Genotype-Guided Prescription of Azathioprine Reduces the Incidence of Adverse Drug Reactions in TPMT Intermediate Metabolizers to a Similar Incidence as Normal Metabolizers

Implementation and Evaluation Strategies for Pharmacogenetic Testing in Hospital Settings: A Scoping Review

BACKGROUND

Pharmacogenetic testing in clinical settings has improved the safety and efficacy of drug treatment. There is a growing number of studies evaluating pharmacogenetic implementation and identifying barriers and facilitators. However, no review has focused on bridging the gap between identifying barriers and facilitators of testing and the clinical strategies adopted in response. This review was conducted to understand the implementation and evaluation strategies of pharmacogenetic testing programs.

METHODS

A PRISMA-compliant scoping review was conducted. The included studies discussed pharmacogenetic testing programs implemented in a hospital setting. Quantitative, qualitative, and mixed design methods were included.

RESULTS

A total of 232 of the 7043 articles that described clinical pharmacogenetic programs were included. The most common specialties that described pharmacogenetic implementation were psychiatry (26%) and oncology (16%), although many studies described institutional programs implemented across multiple specialties (19%). Different specialties reported different clinical outcomes, but all reported similar program performance indicators, such as test uptake and the number of times the test recommendations were followed. There were benefits and drawbacks to delivering test results through research personnel, pharmacists, and electronic alerts, but active engagement of physicians was necessary for the incorporation of pharmacogenetic results into clinical decision making.

CONCLUSIONS

Further research is required on the maintenance and sustainability of pharmacogenetic testing initiatives. These findings provide an overview of the implementation and evaluation strategies of different specialties that can be used to improve pharmacogenetic testing.

Exploring the impact of pharmacogenetics on personalized medicine: A systematic review

INTRODUCTION

Pharmacogenetics evaluates how genetic variations influence drug responses. Nowadays, genetic tests have advanced, becoming more affordable, and its integration is supported by stronger clinical evidence. Guidelines such as those from CPIC (Clinical Pharmacogenetics Implementation Consortium) and resources like PharmGKB facilitate genotype-based prescribing; and organizations like the FDA promote genetic testing before initiating certain medications. Preventive pharmacogenetic panels seem promising, but further research on biomarkers and diverse populations is needed. The aim of this review is to analyze recent evidence on the genotype-drug response relationship to examine how the genetic profile of patients influences the clinical response to treatments, and analyze the areas of research that need further study to advance towards a genetic-based precision medicine.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A systematic search was conducted on PubMed to identify articles investigating the genotype-drug response relationship. The search strategy included terms such as "pharmacogenetics", "personalized treatment", "precision medicine", "dose adjustment", "individualizing dosing", "clinical routine", and "clinical practice." Clinical trials, observational studies, and meta-analyses published in English or Spanish between 2013 and 2023 were included. The initial search resulted in a total of 136 articles for analysis.

RESULTS

49 articles were included for the final analysis following review by 2 investigators. A relationship between genetic polymorphisms and drug response or toxicity was found for drugs such as opioids, GLP-1 agonists, tacrolimus, oral anticoagulants, antineoplastics, atypical antipsychotics, efavirenz, clopidogrel, lamotrigine, anti-TNFα agents, voriconazole, antidepressants, or statins. However, for drugs like metformin, quetiapine, irinotecan, bisoprolol, and anti-VEGF agents, no statistically significant association between genotype and response was found.

CONCLUSION

The studies analyzed in this review suggest a strong correlation between genetic variability and individual drug responses, supporting the use of pharmacogenetics for treatment optimization. However, for certain drugs like metformin or quetiapine, the influence of genotype on their response remains unclear. More studies with larger sample sizes, greater ethnic diversity, and consideration of non-genetic factors are needed. The lack of standardization in analysis methods and accessibility to genetic testing are significant challenges in this field. As a conclusion, pharmacogenetics shows immense potential in personalized medicine, but further research is required.

Developments in pharmacogenetics, pharmacogenomics, and personalized medicine

The development of Pharmacogenetics and Pharmacogenomics in Western Europe is highly relevant in the worldwide scenario. Despite the usually low institutional support, many research groups, composed of basic and clinical researchers, have been actively working for decades in this field. Their contributions made an international impact and paved the way for further studies and pharmacogenomics implementation in clinical practice. In this manuscript, that makes part of the Special Issue entitled Spanish Pharmacology, we present an analysis of the state of the art of Pharmacogenetics and Pharmacogenomics research in Europe, we compare it with the developments in Spain, and we summarize the most salient contributions since 1988 to the present, as well as recent developments in the clinical application of pharmacogenomics knowledge. Finally, we present some considerations on how we could improve translation to clinical practice in this specific scenario.

Pharmacogenomic testing for CYP2C19 and CYP2D6 in cyclic vomiting syndrome

BACKGROUND

Amitriptyline (AT) is recommended as first-line prophylactic therapy in patients with cyclic vomiting syndrome (CVS). However, significant side effects limit its use and dosing is based on trial and error. Though the Clinical Pharmacogenetic Implementation Consortium (CPIC) Guidelines recommend dosing for AT based on CY2D6 and CYP2C19 genotype profile, this is not followed in clinical practice.

METHODS

This pilot study determined CYP2C19 and CYP2D6 genotypes and ascertained its association with adverse drug reactions (ADRs), clinical response, and serum concentration of AT and nortriptyline in a well-characterized cohort of adults with CVS.

KEY RESULTS

Of 46 subjects with CVS, age 33 ± 12 years, 61% female, 85% Caucasian, a third (33%) had normal CYP2C19 metabolizer status, while 4% were poor, and 43% were ultrarapid metabolizers. Most (61%) had normal CYP2D6 genotype while 9% were poor and 2% were ultra-rapid metabolizers. There was no statistically significant association between genotype and ADRs, clinical response or serum drug concentration. There was a trend towards significance between genotype and clinical response, with 64% of responders having normal CYP2D6 metabolism versus 36% of nonresponders (p = 0.06). ADRs were encountered in 46% of patients with 28% discontinuing the medication as a result.

CONCLUSIONS AND INFERENCES

A subset of patients with CVS have dysfunctional alleles of CYP2C19 and CYP2D6. Larger prospective studies to evaluate the clinical impact of pharmacogenomic testing in CVS are needed. This has the potential to optimize clinical management, predict ADRs and allow for personalized therapy.

Azathioprine dose tailoring based on pharmacogenetic information: Insights of clinical implementation

Azathioprine is commonly used as an immunosuppressive antimetabolite in the treatment of acute lymphoblastic leukemia, autoimmune disorders (such as Crohn's disease and rheumatoid arthritis), and in patients receiving organ transplants. Thiopurine-S-methyltransferase (TPMT) is a cytoplasmic trans-methylase catalyzing the S-methylation of thiopurines. The active metabolites obtained from thiopurines are hydrolyzed into inactive forms by the Nudix hydrolase 15 (NUDT15). The TPMT*2 (defined by rs1800462), *3A (defined by rs1800460 and rs1142345), *3B (defined by rs1800460), *3C (defined by rs1142345), *6 (defined by rs75543815), and NUDT15 rs116855232 genetic variant have been associated, with the highest level of evidence, with the response to azathioprine, and, the approved drug label for azathioprine and main pharmacogenetic dosing guidelines recommend starting with reduced initial doses in TPMT intermediate metabolizer (IM) patients and considering an alternative treatment in TPMT poor metabolizer (PM) patients. This study aims to assess the clinical impact of azathioprine dose tailoring based on TPMT genotyping studying the azathioprine toxicity and efficacy, treatment starts, and dose adjustments during follow-up, comparing TPMT IM/PM and normal metabolizer (NM) patients. It also studied the association of NUDT15 rs116855232 with response to azathioprine in patients receiving a tailored treatment based on TPMT and characterized the TMPT and NUDT15 studied variants in our population. Results show that azathioprine dose reduction in TPMT IM patients (TPMT*1/*2, *1/*3A, or *1/*3C genotypes) is related to lower toxicity events compared to TPMT NM (TPMT *1/*1 genotype), and lower azathioprine dose adjustments during follow-up without showing differences in the efficacy. The results support the hypothesis of existing other genetic variants affecting azathioprine toxicity.

Preemptive TPMT Genotyping and Adherence to Genotype-Based Therapeutic Recommendations Reduces the Healthcare Cost in Patients Receiving Azathioprine or 6-Mercaptopurine for Autoimmune Diseases

A cost analysis of thiopurine treatment was carried out in 257 patients, with 153 preemptively genotyped for TPMT and 104 retrospectively genotyped in a Spanish setting. The healthcare cost was significantly higher in patients retrospectively genotyped compared to those who were preemptively genotyped (p < 0.001). TPMT intermediate metabolizers (IMs) (n = 23) showed a 3.3-fold higher healthcare cost when compared to normal metabolizers (NMs) (p < 0.001). The healthcare cost in patients with a TPMT IM phenotype whose physician adhered to the genotype-informed recommendation was similar than the cost in TPMT NMs and was significantly lower than IMs whose physician did not adhere to the therapeutic recommendation (3.8-fold, p = 0.016). Myelotoxicity occurrence was significantly lower in patients preemptively vs. retrospectively genotyped (2.0% and 21.2%, respectively, p < 0.001). Patients who developed myelotoxicity showed a significantly higher healthcare cost than those who did not (4.10-fold, p < 0.001). Overall, 87% of patients whose dose was not adjusted despite being TPMT IMs suffered myelotoxicity, while only one of the eight patients (13%) whose dose was adjusted suffered myelotoxicity (p < 0.001). In conclusion, TPMT preemptive genotyping and physician adherence to genotype-informed therapeutic recommendations prevents myelotoxicity and significantly reduces the healthcare cost, and it is therefore essential for the sustainability of the Spanish healthcare system.

TPMT gene polymorphisms (c.238G>C, c.460G>A and c.719A>G) in a healthy Venezuelan population

Background: The presence of polymorphisms in the TPMT gene is associated with adverse effects in patients treated with standard doses of thiopurine drugs. Scientific evidence recognizes significant ethnic differences in their frequencies and how their early identification can prevent clinical complications. Methods: 150 healthy residents of Aragua, Venezuela were enrolled. The SNPs c.460G>A and c.719A>G were detected by PCR-restriction fragment length polymorphism assay and c.238G>C by allele-specific PCR. Results: All genotype polymorphisms were heterozygous. TPMT*1/*3A, TPMT*1/*3C and TPMT*1/*2 genotypes were found in 4.0, 2.0 and 0.7%, respectively. Conclusion: 6.7% of individuals have an intermediate TPMT activity. These findings support the importance of prior genotyping of TPMT in Venezuelan patients who require thiopurine drug therapy.

Association of genetic polymorphism of NUDT15, TPMT and ITPA gene in the toxicity and efficacy of azathioprine-based regimen in Egyptian inflammatory bowel disease patients

Background

Inflammatory Bowel disease (IBD) is a chronic progressive condition that prompts generous physical and mental morbidity. Choosing the best kind of management and medication dosage prevents new episodes of high disease activity during therapy because of adverse drug reactions (ADRs). This can lead to cessation or inefficacy of the treatment, or complete non-responsiveness to specific medications. Pharmacogenetics (PGx) is a well-established aspect in IBD. One of the exemplary instances of PGx is thiopurines, which are frequently utilized as IBD therapy. This study aimed to evaluate specific gene polymorphism involved in the toxicity and efficacy of Azathioprine (AZA) use in the management in Egyptian patients and to find the correlation between the polymorphism of Nudix Hydrolase15 (NUDT15) gene (rs116855232), The Thiopurine methyltransferase (TPMT) gene (rs1800460) and Inosine Triphosphatase (ITPA) gene (rs1127354) which are involved in the metabolism of the medications utilized in IBD management.

Methods

This prospective study was performed in 150 patients with IBD. All patients were treated with 2 mg/kg per day AZA (Imuran, GlaxoSmithKline®) for at least 3 months at therapeutic doses to induce remission. Subsequent treatment of AZA. The minimum follow-up period for those who did not experience ADR was one year. Among the studied patients, one hundred twenty-nine patients were treated with combination regimen of steroids (oral prednisone 1 mg/kg/day).

Also, treatment failure was considered among the patients who could not tolerate AZA side effects, or there was no improvement after dose modification.

Results

The most identifiable adverse effect among the studied population was anemia followed by leukopenia and myelosuppression. SNPs genotype TPMT (rs1800460) and ITPA gene (rs1127354) were significantly related to adverse effects among IBD patients receiving Azathioprine treatment. There was a lack of any variants in the NUDT15 genotype among the Egyptian population.

Conclusion

Further research is required in to clarify the relationship between NUDT15 PGx and AZA-ADRs. The effect of NUDT15 PGx on toxicity and ADRs as yet necessitates to be elucidated. Studies with a larger sample size and involving different ethnicities are also necessary.

Individualized medication based on pharmacogenomics and treatment progress in children with IgAV nephritis

Immunoglobulin A vasculitis (IgAV) nephritis, also known as Henoch-Schönlein purpura nephritis (HSPN), is a condition in which small blood vessel inflammation and perivascular IgA deposition in the kidney caused by neutrophil activation, which more often leads to chronic kidney disease and accounts for 1%–2% of children with end-stage renal disease (ESRD). The treatment principles recommended by the current management guidelines include general drug treatment, support measures and prevention of sequelae, among which the therapeutic drugs include corticosteroids, immunosuppressive agents and angiotensin system inhibitors. However, the concentration range of immunosuppressive therapy is narrow and the individualized difference is large, and the use of corticosteroids does not seem to improve the persistent nephropathy and prognosis of children with IgAV. Therefore, individualized maintenance treatment of the disease and stable renal prognosis are still difficult problems. Genetic information helps to predict drug response in advance. It has been proved that most gene polymorphisms of cytochrome oxidase P450 and drug transporter can affect drug efficacy and adverse reactions (ADR). Drug therapy based on genetics and pharmacogenomics is beneficial to providing safer and more effective treatment for children. Based on the pathogenesis of IgAV, this paper summarizes the current therapeutic drugs, explores potential therapeutic drugs, and focuses on the therapeutic significance of corticosteroids and immunosuppressants in children with IgAV nephritis at the level of pharmacogenomics. In addition, the individualized application of corticosteroids and immunosuppressants in children with different genotypes was analyzed, in order to provide a more comprehensive reference for the individualized treatment of IgAV nephritis in children.