1
|
Boinpally R, Shebley M, Trugman J. Ubrogepant: Mechanism of action, clinical and translational science. Clin Transl Sci 2024; 17:e13675. [PMID: 38266060 PMCID: PMC10777434 DOI: 10.1111/cts.13675] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/26/2023] [Revised: 10/02/2023] [Accepted: 10/09/2023] [Indexed: 01/26/2024] Open
Abstract
In recent years, the treatment of migraine has experienced a breakthrough in the development of drugs that target the calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) signaling pathway. Monoclonal antibodies against the receptor or ligand have been developed for the preventive treatment of migraine; whereas, orally administered small molecule CGRP receptor antagonists, called gepants, have been developed for both acute and/or preventive treatment. Both modalities have demonstrated safe and effective treatment of migraine, reducing the number of migraine days for patients as well as reducing symptoms and improving patient function and overall quality of life. Here, we provide an abridged review of ubrogepant, an oral CGRP receptor antagonist, approved for the acute treatment of migraine. We briefly summarize the role of CGRP in migraine pathophysiology, describing the mechanism of action of ubrogepant in the context of this pathway, the clinical pharmacology properties and the clinical development and outcomes, including safety, efficacy, pharmacokinetics, and pharmacodynamics, that supported ubrogepant's approval.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Joel Trugman
- Clinical DevelopmentAbbVieNorth ChicagoIllinoisUSA
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Manack Adams A, Hutchinson S, Engstrom E, Ayasse ND, Serrano D, Davis L, Sommer K, Contreras-De Lama J, Lipton RB. Real-world effectiveness, satisfaction, and optimization of ubrogepant for the acute treatment of migraine in combination with onabotulinumtoxinA: results from the COURAGE Study. J Headache Pain 2023; 24:102. [PMID: 37537578 PMCID: PMC10399003 DOI: 10.1186/s10194-023-01622-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/04/2023] [Accepted: 06/26/2023] [Indexed: 08/05/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Individuals using onabotulinumtoxinA as a preventive migraine treatment often use acute treatments for breakthrough attacks. Data on real-world effectiveness of the small-molecule calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) receptor antagonist ubrogepant in combination with onabotulinumtoxinA are limited. METHODS COURAGE, a prospective, multiple attack, observational study, evaluated the real-world effectiveness of ubrogepant (50 or 100 mg) for acute treatment of migraine in people receiving onabotulinumtoxinA, an anti-CGRP monoclonal antibody (mAb), or both. This analysis focused only on onabotulinumtoxinA users. The Migraine Buddy app was used to identify eligible participants and track response to treated attacks. For each ubrogepant-treated attack, meaningful pain relief (MPR) and return to normal function (RNF) at 2 and 4 h post-dose over 30 days was assessed. MPR was defined as a level of relief that is meaningful to the participant, usually occurring before the pain is all gone. After 30 days, satisfaction was reported on a 7-point scale and overall acute treatment optimization was evaluated using the migraine Treatment Optimization Questionnaire-4 (mTOQ-4). RESULTS This analysis included 122 participants who received ubrogepant and onabotulinumtoxinA and reported on 599 ubrogepant-treated attacks. Following the first ubrogepant-treated attack, MPR was achieved in 53.3% of participants 2 h post-dose and in 76.2% of participants 4 h post-dose. RNF was achieved in 25.4% of participants 2 h post-dose and in 45.9% of participants 4 h post-dose. MPR and RNF results were similar across up to 10 ubrogepant-treated attacks. After 30 days, satisfaction with ubrogepant in combination with onabotulinumtoxinA was reported by 69.8% of participants and acute treatment optimization (defined as mTOQ-4 score ≥ 4) was achieved in 77.6%. CONCLUSIONS In this prospective real-world effectiveness study, ubrogepant treatment in onabotulinumtoxinA users with self-identified migraine was associated with high rates of MPR and RNF at 2 and 4 h as well as satisfaction and acute treatment optimization. Although the lack of a contemporaneous control group limits causal inference, these findings demonstrate the feasibility of using a novel, app-based design to evaluate the real-world effectiveness and satisfaction of treatments.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | | | - Linda Davis
- Kolvita Family Medical Group, Mission Viejo, CA, USA
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
3
|
Pérez-Rodríguez A, Bandrés-Hernández P, Anciones C, Terrón-Cuadrado C, Canuet-Delis L, Gilo-Arrojo F, Anciones B. [Cardiovascular safety of new drugs for the acute and preventive treatment of migraine: gepants and ditans]. Rev Neurol 2023; 76:295-308. [PMID: 37102254 PMCID: PMC10478141 DOI: 10.33588/rn.7609.2022238] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/19/2023] [Indexed: 04/28/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Migraine is a prevalent neurological condition characterised by disabling headache attacks. In recent decades, new drugs have been developed specifically for the acute and preventive treatment of migraine based on its pathophysiology. These include calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) antagonists (CGRP) (gepants) and selective serotoninergic 5-HT1F receptor agonists (ditans). CGRP is a neuropeptide released by trigeminal terminals that acts as a vasodilator, causes neurogenic inflammation and thus generates pain and sensitisation in migraine. It also has a powerful vasodilatory action and is involved in cardiovascular regulation, which is why numerous studies are under way to assess the vascular safety of acting against CGRP. The high selectivity of ditans for the serotoninergic 5-HT1F receptor with a low affinity for other serotoninergic receptors seems to translate into little or no vasoconstrictor effect, which is mediated by the activation of 5-HT1B receptors. DEVELOPMENT The aim of our study is to review the cardiovascular safety demonstrated by these new drugs for the treatment of migraine by analysing the evidence published to date. We conducted a literature search in the PubMed database and a review of clinical trials published at clinicaltrial.gov. We included literature reviews, meta-analyses and clinical trials in English and Spanish. We analysed reported cardiovascular adverse effects. CONCLUSIONS Based on the results published to date, we can conclude that the cardiovascular safety profile of these new treatments is favourable. Longer-term safety studies are needed to confirm these results.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- A Pérez-Rodríguez
- Hospital Nuestra Señora del Rosario, Madrid, España
- Hospital de La Zarzuela, Madrid, España
| | | | - C Anciones
- Hospital Nuestra Señora del Rosario, Madrid, España
- Hospital de La Zarzuela, Madrid, España
| | - C Terrón-Cuadrado
- Hospital Nuestra Señora del Rosario, Madrid, España
- Hospital de La Zarzuela, Madrid, España
| | - L Canuet-Delis
- Hospital Nuestra Señora del Rosario, Madrid, España
- Hospital de La Zarzuela, Madrid, España
| | - F Gilo-Arrojo
- Hospital Nuestra Señora del Rosario, Madrid, España
- Hospital de La Zarzuela, Madrid, España
| | - B Anciones
- Hospital Nuestra Señora del Rosario, Madrid, España
- Hospital de La Zarzuela, Madrid, España
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Argyriou AA, Mantovani E, Mitsikostas DD, Vikelis M, Tamburin S. A systematic review with expert opinion on the role of gepants for the preventive and abortive treatment of migraine. Expert Rev Neurother 2022; 22:469-488. [PMID: 35707907 DOI: 10.1080/14737175.2022.2091435] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/04/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Gepants are small molecules targeting the calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) that have been recently introduced and are under additional clinical development as preventive and abortive treatment options for migraine. AREAS COVERED After providing a narrative overview of current preventive and acute treatment options for migraine and summarizing the pathophysiology of migraine attack and the role of CGRP, we performed a systematic review, according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) recommendations, on trials on gepants in preventive and acute treatment of migraine. Studies and results were reviewed and discussed, and expert opinion was presented. We also collected data on relevant ongoing trials. EXPERT OPINION Whether direct targeting CGRP pathways within the central nervous system or indirectly modulating them from the peripheral nervous system is more effective and safer in migraine remains still unclear. The available data on the efficacy and safety of gepants suggest they may represent an abortive, and to some extent, preventive treatment option for migraine, in patients who do not respond or have adverse effects to first/second line treatments or at high risk for medication overuse headache; thus opening new therapeutic horizons.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Andreas A Argyriou
- Headache Outpatient Clinic, Department of Neurology, 'Agios Andreas' State General Hospital of Patras, Patras, Greece
| | - Elisa Mantovani
- Department of Neurosciences, Biomedicine and Movement Sciences, University of Verona, Verona, Italy
| | - Dimos-Dimitrios Mitsikostas
- 1st Department of Neurology, Aeginition Hospital, Medical School, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece
| | | | - Stefano Tamburin
- Department of Neurosciences, Biomedicine and Movement Sciences, University of Verona, Verona, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Abstract
Migraine is a common and disabling neurological disorder, with several manifestations, of which pain is just one. Despite its worldwide prevalence, there remains a paucity of targeted and effective treatments for the condition, leaving many of those affected underserved by available treatments. Work over the last 30+ years has recently led to the emergence of the first targeted acute and preventive treatments in our practice since the triptan era in the early 1990s, which are changing the landscape of migraine treatment. These include the monoclonal antibodies targeting calcitonin gene-related peptide or its receptor. Evolving work on novel therapeutic targets, as well as continuing to exploit drugs used in other disorders that may also have a therapeutic effect in migraine, is likely to lead to more and more treatments being able to be offered to migraineurs. Future work involves the development of agents that lack vasoconstrictive effects, such as lasmiditan, do not contribute to medication overuse, such as the gepants, and do not interact with other drugs that may be used for the disorder, as well as agents that can act both acutely and preventively, thereby utilising the quantum between acute and preventive drug effects which has been demonstrated with different migraine drugs before. Here we discuss the evolution of oral migraine treatments over the last 5 years, including those that have gained regulatory approval and reached clinical practice, those in development and potential other targets for the future.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nazia Karsan
- Headache Group, School of Neuroscience, Wolfson Centre for Age-Related Diseases, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, London, UK
- NIHR King's Clinical Research Facility and South London and Maudsley Biomedical Research Centre, Wellcome Foundation Building, King's College Hospital, London, SE5 9PJ, UK
| | - Peter J Goadsby
- Headache Group, School of Neuroscience, Wolfson Centre for Age-Related Diseases, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, London, UK.
- NIHR King's Clinical Research Facility and South London and Maudsley Biomedical Research Centre, Wellcome Foundation Building, King's College Hospital, London, SE5 9PJ, UK.
- Department of Neurology, University of California, Los Angeles, USA.
| |
Collapse
|