Imaging moving heart structures with PET

Estimation of optimal number of gates in dual gated 18F-FDG cardiac PET

Gating of positron emission tomography images has been shown to reduce the motion effects, especially when imaging small targets, such as coronary plaques. However, the selection of optimal number of gates for gating remains a challenge. Selecting too high number of gates results in a loss of signal-to-noise ratio, while too low number of gates does remove only part of the motion. Here, we introduce a respiratory-cardiac motion model to determine the optimal number of respiratory and cardiac gates. We evaluate the model using a realistic heart phantom and data from 12 cardiac patients (47–77 years, 64.5 on average). To demonstrate the benefits of our model, we compared it with an existing respiratory model. Based on our study, the optimal number of gates was determined to be five respiratory and four cardiac gates in the phantom and patient studies. In the phantom study, the diameter of the most active hot spot was reduced by 24% in the dual gated images compared to non-gated images. In the patient study, the thickness of myocardium wall was reduced on average by 21%. In conclusion, the motion model can be used for estimating the optimal number of respiratory and cardiac gates for dual gating.

Clinical comparison of the positron emission tracking (PeTrack) algorithm with the real-time position management system for respiratory gating in cardiac positron emission tomography

PURPOSE

A data-driven motion tracking system was developed for respiratory gating in positron emission tomography (PET)/computed tomography (CT) studies. The positron emission tracking system (PeTrack) estimates the position of a low-activity fiducial marker placed on the patient during imaging. The aim of this study was to compare the performance of PeTrack against that of the real-time position management (RPM) system as applied to respiratory gating in cardiac PET/CT studies.

METHODS

The list-mode data of 35 patients that were referred for ⁸² Rb myocardial perfusion studies were retrospectively processed with PeTrack to generate respiratory motion signals and triggers. Fifty acquisitions from the initial cohort, conducted under physiologic rest and stress, were considered for analysis. Respiratory-gated reconstructions were performed using reconstruction software provided by the vendor. The respiratory signals and triggers of the gating systems were compared using quantitative measurements of the respiratory signal correlation, median, and interquartiles range (IQR) of observed respiratory rates and the relative frequencies of respiratory cycle outliers. Quantitative measurements of left-ventricular wall thicknesses and motion due to respiration were also compared. Real-time position management signals were also retrospectively processed using the trigger detection method of PeTrack for a third comparator ("RPMretro") that allowed direct comparison of the motion tracking quality independently of differences in the trigger detection methods. The comparison of PeTrack to the original RPM data represent a practical comparison of the two systems, whereas that of PeTrack and RPMretro represents an equal comparison of the two. Nongated images were also reconstructed to provide reference left-ventricular wall thicknesses. LV wall thickness and motion measurements were repeated for a subset of cases with motion ≥7 mm as image artifacts were expected to be more severe in these cases.

RESULTS

A significant correlation (P < 0.05) was observed between the RPM and PeTrack respiratory signals in 45/50 acquisitions; the mean correlation coefficient was 0.43. Similar results were found between PeTrack and RPMretro. No significant difference was observed between the RPM and PeTrack with respect to median respiratory rates and the percentage of respiratory cycles outliers. Respiratory rate variability (IQR) was significantly higher with PeTrack vs RPM (P = 0.002) and RPMretro (P = 0.04). Both PeTrack and RPM had a significant increase in the percentage of respiratory rate outliers compared to RPMretro (P < 0.001 and P = 0.001, respectively). All methods indicated significant differences in LV thickness compared to nongated images (P < 0.02). LV thickness was significantly larger for PeTrack compared to RPMretro in the highest motion subset (P = 0.009). Images gated with RPMretro showed significant increases in motion compared to both PeTrack (P < 0.001) and prospective RPM (P = 0.002). In the subset of highest motion cases, the difference between RPM and RPMretro was no longer present.

CONCLUSIONS

The data-driven PeTrack algorithm performed similarly to the well-established RPM system for respiratory gating of ⁸² Rb cardiac perfusion PET/CT studies. Real-time position management performance improved after retrospective processing and led to enhanced performance compared to both PeTrack and prospective RPM. With further development PeTrack has the potential to reduce the need for ancillary hardware systems to monitor respiratory motion.

MR-based cardiac and respiratory motion correction of PET: application to static and dynamic cardiac 18F-FDG imaging

Motion of the myocardium deteriorates the quality and quantitative accuracy of cardiac PET images. We present a method for MR-based cardiac and respiratory motion correction of cardiac PET data and evaluate its impact on estimation of activity and kinetic parameters in human subjects. Three healthy subjects underwent simultaneous dynamic ¹⁸F-FDG PET and MRI on a hybrid PET/MR scanner. A cardiorespiratory motion field was determined for each subject using navigator, tagging and golden-angle radial MR acquisitions. Acquired coincidence events were binned into cardiac and respiratory phases using electrocardiogram and list mode-driven signals, respectively. Dynamic PET images were reconstructed with MR-based motion correction (MC) and without motion correction (NMC). Parametric images of ¹⁸F-FDG consumption rates (K_i) were estimated using Patlak's method for both MC and NMC images. MC alleviated motion artifacts in PET images, resulting in improved spatial resolution, improved recovery of activity in the myocardium wall and reduced spillover from the myocardium to the left ventricle cavity. Significantly higher myocardium contrast-to-noise ratio and lower apparent wall thickness were obtained in MC versus NMC images. Likewise, parametric images of K_i calculated with MC data had improved spatial resolution as compared to those obtained with NMC. Consistent with an increase in reconstructed activity concentration in the frames used during kinetic analyses, MC led to the estimation of higher K_i values almost everywhere in the myocardium, with up to 18% increase (mean across subjects) in the septum as compared to NMC. This study shows that MR-based motion correction of cardiac PET results in improved image quality that can benefit both static and dynamic studies.

A Computational Framework for Data Fusion in MEMS-Based Cardiac and Respiratory Gating

Dual cardiac and respiratory gating is a well-known technique for motion compensation in nuclear medicine imaging. In this study, we present a new data fusion framework for dual cardiac and respiratory gating based on multidimensional microelectromechanical (MEMS) motion sensors. Our approach aims at robust estimation of the chest vibrations, that is, high-frequency precordial vibrations and low-frequency respiratory movements for prospective gating in positron emission tomography (PET), computed tomography (CT), and radiotherapy. Our sensing modality in the context of this paper is a single dual sensor unit, including accelerometer and gyroscope sensors to measure chest movements in three different orientations. Since accelerometer- and gyroscope-derived respiration signals represent the inclination of the chest, they are similar in morphology and have the same units. Therefore, we use principal component analysis (PCA) to combine them into a single signal. In contrast to this, the accelerometer- and gyroscope-derived cardiac signals correspond to the translational and rotational motions of the chest, and have different waveform characteristics and units. To combine these signals, we use independent component analysis (ICA) in order to obtain the underlying cardiac motion. From this cardiac motion signal, we obtain the systolic and diastolic phases of cardiac cycles by using an adaptive multi-scale peak detector and a short-time autocorrelation function. Three groups of subjects, including healthy controls (n = 7), healthy volunteers (n = 12), and patients with a history of coronary artery disease (n = 19) were studied to establish a quantitative framework for assessing the performance of the presented work in prospective imaging applications. The results of this investigation showed a fairly strong positive correlation (average r = 0.73 to 0.87) between the MEMS-derived (including corresponding PCA fusion) respiration curves and the reference optical camera and respiration belt sensors. Additionally, the mean time offset of MEMS-driven triggers from camera-driven triggers was 0.23 to 0.3 ± 0.15 to 0.17 s. For each cardiac cycle, the feature of the MEMS signals indicating a systolic time interval was identified, and its relation to the total cardiac cycle length was also reported. The findings of this study suggest that the combination of chest angular velocity and accelerations using ICA and PCA can help to develop a robust dual cardiac and respiratory gating solution using only MEMS sensors. Therefore, the methods presented in this paper should help improve predictions of the cardiac and respiratory quiescent phases, particularly with the clinical patients. This study lays the groundwork for future research into clinical PET/CT imaging based on dual inertial sensors.