Real-Life Effectiveness of Apremilast for the Treatment of Psoriasis in Belgium: Results From the Observational OTELO Study

Improved Quality of Life in Patients with Psoriasis Receiving Apremilast: Real-World Data from the Netherlands

INTRODUCTION

Psoriasis is a chronic inflammatory condition that can significantly impact the quality of life (QoL), regardless of the level of skin involvement. Apremilast is indicated for the treatment of moderate to severe psoriasis. Real-world data regarding the impact of apremilast on patient-reported outcomes in clinical practice in the Netherlands is lacking.

METHODS

The prospective, multicenter observational Apremilast in Real-Life Psoriasis Treatment (APRIL) study enrolled patients ≥ 18 years old with moderate to severe plaque psoriasis receiving apremilast in clinical practice in the Netherlands. Patients were followed-up for 12 months, with assessments scheduled at 6 and 12 months. The primary outcome was Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI) response (score ≤ 5 or ≥ 5-point improvement from baseline) at 6 months. Secondary patient-reported outcomes included EQ-5D and skin-specific parameters; exploratory outcomes were Patient Benefit Index (PBI) and Work Productivity and Activity Impairment (WPAI).

RESULTS

Of the 155 patients enrolled (February 2016-June 2019), 153 received apremilast; 69 (45%) and 39 (26%) continued treatment at 6 and 12 months, respectively. Psoriasis in special areas was common (scalp, 65%; nail, 51%; palmoplantar, 27%). Most patients (92%) had received prior systemic antipsoriatic therapies. Of the 151 patients with a baseline DLQI value, 56 (37%) achieved DLQI response at 6 months. Mean (standard deviation) PBI scores were 3.5 (1.2) and 3.8 (1.1) at 6 and 12 months, respectively. Improvements in DLQI, EQ-5D, and WPAI scores and disease signs and symptoms, including itch and special areas, were observed at 6 and 12 months. Adverse events were consistent with the known safety profile.

CONCLUSIONS

In the Netherlands, patients with moderate to severe psoriasis receiving apremilast for up to 12 months reported improved disease-related QoL, skin involvement, and patient-reported outcomes. These data add to the growing body of evidence demonstrating apremilast is an effective treatment for psoriasis, itch, and special areas (scalp and palms).

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02652494.

Real-World Apremilast Use for Treatment of Plaque Psoriasis in Italy: Patient Perspective, Characteristics, and Clinical Outcomes from the DARWIN Study

INTRODUCTION

While several European studies have reported real-world apremilast use, patient-perceived benefits, and treatment satisfaction, local reimbursement criteria for apremilast vary and data from Italy are limited.

METHODS

The cross-sectional DARWIN study enrolled consecutive patients who had initiated apremilast for plaque psoriasis 6 (± 1) months prior to enrolment at a single visit across 24 Italian dermatological sites. Disease severity was assessed using body surface area (BSA) and Physician Global Assessment (PGA). Patient-reported outcomes assessed 6 (± 1) months after apremilast initiation were Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI), Patient Benefit Index (PBI), and 9-item Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire for Medication (TSQM-9).

RESULTS

Of 184 patients enrolled between July 2019 and January 2021, 180 were included in the analysis. At apremilast initiation, median (25th-75th percentile) time since psoriasis diagnosis was 8.6 (3.2-22.2) years; median BSA, 10.0% (5.0-16.0); mean (standard seviation, SD) DLQI total score, 13.5 (8.0). Over half (54.9%) of patients with available data reported psoriasis had a very or extremely large effect on their quality of life (QoL); half reported itching (50.6%) and/or special areas involvement (50.0%). Most (73.9%) had comorbidities and were biologic-naïve (81.5%). The most common reasons for initiating apremilast were lack of efficacy of previous treatment (56.7%) and contraindications to other treatments (44.4%). At 6 (± 1) months, most patients were continuing apremilast and/or reported a Global PBI score ≥ 1 (minimum clinical benefit) (86.1% and 90.0%, respectively); approximately half achieved BSA ≤ 3% and/or DLQI total score ≤ 5 (47.1% and 48.5%); 18.8% achieved PGA = 0; mean (SD) TSQM-9 global treatment satisfaction score was 59.0 (24.8). Apremilast was well tolerated; no new safety signals were identified.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients treated with apremilast for 6 months in Italian clinical practice reported improved QoL, clinically relevant improvements in symptoms, high treatment satisfaction, and high treatment persistence. Our data indicate apremilast is a valuable treatment option for moderate plaque psoriasis.

STUDY REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov identifier, NCT04031027.

The Needs of Patients with Psoriasis and Benefits of Apremilast in French Clinical Practice: Results from the Observational REALIZE Study

INTRODUCTION

Real-world data on the needs of patients with psoriasis and patient-perceived benefits of apremilast are limited. We report such data from France.

METHODS

The multicenter, observational REALIZE study was conducted in real-life clinical practice in France and enrolled patients with moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis who had initiated apremilast per French reimbursement criteria in the 4 weeks preceding enrollment (September 2018-June 2020). Physician assessments and patient-reported outcomes (PROs) were collected at enrollment, 6 months, and 12 months. PROs included the Patient Benefit Index for skin diseases (PBI-S), Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI), and 9-item Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire for Medication (TSQM-9). The primary outcome was PBI-S ≥ 1 (minimum clinically relevant benefit) at month 6.

RESULTS

Of 379 enrolled patients who received ≥ 1 dose of apremilast, most [n = 270 (71.2%)] remained on apremilast at 6 months and over half [n = 200 (52.8%)] persisted at 12 months. Patients reported the following treatment goals as most important (≥ 70% reported goal as "very important" in the Patient Needs Questionnaire): get better skin quickly, regain disease control, be healed of skin alterations, and have confidence in the therapy. Most patients persisting on apremilast achieved a PBI-S ≥ 1 at months 6 and 12 (91.6% and 93.8%, respectively). Mean (SD) DLQI decreased from 11.75 (6.69) at enrollment to 5.17 (5.35) and 4.18 (4.39) at months 6 and 12, respectively. Most patients (72.3%) reported moderate-to-severe pruritus at enrollment and no/mild pruritus at months 6 and 12 (78.8% and 85.9%, respectively). Mean (SD) TSQM-9 Global Satisfaction scores were 68.4 (23.3) and 71.7 (21.5) at months 6 and 12, respectively. Apremilast was well tolerated; no new safety signals were identified.

CONCLUSIONS

REALIZE provides insights regarding the needs of patients with psoriasis and the patient-perceived benefits of apremilast. Patients who persisted on apremilast reported improvements in quality of life, high treatment satisfaction, and clinically relevant benefits.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

NCT03757013.

Apremilast Use in Severe Psoriasis: Real-World Data from Central and Eastern Europe

INTRODUCTION

The broad and sustained efficacy of apremilast for psoriasis has been demonstrated in randomized and real-world observational studies. Data from Central and Eastern Europe (CEE) are lacking. Moreover, apremilast use in this region is limited by country-specific reimbursement criteria. This is the first study to report data on the real-world use of apremilast in the region.

METHODS

APPRECIATE (NCT02740218) was an observational, retrospective, cross-sectional study assessing psoriasis patients 6 (± 1) months after apremilast treatment initiation. The study aimed to describe the characteristics of patients with psoriasis receiving apremilast, estimate treatment outcomes, including Psoriasis Area Severity Index (PASI), Body Surface Area (BSA), and Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI), and assess dermatologists' and patients' perspectives on treatment using questionnaires including the Patient Benefit Index (PBI). Adverse event reports were taken from the medical records.

RESULTS

Fifty patients (Croatia: 25; Czech Republic: 20; Slovenia: 5) were enrolled. In patients continuing apremilast at 6 (± 1) months, mean (± SD) PASI score was reduced from 16.2 ± 8.7 points at treatment initiation to 3.1 ± 5.2 at 6 (± 1) months; BSA from 11.9% ± 10.3% to 0.8% ± 0.9%; DLQI from 13.7 ± 7.4 points to 1.6 ± 3.2. PASI 75 was reached by 81% of patients. Physicians reported that the overall treatment success fulfilled their expectations in more than two thirds of patients (68%). At least three-quarters of patients reported apremilast had a quite or very high benefit on the needs they identified as being most important. Apremilast was well tolerated; no serious or fatal adverse events were identified.

CONCLUSION

Apremilast was effective in reducing skin involvement and improving quality of life in CEE patients having severe disease. Treatment satisfaction among physicians and patients was very high. These data add to the growing body of evidence showing consistent effectiveness of apremilast across the continuum of psoriasis disease severity and manifestations.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov identifier, NCT02740218.

Characteristics and outcomes of patients with psoriasis treated with apremilast in the real-world in Austria - results the APPRECIATE study

Background

Apremilast, an oral phosphodiesterase 4 inhibitor, is approved in the European Union for the treatment of moderate-to-severe chronic plaque psoriasis in adult patients refractory or contraindicated to or intolerant of other systemic therapies.

Objectives

The APPRECIATE study assessed apremilast use in real-world practice and its clinical value to physicians and patients. APPRECIATE was a multinational, observational, retrospective, cross-sectional study.

Methods

Apremilast effectiveness at 6 (±1) months was assessed on the basis of psoriasis severity and health-related quality-of-life scores and treatment satisfaction using physician/patient-reported outcomes, respectively. We report the Austrian cohort of 72 patients.

Results

At 6 (±1) months, three-quarters of patients remained on apremilast, while physicians and patients reported treatment benefits across all psoriasis symptoms and manifestations. Of patients, the majority were satisfied with their treatment and achieved treatment goals considered most relevant. Patients' and physicians' perceptions of treatment effectiveness were aligned, and health-related quality-of-life scores indicated an improvement in the majority of patients. Apremilast tolerability was consistent with the known safety profile.

Conclusions

Among psoriasis patients receiving apremilast in Austria, improvement in clinical outcomes were observed and satisfaction with apremilast treatment among patients and physicians was high.

Registration

ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02740218.