in Treatment of Recurrent Small Cell Lung Cancer (SCLC): Insights for Optimizing Patient Outcomes from an Expert Roundtable Discussion

RESILIENT Part 2: A Randomized, Open-Label Phase III Study of Liposomal Irinotecan Versus Topotecan in Adults With Relapsed Small Cell Lung Cancer

PURPOSE

The phase III RESILIENT trial compared second-line liposomal irinotecan with topotecan in patients with small cell lung cancer (SCLC).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Patients with SCLC and progression on or after first-line platinum-based chemotherapy were randomly assigned (1:1) to intravenous (IV) liposomal irinotecan (70 mg/m2 every 2 weeks in a 6-week cycle) or IV topotecan (1.5 mg/m2 daily for 5 consecutive days, every 3 weeks in a 6-week cycle). The primary end point was overall survival (OS). Key secondary end points included progression-free survival (PFS) and objective response rate (ORR).

RESULTS

Among 461 randomly assigned patients, 229 received liposomal irinotecan and 232 received topotecan. The median follow-up was 18.4 months. The median OS was 7.9 months with liposomal irinotecan versus 8.3 months with topotecan (hazard ratio [HR], 1.11 [95% CI, 0.90 to 1.37]; P = .31). The median PFS per blinded independent central review (BICR) was 4.0 months with liposomal irinotecan and 3.3 months with topotecan (HR, 0.96 [95% CI, 0.77 to 1.20]; nominal P = .71); ORR per BICR was 44.1% (95% CI, 37.6 to 50.8) and 21.6% (16.4 to 27.4), respectively. Overall, 42.0% and 83.4% of patients receiving liposomal irinotecan and topotecan, respectively, experienced grade ≥3 related treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs). The most common grade ≥3 related TEAEs were diarrhea (13.7%), neutropenia (8.0%), and decreased neutrophil count (4.4%) with liposomal irinotecan and neutropenia (51.6%), anemia (30.9%), and leukopenia (29.1%) with topotecan.

CONCLUSION

Liposomal irinotecan and topotecan demonstrated similar median OS and PFS in patients with relapsed SCLC. Although the primary end point of OS was not met, liposomal irinotecan demonstrated a higher ORR than topotecan. The safety profile of liposomal irinotecan was consistent with its known safety profile; no new safety concerns emerged.

Patterns and prognostic values of programmed cell death-ligand 1 expression and CD8 + T-cell infiltration in small cell carcinoma of the esophagus: a retrospective analysis of 34 years of National Cancer Center data in China

BACKGROUND

Small cell carcinoma of the esophagus (SCCE) is an extremely rare and highly aggressive neuroendocrine malignancy with a strikingly poor prognosis. Given the great clinical successes of checkpoint immunotherapies, we explored the expression profile and clinical significance of programmed cell death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) and CD8 + T cell in SCCE for the first time.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Tumor-infiltrating immune cells (TIICs) and tumor cells in postoperative, whole tumor sections from 147 SCCE patients were stained for PD-LI expression. We also evaluated each patient's Combined Positive Score (CPS). Multiplex immunofluorescence staining (CD3, CD20, CD68, and PD-L1) was introduced to clarify the location of PD-L1. CD8 density was analyzed by digital imaging and analysis of entire slides. Clinical outcomes were tested for correlations with both PD-L1 expression and CD8 density.

RESULTS

No patients had PD-L1 expressed in their tumor cells. PD-L1 + expression in TIICs was detected in 65 patients (44.2%) and 42 (28.6%) exhibited CPS positivity. Multiplex immunofluorescence staining demonstrated that most of the PD-L1 was expressed on the CD68 + monocytes/macrophages. PD-L1 expression in the TIICs and CPS was found to be correlated with paraffin block age, tumor length, macroscopic type, T stage, and increased overall survival (OS). Expression of PD-L1 in TIICs showed significantly prolonged relapse-free survival (RFS). Increasing CD8 densities were associated with increased PD-L1 expression ( Ptrend <0.0001). Multivariate regression confirmed that PD-L1 in TIICs and CD8 states were independent predictors of OS, and CD8 status were found to be independently predictive of RFS. A stratification based on PD-L1 and CD8 status was also significantly associated with both OS and RFS.

CONCLUSION

Expression of PD-L1 was only detected in TIICs from approximately half of the patients with SCCEs. In SCCEs, PD-L1 and CD8 status are novel prognostic biomarkers and may inform the implementation of risk-related therapeutic strategies. SCCEs with higher CD8 infiltration also had higher expression of PD-L1, suggesting the development of resistance against adaptive immunity. These findings support the assertion that PD-L1/programmed cell death 1 inhibitors should be investigated in this rare malignancy.

Durable Objective Response to Lurbinectedin in Small Cell Bladder Cancer with TP53 Mutation: A Molecular-Directed Strategy

Small cell bladder cancer (SCBC) is a rare and aggressive disease, often treated with platinum/etoposide-based chemotherapy. Key molecular drivers include the inactivation of onco-suppressor genes (TP53, RB1) and amplifications in proto-oncogenes (MYC). We report a patient with SCBC who achieved an objective and prolonged response to lurbinectedin, which has been approved for metastatic small cell lung cancer, after developing disease progression on cisplatin/etoposide and nivolumab/ipilimumab. A genomic analysis of a metastatic biopsy prior to lurbinectedin initiation revealed a TP53 mutation and amplification of the cell cycle regulators E2F3 and MYCL. A repeat biopsy following the development of lurbinectedin resistance showed a new actionable ERBB2 alteration without significant change in the tumor mutation burden (six mutations/Mb). The present report suggests that lurbinectedin may be active and should be further explored in SCBC harboring TP53 mutations and amplifications in E2F3 and MYC family complexes.

Considerations for selecting second-line treatment in patients with progressive small cell lung cancer and the use of Lurbinectedin in this setting

Small cell lung cancer (SCLC) is characterized by high initial responses to platinum-based chemotherapy plus immune checkpoint inhibitors; however, most patients quickly relapse and require subsequent treatment. Second-line treatment options in SCLC remain limited, and treatment algorithms are not completely consistent across the available guidelines in this setting. This review highlights key considerations regarding selection of second-line treatment for patients with relapsed SCLC. In particular, the role of lurbinectedin, which was first approved in 2020, representing the first significant addition to treatment algorithms in this setting for decades, is summarized. Future directions, including the identification of SCLC subtypes and the need for predictive biomarkers to guide patient selection and targeted therapy, are also discussed.

Myeloprotection with trilaciclib in Chinese patients with extensive-stage small cell lung cancer receiving chemotherapy: Results from a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase III study (TRACES)

INTRODUCTION

Trilaciclib is a transient cyclin-dependent kinase 4/6 inhibitor that decreases the incidence of chemotherapy-induced myelosuppression in extensive-stage small cell lung cancer (ES-SCLC). TRACES study was designed to assess the safety, efficacy and pharmacokinetics (PK) of trilaciclib before chemotherapy in Chinese patients with ES-SCLC.

METHODS

The study included an open-label safety run-in part (Part 1) and double-blinded, placebo-controlled part (Part 2) where patients received trilaciclib or placebo before chemotherapy. Treatment-naïve or previously treated ES-SCLC patients received intravenous trilaciclib (240 mg/m2) or placebo before etoposide/carboplatin or topotecan, respectively. Primary endpoints were PK, safety and duration of severe neutropenia (DSN) in Cycle 1 in Part 1 and Part 2. Exploratory endpoints included the effect of trilaciclib on other myeloprotection endpoints, safety and antitumor efficacy.

RESULTS

Overall, 95 Chinese patients were enrolled, of which 12 and 83 patients were in Part 1 and Part 2, respectively. In Part 1, trilaciclib was well tolerated. Non-compartmental analysis results revealed no substantial differences in the main exposure parameters. In Part 2, 41 patients received trilaciclib, and 42 received placebo. Patients in trilaciclib arm vs placebo arm had a clinically and statistically significant decrease in DSN (mean [SD]) in Cycle 1 (0 [1.7] vs 2 [3.0] days; P = 0.0003), with improvements in additional neutrophil, red blood cell, and platelet measures. After a median follow-up of 14.1 months, the median overall survival was 12.0 months in trilaciclib arm and 8.8 months in placebo arm (HR, 0.69; 95 % CI: 0.40-1.22). Median progression-free survival was 4.8 months and 4.3 months, respectively (HR, 0.86; 95 % CI: 0.53-1.39). Trilaciclib had a well-tolerated safety profile.

CONCLUSIONS

Trilaciclib in the Chinese population demonstrated a similar PK and safety profile as seen in other global trials. There was significant reduction of DSN in Cycle 1, thereby substantiating the myeloprotective effects of trilaciclib in Chinese ES-SCLC patients.

Benefits and risks of PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors for recurrent small cell lung cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis

The development of immune checkpoint inhibitors(ICIs) has revolutionized the progress of solid tumors. Ongoing clinical trials are exploring the use of checkpoint inhibitors in recurrent small-cell lung cancer and achieving specific results. Although studies have been conducted to systematically review this issue, we conducted this single-arm meta-analysis in light of the emergence of several new clinical studies. In total, 854 individuals from 11 clinical investigations were enrolled in this single-arm meta-analysis. Median progression-free survival, median overall survival, and objective response rate were 1.65 months, 6.83 months, and 20.5%, respectively, according to pooled analyses. The best treatment regimen in the subgroup analysis was a dual checkpoint inhibitor combined with other treatments, and the drug that worked well for treatment was pembrolizumab. The benefit of programmed death 1/programmed cell death-ligand 1(PD-1/PD-L1) inhibitors alone is limited, and their combination with other therapies is a promising treatment option. Among PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors, pembrolizumab is the recommended drug.

SMAC Mimetics for the Treatment of Lung Carcinoma: Present Development and Future Prospects

BACKGROUND

Uncontrolled cell growth and proliferation, which originate from lung tissue often lead to lung carcinoma and are more likely due to smoking as well as inhaled environmental toxins. It is widely recognized that tumour cells evade the ability of natural programmed death (apoptosis) and facilitates tumour progression and metastasis. Therefore investigating and targeting the apoptosis pathway is being utilized as one of the best approaches for decades.

OBJECTIVE

This review describes the emergence of SMAC mimetic drugs as a treatment approach, its possibilities to synergize the response along with current limitations as well as future perspective therapy for lung cancer.

METHOD

Articles were analysed using search engines and databases namely Pubmed and Scopus.

RESULT

Under cancerous circumstances, the level of Inhibitor of Apoptosis Proteins (IAPs) gets elevated, which suppresses the pathway of programmed cell death, plus supports the proliferation of lung cancer. As it is a major apoptosis regulator, natural drugs that imitate the IAP antagonistic response like SMAC mimetic agents/Diablo have been identified to trigger cell death. SMAC i.e. second mitochondria activators of caspases is a molecule produced by mitochondria, stimulates apoptosis by neutralizing/inhibiting IAP and prevents its potential responsible for the activation of caspases. Various preclinical data have proven that these agents elicit the death of lung tumour cells. Apart from inducing apoptosis, these also sensitize the cancer cells toward other effective anticancer approaches like chemo, radio, or immunotherapies. There are many SMAC mimetic agents such as birinapant, BV-6, LCL161, and JP 1201, which have been identified for diagnosis as well as treatment purposes in lung cancer and are also under clinical investigation.

CONCLUSION

SMAC mimetics acts in a restorative way in the prevention of lung cancer.

Genomic profiling of relapsed small cell lung cancer reveals potential pathways of therapeutic targets

Background

Almost all patients with small cell lung cancer (SCLC) relapse. The therapeutic options of relapsed SCLC are limited, and the clinical outcomes are poor. Thus, genomic profiling of relapsed SCLC patients may help to develop more effective therapeutic options.

Methods

We collected blood specimens and follow-up information from a consecutive cohort of 31 patients diagnosed with relapsed SCLC in Zhongnan Hospital, Wuhan University, between 2018 and 2019, to analyze the comprehensive genomic profiling, and to investigate the impact of genomic alterations on therapeutic options and survival.

Results

In our cohort of relapsed SCLC, the median number of genomic alterations was 5 (range, 1-11) per sample. The majority of patients were defined as low tumor mutation burden (TMB; 83.9%) and microsatellite stability (MSS; 87.1%). Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs)-based treatment still brought considerable progression-free survival (PFS; 4.93-20.27 months) for patients with low TMB and MSS. Additionally, the most frequent genetic alterations observed in relapsed SCLC were TP53 (77%) and RB1 (52%). Other genomic alterations of high frequency were breast cancer 2 (BRCA2) (32%), ataxia telangiectasia mutated (ATM) (13%), epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) (10%), Notch receptor 1 (NOTCH1) (10%), and Fanconi anemia complementation group A (FANCA) (10%), in turn. Finally, based on the survival of therapeutic strategies targeting potential mutation genes, the role of genotyping in relapsed SCLC was confirmed.

Conclusions

Our studies first exhibited comprehensive genomic profiling of relapsed SCLC, identifying several candidate genes, and briefly analyzed the association of survival and genomic alterations. Our data from a small cohort of relapsed SCLC will benefit further exploration the potential targets or biomarkers.

A cross-sectional analysis of treatment patterns in small-cell lung cancer in five European countries

Aim: To investigate changes in treatment patterns in extensive-stage small-cell lung cancer (ES-SCLC) in France, Germany, Italy, Spain and the UK (EU5) between 2018 and 2021. Methods: Cross-sectional data from an oncology database were analyzed retrospectively. Results: Of 5832 eligible patients, 88.4% had stage IV disease at diagnosis. Among patients receiving first-line treatment, 91.8% (1079 /1176) received the platinum-etoposide (PE) combination in 2018 which decreased to 42.3% (509/1203) by 2021. Usage of the PE-atezolizumab combination increased from 0 to 41.2% during the same timeframe. Topotecan monotherapy remained the most widely used second-line treatment regardless of patients' platinum sensitivity. Conclusion: The first-line standard of care for ES-SCLC has evolved in EU5 with the PE-atezolizumab/durvalumab combination gradually superseding PE usage.

Real-World Outcomes of Trilaciclib Among Patients with Extensive-Stage Small Cell Lung Cancer Receiving Chemotherapy

INTRODUCTION

Trilaciclib was recently approved in the USA for reducing chemotherapy-induced myelosuppression (CIM) among adults with extensive-stage small cell lung cancer (ES-SCLC) when administered prior to chemotherapy. There is limited understanding of real-world outcomes of trilaciclib.

METHODS

A comprehensive literature review was conducted using a keyword search in the MEDLINE, Embase, and conference abstracts. Additional studies were identified through communications with the authors of relevant studies. Published and unpublished real-world studies of trilaciclib- and comparable non-trilaciclib-treated patients with ES-SCLC were included. Evidence on myelosuppressive hematologic adverse events (HAEs), cytopenia-related healthcare utilization, and other reported outcomes (e.g., hospitalizations, dose reduction, and treatment delay) were synthesized. If feasible, outcomes were compared qualitatively between the trilaciclib and historical reference groups, and between first-line trilaciclib initiators and the overall trilaciclib population. Weighted averages were estimated for selected outcomes using sample size as the weight.

RESULTS

The literature search identified five unique studies based on eight records-two included trilaciclib only, two non-trilaciclib only, and one both. In trilaciclib cohorts, the weighted average prevalence of grade ≥ 3 myelosuppressive HAEs in ≥ 1 lineage, ≥ 2 lineages, and all three lineages was 40.5%, 14.5%, and 7.5%, respectively. All rates were numerically lower compared to the historical non-trilaciclib cohorts (58.8%, 28.0%, 13.0% respectively). Cytopenia-related healthcare utilization was also lower in the trilaciclib cohorts. In general, first-line trilaciclib initiators had numerically lower myelosuppressive HAEs and cytopenia-related healthcare utilization than the overall trilaciclib patients.

CONCLUSIONS

The existing evidence suggests that trilaciclib may reduce single and multilineage grade ≥ 3 myelosuppressive HAEs and cytopenia-related healthcare utilization among patients with ES-SCLC in the real world. It is a promising new treatment for CIM prevention in ES-SCLC and may bring greater benefits to first-line trilaciclib initiators. Future studies are recommended to further evaluate the real-world effectiveness of trilaciclib.

SPAG5 Expression Predicts Poor Prognosis and is Associated With Adverse Immune Infiltration in Lung Adenocarcinomas

Background

Sperm-associated antigen 5 (SPAG5) has been identified as a novel driver oncogene involved in multiple cancers; however, its role in lung adenocarcinoma (LUAD) needs further investigation. Our study aims to elucidate the potential significance of SPAG5 in LUAD prognosis and its implications for the efficacy of immunotherapy.

Methods

In this study, we used bioinformatics analysis and tissue microarray (TMA) staining to examine the potential role of SPAG5 in LUAD survival and response to immunotherapy. We used the Oncomine, TIMER2.0, Gene Expression Profiling Interactive Analysis (GEPIA), Sangerbox, PredicScan, and Kaplan-Meier Plotter databases to examine the expression and prognostic role of SPAG5 in the LUAD of The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA), Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO), and other databases. We also used Cancer Single-cell State Atlas (CancerSEA) and Tumor Immune Estimation Resource (TIMER2.0) to analyze the association of SPAG5 with malignant phenotype and tumor immune microenvironment. Furthermore, Immune Cell Abundance Identifier (ImmuCellAI) analysis of TCGA sequencing data was used to predict the role of SPAG5 in determining the response to immune checkpoint blockade (ICB) treatment in LUAD. Co-expression analysis of programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) and SPAG5 was performed using LUAD TMA immunohistochemistry (IHC) analysis.

Results

Our findings indicate that SPAG5 is overexpressed in LUAD and is positively correlated with advanced clinical stage, poor overall survival, relapse-free survival, and progression-free survival outcomes. SPAG5 may be involved in regulating the cell cycle, proliferation, invasion, DNA damage and repair, and tumor immunosuppression. Furthermore, TMA IHC analysis showed a positive correlation between PD-L1 expression in LUAD and SPAG5 which suggests that SPAG5 may serve as a potential predictor of response to ICB therapy in LUAD.

Conclusions

Our results highlight the role of SAPG5 in promoting a tumor malignancy phenotype and immunosuppression in LUAD and suggest that SPAG5 may serve as a potential response marker for ICB therapy.

Lower optimal dose of amrubicin for relapsed small-cell lung cancer: a retrospective study

BACKGROUND

Amrubicin (AMR) is one of the most active agents for small-cell lung cancer (SCLC). However, hematologic toxicity and infection at a commonly used dose (40 mg/m2) is problematic; the optimal dose remains undetermined.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

To evaluate the optimal dose of AMR in terms of efficacy and safety, we reviewed consecutive data on patients with relapsed SCLC who received AMR at doses of 40, 35, and 30 mg/m2 (on days 1-3) at Nippon Medical School Hospital between October 2010 and November 2021.

RESULTS

We reviewed the data of 86 patients (20, 45, 27 who received AMR doses of 40, 35, 30 mg/m2, respectively) according to our study criteria. For patients  ≥ 75 years, the proportion who received second-line treatment tended to be higher in the 30-35 mg/m2 group. Objective response rates were 37/46/35%, median progression-free survival (PFS) were 3.0/4.7/3.2 months, and median overall survival (OS) were 7.8/16.3/8.0 months, respectively. Grade 4 neutropenia occurred in 58/39/31% of patients, which was higher for the 40 mg/m2 group. The incidence of febrile neutropenia did not differ between groups. Multivariate analysis identified the AMR dose was not associated with longer PFS and OS.

CONCLUSION

Treatment with AMR between 30 and 35 mg/m2 showed relatively mild hematologic toxicity compared with AMR at 40 mg/m2, without any significant difference in efficacy. Lower dose of AMR for relapsed SCLC could be a promising treatment option.

Patterns of treatment failure for PD-(L)1 refractory extensive-stage small cell lung cancer in continued PD-(L)1 treatment

BACKGROUND

Although immunotherapy greatly extends overall survival (OS) of patients with extensive-stage small cell lung cancer (ES-SCLC), a number of patients develop immunotherapy resistance (IR). Patterns of failure in ES-SCLC are not clarified. Our study aims to explore the clinical pattern of IR and prognostic factors for these patients.

METHODS

The study was conducted from 117 ES-SCLC patients with immunotherapy between 2018 and 2022. Chi-square tests and Fishers' exact tests was used to explore failure patterns in different populations. Survival analyses of different progression patterns and subsequent treatment regimens were conducted by Kaplan-Meier curves and log-rank test.

RESULTS

86 (73.5%) patients experienced IR. The patients with smoking (never smoker vs. current or ex-smoker, 59.5 % vs. 81.3%, P = 0.010), liver metastasis (extrahepatic metastasis vs. intrahepatic metastasis, 73.6 % vs. 90.9%, P = 0.050), and distant metastasis status (no distant metastasis vs. distant metastasis, 39.1 % vs. 81.9%, P<0.001) were associated with IR rates. Liver progression had a lower incidence in 1st line immunotherapy (1st line vs. ≥2nd lines, 14.0 % vs. 41.7%, P = 0.004) and a higher incidence in multiple progression (multiple progression vs. Oligo-progression, 39.4 % vs. 17.0%, P = 0.021). Cranial (41.7 % vs. 16.1%, P = 0.012) and distant lymph node (16.7 % vs. 3.2%, P = 0.049) progression were the main failure model for acquired IR in comparison to primary IR. Patients with new lesion progression only (17.73 vs. 9.17 months, P = 0.013) and non-hepatic progression (14.23 vs. 11.67 months, P = 0.042) had a longer OS. Patients in cross-line immunotherapy after IR had a favourable prognosis (17.07 vs. 11.93 months, P = 0.007).

CONCLUSION

The most common failure pattern of immunotherapy for ES-SCLC was lung and regional lymph node progression. Brain and liver progression were the most common extra thoracic failure sites for 1st line and 2nd and more lines immunotherapy, respectively. There was a higher probability of primary IR in 2 lines and above immunotherapy. Patients with new only progression site and cross-line rechallenge immunotherapy had a better prognosis.

Indirect treatment comparison of lurbinectedin versus other second-line treatments for small-cell lung cancer

Aim: Compare lurbinectedin versus other second-line (2L) small-cell lung cancer (SCLC) treatments. Methods: An unanchored matching-adjusted indirect comparison connected the platinum-sensitive SCLC cohort of a single-arm lurbinectedin trial to a network of three randomized controlled trials (oral and intravenous [IV] topotecan, and platinum re-challenge) identified by systematic literature review. Network meta-analysis methods estimated relative treatment effects. Results: In platinum-sensitive patients, lurbinectedin demonstrated a survival benefit and favorable safety profile versus oral and IV topotecan and platinum re-challenge (overall survival, hazard ratio [HR]: 0.43; 95% credible interval [CrI]: 0.27, 0.67; HR: 0.43; 95% CrI: 0.26, 0.70; HR: 0.42; 95% CrI: 0.30, 0.58 respectively). Conclusion: Lurbinectedin showed a robust survival benefit and favorable safety versus other SCLC treatments in 2L platinum-sensitive SCLC.

Precise prediction of the sensitivity of platinum chemotherapy in SCLC: Establishing and verifying the feasibility of a CT-based radiomics nomogram

Objectives

To develop and validate a CT-based radiomics nomogram that can provide individualized pretreatment prediction of the response to platinum treatment in small cell lung cancer (SCLC).

Materials

A total of 134 SCLC patients who were treated with platinum as a first-line therapy were eligible for this study, including 51 patients with platinum resistance (PR) and 83 patients with platinum sensitivity (PS). The variance threshold, SelectKBest, and least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) were applied for feature selection and model construction. The selected texture features were calculated to obtain the radiomics score (Rad-score), and the predictive nomogram model was composed of the Rad-score and the clinical features selected by multivariate analysis. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves, calibration curves, and decision curves were used to assess the performance of the nomogram.

Results

The Rad-score was calculated using 10 radiomic features, and the resulting radiomics signature demonstrated good discrimination in both the training set (area under the curve [AUC], 0.727; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.627–0.809) and the validation set (AUC, 0.723; 95% CI, 0.562–0.799). To improve diagnostic effectiveness, the Rad-score created a novel prediction nomogram by combining CA125 and CA72-4. The radiomics nomogram showed good calibration and discrimination in the training set (AUC, 0.900; 95% CI, 0.844-0.947) and the validation set (AUC, 0.838; 95% CI, 0.534-0.735). The radiomics nomogram proved to be clinically beneficial based on decision curve analysis.

Conclusion

We developed and validated a radiomics nomogram model for predicting the response to platinum in SCLC patients. The outcomes of this model can provide useful suggestions for the development of tailored and customized second-line chemotherapy regimens.