Seizures associated with regadenoson: a case series

Role of the clinical radiopharmacist in patient safety during myocardial perfusion imaging with vasodilator stress agents

AIM

To assess the radiopharmacist's role in a multidisciplinary team focused on the contraindications of regadenoson in order to ensure the safe use of pharmacologic vasodilator stress agents in patients undergoing SPECT-MPI.

METHODS

We ambispectively studied its safe use in 1905 patients (54.1% female, mean age: 66.6±11.7 years, range: 20-95 years). Sex, age, medical history, medications, drug allergies, and contraindications for stress testing were registered together with recommendations for the nuclear physician in charge.

RESULTS

Detected contraindications and corresponding recommendations were as follows: risk factors for QTc interval prolongation 7.5% - measurement of QTc interval previously to test and monitor ECG; prior stroke or TIA 4.2% - consider carotid stenosis assessment; salicylates/sulfonamides allergy 3.1% - use 99mTc-sestamibi; epilepsy or risk factors for seizures 2.4% - use of adenosine or reconsider test indication; systemic corticosteroid therapy for severe COPD 1.3% - reassessment of patient's condition; acute exacerbation of COPD 0.8% - defer test until acute episode is over; severe asthma 0.4% - do not perform test; methylxanthine ingestion 0.3% - avoid consumption previously; other 6.1% - evaluation of other contraindications. No contraindications were detected in 73.6% of patients. The test was canceled due to absolute contraindications in 2.9% of the requests.

CONCLUSIONS

Working in a systematic way, the radiopharmacist was able to detect a high number of issues related to regadenoson, with one out of four patients presenting some clinical contraindication. The recommendations given by the radiopharmacist were well accepted by the nuclear physicians who changed their approach contributing to increase the safety of patients referred for MPI.

Hemiplegic migraine episode triggered by regadenoson

SPECT and PET myocardial perfusion imaging (MPI) are widely used to evaluate patients for coronary artery disease. Regadenoson (a selective A2A adenosine receptor agonist) is a commonly used vasodilator agent for stress MPI because of its safety profile and ease of use. Common adverse reactions such as headache, shortness of breath, flushing, and chest and abdominal discomfort are typically mild and can be effectively reversed using methylxanthines such as aminophylline and caffeine. Neurological adverse reactions such as seizure and stroke have rarely been reported with the use of regadenoson. The hemodynamic changes associated with regadenoson administration, such as an exaggerated hypotensive or hypertensive response, may be the cause for the reported cerebrovascular accidents. Activation of central nervous system A2A adenosine receptors is thought to be responsible for seizure episodes in patients with or without known histories of seizure. A2A adenosine receptors activation is also believed to play a role in headaches and migraine. This patient reported who has a history of hemiplegic migraine developed left side weakness and headache following the administration of regadenoson during a PET MPI study. Imaging work-up to rule out cerebrovascular accident was normal. After 1 hour from the onset of his symptoms, his weakness and headache significantly improved with complete resolution within 24 hours. We concluded that regadenoson triggered a hemiplegic migraine episode in this patient, which has not been previously reported in the literature. It may be prudent to avoid regadenoson and adenosine use in patients with a history of hemiplegic migraine.

Regadenoson versus dipyridamole: Evaluation of stress myocardial blood flow response on a CZT-SPECT camera

BACKGROUND

Regadenoson is a selective adenosine receptor agonist. It is currently unclear if the level of hyperemia differs between stress agents. We compared Myocardial Blood Flow (MBF) and Myocardial Flow Reserve (MFR) response on CZT-SPECT Myocardial Perfusion Imaging (MPI) to evaluate if dipyridamole and regadenoson could induce the same level of hyperemia.

METHODS

228 patients with dynamic CZT-SPECT MPI were retrospectively analyzed (66 patients stressed with regadenoson and 162 with dipyridamole) in terms of MBF and MFR. To rule out confounding factors, two groups of 41 patients were matched for clinical characteristics in a sub-analysis, excluding high cardiovascular risk patients.

RESULTS

Overall stress MBF was higher in regadenoson patients (1.71 ± 0.73 vs. 1.44 ± 0.55 mL·min-1·g-1 for regadenoson and dipyridamole, respectively, p < .05). However, when confounding factors were ruled out, stress MBF (1.57 ± 0.56 vs. 1.61 ± 0.62 mL·min-1·g-1 for dipyridamole and regadenoson, respectively, p = .88) and MFR (2.62 ± 0.77 vs. 2.46 ± 0.76 for dipyridamole and regadenoson, respectively, p = .40) were not different between regadenoson and dipyridamole.

CONCLUSIONS

Our results suggest that dipyridamole and regadenoson induce equivalent hyperemia in dynamic SPECT with similar stress MBF and MFR in comparable patients.

Selective Adenosine A2A Agonists May Change Myocardial Perfusion Imaging

In recent years, the requirement for pharmacological stress myocardial perfusion imaging (SPECT) has increased, and adenosine stress testing is now the mainstream. Selective adenosine A2A receptor agonists will be applied clinically in the future. By selectively activating only A2A receptors, it can reduce complications such as bronchospasm, hypotension, and bradycardia, which have been problems with adenosine stress tests. In addition, since this drug can be administered in bolus injection, it has the advantage of being able to perform the test at one root.

Regadenoson Stress Testing: A Comprehensive Review With a Focused Update

Regadenoson is a pharmacological stress agent that has been widely used since its approval by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) in 2008. For many years, dipyridamole and adenosine, which are non-selective adenosine receptor agonists, were more popular. However, these agents are less preferred now due to their undesirable adverse effects as compared to regadenoson. In the ADVANCE (ADenoscan Versus regAdenosoN Comparative Evaluation) phase 3 clinical trial, regadenoson demonstrated non-inferiority to adenosine for detecting reversible myocardial ischemia. This review summarizes the clinical utilities of regadenoson as the most widely used pharmacological stress agent. Moreover, the use of regadenoson has been documented in specific patient populations. Although regadenoson has established safety and efficacy in most patients with chronic diseases, there are equivocal results in the literature for other chronic diseases. It is warranted to highlight that the use of regadenoson has not been studied in patients of low socioeconomic class; it is a condition that carries a significant burden on the cardiovascular system.

Seizure: An Adverse Effect of Regadenoson in Myocardial Perfusion Imaging

Regadenoson is a selective adenosine 2a (A2a) receptor agonist that is used in cardiac stress testing to evaluate for ischemic heart disease and has largely replaced adenosine in the modern era. Since adenosine receptors are involved in synaptic transmission between neurons throughout the central nervous system (CNS) including the cerebral cortex, hippocampus, and other structures as well, regadenoson can lower the seizure threshold in susceptible individuals. Epileptogenic activity is an uncommon yet potentially severe adverse effect of regadenoson use, and therefore, more awareness is required in screening patients at risk and evaluating alternate ways to investigate coronary artery disease (CAD) in susceptible individuals.

Safety of vasodilator stress myocardial perfusion imaging in patients with elevated cardiac biomarkers

BACKGROUND

While adenosine and dipyridamole as myocardial perfusion imaging (MPI) stress agents have literature supporting their safety in the setting of myocardial infarction (MI), regadenoson does not. Studying a high risk cohort of patients with elevated cardiac biomarkers may shed light on potential safety issues of these agents which might also affect lower risk cohorts.

METHODS

All patients who had undergone a clinically indicated stress MPI study at two academic centers from 1/1/2010 through 12/31/2012 with elevated troponin ≤7 days prior to testing were included. The primary endpoint was a composite of death, non-fatal MI, congestive heart failure (CHF), stroke, ventricular arrhythmias, atrial fibrillation/flutter, or atrioventricular block requiring intervention within 24 h of testing.

RESULTS

Of the 703 stress MPI studies that met inclusion criteria, 360 (51.2%), 199 (28.3%), 74 (10.5%), 9 (1.3%), and 61 (8.7%) underwent regadenoson, dipyridamole, adenosine, dobutamine, and exercise stress, respectively. The primary endpoint occurred in 11 (1.6%) patients with an incidence of 1.4% (n = 5), 1.0% (n = 2), 1.4% (n = 1), 11.1% (n = 1), and 3.3% (n = 2) following regadenoson, dipyridamole, adenosine, dobutamine, and exercise stress, respectively (P = 0.137). The adverse events included non-fatal MI in 7 (1.0%) patients, death in 1 (0.1%) patient, CHF in 1 (0.1%) patient, ventricular arrhythmia in 1 (0.1%) patient, and atrial arrhythmia in 1 (0.1%) patient.

CONCLUSION

In the setting of elevated troponin, serious complications associated with either exercise or vasodilator stress testing appear to be relatively rare with no increased risk attributable to a particular vasodilator agent.

EANM procedural guidelines for radionuclide myocardial perfusion imaging with SPECT and SPECT/CT: 2015 revision

Since the publication of the European Association of Nuclear Medicine (EANM) procedural guidelines for radionuclide myocardial perfusion imaging (MPI) in 2005, many small and some larger steps of progress have been made, improving MPI procedures. In this paper, the major changes from the updated 2015 procedural guidelines are highlighted, focusing on the important changes related to new instrumentation with improved image information and the possibility to reduce radiation exposure, which is further discussed in relation to the recent developments of new International Commission on Radiological Protection (ICRP) models. Introduction of the selective coronary vasodilator regadenoson and the use of coronary CT-contrast agents for hybrid imaging with SPECT/CT angiography are other important areas for nuclear cardiology that were not included in the previous guidelines. A large number of minor changes have been described in more detail in the fully revised version available at the EANM home page: http://eanm.org/publications/guidelines/2015_07_EANM_FINAL_myocardial_perfusion_guideline.pdf.

[Regadenoson as a new stress agent in myocardial perfusion imaging. Initial experience in The Netherlands]

OBJECTIVE

Regadenoson is a recently approved selective adenosine-2A receptor agonist to induce pharmacological stress in myocardial perfusion imaging (MPI) procedures using a single bolus injection.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

We included 123 patients referred for MPI because of suspected coronary arterial disease (CAD). Of these, 66 patients underwent a regadenoson stress test and 57 patients underwent an adenosine stress test preceding standard myocardial SPECT imaging. Technicians, physicians and patients were asked to report their experience using questionnaires.

RESULTS

As compared to adenosine, regadenoson did not produce any atrio-ventricular block (0 vs. 10% with adenosine), but did produce minor tachycardia and minimal blood pressure changes while all other side effects were milder and shorter. There were fewer patients with severe complaints after taking regadenoson than adenosine (17% vs. 32%, respectively, p<0.01). The most frequent complaint reported was dyspnea, followed by flushing and chest pain. However, when they did occur, they usually disappeared rapidly. The overall symptom score, including severity and duration of side effects, was significantly lower after regadenoson than after adenosine (6.7±6.3 vs. 10.0±7.9, respectively; p<0.01.) SPECT imaging results were similar. The regadenoson procedure was faster and more practical.

CONCLUSION

Regadenoson, the new selective adenosine-2A receptor agonist, is a stress agent for MPI with a patient- and department friendly profile.

A rare complication of a common stress test

In 2008, regadenoson, a selective adenosine2A (A_2A) receptor agonist, was approved by the US Federal and Drug Administration for use as a pharmacologic stress agent in myocardial perfusion studies. By stimulating A_2A receptors in coronary smooth muscle, it can increase coronary blood flow by 2.5-fold or greater. Previous data showed non-inferiority of regadenoson in detecting reversible myocardial ischemia, compared to adenosine. Given less serious adverse effects, being better tolerated and easily administered, regadenoson has been widely used for myocardial perfusion imaging. As adenosine receptors have many sub-types and are located in multi-organ systems, regadenoson can cause various adverse effects, including bronchospasm, atrioventricular block, or hypotension. However, adverse effects on the central nervous system are rarely reported. As adenosine receptors (A₁ and A_2A receptors) play a major role in neuron-glial cells interaction, regadenoson can provoke seizure through A_2A receptor activation. We hereby report a case of regadenoson associated-seizure and review seizure mechanism. This may raise more concern for a rare serious adverse effect of regadenoson which should be taken into consideration when selecting cardiac stress modalities. <Learning objective: Regadenoson can provoke seizure through central A_2A receptor activation. This should be taken into consideration when selecting cardiac stress test modalities, particularly in patients with known seizure disorder or history of organic brain disease.>.