The effect of coronary revascularization on regional myocardial blood flow as assessed by stress positron emission tomography

Fast vs slow rubidium-82 infusion profiles and test-retest precision of myocardial perfusion using contemporary 3D cardiac analog PET-CT imaging

BACKGROUND

On legacy 2D PET systems utilizing a 50 mL/min Rb-82 profile, test-retest precision of quantitative perfusion is ∼10%. It is unclear whether Rb-82 infusion rate significantly impacts quantitative perfusion and/or image quality on modern analog 3D PET-CT systems. We aimed to determine whether the Rb-82 infusion profile significantly impacts test-retest precision of quantitative perfusion, perfusion metrics, and/or image quality on a modern analog 3D PET-CT scanner.

METHODS

Ninety-eight volunteers from 3 distinct groups: healthy volunteers (Normals), patients with risk factors and/or coronary disease (Clinicals) and patients with prior transmural myocardial infarctions (Infarcts), underwent cardiac stress testing on an analog 3D PET-CT. Participants received 3 consecutive resting scans and 2 consecutive stress scans, minutes apart, with two randomly assigned Rb-82 infusion profiles: 50 mL/min (fast [F]) and 20 mL/min (slow [S]). Perfusion metrics (resting (rMBF) and stress myocardial blood flow (sMBF)) were calculated using HeartSee software. Coefficients of variance (COV), repeatability (RC), MBF and image quality metrics were compared.

RESULTS

rMBF correlated well between F and S profiles, with intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC) ranging 0.91-0.93. sMBF was highly correlated between F and S profiles (ICC=0.97). Fast and slow profiles were associated with similar same-day test-retest precision (COV 11.5% vs. 11.3% (p=0.77); RC 21.5% vs. 22.6%, for F-F vs S-S). There were no clinically significant differences in MBF values between F and S profiles. Image quality metrics were similar between the 2 profiles.

CONCLUSIONS

There are no clinically significant differences in precision, perfusion metrics or image quality between Rb-82 fast and slow infusions using a contemporary analog 3D PET-CT.

Quantitative analysis of myocardial blood flow in surgically revascularized and not revascularized myocardial segments. A pilot PET study

PURPOSE

To prospectively compare changes in myocardial blood flow (MBF) and myocardial flow reserve (MFR) in multivessel coronary artery disease (MVCAD) patients undergoing incomplete revascularization (IR) versus complete revascularization (CR) by coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG).

METHODS

Seven male patients (age 68 ± 9 years) with MVCAD underwent myocardial perfusion PET/CT with [13N]ammonia before and at least 4 months after CABG. Segmental resting and stress MBF as well as MFR were measured. Resting and during stress left ventricle ejection fraction (LVEF) were also calculated.

RESULTS

Three patients (43%) underwent CR and four (57%) IR. Among 119 myocardial segments, 101 (85%) were revascularized, and 18 (15%) were not. After CABG, stress MBF (mL/min/gr) and MFR are significantly increased in all myocardial segments, with a greater increase in the revascularized segments (p = 0.013). In both groups, LVEF significantly decreased during stress at baseline PET (p = 0.04), but not after CABG.

CONCLUSION

Stress MBF and MFR significantly improve after CABG in both revascularized and not directly revascularized myocardial segments. IR strategy may be considered in patients with high surgical risk for CR.

Serial fractional flow reserve, coronary flow reserve and index of microcirculatory resistance after percutaneous coronary intervention in patients treated for stable angina pectoris assessed with PET

BACKGROUND

Cardiac 15 O-water PET is a noninvasive method to evaluate epicardial and microvascular dysfunction and further quantitate absolute myocardial blood flow (MBF).

AIM

The aim of this study was to assess the impact of revascularization on MBF and myocardial flow reserve (MFR) assessed with 15 O-water PET and invasive flow and pressure measurements.

METHODS

In 21 patients with single-vessel disease referred for percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), serial PET perfusion imaging and fractional flow reserve (FFR), coronary flow reserve (CFR) and index of microcirculatory resistance (IMR) were performed during PCI and after 3 months.

RESULTS

In the affected myocardium, stress MBF and MFR increased significantly from before revascularization to 3 months after revascularization: stress MBF 2.4 ± 0.8 vs. 3.2 ± 0.8; P  < 0.001 and MFR 2.5 ± 0.8 vs. 3.4 ± 1.1; P  = 0.004. FFR and CFR increased significantly from baseline to after revascularization and remained stable from after revascularization to 3-month follow-up: FFR 0.64 ± 0.20 vs. 0.91 ± 0.06 vs. 0.91 ± 0.07; P  < 0.001; CFR 2.4 ± 1.2 vs. 3.6 ± 1.9 vs. 3.6 ± 1.9; P  < 0.001, whereas IMR did not change significantly: 30.3 ± 22.9 vs. 30.1 ± 25.3 vs. 31.9 ± 25.2; P  = ns. After revascularization, an increase in stress MBF was associated with an increase in FFR ( r  = 0.732; P  < 0.001) and an increase in MFR ( r  = 0.499; P  = 0.021). IMR measured before PCI was inversely associated with improvement in stress MBF, ( r  = -0.616; P  = 0.004).

CONCLUSION

Recovery of myocardial perfusion after PCI was associated with an increase in FFR 3 months after revascularization. Microcirculatory dysfunction was associated with less improvement in myocardial perfusion.

Quantification of Resting Myocardial Blood Flow Using Rubidum82 Positron Emission Tomography in Regions with MRI-Confirmed Myocardial Scar

Background: Resting myocardial blood flow (rMBF) within regions of myocardial scar as measured by positron emission tomography (PET) has not yet been assessed with the radiotracer Rubidium⁸² (Rb⁸²) or correlated with scar thickness. Cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (cMRI) offers high spatial resolution and identifies myocardial scar with late gadolinium enhancement (LGE). Using Rb⁸² PET, we sought to characterize rMBF in regions of myocardial scar of varying thicknesses determined by cMRI. Methods/Results: Patients with a history of myocardial infarction, a resting Rb⁸² PET study and a cMRI were identified. On cMRI, regions of infarction, defined as >50% LGE with akinesis, were sub-categorized as 50-75% LGE or >75% LGE, corresponding with increasing transmural scar thickness. PET zones of infarct based on size and %LGE by cMRI were quantified for mean and minimum rMBF. Mean rMBF (cc/min/g) in infarct zones with >75% LGE was 0.32±0.07 with a minimum rMBF of 0.19±0.03. In infarct zones with 50-75% LGE, rMBF was 0.45±0.14 (50-75% vs. >75%, p=0.002). Conclusions: We identified rMBF within cMRI confirmed regions of myocardial scar of varying thicknesses. rMBF has an inverse relationship with the extent of LGE on cMRI, with the most severe regions (>75% LGE) having mean and minimal rMBF (cc/min/g) of 0.32±0.07 and 0.19±0.03, respectively.

The impact of revascularization on myocardial blood flow as assessed by positron emission tomography

Purpose

Revascularization aims to improve myocardial perfusion. However, changes in regional artery-specific quantitative perfusion after revascularization have not been systematically investigated. It is unclear whether artery-specific thresholds for coronary flow capacity (CFC) and/or relative perfusion predict improved stress perfusion after revascularization. We sought to determine the impact of revascularization based on predefined, artery-specific, severity size thresholds for CFC and/or relative perfusion defects.

Methods

Fifty patients underwent PET imaging before revascularization and then prospectively within 90 days after revascularization. Changes in regional myocardial blood flow (MBF) were stratified based on baseline perfusion abnormalities, baseline reduced CFC, and whether revascularization was performed in that region.

Results

Following angiographic stenosis-directed revascularization, in regions with relative perfusion abnormalities and decreased CFC, stress MBF (sMBF) increased by 0.51 cm³/min/g (59%) from baseline (p < 0.001). In regions without baseline perfusion abnormalities and yet decreased CFC, sMBF increased by 0.35 cm³/min/g (40%) from baseline (p < 0.001). In regions without perfusion abnormalities and normal CFC, sMBF did not increase significantly (+0.07 cm³/min/g, p = 0.56). Patients in whom revascularization was concordant with abnormal PET findings showed increased whole-heart sMBF (+0.22 cm³/min/g, p < 0.001), but in patients in whom revascularization was targeted only to regions without perfusion abnormalities or low CFC, sMBF did not change significantly (−0.06 cm³/min/g, p = 0.38).

Conclusion

Revascularization targeted to regions with reduced CFC and relative perfusion abnormalities on baseline PET yielded significant improvements in sMBF. When revascularization was performed in regions without reduced CFC, sMBF did not improve.

Electronic supplementary material

The online version of this article (10.1007/s00259-019-04278-8) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Impact of Revascularization on Absolute Myocardial Blood Flow as Assessed by Serial [ 15 O]H 2 O Positron Emission Tomography Imaging

Background:

The main goal of coronary revascularization is to restore myocardial perfusion in case of ischemia, causing coronary artery disease. Yet, little is known on the effect of revascularization on absolute myocardial blood flow (MBF). Therefore, the present prospective study assesses the impact of coronary revascularization on absolute MBF as measured by [ 15 O]H 2 O positron emission tomography and fractional flow reserve (FFR) in patients with stable coronary artery disease.

Methods and Results:

Fifty-three patients (87% men, mean age 58.7±9.0 years) with suspected coronary artery disease were included prospectively. All patients underwent serial [ 15 O]H 2 O positron emission tomography perfusion imaging at baseline and after revascularization by either percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) or coronary artery bypass graft surgery. FFR was routinely measured at baseline and directly post-PCI. After revascularization, regional rest and stress MBF improved from 0.77±0.16 to 0.86±0.25 mL/min/g and from 1.57±0.59 to 2.48±0.91 mL/min/g, respectively, yielding an increase in coronary flow reserve from 2.02±0.69 to 2.94±0.94 ( P <0.01 for all). Mean FFR at baseline improved post-PCI from 0.61±0.17 to 0.89±0.08 ( P <0.01). After PCI, an increase in FFR paralleled improvement in absolute myocardial perfusion as reflected by stress MBF and coronary flow reserve ( r = 0.74 and r = 0.71, respectively, P <0.01 for both). PCI demonstrated a greater improvement of regional stress MBF as compared with coronary artery bypass graft surgery (1.14±1.11 versus 0.66±0.69 mL/min/g, respectively, P =0.02). However, patients undergoing bypass grafting had a more advanced stage of coronary artery disease and more incomplete revascularizations.

Conclusion:

Successful coronary revascularization has a significant and positive impact on absolute myocardial perfusion as assessed by serial quantitative [ 15 O]H 2 O positron emission tomography. Notably, improvement of FFR after PCI was directly related to the increase in hyperemic MBF.

Review of cardiovascular imaging in the Journal of Nuclear Cardiology 2017. Part 1 of 2: Positron emission tomography, computed tomography, and magnetic resonance

Several original articles and editorials have been published in the Journal of Nuclear Cardiology in 2017. It has become a tradition at the beginning of each year to summarize some of these key articles in 2 sister reviews. In this first part one, we will discuss some of the progress made in the field of heart failure (cardio-oncology, myocardial blood flow, viability, dyssynchrony, and risk stratification), inflammation, molecular and hybrid imaging using advancement in positron emission tomography, computed tomography, and magnetic resonance imaging.

Research Progress on 18F-Labeled Agents for Imaging of Myocardial Perfusion with Positron Emission Tomography

Coronary artery disease (CAD) is the leading cause of death in the world. Myocardial perfusion imaging (MPI) plays a significant role in non-invasive diagnosis and prognosis of CAD. However, neither single-photon emission computed tomography nor positron emission tomography clinical MPI agents can absolutely satisfy the demands of clinical practice. In the past decades, tremendous developments happened in the field of ¹⁸F-labeled MPI tracers. This review summarizes the current state of ¹⁸F-labeled MPI tracers, basic research data of those tracers, and the future direction of MPI tracer research.