Acute chest pain of uncertain etiology, the short and long view

Use of resting myocardial 18F-FDG imaging in the detection of unstable angina

OBJECTIVE

Increased myocardial glucose metabolism occurs with the onset of myocardial ischemia and may persist even after the restoration of blood flow, termed as 'ischemic memory'. Previous studies have demonstrated that 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose (18F-FDG) is a sensitive marker of myocardial ischemia and may have potential utility in diagnosing unstable angina (UA). This study aimed to explore the value of F-FDG PET/CT in diagnosing UA.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Thirty-four patients (17 male patients; mean age, 59 ± 6 years) with suspected UA were prospectively recruited. Resting myocardial F-FDG PET/CT imaging was performed 21 ± 9 h (2-46 h) after the latest onset of angina pectoris. Resting or exercise myocardial perfusion imaging (MPI) and coronary angiography were performed. 'Focal' or 'focal on diffuse' myocardial F-FDG uptake was defined as abnormal, whereas other patterns of myocardial uptake, including 'focal' uptake on the basal segments, were considered as normal. The final diagnosis of UA was based on a comprehensive analysis of ECG, MPI, and coronary angiography.

RESULTS

Of the 21 patients with a final diagnosis of UA, 18 had increased 18F-FDG uptake (sensitivity 85.7%), whereas, of the 13 patients without UA, only one had abnormal 18F-FDG uptake (specificity 92.3%). The sensitivity of resting 18F-FDG imaging was higher than that of resting MPI (85.7 vs. 52.4%, P=0.016). Moreover, six UA patients with only exercise-induced ischemia showed abnormal F-FDG uptake at rest.

CONCLUSION

This pilot study demonstrated that resting 18F-FDG PET/CT imaging is an accurate and sensitive technique for the identification of UA.

Stress myocardial perfusion imaging for the evaluation and triage of chest pain in the emergency department: a randomized controlled trial

BACKGROUND

Patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS) often present atypically. In a randomized controlled trial, we studied whether adding stress myocardial perfusion imaging (SMPI) to an evaluation strategy for emergency department (ED) patients presenting with chest pain more effectively identifies patients with ACS.

METHODS

Participants were randomized to standard ED chest pain protocol (clinical assessment) or standard protocol supplemented with SMPI results. During 6 hours of electrocardiogram (ECG) monitoring and serial cardiac markers (creatine kinase-MB isoenzyme, troponin), participants developing ST segment changes or elevated cardiac markers were admitted. Those with a negative observation period underwent SMPI (N = 1,004) or clinical assessment (N = 504) based on randomization, and admitted if their SMPI scan was abnormal or senior clinicians found a high or intermediate risk for ACS.

RESULTS

SMPI participants had a significantly lower admission rate than clinical assessment participants (10.16% vs 18.45%), with no significant between-group differences in risk of cardiac events (CEs) after 30 days (0.40% vs 0.79%) or 1 year (0.70% vs 0.99%).

CONCLUSIONS

When added to a standard triage strategy incorporating clinical evaluation, serial ECGs, and cardiac markers, SMPI improved clinical decision making for chest pain patients, significantly reducing the need for hospitalization without an increase in adverse CE rates at 30 days or 1 year.

Performance of rest myocardial perfusion imaging in the management of acute chest pain in the emergency room in developing nations (PREMIER trial)

BACKGROUND

Rest myocardial perfusion imaging (MPI) is effective in managing patients with acute chest pain in developed countries. We aimed to define the role and feasibility of rest MPI in low-to-middle income countries.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Low-to-intermediate risk patients (n = 356) presenting with chest pain to ten centers in eight developing countries were injected with a Tc-99m-based tracer, and standard imaging was performed. The primary outcome was a composite of death, non-fatal myocardial infarction (MI), recurrent angina, and coronary revascularization at 30 days. Sixty-nine patients had a positive MPI (19.4%), and 52 patients (14.6%) had a primary outcome event. An abnormal rest-MPI result was the only variable which independently predicted the primary outcome [adjusted odds ratio (OR) 8.19, 95% confidence interval 4.10-16.40, P = .0001]. The association of MPI result and the primary outcome was stronger (adjusted OR 17.35) when only the patients injected during pain were considered. Rest-MPI had a negative predictive value of 92.7% for the primary outcome, improving to 99.3% for the hard event composite of death or MI.

CONCLUSIONS

Our study demonstrates that rest-MPI is a reliable test for ruling out MI when applied to patients in developing countries.