Myocardial perfusion SPECT identifies patients with left bundle branch block patterns at high risk for future coronary events

Restoration of ventricular septal hypoperfusion by cardiac resynchronization therapy in patients with permanent right ventricular pacing

BACKGROUND

Pacing from the right ventricular apex (RVA) is associated with cardiac dysfunction and shows electrophysiological features similar to left bundle branch block in which left ventricular (LV) mechanical dyssynchrony impairs septal coronary artery perfusion.

METHODS

A total of 62 non-ischemic patients with an implanted pacemaker at the RVA with a pacing rate of >95% were studied. LV septal coronary perfusion as indicated by the LV septal perfusion index was measured by electrocardiography (ECG)-gated single-photon emission computed tomography for all patients at baseline and for patients who were upgraded to CRT at 6months after CRT. Relationships among LV septal perfusion index, QRS duration, and LV ejection fraction were analyzed.

RESULTS

Among the patients with permanent RVA pacing, 28 of 62 (45%) had impaired septal perfusion (i.e., septal perfusion index <0.9). The LV septal perfusion index was significantly correlated with both QRS duration (r=-0.763, p<0.001) and LV ejection fraction (r=0.462, p=0.001). Eleven patients were upgraded to CRT. CRT significantly improved the LV septal perfusion index from 0.63 (SD=0.13) to 0.89 (SD=0.19) (p<0.001)and cardiac function: LV end-systolic volume from 102.3mL (SD=70.0) to 179.7mL (SD=118.4) (p=0.002) and LV ejection fraction from 22.5 (SD=8.9%) to 38.4% (SD=13.9%) (p=0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Nearly half of the non-ischemic patients with permanent RVA pacing presenting with prolonged QRS duration and LV dysfunction developed LV septal hypoperfusion. Both septal perfusion and LV function improved in patients who were upgraded to CRT.

Negative predictive value of SPECT for the occurrence of MACE in a medium-sized clinic in the Netherlands

Background

Single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) is an important prognostic tool in evaluating coronary artery disease (CAD), with a high negative predictive value (NPV) for the occurrence of major adverse cardiac events (MACE). The prognostic value of SPECT is disputed in women, patients with atrial fibrillation (AF), diabetes, left bundle branch block (LBBB) and renal impairment.

Methods

Seven hundred sixty-two patients without prior history of CAD who had SPECT without perfusion deficits were followed for 2 years for MACE. Predictive variables for the occurrence of MACE were reviewed by Cox proportional hazard regression, considering clinical information, resting-ECG data and SPECT data.

Results

The NPV of SPECT for the occurrence of MACE within 2 years was 95.8 %. Multivariate Cox regression revealed male gender as the only significant predictor for the occurrence of MACE, besides a positive stress ECG at SPECT and a low LVEF. AF, LBBB, renal impairment and diabetes had no significant effect on the prognosis after normal SPECT.

Conclusion

SPECT with normal perfusion images has great NPV in a medium-sized clinic in the Netherlands, even in patients with LBBB, AF, diabetes and renal impairment. MACE-free survival, however, was negatively influenced by male gender; we therefore propose more caution in men.

Patients with left bundle branch block pattern and high cardiac risk myocardial SPECT: does the current management suffice?

INTRODUCTION

Myocardial perfusion SPECT (MPS) is frequently used for cardiovascular risk stratification. The significance of MPS in patients with abnormal electrical ventricular activation is often questionable. This review assesses the value of MPS for risk stratification of patients with intrinsic left bundle branch block or that due to right ventricular apical pacing.

METHODS

We reviewed the literature by a search of the MEDLINE database (January 1980 to September 2010). The terms prognosis or prognostic value were combined with SPECT and LBBB or pacing or pacemakers. MPS was categorised as low and high risk according to the original definitions.

RESULTS

We identified 11 studies suitable for review. A low-risk MPS is associated with a low risk of cardiac events whereas high-risk MPS carries a 4.8-fold increased risk, 95% CI [3.2 - 7.2] (p < 0.0001). Despite secondary prevention and an improved medical and interventional care, these figures have hardly changed over time.

CONCLUSION AND CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS

A low-risk MPS permits a policy of watchful waiting whereas a high-risk MPS requires further analysis and treatment. The persistent high cardiac death and acute myocardial infarction rate after a high-risk MPS suggest that the current management of these patients does not suffice and needs reconsideration.