After you Roux, what do you do? A systematic review of most successful advanced assisted ERCP techniques in patients with various altered upper gastrointestinal surgical anatomical reconstructions with particular focus on RYGB (last 10 years)

Laparoscopic-Assisted Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) Versus Endoscopic Ultrasound-Directed Transgastric ERCP in Patients With Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) is a therapeutic procedure for skilled endoscopists that can be even more challenging in some situations, including patients' post-Roux-en-y Gastric Bypass (RYGB) surgery. There is still no consensus on whether laparoscopic-assisted ERCP (LA-ERCP) or endoscopic ultrasound (EUS)-directed transgastric ERCP (EDGE) is the most appropriate, safe, and feasible approach in patients with this type of post-surgical anatomy. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to examine both approaches' feasibility, efficacy, and safety in this situation. We searched for electronic databases (MEDLINE, EMBASE, Lilacs, Google Scholar, and Central Cochrane) to identify studies comparing LA-ERCP versus EDGE. Outcomes measured included technical success, adverse events (AEs) and serious AEs, length of stay (LOS), and procedural time. Descriptive data related to the EDGE procedure was also extracted. The risk of bias and the quality of evidence of the enrolled studies were assessed. Five studies, totalizing 268 patients (176 LA-ERCP and 92 EDGE), were included. There was no statistical difference in technical success and AEs between groups; however, the LOS and procedural times were shorter for the EDGE group. High rates of fistula closure and no weight regain were observed in EDGE. Both methods are feasible and safe techniques to perform ERCP in patients with RYGB anatomy, with comparable technical success and adverse events rate. However, EDGE is associated with shorter LOS and procedural time.

EUS-guided Anastomosis Complication in a Patient with Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass: Dehiscence of the Surgical Anastomosis During Endoscopic Mucosal Resection Across EUS-guided Jejunum-gastric Anastomosis with Lumen Apposing Metal Stent

INTRODUCTION

Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) is one of the most common surgical procedures for the management of morbid obesity. However, RYGB poses technical difficulties in exploring the gastric remnant and in performing endoscopic biliary interventions due to altered anatomy. Recently, EUS guided gastro-gastric anastomosis to access the excluded stomach has been introduced in order to allow direct trans-gastric interventions.

METHOD AND MATERIAL

We report the case of a 38-year-old female referred to our unit to undergo EUS direct trans-gastric intervention (EDGI) for the management of a small stone in the biliary tract. Pre-procedural CT scan highlighted an abnormal distension of the gastric remnant. EUS guided jejuno-gastric anastomosis was carried out with the deployment of a 15 x 10 mm lumen apposing metal stent (LAMS).

RESULTS

After 3 days, an upper GI endoscopy was performed, highlighting a mobile 25 mm polyp near the pylorus. Therefore endoscopic resection was planned before the performance of the ERCP. Piecemeal endoscopic mucosectomy was carried out with no evidence of any adverse event. However, endoscopic evaluation after specimen retrieval detected an almost complete dehiscence of the anastomosis. Emergency surgery was decided with restoration of the continuity of the gastric cavity to allow future endoscopic examinations/procedures.

DISCUSSION

Here, we report the first case of dehiscence of the surgical gastro-jejunal anastomosis during EDGI procedure. Performing an ERCP during EDGI is probably safer than performing gastric interventions. When performing EDGI, it is paramount to carefully evaluate the type of planned gastric procedure and to adopt a tailored approach according the several variables involved.