A case of hepatocellular carcinoma with "pseudoprogression" followed by complete response to atezolizumab plus bevacizumab

Multiple pseudoprogressions during ongoing immunotherapy-based treatment of advanced gastric neuroendocrine carcinoma: A case report and review of literature

BACKGROUND

Gastric neuroendocrine carcinomas (NECs) exhibit aggressive features, such as rapid growth, higher rate of metastasis, and a generally unfavorable prognosis compared to gastric adenocarcinoma. As a result, therapeutic options for NECs remain limited, contributing to the poor prognosis of patients. Immunotherapy has emerged as a promising treatment strategy and demonstrated the potential to partially improve the survival and prognosis of patients with NECs. Nevertheless, the unique clinical response termed pseudoprogression (PsP) has garnered considerable attention in the context of immunotherapy.

CASE SUMMARY

Presented here is a case of NEC recurrence five and a half months after radical gastric surgery. The 45-year-old male patient underwent combination treatment involving a PD-1 blocker and tyrosine kinase inhibitors and encountered two instances of PsP during treatment. The patient ultimately achieved a durable treatment response without altering his treatment regimens, resulting in a substantial therapeutic benefit.

CONCLUSION

This case report aimed to provide the authors' experience with the diagnosis of PsP and treatment strategies for PsP in ongoing immunotherapy.

Comparing health insurance-reimbursed lenvatinib and self-paid atezolizumab plus bevacizumab in patients with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma

Atezolizumab plus bevacizumab (Ate/Bev) and lenvatinib (Len) are first-line therapies for unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (uHCC). However, Ate/Bev's high cost limits its common use in real-life practice, while Len is usually covered by national health insurance (NHI). We conducted this study to compare their effectiveness and safety in real-world settings. We retrospectively evaluated 346 uHCC patients treated with first-line Ate/Bev (n=80) or Len (n=266) from December 2019 to December 2022, using 1:2 ratio propensity score matching (PSM) analyses. Compared to the Len group, the Ate/Bev group exhibited higher incidences of Child-Pugh class B (14.1% vs. 5.7%, P=0.014), larger main tumors (58.8% vs. 40.2%, P=0.003), and more main portal vein invasion (25% vs. 12.8%, P=0.008). Treatment-related adverse events were notably lower in the Ate/Bev group (56.3% vs. 72.3%, P=0.007). After PSM, no significant differences were observed in the objective response rate (21.9% vs. 21.6%, P=0.983), progression-free survival (5.1 vs. 6 months, P=0.783), and overall survival (13.3 vs. 14.1 months, P=0.945) between the Ate/Bev (n=73) and Len (n=142) groups. Patients in the Ate/Bev group received more sequential post-treatments compared to the Len group (45.2% vs. 24.6%, P=0.009). Len-based therapies (n=28, 84.8%) and mono- or combined-immunotherapy (n=19, 54.3%) were the most frequently administered sequential therapies following Ate/Bev and Len, respectively. Patients with uHCC who received first-line self-paid Ate/Bev seemed to have lower liver function reserve and more advanced tumor characteristics compared to those who underwent NHI-reimbursed Len. However, the treatment outcomes and safety profiles were similar between these two groups.

Hepatocellular Carcinoma Presenting with Pseudoprogression in a Patient Receiving Atezolizumab Plus Bevacizumab Combination Therapy

A 65-year-old man with hepatocellular carcinoma and lung metastasis was treated with a combination of atezolizumab and bevacizumab. Subsequently, the patient developed fever and new liver lesions, which were considered to indicate a pseudoprogression. Despite this, the treatment was continued. Three months later, CT scans demonstrated that the new lesions had disappeared and both the primary tumor and metastases had shrunk. A partial response was achieved and maintained for two years. A histological examination revealed a predominance of CD8-positive lymphocytes and PD-L1-positive tumor-associated macrophages, which may predict a positive response to this therapy. Pseudoprogression may therefore be a favorable prognostic factor in hepatocellular carcinoma.

Final Results from SAUL, a Single-arm International Study of Atezolizumab in Unselected Patients with Pretreated Locally Advanced/Metastatic Urinary Tract Carcinoma

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

We assessed the safety of atezolizumab in unselected patients (including understudied populations typically excluded from clinical trials) with pretreated urinary tract carcinoma (UTC). The prespecified final analysis updates previously reported safety and efficacy data.

METHODS

The single-arm prospective SAUL study (NCT02928406) enrolled 1004 patients with locally advanced/metastatic urothelial/non-urothelial UTC that had progressed during/after one to three prior treatment lines for advanced UTC (or <12 mo after [neo]adjuvant therapy). Broad eligibility criteria allowed enrollment of patients with complex comorbidities approximating the real-world setting. Patients received atezolizumab 1200 mg every 3 wk until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. The primary endpoint was safety. Secondary endpoints included duration of response and overall survival (OS).

KEY FINDINGS AND LIMITATIONS

The treated cohort included 10% of patients with poor performance status, 5% with creatinine clearance <30 ml/min, and 4% with autoimmune disease. At median follow-up of 55 mo, median atezolizumab duration was 2.8 mo (range 0-62); 68 patients (7%) continued atezolizumab for >4 yr. Treatment-related grade ≥3 adverse events occurred in 16% of patients (death in 1%); 8% discontinued atezolizumab for adverse events. Median OS was 8.6 mo (95% confidence interval 7.8-9.7) and 136 patients (14%) had OS longer than 4 yr. Limitations include the small sample size for some subgroups of special interest.

CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS

Long-term safety and efficacy data continue to show a benefit of atezolizumab in unselected patients with UTC. Remarkably, 14% of patients lived for >4 yr after starting atezolizumab. These results can inform multidisciplinary team discussions and treatment decision-making for patients with UTC with complex comorbidities.

PATIENT SUMMARY

The SAUL study looked at how well tolerated a drug called atezolizumab was in patients with urinary tract cancer who had already received up to three previous treatments for their cancer, including people who are usually not included in clinical trials because of other medical conditions. The length of survival after starting treatment was also assessed. Overall, the results show that atezolizumab was well tolerated. People for whom other therapies had failed lived for about 8.6 months on average after starting treatment, and 14% of the patients were still alive after 4 years.

CRAFITY score as a predictive marker for refractoriness to atezolizumab plus bevacizumab therapy in hepatocellular carcinoma: a multicenter retrospective study

BACKGROUND

Although atezolizumab plus bevacizumab (Atezo/Bev) therapy has been used as the preferred first-line treatment for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), up to 26% of patients do not achieve disease control, suggesting alternative treatments might be more beneficial for such patients. We investigated key predictors for refractoriness to Atezo/Bev therapy, particularly in the first-line setting.

METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed 302 patients with HCC who received Atezo/Bev therapy between October 2020 and September 2022 across nine hospitals in Japan. Refractoriness was defined as best overall response (BOR) of progressive disease or stable disease and a progression-free survival (PFS) of < 180 days (RECIST v1.1). Clinical benefit was defined as BOR of partial/complete response or stable disease with PFS of ≥ 180 days. Baseline characteristics and potential predictors, identified through literature review, were compared between these groups. Stratifications of overall survival (OS), and PFS were also assessed.

RESULTS

Refractoriness was observed in 126 (41.7%) patients, while 154 (51.0%) achieved clinical benefit. Due to a significant association between the treatment line and refractory rate, the subsequent analysis focused on the first-line cohort (n = 214; 72 [33.6%] patients showed refractoriness). Among 13 potential predictors, the CRP and AFP in immunotherapy (CRAFITY) score had the best predictive performance, with refractory rates of 24.6%, 44.6%, and 57.9% in CRAFITY-0, 1, and 2 patients, respectively (p < 0.001). OS and PFS were also well-stratified by this scoring system.

CONCLUSIONS

Approximately one-third of patients were refractory to first-line Atezo/Bev therapy. The CRAFITY score demonstrated superior performance in predicting refractoriness.

Contrast-enhanced Ultrasonography Features for Diagnosing Pseudoprogression of Hepatocellular Carcinoma with Immunotherapy: A Case Report of the Response after Pseudoprogression

A male patient in his 70s with recurrent hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) after surgery received atezolizumab plus bevacizumab (Atezo+Bev) therapy. Initial computed tomography (CT) revealed tumor growth along with an increase in tumor markers, and contrast-enhanced ultrasonography (CEUS) showed multiple round avascular areas within the nodules with an appearance similar to a slice of Swiss cheese. Continuation of immunotherapy with consideration of the potential for pseudoprogression produced a dramatic response. Although it is difficult to distinguish between true progression and pseudoprogression, the Swiss cheese-like appearance on CEUS may be important for the early diagnosis of pseudoprogression.