Re-response to tolvaptan after furosemide dose reduction in a patient with refractory ascites

Cisterna chyli as an optimal marker of tolvaptan response in severe cirrhotic ascites

For patients with cirrhosis, no definitive predictor of the efficacy and prognosis of tolvaptan treatment exists. We assessed the cisterna chyli's utility as an optimal marker. We retrospectively enrolled 172 patients with cirrhosis. The effect of tolvaptan was evaluated using post-treatment survival time. The overall response to tolvaptan was 52.3%. The median cisterna chyli diameter was 4.1 mm. Of 172 patients, 100 were included in the pilot set and 72 in the validation set. According to the Youden index, the cisterna chyli diameter's cutoff value was 4 mm, with a sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, positive likelihood ratio, and negative likelihood ratio of 92%, 83%, 86%, 91%, 5.43, and 0.09, respectively, in the pilot set. The area under the curve of the cisterna chyli diameter for evaluating tolvaptan's effect was 0.911 and 0.988 in the pilot and validation sets, respectively. During multivariate analysis, cisterna chyli narrowing and furosemide treatment were significant predictive factors for tolvaptan's insufficient effect. Cumulative liver transplantation-free survival rates were significantly higher in patients with cisterna chyli dilatation than in those without (p = 0.028). Our findings suggest a strong association of cisterna chyli with tolvaptan treatment response in patients with cirrhosis and hepatic edema.

Predictors of tolvaptan short-term response in patients with refractory ascites: A meta-analysis

BACKGROUND AND AIM

Tolvaptan represents an oral V₂ -receptor antagonist, which has been suggested as a promising add-on diuretic treatment for refractory ascites. The present meta-analysis aims to accumulate current evidence and identify which clinical and laboratory factors are linked to short-term response to tolvaptan therapy.

METHODS

Medline, Scopus, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Clinicaltrials.gov, and Google Scholar databases were searched from inception. All observational studies reporting the correlation of patients' characteristics with tolvaptan response were selected.

RESULTS

Tolvaptan response was associated with significantly higher baseline body weight (mean difference: 4.59 kg, 95% confidence interval [CI]: [3.58, 5.61]), presence of hepatitis C (odds ratio: 1.59 95% CI: [1.18, 2.14]), lower blood urea nitrogen (BUN) (mean difference: -6.88 mg/dL, 95% CI: [-8.13, -5.63]), lower serum creatinine (mean difference: -0.17 mg/dL, 95% CI: [-0.30, -0.05]), lower C-reactive protein (mean difference: -1.43 mg/dL, 95% CI: [-2.52, -0.35]), and higher sodium levels (mean difference: 1.00 mEq/L, 95% CI: [0.45, 1.55]). The outcomes of bodyweight, hepatitis C, BUN, and C-reactive protein remain significant independently of response definition and risk of bias.

CONCLUSIONS

The present findings suggest bodyweight, BUN, C-reactive protein, and hepatitis C as potential predictive factors of tolvaptan short-term response in patients with refractory ascites. Future studies are needed to introduce cut-off values and construct an optimal combined screening model.

Analysis of tolvaptan non-responders and outcomes of tolvaptan treatment of ascites

BACKGROUND AND AIM

The goals of the study were to identify an effective treatment for ascites and to examine the influence of tolvaptan on outcomes by investigating non-responders to tolvaptan and comparing outcomes of hepatic cirrhosis in patients treated with and without tolvaptan.

METHODS

In Study 1, of 145 patients with hepatic cirrhosis who were treated with tolvaptan between September 2013 and March 2018, 45 who did not achieve weight loss of ≥1.5 kg within one week were investigated. In Study 2, 83 patients who received tolvaptan for ascites between September 2013 and March 2017 were compared with 131 patients who were treated for ascites without use of tolvaptan between January 2006 and January 2012.

RESULTS

In Study 1, the 45 patients were divided into three groups based on changes in dosing of diuretics. Renal function was retained in the dose reduction group compared with that in the other groups, and the rate of discharge with remission and the outcomes were also favorable in patients with dose reduction. In Study 2, survival was significantly more favorable in patients treated with tolvaptan.

CONCLUSIONS

Dose reduction of diuretics may be effective for patients with reduced renal function for whom tolvaptan is ineffective or the effect is insufficient and may also improve outcomes of patients with hepatic cirrhosis by preventing a decline in renal function caused by an increased dose of diuretics.

Response to tolvaptan and its effect on prognosis in cirrhotic patients with ascites

AIM

The vasopressin V2 receptor antagonist tolvaptan has been used for the treatment of cirrhotic patients with ascites; however, no predictor of efficacy and prognosis has been developed. We evaluated candidate predictors of response to tolvaptan treatment.

METHODS

This was a single-center retrospective study. Overall, 97 Japanese cirrhotic patients (60 men, median age 63 years), who were hospitalized for ascites treatment including oral tolvaptan coupled with conventional diuretics, were enrolled. The efficacy of tolvaptan was defined as a urination increase of ≥500 mL or a urine volume ≥2000 mL/day on the day following treatment. The prognosis of tolvaptan treatment was evaluated by the post-treatment survival time by Kaplan-Meier analysis.

RESULTS

Tolvaptan therapy was effective in 67% of cirrhotic patients. Patients showed -1.5 (-17.2 to +6.2) kg change in body weight and 40% achieved ≥2.0 kg reduction in body weight after 1 week of treatment. Platelet counts, urine sodium (Na) level, and urine Na/potassium (Na/K) ratio were higher, and the blood urea nitrogen (BUN)/creatinine (Cr) ratio was lower, in cases showing a response to tolvaptan. The combination of a BUN/Cr ratio ≥17.5 and urine Na/K ratio <3.09 was predictive of being non-responsive to tolvaptan, and the response rate in these patients was only 39% (P < 0.01). The mean post-treatment survival duration was significantly longer in patients who responded to tolvaptan therapy.

CONCLUSIONS

Urinary BUN and Na excretion were predictive of a response to tolvaptan, and tolvaptan treatment may improve the prognosis of cirrhotic patients.